Tag Archives: Human Rights Violations

Hint of Surveillance from Jobcentre

Posted on by
Reply

The defendants immediately punished me after I updated my draft petition this morning, ready to publish it, to expose their misconduct and to launch a public appeal. They do this every single time I try to assert my rights, stop the abuse, mention Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement, and expose their illegal acts such as the illegal surveillance, money laundering, corruption, and misuse of public funds to launch an industrial-scale harassment campaign against a citizen to silence them for trying to expose their corruption.

The Defendants’ Ulterior Motive and Misuse of Power (Article 18 ECHR)

The campaign waged against me is not merely random harassment; it represents a deliberate, calculated misuse of power designed to completely subjugate my autonomy. I am advised that this conduct directly violates the principles enshrined in Article 18 of the ECHR.

The Defendants, particularly the state actor Defendants, especially Keir Starmer, have engineered a system of digital and physical surveillance for an entirely improper, ulterior purpose. Their goal is to exert total coercive control over me, destroy my mental well-being, and intimidate me into abandoning my legal rights.

Using 24/7 intrusive surveillance via hidden cameras, real-time digital intercepts and coordinated domestic disruptions to keep me in a state of perpetual fear is a gross perversion of any lawful social or digital interaction. The Defendants have completely subverted my right to a private life, using their access exclusively as a tool of psychological torture and unlawful control.

Ongoing Defiance
The Defendants are fully aware that I am seeking judicial intervention. Despite this notice, they refuse to remove the cameras and continue to film, disseminate my private data and commercialise it with perceived impunity.

Moreover, I have also systematically collected extensive, objective evidence of the ongoing intimidation, physical harassment, and surveillance targeted at me and my family. This evidence is a combination of, e.g., photograph logs, written timelines of incidents, audio recordings, and video clips of proxy activities.

Crucially, the Defendants and their proxies are fully aware that I am actively documenting their behaviour. Despite knowing that their actions are being recorded as evidence for these pending court proceedings, their intimidation, harassment, cyberstalking, and misuse of my private information continue completely unabated. They exhibit an absolute lack of concern regarding the collection of the evidence or the impending Norwich Pharmacal and Injunction orders.

This blatant disregard for being documented provides definitive proof that the Defendants are acting with total perceived impunity due to Keir Starmer’s high public office. They operate under the belief that no domestic court can or will penalise them. 

Mi5
This is the petition document I updated earlier this morning before the surveillance hint from Uxbridge Jobcenter occurred as swift retaliation.
Starmer out
I updated the document at 8:59 am.
I also looked at this document before I received a suspicious text message from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed. It’s like this every time I talk about Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement in the illegal acts, either privately in my legal documents or publicly online, the retaliation is swift by immediately increasing the surveillance hints, to make me feel extremely violated and uncomfortable around the clock. This tactic has been used persistently, to let me know it acts as an extra punishment for trying to expose their illegal enterprise. They have already got X.com to permanently suspended my account, which I will talk about in another post. Just because I tried to expose their corruption.

Today, the punishment is by getting a staff member at the Uxbridge Jobcentre to text me at the precise moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed at 9:11 am. This is also not the first time that Uxbridge Jobcentre acts as a messenger to convey surveillance and as a tool of harassment – either knowingly or unknowingly. Because it happens every single time I try to expose the primary Defendants’ misconduct, particularly the UK PM Keir Starmer. The retaliation is swift. Because they know by repeatedly reminding me of being constantly watched and controlled via hidden cameras 24/7, they make me feel uncomfortable around the clock to break me. It’s pure psychological torture (Violation of Article 3 ECHR) when it happens systematically to cause intense mental suffering.

