Category Archives: Court Proceedings

The Institutional Citadel

Posted on by
Reply

When a criminal enterprise achieves total penetration of a state’s infrastructure, the traditional sanctuaries established to protect the vulnerable are transformed into frontline nodes of exploitation. By 2025, stripped of my career, frozen out of the economic market by coordinated industry blacklisting, and facing an environment of escalating physical and digital hostility, I sought what should have been absolute sanctuary. I entered a facility operated by the Danish Red Cross—a globally renowned international humanitarian organization explicitly mandated to provide shelter, safety, and refuge to individuals in crisis.

What I encountered inside that facility was a profound betrayal of international humanitarian principles. The institutional citadel did not offer refuge; it functioned as an active extension of the surveillance network.

Within the very rooms assigned to me for shelter, the precise technical signature of the enterprise was re-established. Pinhole camera arrays and high-sensitivity audio interception nodes were covertly installed inside the Red Cross facility, capturing my most private moments during a period of extreme vulnerability. The involvement of an internationally recognized humanitarian organization elevates this operation from a domestic cover-up to an international public interest scandal of unprecedented scale. The data harvested from within this sanctuary was fed directly back into the same commercial distribution networks, proving that the reach of this enterprise respects no humanitarian boundaries, ethical codes, or international charters.

When I attempted to hold these systems accountable, I ran directly into a synchronized, multi-jurisdictional wall of judicial and administrative denial. In the United Kingdom, I brought formal civil claims before the High Court of Justice, detailing severe human rights abuses, the systematic misuse of private information, illicit hacking, and egregious misfeasance in public office. The response of the judiciary was swift and punitive. On two separate occasions, the UK High Court summarily threw out my claims without an open evidentiary hearing, deliberately suppressing my evidence, shielding the corrupt actors from public cross-examination, and directly violating my right to an effective remedy under Article 13 of the ECHR.

The absolute synchronization of this cross-border containment strategy was laid bare on 14 September 2026. Having exhausted every domestic avenue, I executed a multi-page emergency application for Rule 39 Interim Measures directly to the European Court of Human Rights, establishing an unchangeable international legal timeline. On that exact same day, the Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed (DUP)—the Independent Police Complaints Authority in Denmark—issued a rapid, sweeping rejection of the formal police complaint I had submitted just forty-eight hours prior.

The DUP’s formal notice, issued under File Number 26-349-2070, summarily concluded that the actions of the state actors fell entirely outside their jurisdiction and stated that they would take no further action. The fact that an administrative body could review, process, and dismiss a complex complaint involving cross-border corruption on the precise afternoon an international court injunction was filed is a mathematical impossibility under standard administrative timelines. It provides definitive, contextual proof of the real-time interception, endpoint monitoring, and high-level institutional collusion designed to protect this illicit enterprise at all costs.

My complaint to the DUP on 12 September 2026, which they refused to investigate. Even when it contains the crucial information about my daughter that she may also be sexually abused & exploited via hidden cameras without her knowledge or consent.
The rejection letter from the DUP was sent to me on 14 September 2026. The exact same day I also received a rejection letter from the ECHR, and I hadn’t even opened my rejection letter from the ECHR yet at the time I received a rejection letter from the DUP. See below:
A rejection letter received from the ECHR on 14 September 2026, the exact same day I also received a rejection letter from the Danish Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed (DUP). Isn’t it a perfect coincidence?
Caption: A rejection letter from the ECHR dated 11 September 2026, sent to me by Helle Pøhl (Legal Secretary). I received and opened it on 29 September 2026.

In the letter, it states that “in most cases where Rule 39 is applied, evidence available points to a clearly arguable case or a genuine threat and limb, with ensuing real risk of grave harm in breach of the core provisions of the Convention.” This appears odd when I have submitted extensive evidence. Particularly the evidence regarding the attack on 12 August 2026, with the police report and medical note.

Oddly, only Denmark was rejected, no mention of the UK at all. But both states have been added in my application.

I have also submitted evidence and information about the extreme psychological torture via 24/7 non-consensual recording and live-streaming with hidden cameras & audio recording device, forcing me to live without being able to take a shower for about 3 months now.
That’s why they want to keep monitoring all my devices, to detect when I am going to submit my Rule 39 application and what will be submitted.

To prevent the suppression of this information, a complete, unencrypted evidence archive detailing large-scale corruption, systemic surveillance, illegal government tracking, corporate misconduct, gross human rights violations, sex-trafficking ring, money laundering, and more, has been permanently deployed to the decentralized InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). 

These are not standard cloud storage links. They are cryptographic IPFS gateway paths routing to a permanent, decentralized data hash to prevent state-level URL takedowns.

Because this network is decentralized, it cannot be taken down or censored by state authorities. 

📥 INSTANT DOWNLOAD & ACCESS LINKS:

Please copy and paste these links into any standard web browser for immediate access to the raw files:

Primary Mirror:

1. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

2. https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

3. https://dweb.link/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

If standard web gateways are blocked by network firewalls, you can pull the data natively from the IPFS network using this Content Identifier (CID).

