Blog about illegal surveillance, severe human rights violations, extreme psychological torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, violence against women, hate crime, abuse of power, misfeasance in public office, state-sponsored harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, transnational repression, large-scale corruption, money laundering, mass misuse of private information, illegal data sales, human trafficking, systemic cover-ups, miscarriage of justice and more.
1. The Initial Discovery of Cross-Border Data Laundering
While the upcoming television series Elle represents the most recent active exploitation of my private data, the structural monetization of my life narratives began with the production and release of the feature film Babygirl (2024), starring Nicole Kidman. The monetization of my private life may have started long before this. But the film Babygirl (2024), is the one that I began to uncover that my private life non-consensually filmed with hidden cameras 24/7 has been commercialised widely – even in feature films.
This production served as the primary diagnostic indicator that the covert surveillance infrastructure inside my private residence was not merely being used for localized harassment and sexual gratification, but was functioning as a commercial content pipeline. The screenplay and thematic progression of Babygirl mirror, with granular accuracy, specific intimate developments, personal vulnerabilities, and the exact phrasing of private domestic arguments that took place years ago with my Danish ex-husband Jørgen Mortensen, who is also the father of our daughter living alone in Germany, in which the state-actor defendants have also subjected her to the exact same sexual abuse & exploitation via hidden cameras, including via a sexpionage operation.
Almost every aspect in this film was taken directly from my private life. Most information was from the hidden cameras unlawfully installed in my Putney flat in London. Even the scenes where Nicole Kidman masturbated were also taken directly from my own masturbations, unlawfully recorded with both the hidden cameras and audio recording devices over the years. Thus, the film featured lots of scenes where she masturbated. Halina Reijn claimed to have written the script all by herself!
2. The Mechanics of the Supply Chain: Domestic Compromise
The correlation between the script of Babygirl (written, produced and directed by Halina Reijn) and my un-broadcast, private life strongly indicates that data stolen via illicit audio-visual recording devices—alongside historical personal information—was compiled and trafficked without my knowledge or consent. In the context of cross-border intellectual property theft, this points to a coordinated supply chain where domestic actors extracted private matrimonial and intimate data and laundered it into the international entertainment market for commercial profit.
3. The Deprivation of Counsel as a Corporate Shield
Under normal circumstances, a citizen discovering that their private life and highly intimate moments have been commodified into a major feature film would retain legal counsel to issue subpoenas, demand production logs, and initiate chain-of-title discovery against the studio (A24) and the creators.
However, because public authorities systematically monitor my digital devices and intercept my outreach to independent lawyers, I am structurally barred from utilizing the court system. The co-defendants—both the state actors operating the surveillance hardware and the commercial entities profiting from the film—rely on this Article 6 ECHR violation to avoid accountability. They operate under the assumption that as long as I am legally isolated, the true origin of their source material will remain hidden from the public.
4. Direct Call for Journalistic and Ethical Scrutiny
Following the public precedent established by individuals exposing identity theft in the entertainment industry, this addendum serves as formal notice to the public, media watchdogs, and the SAG-AFTRA Ethics Committee.
Investigative journalists are urged to review the production timelines and script acquisition records of Babygirl (2024). The international public is my witness: the entertainment industry cannot be permitted to use state-enforced legal blockades to insulate themselves from the consequences of utilizing non-consensual intimate data as commercial entertainment.
I uploaded this photo of a glass of milk to my WordPress blog on 28 May 2013.
Halina Reijn did give some hints that it’s inspired by a real life story but then added, it’s from her own story. Particularly regarding the milk. I am not so sure about that. Look at both pictures above. This is one of the strong indications that my private life has been stolen from me in every way possible, not just via hidden cameras. This proves that the state-actor defendants have been violating my privacy in secret for years.
I have filed a claim in the High Court of England and Wales (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division – Claim No. KB-2025-004650) against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook/Instagram), Elon Musk, X.com (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and other parties.
The claim further alleges that my original literary and creative works were unlawfully accessed through hacking and disseminated to third parties without my consent, resulting in loss of income, loss of future professional opportunities, and significant psychological harm such as PTSD, severe emotional distress.
Some Defendants deny liability. Through their legal representatives, certain Defendants, including the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, have stated that the allegations are denied and that they intend to defend the claim.