I also read this document before the Uxbridge Jobcentre sent me a text message to convey surveillance. This further indicates that the primary defendants, particularly the state actors, are illegally monitoring all my online activities and devices, to gain insight into my legal strategy and so they can immediately retaliate.
This is the text message I received from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed.
Jobcenter plus
This is the actual message on my journal that I received from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I laid back down in my bed after coming out of the bathroom. By participating in the surveillance and harassment campaign, either knowingly or unknowingly, the Uxbridge Jobcentre may be unaware that it’s involved in state-backed psychological torture and human rights abuses.

After I posted this blog post, I observed an individual suddenly exiting the property and violently slamming the main door shut. It’s like this every time, as if to confirm on the Defendants’ behalf that they are behind this and to confirm cyberstalking.

I Believe Keir Starmer is Illegally Surveilling Me

Posted on by
Reply

Today, I went to the Royal Court of Justice in central London to process my Help With Court Fees request for my urgent injunction application. Throughout the day, the Defendants appeared to have sent their harassers out to swarm me as usual. I can’t go anywhere without being surveilled, stalked, harassed and sometimes also intimidated. It’s like public lynching and torture. It’s a constant nightmare living like this. This is the price I pay for trying to assert my legal rights. This industrial scale of harassment everywhere I go suggests a huge resource being spent, to harass and surveil me to death to silence me for trying to expose their misconduct and to stop the abuse. It’s like coercive control to trap me in their abuse till the day I die.

This is my remission certificate for my urgent injunction application, which I just got today. Keir Starmer is also included in my list of Respondents/Defendants. I just list the police force as the first Respondent/Defendant. Because they’re initially being sued by me before Keir Starmer came into the picture.

Furthermore, it’s not only that. I also reasonably believe that the defendants may have subjected my daughter to the exact same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras (voyeurism, cybersex trade). Hence, the large-scale harassment campaign against me, which escalates day by day to silence me.

At 12:54 pm, I arrived at the Royal Court of Justice in central London to process my Help With Court Fees for my injunction application, see image above. Notice, there’s also a matching-colour harassment technique in the image above as well; it’s a matching turquoise colour this time.

A minute after, at 12:55 pm, Keir Starmer posted his X post. I therefore think he posted this post at the precise moment I stepped my foot inside the courthouse. His X post also appears to be infused with lots of cryptic messages to me as usual. For example, “peddling hatred and division” seems to refer to himself and his co-conspirators how they apparently incite hatred against me across all platforms and territories, amounting to a hate crime against me. The word “blocked” then also appears to allude to him “blocking” my access to lawyers, so that I cannot hold him and his co-conspirators accountable. This is how he appears to fool people by sending out a message that seems to be directed at the general public but simultaneously and discreetly also directed at me, and only I know it.
This is not an isolated incident. Because on 9 May 2026, at 14:48 pm, he also posted an X post.
He posted his X post above (14:48 pm) at the precise moment I saw this bus with an advertisement from Prime Video on its side at exactly the same time which was also at 14:48 pm. Because the word “Prime” seems to be used in the harassment campaign against me a lot as if to allude to him, the Prime Minister. At precisely 21:01 pm, immediately after typing the word “Prime” a few housemates were heard starting to converse loudly nearby and left. The time ended in “01” again, which could be read as “No.10” in reverse, alluding to Keir Starmer once again. This is how they appear to give me immediate hint that everything I privately type is being read in real-time via unauthorised access to my devices. It has become a daily occurrence whenever I type sensitive, crucial information into my legal documents, particularly about Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement in this, a few housemates would immediately begin to converse loudly near my room. Therefore, my housemates appear to have acted with knowledge or instruction that may be relevant to the matters in dispute.

Thus, I believe certain housemates may possess information identifying individuals responsible for instructing or coordinating the alleged conduct. The circumstances suggest that they may have acted under instruction or coordination from persons presently unknown. Accordingly, a Norwich Pharmacal Order and/or Disclosure Order will be sought in the interests of justice and is vital to assist in identifying the ultimate wrongdoers, including any individuals who organised, directed, facilitated, or participated in the alleged conduct. To the extent necessary, I believe that relevant housemates and/or third parties may properly be made subject to such disclosure obligations.