RAW DATA CONTENT IDENTIFIER (For secure newsroom extraction):

QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

SUMMARY OF CONTAINED EVIDENCE:

– Urgent injunction and court proceedings filed at the Danish Copenhagen City Court (Københavns Byret) on 5 October 2026 (Case Number: BS-47916/2026-KBH).

– New Rule 39 Interim Measure application package.

– Petition bundle detailing how UK state actors sexually abuse and exploit me via hidden cameras for more than a decade and even continue their illegal enterprise into Denmark within the Danish Red Cross Shelter for Women in Hvidovre by also unlawfully installing hidden cameras and audio recording devices in my room, including in shared bathroom and shower facilities as well violating the privacy of other vulnerable women in the process. Or, maybe they have manipulated and instructed the Danish authorities to carry on the abuse for them in Denmark instead. This archive details the abuse and exploitation they have been doing to me and my daughter for years, including how they got the UK Court to strike out my claims repeatedly to avoid accountability and to continue their crimes under the radar.

– How they block my access to lawyers, so they can continue their illegal enterprise and organised crime uninterrupted!

– And many more pieces of evidence related to this matter.

*Please download, duplicate, and host these files locally to ensure they remain accessible to the global public.*

You can also sign my petition here as well to support my case https://c.org/Rw7KMS6ghH

Sunday 9 August 2026 – Motorcycle Noise Harassment

Posted on by
Reply

This is my diary for today to document, how they abuse me daily through severe harassment, intimidation, voyeurism and even try to slowly kill me through noise:

  • At precisely 5:39 am, soon after I turned around in bed from left to right, I heard someone open the hallway door and close it. It’s unsure if the individual was going out or going in. But the time ended in the number “39” appearing intentional, as if to mockingly refer to Rule 39 Interim Measure that I am going to apply to the ECHR. 
  • At approximately 9:26 am, immediately upon sitting down on the toilet to urinate (I used the bathroom on the left side of the building), I heard a motorcycle ride past below the window or nearby. But before this, I had just finished defecating and there were no external sounds or anything like that to convey voyeurism, as if to show me some mercy or just to play games. But as soon as I sat back down on the toilet again to urinate, they immediately gave me a hint of voyeurism. 
  • At approximately 12:34 pm, immediately upon habitually leaning myself forward a bit while using the bathroom, I observed a helicopter emerging and flying past the bathroom window. This appeared to occur shortly after I had drafted a letter for sending to lawyers, asking them for representation. 
  • At approximately 18:50 pm, immediately after I put the phone down, I heard a motorcycle accelerate past my residence in the distance. The way the rider accelerated the engine was also in such a way that it prolonged the acceleration for as long as possible until the noise vanished from my hearing. This is how they try to weaken my heart and kill me slowly through noise. Because they did this at the exact moment I laid down, not when I was still sitting up, so that the noise could easily impact my heart. I therefore reasonably believe this is one of the reasons why they illegally install hidden cameras and audio recording devices in every place I live, to analyse the noise level, my location inside the room, what I do, and so on, so that they can precisely plan their attacks and slowly kill me through noise without getting their hands dirty. This is like premeditated murder.
The Aircraft is “drawing a line” right outside my window in Copenhagen, Denmark again, replicating the exact same intimidation technique used in the UK. This happens shortly after I have been working on my letter to send to Danish lawyers asking for representation.

Back to Denmark

Posted on by
Reply

Unfortunately, soon after the court sealed my injunction application, see below, the defendants escalated their witness intimidation so much that they forced me to flee the UK back to Denmark. So, I am now back in Denmark and start my life all over again here.

The court sealed my injunction application on 21 June 2026, just the day before Keir Starmer resigned as the UK PM on 22 June 2026, who had also been added as a Respondent / Defendant.

But that’s not the end of it. The witness intimidation, large-scale harassment, and the illegal installation of hidden cameras in every place I live in Denmark, including in shared rooms and bathrooms in hostels, to sexually abuse, sexually humiliate, harass me, exploit and psychologically torture me continue unabated in Denmark as well. This is shocking despite the lawsuit having already been initiated, the injunction application having already been sealed and their lawyers having already been served the claim form and the injunction, they just boldly continue the abuse into Denmark regardless. This makes me think that the Danish police and/or authorities may be involved in this as well.

Every day I face severe harassment everywhere I go in Denmark and even inside my current accommodation. People are told to wear Adidas and Nike brands; the brand names they often use to harass me with. The same with the colours red, navy blue, burgundy, orange and pink, which are the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, in which civilians are told / paid to wear these colours to harass me. They often intensify the colour and brand harassment whenever I try to assert my legal rights or make progress in this case, replicating the exact same harassment techniques used in the UK before I fled the country! This strongly suggests that the same perpetrators are behind this. Probably the British police, Keir Starmer and their Co-defendants, again, to try to silence me.

These two, probably father and son, also wore Adidas shoes. The father also wore a navy blue jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me.

The amount of money they have spent so far to launch a cross-border intimidation and harassment campaign against me may have already exceeded the compensation I have asked them for. This is insane.