On 19 December 2025, the court stayed the proceedings to permit the filing of amended Particulars of Claim, which I am currently preparing in accordance with the court’s directions.
When people ask what genre my memoir belongs to, I often hesitate—not because the answer is unclear, but because it sits at the crossroads of horror, legal drama, cyber-thriller, and personal testimony.
My story does not fit neatly into one category because my life, for years, has been pushed into territories that feel both unreal and yet painfully real. To help others understand what the emotional and atmospheric world of my memoir looks like, I often describe it through the works that echo closest to my experience.
These are the stories whose tones, structures, and themes mirror the world I’ve been forced to navigate.
1. Dracula – A Gothic Frame Narrative of Entrapment
In Stoker’s Dracula, the Count is built from the language of otherness. His foreign appearance, unfamiliar customs, and unsettling manners are framed as something fundamentally alien to the British characters around him, marking him as something the British characters cannot understand and therefore cannot trust.
Stoker therefore turns this difference into a form of monstrosity, inviting the reader to associate the foreign with the danger and the fear of strangers.
Dracula becomes the marked term—an embodiment of the outsider, the unknown, the untrustworthy.
Harker and Mina, in contrast, move through the narrative with the ease of those who belong. They represent the unmarked world—the safe, familiar heart of the British Empire. Their identity is the default, the standard from which Dracula deviates.
This dynamic is central to the novel’s power: a clash between a stable imperial identity and a foreign threat cast as monstrous simply for being different.
It is told through diary entries, letters, telegrams, and newspaper clippings—a fragmented narrative that slowly reveals a deeper horror.
My memoir shares this structure.
Much like Jonathan Harker, who finds himself trapped inside Dracula’s castle—watched, monitored, studied—I too found myself in environments I could not escape. Every new home, hostel room, or temporary refuge felt like a cage of its own. I moved from place to place only to discover new forms of monitoring, new intrusions, new violations.
My memoir captures that same psychological imprisonment.
2. The Firm – A Legal Thriller Built on Surveillance & High Stakes
John Grisham’s The Firm has long been considered a classic legal thriller. Tom Cruise’s character in the movie of the same name discovers that his life—his home, his conversations, his marriage—has been infiltrated by hidden devices placed by powerful actors.
My memoir also unfolds as a legal thriller—not fiction, but a real struggle against organisations and individuals with far greater power, resources, and reach. Surveillance, secrecy, intimidation, and manipulation form the backdrop of both stories.
The Firm uses bugs and cameras as tools of control. The same with my memoir, which examines how these same tools can be weaponised across borders, technologies, and institutions to assert control over me no matter where I go or live!
3. Erin Brockovich – Taking on Large Powers Without Legal Training
One of the strongest emotional parallels comes from Erin Brockovich. Erin—without formal legal training, without privilege, without institutional backing—stood up to a massive corporation because she knew something was wrong.
My memoir is written from the perspective of someone who has had to learn the law on the fly—someone who is fighting entities far larger and more powerful than herself, not out of choice, but out of necessity.
It is a legal battle intertwined with survival.
4. The Great Hack – Data, Power, and Privacy Gone Wrong
The documentary The Great Hack explores how personal information can be collected, weaponised, and used to manipulate people on a mass scale.
My experience echoes this theme in an intensely personal way.
My memoir examines what happens when private data, digital tracking, and modern technology collide with malice—and how that collision can devastate a single individual’s life. It is a story of cybersecurity breaches, data breach, misuse of private information, digital exploitation, and the struggle to reclaim ownership of one’s identity in a world where data is power.
Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
Article Talk. In the 2010s, personal data belonging to millions of Facebook users was collected by British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica for political advertising without informed consent.
During his testimony before Congress on April 10, 2018, Zuckerberg said it was his personal mistake that he did not do enough to prevent Facebook from being used for harm. “That goes for fake news, foreign interference in elections and hate speech”. During the testimony, Mark Zuckerberg publicly apologized for the breach of private data: “It was my mistake, and I’m sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and I’m responsible for what happens here”.
But many of the senators weren’t buying the 33-year-old billionaire’s apology.
“We’ve seen the apology tours before,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut.