At precisely 21:10 pm, referring to No.10 again, immediately after finishing typing the previous paragraph, a housemate was heard exiting the property and slamming the main door shut with full force! I have recorded the incident as evidence.

These two incidents are just some of the many incidents which strongly suggest that Keir Starmer may be illegally surveilling me 24/7, amounting to an obsession. Because I reasonably believe that he’s directly behind or complicit in the order of the unlawful installation of hidden cameras in every place I live, including where my 35-year-old daughter lives as well, since he became PM in 2024. Perhaps, both for his own sexual gratification and financial gain, when the non-consensually recordings also appear to be disseminated and live-streamed to various places for profit as well. If he’s actually part of this cybersex trafficking ring, he has committed money laundering and crimes against humanity. Maybe that’s why he apparently blocks my access to lawyers, including making my evidence and documents disappear each time I submit them to apply for an urgent injunction and initiate court proceedings, so that I cannot hold him and his co-defendants accountable. I can. But it’ll be challenging.

When I went inside the courthouse and arrived at the office for Help With Court Fees, there’s already someone in there. I had to wait for nearly 2 hours. Because after that person came out, another person also needed to go in before me. This is how they appear to try to delay my case and frustrate me as much as possible by surveilling me at all times and planting their people there before I arrived.

As soon as I walked into the courthouse, someone would suddenly emerge from round the corner or a room to startle me, and this startle harassment technique has been consistently used in the harassment campaign against me as well. They especially use this harassment method more whenever I raise concerns about my daughter that they may be targeting her as well, on the verge of filing my urgent injunction application / initiating court proceedings, expose their misconduct, etc.

Some of the court clerks even wore a top matching the top that I wore underneath my jumper before heading to the court, to convey surveillance as always. That they see everything I do, including what I wear, in my room via hidden cameras and reflect it back to me via various means to cause severe distress. It could also lead to psychiatric injury when it’s being done repeatedly, which may be their ultimate goal.

He appears to use the word “reflect” in his X post as well as his secret communication to me as usual. That everything I do in my room is being “reflected” back to me to convey the illegal surveillance via hidden cameras in my room, unlawfully installed to harass, sexually abuse and exploit me.

I therefore believe that certain third parties may have been recruited, encouraged, or influenced into participating in the  harassment by persons connected to Keir Starmer and other co-defendants, including Unknown Defendants.

All in all, I think Keir Starmer and some of his co-defendants, particularly the police, have put me under 24/7 intrusive surveillance illegally and in every way possible such as via hidden cameras and phone tracking, which is why Keir Starmer and his co-defendants appear to know my every movement – both inside my own home and when I am out and about. The hidden cameras, which also record audio, then non-consensually film everything I do around the clock. They then seem to distribute/live-stream the illegal recordings to various places for profit (cybersex trafficking, money laundering). Again, that’s why they, particularly Keir Starmer, seemingly block my access to lawyers, so their allegedly illegal enterprise will never be exposed.

See the images below how the people behind organised harassment (gangstalking) frustrate and abuse their victims, which is precisely what I am going through right now. This is a calculated hate crime and crimes against humanity. Because I reasonably believe they are targeting my daughter as well. They even keep giving me hints that they’re also sexually abusing her via hidden cameras, stalking her and even implying death threats against her. That’s why my every attempt to warn her is met with evidence tampering, intimidation and more severe harassment. Thus, this is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

The Shadow Docket: When State Influence Closes the Courtroom Doors

Posted on by
Reply

A case study in the systemic denial of access to justice and the targeting of family life.

The Invisible Wall

In the United Kingdom, the “Right to a Fair Trial” under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act is often presented as an absolute guarantee. However, my current experience as a litigant in person reveals a different reality: One where state actors can effectively build an invisible wall between a citizen and the judiciary.