Well, I’m telling you now, I am not done with you yet. I will continue to pursue justice from Denmark instead. There’s no way I will back down! You have crossed the line by not just abusing me but my daughter as well.

Also here, Adidas shoes and pants.
Adidas top.
Adidas backpack. The man also wore a pair of navy blue shorts, to make it more obvious to me that this is intentional harassment.

Letter to Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, 10 July 2026, I was on my way to send my settlement offer letter to Elon Musk, one of the defendants in my claim, and experienced severe harassment as usual. Everywhere I went, even in a shop or post office, someone or even the staff there themselves would suddenly emerge from round the corner to startle me, intimidate and to figuratively block my way out!

This tactic has been employed every single time I make progress in my claim or just try to assert my legal rights, such as sending my settlement offer letter to certain defendants or applying for an urgent injunction, the retaliation is swift! Again, this is an abuse of power.

This also strongly suggests that all my devices and physical movements are being unlawfully monitored at all times, severely violating my Human Right Article 8 (Right to Privacy) under the ECHR.

My physical movements are being tracked both via phone tracking and via their proxy agents (stalking by proxy) to ensure that even if I don’t have my phone with me, they can still track me.

This is my settlement offer letter package sent to Elon Musk yesterday to his registered office in London, sent by special delivery. So, he should have received it by Monday 13 next week.

On 7 July 2026, after drafting my settlement offer letter to Warner Bros as well ready to send it on 8 July 2026, I also experienced severe air harassment as usual. The aircraft would “draw lines” and “target-like” or “No.10” symbols right outside my window and everywhere I went.

The aircraft began to actively “draw a line” at the very moment I planned to leave the property, suggesting once again that all my movements were being unlawfully monitored at all times from within my room via hidden cameras before I even left my room.
Same here.
Another “target-like” or “X” or even “no.10” symbol was drawn by the aircraft right overhead.
Another one here as well, looking more like “no.10” symbol.
Everywhere I went, I was subjected to a sustained campaign of colour harassment and intimidation. Particularly, the use of the blue-and-red colour combination as seen in the photo above.
When I went to Boots to collect my prescription for my toothache, this elderly man wearing a red sports t-shirt with a cryptic message was already in the queue before I even arrived, suggesting once again that all my movements are being unlawfully tracked for malicious purposes. Red colour has also been used in the harassment campaign against me a lot, among navy blue and green, to let me know this is intentional. The number “26” also appears to allude to Keir Starmer who’s born on 2 Sept 1962 (63 years).
This is the man who wears the number “26” red top.
The aircraft were actively “drawing lines” and “symbols” everywhere I went on 7 July 2026; the date I finished preparing my settlement offer letter to Warner Bros.

Because Warner Bros is also one of the defendants in my claim for misusing my private information by making references to / incorporating my private information, intimate materials and/or creative works into their films such as the films Superman (2025) and The Bride! (2026). Warner Bros and its creative team may have received my private information and intimate materials from somewhere or someone – probably from Keir Starmer himself. He may even receive lifetime royalties for it! He simply treats me as his property, to do whatever he wants with me and make money on me. That’s why I am suing him as well in his personal capacity for his personal misconduct.

He and his co-conspirators may even do the same thing to my daughter. They even keep suggesting that they are also sexually abusing and exploiting her via hidden cameras, exactly the same way they do to me.

They even ignored my past warnings and settlement offers. This warning and settlement offer package sent to Warner Bros on 8 July 2026 is therefore my final negotiation and warning.
But my package to Warner Bros was somehow not delivered on Thursday, 9 July 2026, when it was supposed to be delivered the next day by 1 pm since it’s a special delivery?! The screenshot above showed “due to be delivered today” but that did not happen. I then rang royal mail yesterday and was assured that it would be delivered on Monday 13 next week instead.
Today, 11 July 2026, at approximately 11:45 am, as I wrote this blog post, I heard a loud car horn outside, as if to make me go look out the window as usual. When I did, I observed the aircraft “drawing a line” right outside my window again.
At precisely 11:46 am, I also observed a car driving past my window, after seeing the line in the sky drawn by the aircraft, containing the “no.10” in its license plate as well. The time also symbolically ended in the number 6, as if to refer to the violation of my human right article 6 (right to a fair trial) under the ECHR as usual. Because I have also said many times that I think Keir Starmer has blocked my access to lawyers, so that I cannot hold him and his co-conspirators accountable for illegal surveillance, misusing my private information for profit, severe harassment, intimidation and many more illegal acts committed against me and my daughter.
A close-up of the car with its number plate containing the “no.10” as well.

Investigative Journalists Attention

Posted on by
Reply

PRESS NOTICE: High-Profile High Court Action Issued Against Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer, the Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, Elon Musk, X Corp, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc., TikTok. Coca-Cola, Google, US Film Studios such as Warner Bros and Universal Pictures + Others – Claim No: KB-2025-004650 

For the attention of: The Legal Editor / Home News Desk

NOTICE OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS PURSUANT TO CPR 5.4C 

Please find notice of a high-value civil action newly listed as “Approved” in the High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division) under Claim Number: KB-2025-004650

Case Details:

Jurisdiction: High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division), London.