“After more than a decade of promises to do better, how is today’s apology different?” said Sen. John Thune, R-South Dakota.
On 27 August 2025 at approximately 3:05 pm, I stepped out of my accommodation to go to the library and print my settlement offer letters. Within seconds, I encountered yet another incident that fits the now-familiar pattern of mirroring and colour coding used to signal that I am being watched in real time.
As I walked down the street, a woman passed me wearing a combination of beige and dark grey—colours that have recently been used repeatedly in harassment tactics. More strikingly, she carried a bag over her shoulder in the exact same way I had carried my tote bag moments earlier while inside my room. She made deliberate eye contact and gave a subtle, knowing smile. She also wore wireless earbuds, which many of the harassers often wear to receive real-time instructions, how to harass me.
Individually, these details might appear insignificant. But in context, the timing, the mirroring of my items and movements, and the expression on her face were unmistakably calculated. Experiences like this have occurred consistently after I prepare legal documents, publish evidence, or take steps to assert my rights. It felt like yet another reminder that my private life is not private — that my daily movements, my belongings, even how I carry my bag are being watched, recorded, and reflected back at me through members of the public.
What makes these incidents especially distressing is the implication that hidden camera footage from inside my room is being accessed and circulated. This goes far beyond voyeurism. It points to large-scale misuse of private information, where my everyday life is being monitored, mirrored, and potentially monetised as if I were unwilling entertainment in a “Big Brother”-style illegal production. And the fact that these behaviours continue despite anticipated court proceedings makes the situation even more alarming.
The way she held her bag seemed to mirror me.This was how I carried my tote bag that day, and she appeared to hold her bag the same way to convey illegal surveillance that I am being constantly watched! She might not know that she was being used to convey surveillance.
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
In recent months, I have noticed a disturbing trend — numerous films, television shows, and even commercials appear to be making direct or indirect references to my private life, my personal experiences, and even my creative works. What is even more troubling is that this pattern coincides with the illegal surveillance and data theft I have been subjected to for years. It is now becoming clear that this is not a coincidence but a coordinated, industrial-scale misuse of my private information and creative property.
Thus, what I am facing is not just an invasion of privacy or the theft of creative works — it is a coordinated system of control designed to suppress, isolate, and exploit me on every possible level. While my private information and creative works are being illegally shared, filmed, and commercialised by others, I am simultaneously being blacklisted from all legitimate opportunities that could allow me to rebuild my life or protect my rights.
No matter how many jobs I apply for — regardless of my qualifications or experience — my applications are repeatedly rejected. This is not a coincidence. It appears to be part of a broader pattern of systemic blacklisting and interference aimed at keeping me financially trapped and professionally silenced. By blocking every path to stable employment and income, those responsible ensure I cannot afford legal representation or take timely legal action against them.
The harm caused by this is not merely financial — it is multiplied tenfold, if not more. Every rejection compounds the impact of their exploitation, giving them more time to continue their illegal practices unchecked. While they profit from my stolen ideas, private information, and creative works, I am deliberately kept at a disadvantage, unable to defend myself or pursue my own artistic career.
As an aspiring writer and filmmaker, I have written scripts, story concepts, original plots, treatments, and other creative materials — the foundations of what could have been a fulfilling and sustainable creative career.
I should be able to write freely, publish my work, and develop my stories into films of my own. But how can I do that when everything I write is constantly monitored, stolen, and distributed without my consent? I now live in a constant state of fear — afraid to create, afraid to share, afraid even to dream — because everything I produce is taken from me and turned into profit for others.
This is not only a violation of my privacy and intellectual property — it is a systematic campaign to erase my agency and ownership over my own life and creativity. They have weaponised surveillance, blacklisting, obstruction of justice, and even death threats, to keep me powerless while exploiting everything that belongs to me. It is a cruel, calculated cycle: by keeping me unemployed, unrepresented, and silenced, they ensure that their exploitation continues under the radar.
This is not justice. This is not freedom. This is a deliberate and ongoing effort to profit from my pain while ensuring I am powerless to fight back. And that is precisely why I must continue to speak out — to expose what they are doing and reclaim my voice from those who have tried to erase it.
Therefore, I will not remain silent. Exposing this pattern is the first step towards reclaiming my voice — and holding those responsible to account for the industrial-scale theft, harassment, and blacklisting that have stolen years of my life and the future I rightfully deserve.