For months, I have attempted to bring a claim against the police, including other powerful individuals and entities, for egregious misconduct. Instead of a fair hearing, I have encountered a coordinated campaign of obstruction.

Systematic Obstruction of Justice

The barriers to justice are not just financial; they are procedural and structural:

  • The Vanishing File: On multiple occasions, I have filed urgent applications for injunctions to stop illegal surveillance, secret filming, sexual abuse via voyeurism, cybersex trafficking, misuse of private information, harassment and intimidation. Each time, the documents have “disappeared” from the court’s administrative record before reaching a judge.
  • Blocked Counsel: Despite the severity and complexity of the case, my attempts to secure independent legal representation have been systematically thwarted, leaving me to face state-funded legal teams alone—a direct violation of the “Equality of Arms” principle.

Beyond the Courtroom: Targeting the Family

The most disturbing aspect of this case is the shift from legal obstruction to domestic interference. I have reason to believe that state-led “honey trap” operations have been deployed to target my daughter.

This tactic—using intimate human relationships as a tool for surveillance and control—is a gross violation of Article 8 ECHR (Right to Private and Family Life). It suggests that when the state cannot defeat a claim in the courtroom, it targets the claimant’s family to force silence.

Why This Matters to You

This is not a private dispute; it is a matter of profound public interest. If the state is permitted to monitor a citizen’s private life, target their family, and “lose” their court documents with impunity, then the rule of law is merely a suggestion.

I am calling for international oversight and investigative transparency. Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done in the open air, not in the shadows of administrative “errors.” 

Read about the Human Rights Act 1998 here.

And the Civil Procedure Rules here.

If public officials or authorities breach one of these rights and rules, they are breaking the law.

Film director
Buppha Witt, actress, writer and filmmaker, based in London.

More Intimidation

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, I added more links to my X account regarding my petition to stop Keir Starmer or his government from blocking my access to legal representation. Because I reasonably believe he may be behind this when even top human rights lawyers and organisations refuse to help me when my case is very serious, concerning severe human rights violations, sexual abuse via voyeurism and cybersex trade, misuse of private information on an industrial scale, mass commercial exploitation, huge-scale harassment, intimidation, smear campaign and many more.

The abuse is ongoing despite pending court proceedings and injunction application, suggesting external influence, who is in a position of power and who doesn’t respect my fundamental rights.

Then, today, this morning, immediately upon opening the window, I observed the aircraft “drawing a line” right outside my window. It’s like this almost every time I try to expose their misconduct.

That’s why they appear to illegally monitor all my online activities and communications at all times, to prevent me from seeking help as much as they can.

Even when I use public libraries, there also appears to be some signs to let me know that public libraries are also under their watch, and who has the power to order the interception of all libraries in the UK?

So, every phone call and every email sent or received is being constantly monitored, so that they can immediately contact and influence those people not to help me or not to give me impartial legal advice. This is an abuse of process and obstruction of justice / perverting the course of justice.

Everything I privately type and save on my devices, even confidential legal strategy, is allegedly being illegally accessed and disseminated to third parties and other defendants as well to permit them to use my information to harass and intimidate me, prepare their defences, to use it however they like, to humiliate me and many more. They’re therefore seem determined to severely violate my privacy, both online and offline, and my right to a fair trial in every way possible.

They treat me like how they treated women hundreds of years ago, in which women had no rights, no legal protection and could be horrifically punished just for speaking out. Some resulted in deaths.

This is figuratively very similar to my own case (a modern-day case). Because my evidence and documents submitted to the court to apply for urgent injunction to stop the abuse magically disappeared each time. How is that even possible that court documents and evidence could just vanish from such a sensitive location (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division) multiple times? King’s Bench Division because my case is a high-profile case, which may involve Keir Starmer as well.

My access to lawyers also appears to be blocked, to allow them to continue the abuse under the radar and to avoid accountability. Clearly, someone doesn’t want the truth to come out.