Claimant: Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt (Litigant in Person)

Defendants: (1) Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer (2) The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis (3) Elon Musk (4) X Corp (5) Mark Zuckerberg (6) Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) TikTok (8) Coca-Cola (9) Google (10) Warner Bros (11) Universal Pictures + Others 

Summary of Action:

The claim involves a high-value dispute pleaded on a joint and several liability basis, concerning systematic illegal surveillance, unlawful installation of hidden cameras and audio recording devices to non-consensually record and surveil the Claimant 24/7, dissemination / live-streaming of the illegal recordings for profit and harassment, cyberstalking, hacking, severe data breach, mass misuse of private information, commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, flagrant copyright infringement under Section 97(2) of the CDPA, gross human rights abuses, obstruction of justice, misfeasance in public office, large-scale corruption, cybersex trafficking ring, money laundering, and many more related illegal acts, committed against the Claimant, Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt, for more than a decade and still continuing despite pending injunction and court proceedings.

The shocking part is that the Primary UK State-Actor Defendants, such as Keir Starmer and the Police, may have also subjected the Claimant’s 35-year-old daughter to the exact same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras and via a honey trap. Particularly when every attempt to warn her daughter by the Claimant is met with evidence tampering, intimidation, manipulation, gaslighting, and an increase in severe harassment. This is therefore NOT the behavior of innocent parties!

The Particulars of Claim detail that proprietary data and sensitive private materials were unlawfully obtained, mostly via hidden cameras, as mentioned above, and subsequently exploited globally via international corporations, film distribution networks, streaming platforms, tech platforms, and more.

The First Defendant, Keir Starmer, abruptly resigned his public position on 22 June 2026, exactly 18 hours after being formally added to these High Court proceedings. An urgent application for an Interim Injunction carrying a Penal Notice is currently before the court. See below:

At around 14:50 pm on 21 June 2026, I formally submitted my injunction application and added Keir Starmer as a Respondent / Defendant as well. 18 Hours after, at 9 am on 22 June 2026, he abruptly resigned.

CRITICAL VERIFICATION UPDATE: The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, one of the defendants, have formally appointed global firm DWF Law LLP via Form N434 to manage the defense under High Court Claim KB-2025-004650. This confirms the proceedings are live, active, and escalating. Media verification can be completed immediately against DWF’s record on the CE-File registry.

I also face severe harassment and intimidation daily. It escalates day by day as I work on this case, even during pending injunction and court proceedings. That’s why I need the public to contact human rights organisations and journalists for me, since all my devices and communications are being unlawfully monitored by the UK State-actor Defendants 24/7.

You can read more about the escalating harassment and intimidation here  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s9uE79kueAtbYQdZhQwHpM0IeUd1LWd0/view?format=pdf

Media Access Instructions:

Pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 5.4C(1), members of the accredited press possess an automatic right to obtain copies of the Sealed Claim Form and Particulars of Claim directly from the High Court Central Office / King’s Bench Division Masters’ Secretary.

The Claimant welcomes transparent public scrutiny of these proceedings. Please quote Claim Number: KB-2025-004650 to the court clerk to secure the pleadings. 

Please send an email with the information above to newsdesk@courtnewsuk.co.uk and newsdesk@lawgazette.co.uk on my behalf since I can’t do it myself when all my devices and communications are being illegally monitored 24/7.

More places to send my press kit to:

  • National Legal Affairs Editors: Find the direct emails of journalists like Haroon Siddique (The Guardian Legal Affairs), or the investigative teams at The Times and The Independent.
  • Deliver my evidence directly to investigative press desks (such as the BBC Panorama, The Guardian, or Private Eye).
  • Contact the legal and public-interest desks of major outlets (e.g., The Guardian, The Times, BBC Panorama, or The Bureau of Investigative Journalism).
  • Investigatory Media: Investigative desks at major national newspapers (such as The Guardian, The Times, or The Financial Times) and independent investigative outlets like The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF) London Bureau: RSF specializes in breaking through state censorship and calling out governments globally. If you are in London, you can contact their UK desk directly at rsf-uk@rsf.org, or coordinate physical delivery to their office at 6th Floor, 2 London Wall Place, London, EC2Y 5AU.
  • The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) Campaigns Team: Reach out directly to the NUJ press and campaigns department at campaigns@nuj.org.uk or submit my case anonymously to the NUJ Journalists’ Safety Tracker. The NUJ has a direct mandate to raise national political and media alarms when a reporter’s safety and professional tools are weaponized against them.
  • Contact Private Eye (editorial@private-eye.co.uk), The Canary, or Novara Media. Give them my petition link and say this for me: “I am being monitored by UK officials for suing them, here is the proof https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk 

If one independent journalist tweets my petition, it can reach millions overnight.