1. Early 2023 I submitted some formal complaints concerning the conduct of certain individuals working across different public bodies.
2. August 2023 My daughter and her long-term partner of twelve years unexpectedly separated.
3. September 2023 She began a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online. Who is 10 years younger than her and who works as a streamer. Despite their relationship lasting around two years, he has never visited her home. It’s always her who goes visit him in Spain or they meet elsewhere to go on holidays together, which raises concerns that her home environment might not be safe or private.
4. Autumn 2023 Shortly after this new relationship began, I started noticing films, commercials, and online content that appeared to reference or echo my daughter’s personal life — including details that seemed drawn from sensitive or private information. This mirrored the way my own private materials and experiences have been repeatedly misused and echoed in media content.
5. October 2023 I began to suspect that my own personal and sensitive information may have been illegally shared with third parties without my knowledge or consent.
6. Summer 2024 On my previous blog, http://www.buppha.com, I began writing about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, and tech abuse — unaware that I was myself a victim of the very illegal acts I was describing. Soon after, the harassment and excessive surveillance campaign against me started!
7. Late 2024 I began to realise that my private activities at home may have been secretly filmed and distributed for years — likely for over a decade — without my consent.
8. Early 2025 After I attempted to stop the abuse lawfully by sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters, the illegal surveillance and harassment campaign against me intensified dramatically.
9. Spring & Summer 2025 My access to legal representation also appears to have been blocked. Consequently, I had no choice but to try to apply for an urgent injunction myself. I then made several attempts to apply for an urgent injunction through the King’s Bench Division, but each time my evidence and documents mysteriously disappeared after submission?!
Imagine living your life under constant observation, where every movement, every gesture, every private moment is monitored, recorded, zoomed in, and exploited. This is my reality. For years, I have been subjected to organised harassment, covert surveillance, and media exploitation, a pattern of abuse recognised by the United Nations and documented in OHCHR human rights reports.
The harassment and excessive monitoring campaign against me intensified last year, 2024, when I found out I have been living under 24/7 intrusive and illegal surveillance and tried to legally stop it.
Thus, this post details my experience of ongoing covert, intrusive surveillance around the clock, psychological harassment, and the industrial-scale misuse of private information, referencing UN-recognised harassment techniques. Insights for journalists, investigative journalists, policymakers, human rights organisations, human rights watch, human rights lawyers, politicians and advocates.
Industrial-Scale Exploitation of Private Life
For over a decade, my private life has secretly been under constant, unlawful and intrusive surveillance, racial and sexual harassment, and exploitation, targeting both my private life and my loved ones.
Hidden cameras captured intimate moments, including my personal relationships and private activities, without my consent. This footage has allegedly been shared widely—across online platforms, pornographic sites, and even with the people I know, including my daughter’s childhood friends to humiliate her as well (I have strong circumstantial evidence of this and will present it to the court. They may even be called to testify under oath). But she isn’t aware of it.
These entities profit financially while deliberately inflicting emotional distress. Even my daughter has allegedly been targeted, demonstrating malicious intent extending beyond myself. They even keep implying that they’re also exploiting her to cause me additional distress.
They use a range of psychological tactics, illegal surveillance methods, and media exploitation to intimidate, control, and humiliate me. Despite ongoing / pending legal actions, the harassment has escalated, showing malicious intent and deliberate obstruction of justice.
I am sharing my story publicly because silence allows them to shape the narrative, especially when they are high-profile individuals, tech executives, or institutions with reputations to protect.
Despite anticipated legal actions, these violations continue unabated, leaving me with no choice but to go public to protect myself and highlight the broader injustice.
The intent is unmistakable: to humiliate, harass, and exploit me, and probably my daughter as well, for financial gain. Even as I take legal steps to protect myself, these actions continue. My access to legal representation has been deliberately blocked, making it even more difficult to challenge this ongoing abuse.
Daily Surveillance and Harassment
The harassment I face is continuous, 24/7, and involves multiple methods:
Helicopter intimidation: Helicopters frequently fly over the courthouse (King’s Bench Division) or my residence whenever I attempt to assert my rights, submit court documents, on the verge of initiating court proceedings, or contact law firms.