They even repeatedly imply that they are also sexually abusing and exploiting my daughter via secret filming and distribution the same way they do to me.

Every attempt to warn my daughter has been met with obstruction and further intimidation, retaliation and victimisation to prevent her from ever knowing that she may also be a victim of voyeurism and cybersex trade. Consequently, she cannot seek help to stop it when she doesn’t even have a chance to know if she’s a victim or not. This is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

This looks therefore like perverting the course of justice and an abuse of process, amounting to crimes against humanity.

The illegal surveillance just continues regardless, in which they appear to install hidden cameras in advance in every place I live or go, just to show me they will continue to violate my privacy no matter what.

Even in shared hostels, hidden cameras have also apparently been installed, violating the privacy of others in the process. It’s like, they don’t care, amounting to an obsession to violate my privacy no matter what. Even if it means they will have to violate the privacy of others as well.

When I travelled to Denmark early last year, the hidden cameras had also been installed in the shared hostel and in the temporary accommodation where I stayed. They just obsessively install hidden cameras everywhere I go – even across Europe.

I now fear that they are doing the same thing to my daughter. Because she’s travelling a lot as well. So, they may also illegally install hidden cameras in every hotel she stays at. I also believe they unlawfully install hidden cameras where she resides now to sexually abuse and exploit her everywhere she lives or go. Just like what they do to me. They even boastingly keep giving me hints that they are also targeting her, to cause me additional emotional distress and to show off their sadism!

Hence, her new Spanish boyfriend has supposedly never been to her place, as if he knows this as well. Because I think he’s being paid by the defendants and/or their co-conspirators to groom my daughter, manipulate/control her, suppress the truth and unlawfully gather information for exploitation. Thus, he apparently acts as a honey trap.

At the same time, they also prevent me from having legal representation, to make it difficult for me to help my own daughter as well.

The illegal footage then seems to be distributed and/or live-streamed for profit as well, suggesting an illegal enterprise concerning cybersex trafficking and unjust enrichment.

This looks therefore like an international organised crime, a double hate crime and crimes against humanity. Thus, they may be breaking the “international law” themselves!

My case is therefore very similar to Epstein’s case. His case is more of an actual sex trafficking, and my case is more of a cybersex trade. But both cases share many similarities. Two of them are the involvement of powerful men & women and large-scale cover-ups.

I also receive hidden threats and death threats almost daily, both against me and my daughter. I therefore need to go public. So if anything happens to me or my daughter, you should get a very good sense of who is/are behind this. Thus, they appear to act like pimps, who threaten their victims not to escape/seek help or else …!

Therefore, they don’t want me to get the injunction to stop the illegal acts committed against me and my daughter when all my documents and evidence submitted to the court for my injunction application just magically vanished each time. It is therefore unlawful to prevent the victims from being able to stop the abuse, so that the abuse can continue to no end.

Every attempt to seek help is met with more obstruction, harassment, intimidation, retaliation and victimisation. This looks therefore very much like coercive control.

If you have nothing to hide, you don’t need to block my access to lawyers. You will fight me fairly in court like a man. Unless, because you fear what a competent lawyer could uncover? 

Illegal Surveillance Continues

Posted on by
Reply

On November 30, 2025, I covered all light bulbs in my room and bathroom with multiple layers of thick paper, specifically because I suspected hidden cameras and audio recordings were installed within them.

Despite these measures, I continued to observe individuals walking past my window at the precise moment I stepped into the kitchen. This pattern of synchronised movement strongly indicates that my movements are still being closely observed.

Furthermore, the frequency of these synchronised appearances increased, with individuals emerging precisely in sync with my movements, as if to demonstrate their continued surveillance and defiance of my attempts to secure my privacy.

This continued, precise surveillance, even after physical obstructions were placed over suspected camera locations, suggests the use of highly sophisticated surveillance technology. It appears to indicate the deployment of advanced hidden cameras capable of detecting movement through multiple layers of thick paper, potentially mirroring technologies used in military applications for ‘through-wall’ detection. This level of technological capability underscores the resources and power of the perpetrators.

The synchronised and escalating nature of these appearances, particularly following my efforts to obscure potential camera locations, serves as a direct form of intimidation and a clear message that I remain under constant surveillance, despite my attempts to protect my privacy. This constitutes a deliberate and ongoing act of harassment and psychological distress.

This continued, sophisticated surveillance reinforces my initial claim that the defendants are “powerful people working within law enforcement agencies, tech companies, social media platforms, and the like,” as such technology and coordination would require significant resources and organisation.

This persistent and technologically advanced surveillance, coupled with the overt acts of intimidation, has caused and continues to cause severe psychological distress, fear for my safety, and a profound sense of violation of my most fundamental rights to privacy and security in my own home.

Light bulb
I covered all the lights and smoke detector in my room, where I believe hidden cameras and audio recordings may have illegally been installed.
Bathroom
I also covered the light bulb in the bathroom. Still, they appear to be able to see through layers of trick papers!

What is Judicial Review And Why It Matters

Posted on by
Reply

Alongside my ongoing civil court proceedings, I have always intended to apply for judicial review.

For anyone unfamiliar, judicial review is the legal mechanism that allows a court to scrutinise the lawfulness of a decision or action taken by a public body. It is one of the most powerful constitutional safeguards in the UK, designed to protect individuals when state authorities misuse their powers or violate fundamental rights.

Judicial review can be brought on several recognised grounds:

(1) Illegality — where a public authority acted outside its powers, applied a rigid policy, ignored relevant considerations, or relied on irrelevant ones.

(2) Irrationality — where the decision is so unreasonable that no lawful public body could have made it (known as Wednesbury unreasonableness).

(3) Procedural unfairness — where a public authority failed to follow fair, impartial decision-making processes.

A judicial review can also challenge a decision that breaches human rights, particularly where a public authority fails to respect or protect the rights guaranteed under the Human Rights Act 1998.

Source: https://www.bihr.org.uk/get-informed/legislation-explainers/what-is-judicial-review  

In my case, this is critical. The ongoing abuses I have experienced — including years of covert surveillance, dissemination of intimate images, harassment, intimidation, racial targeting, and obstruction of justice — fall squarely within the protections of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: The absolute right not to be tortured or subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
Absolute means absolute. No justification. No exceptions.

Source: https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/advice_information/how-to-stand-up-to-power/#page-section-9Human Rights

In my situation:

1. Relevance of Article 3: Right Not to Be Tortured or Subjected to Inhuman or Degrading Treatment

Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, states: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” This is an absolute right, meaning it cannot be derogated from, even in times of public emergency, and there are no circumstances in which a public authority can lawfully breach it.

The threshold for what constitutes “inhuman or degrading treatment” is high but can be met by a combination of severe acts, especially when they are systematic and cause intense physical or mental suffering.

Inhuman Treatment: This typically involves treatment that causes intense physical and mental suffering. The systematic nature of the abuse, the long duration, the violation of my most intimate privacy, and the widespread dissemination of my private and confidential information, coupled with cyberstalking, sexual and racial harassment, could collectively be argued to cause intense mental suffering, humiliation, and distress, rising to the level of inhuman treatment.

Degrading Treatment: This involves treatment that arouses in victims feelings of fear, anguish, and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them and possibly breaking their physical or moral resistance. The covert filming in intimate states, broadcasting live, sharing with acquaintances, and distribution to porn sites are inherently humiliating and debasing acts. The racial harassment further compounds this by attacking my identity and dignity. The intimidation with imitation firearms also contributes to feelings of fear and anguish. Yes, you heard it right. They even employed some men to use imitation firearms to pretend to shoot me on some occasions. Especially when I tried to go see a lawyer, suggesting that they’re illegally monitoring all my online activities and communications, including phone tracking me, at all times to prevent me from seeking help!