  • Contact Digital Rights Groups: Reach out to UK organizations dedicated to internet privacy and anti-surveillance, such as Big Brother Watch or the Open Rights Group. Because your story involves digital monitoring and privacy violations, these groups have massive, ready-made email lists of thousands of activists who will sign and share your link instantly.
  • Big Brother Watch – Focuses on surveillance abuses – bigbrotherwatch.org.uk 
  • Privacy International – Addresses unlawful surveillance issues globally – privacyinternational.org 
  • Equality and Human Rights Commission – May investigate systemic abuses within public bodies – equalityhumanrights.com 

Please also visit this page to download all my evidence to pass it onto major news outlets, journalists, human rights organisations, human rights lawyers and more for me https://buppha.com/high-court-of-justice-kings-bench-division-london-uk/

Read more about it on my petition page, sign and share it to as many people as possible here https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk

Or just scan the QR Code below:

Sign the petition to help me fight the injustice

Resubmit My Injunction Application

Posted on by
Reply

Today, just now, I have re-filed my N244 Injunction Application along with my 2nd Witness Statement, Exhibits, Draft Order, Affidavit, the UN Urgent Appeal and other related documents.

Because the previous filing submitted on 9 June 2026 was filed incorrectly, in which I put everything in one long document, including the actual N244 Application Notice itself, and it couldn’t be sealed on its own. So, I finally submitted it again.

It took me a long time to assemble all of this once again and resubmit it due to my lack of legal representation. As I said many times before that my access to lawyers has been blocked, possibly by Keir Starmer. So, I have to do everything on my own.

Keir Starmer
Screenshot of my previous filing submitted on 9 June 2026, showing why I have to refile my N244 Application Notice.
Breach of privacy injunction
Today, I have just re-submitted it again.

Perverting the Course of Justice

Posted on by
Reply

As I said in one of my blog posts that the Defendants and/or their associates appear to have repeatedly manipulated my daughter, ex-husband, ex-boyfriend, the people I know, and even medical professionals not to believe what I say, to trap me and my daughter in their ongoing sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras. It’s both coercive control and perverting the course of justice (tampering with evidence).

My ex-husband, Jørgen Mortensen, a white Danish man, has no idea that the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his associates may be sexually abusing and exploitating his own daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming under the noses of everyone. Particularly when my every attempt to warn our daughter and him is met with evidence tampering to suppress the truth, as I said earlier.

Keir Starmer also has a daughter himself. How can he look his own daughter in the eye while at the same time appearing to sexually abuse my daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming her life for profit? If he’s done nothing wrong, I invite him to publicly clarify it, and we should fight fairly in court without my access to lawyers being blocked.

It’s cheating and an abuse of process to prevent a citizen from having legal representation and simultaneously also illegally monitor all their legal strategies, so you can automatically win the case, which may also constitute perverting the course of justice.

If they have nothing to hide, there’s no need to manipulate or gaslight others into not believing me. They also isolate me as much as they can, to cut all help and support I could get. I now live in complete isolation. To make matter worse, they even block my access to lawyers. Again, this is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

At approximately 21:29 pm, immediately upon typing the above-mentioned paragraph, I heard someone suddenly begin to make some noise near my room. This is what the State Actor Defendants seem to be doing by cyberstalking me 24/7, and then as soon as I begin to expose their wrongdoing – either privately or publicly – they would immediately instruct an individual to come out of their room and begin to rummage in the kitchen near my room. Sometimes, the individual would close the microwave or something very loudly as a form of intimidation and discreet censorship, to make me feel intimidated.

Every time I begin to edit my injunction application bundle, housemates also begin to exit/return to the property and violently slam the main door near my room shut. This is a classic witness intimidation. Despite knowing full well that I am preparing my injunction application, the torture, abuse, illegal surveillance, secret filming, live-streaming / distributing the non-consensually recordings for profit, mass misuse of private information, witness intimidation and severe harassment just continue unabated, suggesting that they act with impunity.

At approximately 22:31 pm, another discreet witness intimidation occurred again. Because immediately after I added some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer in my Tumblr post before posting it, I heard someone return to the property and start making noises. I then opened my door to look this time, the individual was the one residing in room 3, wearing a very bright red jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, as if the State Actor Defendants could guess that I would come out of my room again to see who it was, they then appear to get him to wear a red jumper ready for me to see as a form of colour harassment.

This is how they also use hidden cameras to torture me daily and to plan their attacks, harassment and intimidation. Because just moments earlier, at approximately 21:29 pm, I heard some noise in the kitchen, as I said earlier, and went out to investigate. But the individual quickly disappeared as usual. The state actor defendants could then see via hidden cameras and CCTV in the house that I went out of my room to investigate, they then seem to get my housemate in room 3 to suddenly return home and make lots of noise at the exact moment I typed some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer, to make me go out and look. I would then see him wearing a very bright red jumper. This is how they try to be one step ahead of me using hidden cameras as their weapons to plan their next moves. They also seem to derive some kind of satisfaction from playing cat and mouse with me. This is like violence against women. They then also block my access to lawyers, to make it difficult for me to stop the abuse.

CCTV cameras in the house and everywhere, including on public transport, such as on buses and trains, are also being misused for malicious purposes, such as to surveil me at all times when I am not inside my room to let me know, they’re going to surveil me to death and everywhere! Because they intentionally let me know that they are also illegally surveilling me while I am traveling by bus or train by reflecting everything back to me, to let me know everything has been observed and recorded.