Push notifications, emails, or phone calls timed to coincide with my private activities, such as using the bathroom, cooking, or moving in bed.
Conditioning and signalling: Individuals wear specific colours (e.g., navy blue, army green) to imply intentionality and perform specific actions, like opening doors, leaving / returning, conversing, whistling, or walking past my window in sync with my movements such as when I step into the kitchen, open the bathroom door, to remind me I am being constantly monitored.
Vehicle harassment: Cars and motorcycles drive past or accelerate at precise moments during my daily routines or just to make a turn in bed to signal constant, intrusive surveillance with the purpose to make me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing I am being constantly watched.
Children’s distraction techniques: Even children are used to create auditory hints, talking loudly to catch my attention at key moments.
These tactics are not random; they appear deliberately orchestrated to instill fear, paranoia, and a constant sense of surveillance, aligning with violations of Human Rights Act 1998, for example:
Article 3: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.
Article 8: Respect for your private and family life.
Article 6: Right to a fair trial.
They just seem to try to violate all my human rights.
Industrial-ScaleMisuse of Private Information
They have systematically exploited my private materials for financial gain and public humiliation:
Unauthorised filming and distribution: Hidden cameras and surveillance devices were used to obtain private footage with audio as well!
Media and film exploitation: My private materials and information have been allegedly shared with film companies, voyeuristic websites, porn sites, advertisement companies, tech platforms, social media sites and other media to produce content referencing my life, which is also a form of harassment on top of commercial exploitation.
Unjust enrichment: These entities profit from my experiences without my permission while intentionally inflicting emotional distress.
Impact on family: Even my daughter has probably been targeted as well through voyeurism and shared private material, showing malicious intent beyond myself.
These actions constitute harassment, invasion of privacy on a global scale, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, with a clear commercial dimension; it’s an illegal enterprise that they don’t want the public to know.
Documented Harassment Techniques Recognised by the UN
What I have endured is not an isolated or “localised” situation. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has itself published detailed lists of harassment techniques used globally against victims of covert surveillance and organised stalking. These methods are documented as forms of psychological torture and community-based harassment.
According to the OHCHR’s report (“Harassment Techniques,” OHCHR.org), such tactics include:
Surveillance — Victims are persistently followed, electronically and physically monitored 24/7, and subjected to phone or computer hacking, including phone tracking.
Profiling — Intimate personal data is collected, often via trusted individuals or partners, and later weaponised to exploit emotional weaknesses.
Conditioning — Victims are sensitised to specific triggers such as coughing, colour patterns, hand gestures, or car headlights, which are then repeated to induce fear and hypervigilance.
Sound Campaigns — Abnormally high noise levels are directed at victims using cars, garbage trucks, shouting, or directional speakers to disturb peace and create psychological distress.
Sleep Deprivation — Victims are deliberately woken multiple times per night or kept awake for extended periods, impairing their ability to function and discrediting them as unstable.
Baiting and Entrapment — Harassers provoke victims into defensive reactions or minor offences, later used to criminalise or discredit them.
Gaslighting — A form of psychological abuse that distorts the victim’s perception of reality, undermining their confidence and mental stability.
Black-Bag Jobs — Covert entries into victims’ homes, with items moved or tampered with to induce self-doubt and fear.
Propaganda and Disinformation — Online misinformation campaigns spread to discredit victims and frame them as delusional, while false “support groups” are created to further isolate, manipulate and gaslight them.
Simulated Mental Health Symptoms — Harassers mimic or induce behaviours designed to make victims appear mentally ill, ensuring disbelief and institutional neglect.
These methods are well-documented human rights abuses and are therefore not isolated incidents.
Similar tactics have been reported by other UK survivors and other victims around the world. For example, another UK survivor of covert surveillance and organised harassment has confirmed that perpetrators use everyday stimuli (cars, clothing, coughs, phones) to create hypervigilance, fear, and trauma. This matches the tactics used against me daily, including colour-coded clothing, spitting, and staged public messages.
I am sharing my experience to urge journalists, policymakers, and human rights organisations to:
Investigate organised harassment networks.
Protect victims from illegal surveillance and exploitation.
Ensure perpetrators face legal and ethical consequences.