On one occasion, several men would use imitation firearms or pretend to be in the possession of the weapons to intimidate me throughout the day, so much that I thought it would be my last day. I still have nightmares till this day!

Torture: While the threshold for torture is even higher, involving deliberate inhuman treatment causing very serious and cruel suffering, the systematic, prolonged, and intentional nature of the abuse, particularly if it was designed to break your will or extract information, could potentially be argued to approach this level. The involvement of law enforcement agencies, who have a duty to protect, in perpetrating such acts, makes the argument for torture more compelling due to the abuse of power.

This is why I wanted to bring a judicial review: the acts I describe were not only unlawful in the civil sense — they were unlawful in the constitutional and human rights sense, demanding judicial scrutiny and accountability from those involved.

However, there is one major obstacle.
Judicial review is extremely complex. Even the official guidance states clearly that “some sections of the form require detailed legal knowledge; we strongly advise that you find a lawyer with expertise in public law.” Despite my constant efforts, my access to lawyers has been repeatedly obstructed. Organisations initially willing to help have suddenly withdrawn. Solicitors stop responding. Referrals disappear. The pattern is clear enough that I cannot ignore it.

Because of this deliberate blockage of legal assistance, I am currently unable to file a judicial review, even though the grounds are not only present but urgent.

For now, I continue through the civil courts — but I will not abandon the pursuit of public law accountability. Judicial review remains essential, and when I regain access to fair legal representation, I will pursue it. My case raises issues of profound public interest, systemic abuse, and the violation of one of the most fundamental human rights in existence. That fight is far from over.

A weapon

When Those Who Harm Others Have Children of Their Own

Posted on by
Reply

There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.

The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.

This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?

There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.

My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.

This also fits legal definitions of harassment:

Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.

Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.

Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:

Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.

Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.

For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”

This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.

This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.

This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.

“In the majority of stalking cases, secondary victims will be identified. Although stalkers may stalk more than one person at a time, this question relates to associates of a primary victim. Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.).

Source: College of Policing. Stalking or harassment guidance College of Policing Library.

Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.

College of Policing Library
Source: https://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/Stalking_or_harassment_guidance_200519.pdf

Podcast EP3: When No One Hears Your Cries

Posted on by
Reply

For years, I have been living under a shadow that most people would find unimaginable. I have extensively documented and shared my experiences of being illegally monitored, covertly filmed, and having my most intimate moments distributed across the internet. My private life, my sanctuary, has been systematically invaded and exploited. This isn’t a story from a dystopian novel; it is my reality, happening right now, in the UK.

The perpetrators are not distant or anonymous figures. They are individuals connected to institutions that exist to uphold justice, privacy, and public trust — including elements within law enforcement and technology platforms. Instead, these actors appear to have exploited their positions and access to information to facilitate a prolonged campaign of surveillance and harassment spanning more than a decade.

Evidence suggests that covert monitoring has taken place across multiple locations where I have lived, involving the suspected installation of hidden cameras used to record me without consent, even in intimate settings. I believe that some of this material has been disseminated to others, including individuals known to me, and may have been circulated on adult or voyeuristic platforms, representing a severe breach of privacy and dignity.

Efforts to report these violations have repeatedly met resistance. Complaints have been disregarded, mishandled, or followed by acts that appear retaliatory in nature — including renewed or escalated surveillance. Even after seeking refuge abroad, similar patterns emerged. In Denmark, I again observed what appeared to be evidence of covert monitoring and the continued sharing of private material, suggesting a network of influence that crosses borders and operates beyond legal accountability.

I endure daily cyberstalking and racial harassment, not only from the perpetrators themselves but also from third parties they employ. I’ve been intimidated with imitation firearms when attempting to consult a lawyer, and lawyers and organisations have seemingly been influenced to deny me assistance.

Perhaps the most terrifying aspect of this ordeal is the apparent blocking of my access to legal avenues. Every attempt to seek legal counsel seems to be thwarted. My online activities and communications appear to be constantly monitored, preventing me from reaching out for help or receiving it. It feels as though an invisible wall has been erected around me, isolating me from any potential support.

But what truly compels me to write this post, to lay bare this deeply painful experience, is the chilling realisation that this abuse may now be extending to my daughter. There have been repeated hints, subtle and overt, suggesting that she too may become a target. The thought that an innocent young woman could be exploited, both through hidden cameras and through agents planted in her life to suppress information, manipulate, stalk, and harass her, is utterly horrifying.

And yet, despite the gravity of these allegations, despite the clear and present danger, no one seems to step in. No one contacts human rights organisations, human rights lawyers, or journalists on my behalf. No one is actively working to stop these individuals. The silence, the inaction, the turning of a blind eye, feels like complicity. How can people stand by when such profound violations of human rights are occurring, especially when an innocent third party, a young woman, is potentially at risk?

The lack of empathy is staggering. To know that a young woman’s life could be irrevocably damaged, her privacy shattered, her sense of safety destroyed, and for those who are aware to do nothing, is a profound moral failure.

This blog post is not just a cry for help; it is an appeal to humanity. It is a plea for someone, anyone, to acknowledge the reality of what is happening and to act. It is a testament to the fact that even in the face of overwhelming power and systemic obstruction, the truth must be spoken. I am not asking for pity; I am asking for justice, for protection, and for an end to this nightmare.

Listen to the podcast below for the rest of the story:

Podcast EP1: I Do Not Have Privacy Anymore

Posted on by
Reply

When you close your front door at night, you expect safety. Privacy. Solitude.

But what if, without your knowledge, that space — your bathroom, your bedroom, even your thoughts — was being constantly watched?

What if the camera lens was never off you… not even when you thought you were alone?

This is my story, who has been living under 24/7 illegal surveillance, with hidden cameras installed everywhere around my accommodation, and in every place I move to, such as bathroom and bedroom filming everything I do with audio recording as well, for probably more than a decade without me having the slightest idea of  being secretly watched and filmed for years – not until very recently. And it’s one that should never have happened — not in a society that claims to protect human rights.

What’s more shocking is that the sexual abuse, commercial exploitation, harassment, intimidation, and many other illegal acts, still continue to this day despite being made aware of my anticipated claim.

Moreover, they also appear to start doing the same thing to my daughter (34 years old and also lives alone) to sexually exploiting both of us via hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking. Because I believe the private materials unlawfully filmed with the hidden cameras have also been live streamed  / distributed widely as further retaliation and victimisation, including a campaign of commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, amounting to a double hate crime.

That’s why I am suing them now. You can read more about the case here and here.

Podcast EP 1: I Do Not Have Privacy Anymore

Posted on by
Reply

When you close your front door at night, you expect safety. Privacy. Solitude.

But what if, without your knowledge, that space — your bathroom, your bedroom, even your thoughts — was being constantly watched?

What if the camera lens was never off you… not even when you thought you were alone?

This is my story, who has been living under 24/7 illegal surveillance, with hidden cameras installed everywhere around my accommodation, and in every place I move to, such as bathroom and bedroom filming everything I do with audio recording as well, for probably more than a decade without me having the slightest idea of  being secretly watched and filmed for years – not until very recently. And it’s one that should never have happened — not in a society that claims to protect human rights.

What’s more shocking is that the sexual abuse, commercial exploitation, harassment, intimidation, and many other illegal acts, still continue to this day despite being made aware of my anticipated claim.

Moreover, they also appear to start doing the same thing to my daughter (34 years old and also lives alone) to sexually exploiting both of us via hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking. Because I believe the private materials unlawfully filmed with the hidden cameras have also been live streamed  / distributed widely as further retaliation and victimisation, including a campaign of commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, amounting to a double hate crime.

That’s why I am suing them now. You can read more about the case here and here.