This is a misuse of power, a form of extreme torture and gross human rights violations violating both the domestic and international law. If Keir Starmer is also behind this, then it makes this case even more shocking and unprecedented. Particularly when he used to be a human rights lawyer himself, and now he’s running the country!

This is the post that I was just about to publish on Tumblr with some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer before a housemate suddenly returned home and began to make loud noises, to make me feel intimidated.

By preventing me from having legal representation, they don’t just try to protect themselves from being held accountable but also to allow themselves to continue to sexually abuse and exploit me and my daughter via hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking to no end. They must be making lots of money on us when they appear to do whatever they can to carry on their illegal enterprise under the radar, amounting to perverting the course of justice and money laundering.

They simply treat us as their properties, matching the definition of modern slavery in all its forms, which also includes sex trafficking and human trafficking.

Sexual Offences Act 2003 and Related Legislation

  • Secret filming of intimate acts without consent falls under voyeurism (section 67).
  • Dissemination of such recordings constitutes sexual exploitation and may fall under revenge pornography offences (Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, section 33).

Modern Slavery Act 2015

  • Treating me and my daughter as “properties for business” by generating ongoing profits from the non-consensual distribution of our private lives amounts to exploitation through slavery and servitude.
  • Section 1 prohibits holding a person in slavery or servitude. Section 2 criminalises human trafficking, including sexual exploitation for profit.
  • The pattern of repeated exploitation despite pending injunction application and court proceedings shows we are being used as assets in an illegal enterprise.

On 6 June 2026, at precisely 01:03 am, immediately upon typing “They simply treat us as their properties” into the previous paragraph, I heard someone suddenly return home and slam the main door shut. The timing of this incident is significant, as the minute ended in the number 3, which I believe was used to symbolically reference Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the very right that prohibits torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. This incident is consistent with the ongoing pattern of harassment, where external noises, actions and symbolic harassment are deliberately synchronized with my private activities, clearly indicating that all my devices are being constantly monitored and that they intend for me to know it.

This is why I think they want to keep illegally monitoring all my devices, online activities and communications 24/7, to be able to control, intimidate and provoke me just at the right time. Again, that is why it’s important for them to keep unlawfully cyberstalking me at all times, so that as soon as I type in sensitive information, they will detect it right away and immediately orchestrate the harassment or intimidation. This is one of their methods of psychological torture. It’s also a form of Tech Abuse, which many women face. But typically by their own partners.

On 4 June 2026, at precisely 00:01 am, soon after publishing this blog post, I observed a helicopter flying low over my residence passing my window as if intentional as always. Because this is not an isolated incident. It has happened many times before. The timing of this incident is significant once again, as the minute ended in the number “01,” which I believe was used to symbolically reference the “No.10.” Because they have been using “No.01” or “No.10” persistently lately to harass me and to refer to something or someone as usual. For example, on one occasion, while walking on the street, two women walked past me, which seemed intentional. At the precise moment they were about to walk past me, one of them then suddenly pointed to something in a shop and loudly said, almost like shouting: “Look, it’s only £10!”

This is just one of the many incidents that No.10 seems to be uttered loudly within my earshot, or embedded in email correspondence, advertisements, social media posts and even in films, suggesting an industrial harassment campaign against me using all kinds of harassment techniques. “No.10” is one of them.

I Believe Keir Starmer is Illegally Surveilling Me

Posted on by
Reply

Today, I went to the Royal Court of Justice in central London to process my Help With Court Fees request for my urgent injunction application. Throughout the day, the Defendants appeared to have sent their harassers out to swarm me as usual. I can’t go anywhere without being surveilled, stalked, harassed and sometimes also intimidated. It’s like public lynching and torture. It’s a constant nightmare living like this. This is the price I pay for trying to assert my legal rights. This industrial scale of harassment everywhere I go suggests a huge resource being spent, to harass and surveil me to death to silence me for trying to expose their misconduct and to stop the abuse. It’s like coercive control to trap me in their abuse till the day I die.

This is my remission certificate for my urgent injunction application, which I just got today. Keir Starmer is also included in my list of Respondents/Defendants. I just list the police force as the first Respondent/Defendant. Because they’re initially being sued by me before Keir Starmer came into the picture.

Furthermore, it’s not only that. I also reasonably believe that the defendants may have subjected my daughter to the exact same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras (voyeurism, cybersex trade). Hence, the large-scale harassment campaign against me, which escalates day by day to silence me.

At 12:54 pm, I arrived at the Royal Court of Justice in central London to process my Help With Court Fees for my injunction application, see image above. Notice, there’s also a matching-colour harassment technique in the image above as well; it’s a matching turquoise colour this time.

A minute after, at 12:55 pm, Keir Starmer posted his X post. I therefore think he posted this post at the precise moment I stepped my foot inside the courthouse. His X post also appears to be infused with lots of cryptic messages to me as usual. For example, “peddling hatred and division” seems to refer to himself and his co-conspirators how they apparently incite hatred against me across all platforms and territories, amounting to a hate crime against me. The word “blocked” then also appears to allude to him “blocking” my access to lawyers, so that I cannot hold him and his co-conspirators accountable. This is how he appears to fool people by sending out a message that seems to be directed at the general public but simultaneously and discreetly also directed at me, and only I know it.
This is not an isolated incident. Because on 9 May 2026, at 14:48 pm, he also posted an X post.
He posted his X post above (14:48 pm) at the precise moment I saw this bus with an advertisement from Prime Video on its side at exactly the same time which was also at 14:48 pm. Because the word “Prime” seems to be used in the harassment campaign against me a lot as if to allude to him, the Prime Minister. At precisely 21:01 pm, immediately after typing the word “Prime” a few housemates were heard starting to converse loudly nearby and left. The time ended in “01” again, which could be read as “No.10” in reverse, alluding to Keir Starmer once again. This is how they appear to give me immediate hint that everything I privately type is being read in real-time via unauthorised access to my devices. It has become a daily occurrence whenever I type sensitive, crucial information into my legal documents, particularly about Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement in this, a few housemates would immediately begin to converse loudly near my room. Therefore, my housemates appear to have acted with knowledge or instruction that may be relevant to the matters in dispute.

Thus, I believe certain housemates may possess information identifying individuals responsible for instructing or coordinating the alleged conduct. The circumstances suggest that they may have acted under instruction or coordination from persons presently unknown. Accordingly, a Norwich Pharmacal Order and/or Disclosure Order will be sought in the interests of justice and is vital to assist in identifying the ultimate wrongdoers, including any individuals who organised, directed, facilitated, or participated in the alleged conduct. To the extent necessary, I believe that relevant housemates and/or third parties may properly be made subject to such disclosure obligations.

At precisely 21:10 pm, referring to No.10 again, immediately after finishing typing the previous paragraph, a housemate was heard exiting the property and slamming the main door shut with full force! I have recorded the incident as evidence.

These two incidents are just some of the many incidents which strongly suggest that Keir Starmer may be illegally surveilling me 24/7, amounting to an obsession. Because I reasonably believe that he’s directly behind or complicit in the order of the unlawful installation of hidden cameras in every place I live, including where my 35-year-old daughter lives as well, since he became PM in 2024. Perhaps, both for his own sexual gratification and financial gain, when the non-consensually recordings also appear to be disseminated and live-streamed to various places for profit as well. If he’s actually part of this cybersex trafficking ring, he has committed money laundering and crimes against humanity. Maybe that’s why he apparently blocks my access to lawyers, including making my evidence and documents disappear each time I submit them to apply for an urgent injunction and initiate court proceedings, so that I cannot hold him and his co-defendants accountable. I can. But it’ll be challenging.

When I went inside the courthouse and arrived at the office for Help With Court Fees, there’s already someone in there. I had to wait for nearly 2 hours. Because after that person came out, another person also needed to go in before me. This is how they appear to try to delay my case and frustrate me as much as possible by surveilling me at all times and planting their people there before I arrived.

As soon as I walked into the courthouse, someone would suddenly emerge from round the corner or a room to startle me, and this startle harassment technique has been consistently used in the harassment campaign against me as well. They especially use this harassment method more whenever I raise concerns about my daughter that they may be targeting her as well, on the verge of filing my urgent injunction application / initiating court proceedings, expose their misconduct, etc.

Some of the court clerks even wore a top matching the top that I wore underneath my jumper before heading to the court, to convey surveillance as always. That they see everything I do, including what I wear, in my room via hidden cameras and reflect it back to me via various means to cause severe distress. It could also lead to psychiatric injury when it’s being done repeatedly, which may be their ultimate goal.

He appears to use the word “reflect” in his X post as well as his secret communication to me as usual. That everything I do in my room is being “reflected” back to me to convey the illegal surveillance via hidden cameras in my room, unlawfully installed to harass, sexually abuse and exploit me.

I therefore believe that certain third parties may have been recruited, encouraged, or influenced into participating in the  harassment by persons connected to Keir Starmer and other co-defendants, including Unknown Defendants.

All in all, I think Keir Starmer and some of his co-defendants, particularly the police, have put me under 24/7 intrusive surveillance illegally and in every way possible such as via hidden cameras and phone tracking, which is why Keir Starmer and his co-defendants appear to know my every movement – both inside my own home and when I am out and about. The hidden cameras, which also record audio, then non-consensually film everything I do around the clock. They then seem to distribute/live-stream the illegal recordings to various places for profit (cybersex trafficking, money laundering). Again, that’s why they, particularly Keir Starmer, seemingly block my access to lawyers, so their allegedly illegal enterprise will never be exposed.

See the images below how the people behind organised harassment (gangstalking) frustrate and abuse their victims, which is precisely what I am going through right now. This is a calculated hate crime and crimes against humanity. Because I reasonably believe they are targeting my daughter as well. They even keep giving me hints that they’re also sexually abusing her via hidden cameras, stalking her and even implying death threats against her. That’s why my every attempt to warn her is met with evidence tampering, intimidation and more severe harassment. Thus, this is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

Increase Police Presence

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, Wednesday 13 May 2026, at 14:16 pm, I received a reply email from the police’s legal representative. Soon after, I went out to my appointment at Uxbridge Jobcentre Plus, I would experience an increase in police presence in my vicinity throughout the day.

Police's solicitors
This is the email I received from the police’s lawyer yesterday.

Police vehicles would often drive past me wherever I went as well as an escalation in (colour) harassment and intimidation. It’s too frequent to be coincidences. See pictures below:

Matching red. The matching-colour harassment technique has been used in the harassment campaign against me quite often as well. See more explanation below:
See more about known Harassment Techniques from the OHCHR.org below:

https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/Harrassmenttechniques.pdf

At approximately 2 pm, while I was sitting on the sofa inside Uxbridge Jobcentre waiting for my appointment, a security staff member, as seen in the image above in orange circle, pretended to bend over right in front of me with his buttocks within my line of sight to make me feel uncomfortable as a form of sexual harassment or degrading treatment, as if he was instructed to do – possibly by the police. Because this is not an isolated incident. Also, soon after this type of incident happens, I almost always observe police vehicles in my vicinity wherever I go as evidenced in this blog post. The photo above was taken when I left the Jobcenter at approximately half an hour after the incident.
After leaving Uxbridge Jobcentre, a man was walking past me wearing a pair of red shorts. Red is also one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me (colour harassment).
Then, as I was about to walk past a grocery shop, two individuals suddenly walked out of the shop to startle me! The startle harassment technique has also been used in the harassment campaign against me quite often. Especially, whenever I make progress in this case, expose their misconduct, add more crucial information and evidence to my legal documents, on the verge of filing my injunction application, and so forth.

The defendants utilize unauthorized real-time surveillance, including hidden cameras and phone tracking, to coordinate a series of ‘shock’ encounters involving housemates and various third parties whenever I go out. These encounters are timed to coincide with my legal filings and legal correspondences, intentionally creating a climate of fear to coerce me into abandoning the proceedings and injunction application.

This strongly suggests they may have been receiving real-time instructions from the defendants or their agents on when to emerge to cause maximum psychological disruption. This type of startle tactic—timed perfectly to moments of transition—is a repeated pattern designed to harass and destabilize me. Given the precision of their appearance and the context, it further supports the presence of ongoing surveillance and coordinated interference with my movements and peace of mind.

The timing, symbolic clothing, since one of them also wears a hoodie with a “blue” stripe on it and blue colour has been used consistently in the harassment campaign against me, and abrupt exit appear intended to startle me and reinforce the message that I am being constantly surveilled and controlled.

At 14:42 pm, soon after, a man walked past me with his fist clenching as a form of intimidation, as seen in the image above. This is not the first time that I experience this.
A close-up of his clenching fist 👊.
At 14:43 pm, just a minute after seeing the man with a clenching fist 👊, a police vehicle was observed driving past me.
At 14:44 pm, I observed a police vehicle driving past me again – probably the same one I just saw a minute earlier and they just drove around the corner. Before it, there’s also an advertisement of a film Batman, as if to let me know that this film may have also incorporated my private information into it. Because they have repeatedly used this type of hints to let me know, where my private information may have been disseminated to and misused.
A close-up of the police vehicle.
At 14:46 pm, 2 minutes after seeing the police car, an elderly male housemate was walking past me clenching his fist ✊ as well.
A close-up of his clenching fist 👊
At 11:48 am, on Thursday 14 May 2026, immediately after adding evidence about the security staff member at Uxbridge Jobcentre, who appeared to sexually harass me by bending over right in front of me, possibly he was instructed to do so by someone, potentially by the police, another elderly male housemate, as seen in the image above in a red circle, was observed exiting the property and slamming the main door shut forcefully. He does this often whenever I type crucial information into my legal documents, strongly suggesting that my devices are being illegally monitored 24/7. This is how they appear to use my housemates, neighbours and the entire community / city as tools of surveillance hints, harassment and intimidation. Just because I try to assert my legal rights.

At approximately 17:51 pm, immediately after editing the above-mentioned paragraph, a housemate was heard exiting the property and slamming the main door shut.

Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms and Others Sued in UK For Privacy Violations, Retaliation, Harassment

Posted on by
Reply

I have filed a claim in the High Court of England and Wales (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division – Claim No. KB-2025-004650) against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook/Instagram), Elon Musk, X.com (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and other parties.


According to the claim, I allege decade-long, continuous unlawful surveillance, even after the initiation of court proceedings, severe breach of privacy, misuse of private information on a massive scale, hacking/cyberstalking, organised harassment, conspiracy to injure and to pervert the course of justice, retaliation, blacklisting, obstruction of justice, gross human rights abuses, and related causes of action.


The claim further alleges that my original literary and creative works were unlawfully accessed through hacking and disseminated to third parties without my consent, resulting in loss of income, loss of future professional opportunities, and significant psychological harm such as PTSD, severe emotional distress.


Some Defendants deny liability. Through their legal representatives, certain Defendants, including the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, have stated that the allegations are denied and that they intend to defend the claim.


On 19 December 2025, the court stayed the proceedings to permit the filing of amended Particulars of Claim, which I am currently preparing in accordance with the court’s directions.

Social Media