Living under 24/7 intrusive surveillance and having private life exploited for profit is a violation of human rights, a form of psychological torture, and an urgent social issue. Public awareness is the first step toward justice.
Conclusion
The combination of illegal surveillance, psychological harassment, and media exploitation represents a severe violation of human rights. By sharing my experience, I hope to:
Raise awareness of organised harassment campaigns.
Provide a roadmap for victims to document and publicise abuses.
Encourage policymakers, journalists, and human rights organisations to investigate, intervene, and prevent these abuses.
These are not isolated incidents — they are part of a systematic abuse of power with both financial and psychological motives.
🚨 Open Call to Journalists & Human Rights Organisations: Please Investigate the Systematic Abuse and Denial of My Right to Legal Representation
The defendants I am suing also have solicitors to represent them. But I am not allowed to have legal representation due to the alleged blocking of my access to lawyers, forcing me to represent myself against powerful state and non-state actors. What is this?
Consequently, this is a grave violation of my human right article 6 (Right to a fair trial) under the Human Rights Act 1998.
I cannot even use my phone and laptop to contact anyone for help safely and confidentially. Because all my online activities and communications seem to have been monitored and listened to at all times to prevent me from seeking help and from preparing my case fairly, safely and confidentially.
Some Background:
For over a year, I have been subjected to an escalating campaign of psychological harassment, psychological torture, mental abuse, unlawful surveillance, intimidation and coordinated public humiliation — across borders and involving state and non-state actors.
Despite repeated complaints and numerous attempts to seek legal protection through proper judicial channels, I am being systematically denied access to legal representation.
This is not due to a lack of effort on my part. I have contacted dozens of solicitors, about 200-300 so far, submitted formal complaints to legal regulators, and applied to the courts for urgent injunctions and relief. Yet every attempt is either blocked, withdrawn without explanation, or mysteriously interrupted — often immediately after I submit sensitive evidence or publish new details online.
It is now clear that this is not coincidental. It appears to be a deliberate pattern of obstruction, aimed at silencing me and preventing legal accountability for what I believe are serious and unlawful actions — including:
Racial and sexual harassment (e.g. illegal surveillance, phone tracking)
Hacking/Cyberstalking and interception of communications
Sexual exploitation via 24/7 voyeurism and cybersex trade, despite initiating court proceedings and applying for an urgent injunction the abuses shockingly continue with impunity
Social ostracism
Character assassination and public shaming
Interference with the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act
Torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, in violation of Article 3 – the torture I have to go through each day is both mental and physical in which I am not even allowed to take a shower and have consequently not taken a shower for days now!
Violation of my right to private and family life, protected by Article 8
Severe discrimination, in violation of Article 14
And many more!
I am calling on all journalists, legal advocates, and human rights organisations to urgently investigate this matter and help bring attention to what is happening. I am documenting everything in real time and can share evidence with trusted parties under safe, confidential conditions.
> Everyone deserves a fair chance to be heard — especially when powerful actors are involved. Everyone deserves legal protection — not punishment — for speaking out.
If you are a journalist, solicitor, barrister, human rights worker, or NGO interested in helping or investigating, please contact me via my secure contact form or by encrypted email (available upon request).
Article 6 doesn’t give you an automatic right to free legal representation in civil cases. But if your case is too complex for you to represent yourself properly, there may be a breach of article 6 if you don’t get help with legal costs.”
My case is also too complex for me to represent myself properly. Consequently, there may be a breach of my article 6 if I don’t get help with legal costs and/or legal representation.
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) guarantees the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal. This right applies to both civil and criminal proceedings and includes key safeguards such as:
The right to equality of arms between parties.
The right to legal representation where necessary for effective participation.
The duty of the court or tribunal to provide reasoned judgments.
Thus, it’s very frustrating when I can’t get impartial legal advice and can’t have legal representation, so that the abuse can continue under the radar.
if you’re a human rights solicitor, a human rights organisation, or just someone who’s willing to help me, please do not hesitate to contact me.
If you’re a journalist and would like to investigate this, please feel free to contact me as well.
But all my online activities and communications appear to have been monitored at all times, so I don’t know how to go about this. If you have any ideas, please let me know as well.
While you’re here, please don’t forget to donate by scanning the code on the image below:
