A civil claim has been filed in the High Court of Justice.  

Claim Number: KB-2025-004650

Court: High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division in London

Date Filed: 17 December 2025

This page provides a transparent, factual overview of the legal proceedings as they unfold.

—

What This Case Is About

This legal action concerns serious privacy violations, both physical and digital, including:

– gross human rights abuses 
– illegal surveillance 
– hidden cameras, secret filming and distributing / live-streaming (cybersex trafficking)
– misuse of private information 
– commercial exploitation
– dissemination of private material 
– digital exploitation involving AI‑generated content 
– hacking / cyberstalking
– harassment
– intimidation
– blackmail
– unlawful retaliation and victimisation
– violence against women
– severe discrimination
– a possible hate crime
– and many, many more

This is an issue‑based case focused on privacy, safety, digital rights and gross human rights violations.

—

Why I Am Publishing This Information

I am sharing this information publicly to:

– provide transparency  

– counter false rumours about the legitimacy of my case  

– allow journalists to verify that legal action is underway  

– document the legal process responsibly  

– support public awareness of digital privacy problems since the case highlights a wider public‑interest issue.

All documents or evidence published here will be redacted or concealed to remove personal data and sensitive information.

—

Filed Documents (Redacted)

The following documents have been filed with the High Court and will be published here in redacted form:

– Sealed N1 Claim Form (Redacted)  

– Amended Particulars of Claim (Redacted)  

– Future filings will be added as the case progresses  

These documents confirm the existence of the claim and outline the issues in a legally appropriate way.

—

Timeline of Key Events

This timeline will be updated as the case develops.

– 18/12/2025 — N1 Claim Form and Particulars of Claim filed and  issued (Claim No: KB-2025-004650)   

– 19/12/2025 — The Court notified me to prepare my injunction application for the injunction hearing

– 6/1/2026 — The judge temporarily stayed the Proceedings because my Particulars of Claim were incomplete and asked me to resubmit them in amended form  

– 31/3/2026 — I have submitted my amended High Court claim via e-filing

– 23/4/2026 — I received a notification from the Court via e-filing notifying me that my claim had been struck-out on 2/4/2026, which I believe it’s due to fraud on the court

– 8/5/2026 — I submitted my urgent injunction application and an application to set aside the strike-out

– 14/5/2026 — I received a notification from the Court via e-filing, saying that my application notice has not been put on the correct form, and I must resubmit using the N244 without notice application form

– 9/6/2026 — I re-submitted my urgent injunction application with the correct form and an application to set aside the strike-out

– 14/6/2026 — I received a notification from the Court via e-filing, with the Clerk’s Comments: Please file the application notice as a separate document. This will enable it to be sealed..

– 21/6/2026 — I re-submitted my urgent injunction application per instruction from the Court’s clerk on 14/6/2026 together with an application to set aside the strike-out and to strike out the Defendants’ defenses instead due to an abuse of process and misleading the Court

– (date) — Injunction hearing scheduled  

This page will continue to be updated to ensure transparency.

—

Commitment to Responsible Transparency

This website will never publish:

– personal addresses  

– phone numbers  

– email addresses  

– signatures  

– sealed or restricted material  

Only procedural information and redacted documents will be shared.

—

My case raises two major public‑interest issues: digital privacy and access to justice. On the privacy side, I’ve taken formal legal action because of serious digital violations, including illegal surveillance and misuse of private information. But alongside that, I’ve faced significant barriers in securing legal representation, while the opposing side has full legal support.

This imbalance undermines the fairness of the process. Article 6 of the Human Rights Act protects the right to a fair trial, which includes access to legal advice and equality of arms. When one party is represented and the other is prevented from obtaining representation, the fairness of the proceedings is compromised.

This is one of the reasons I am seeking an urgent injunction — to stop the blocking of my access to legal representation and to restore fairness to the legal process.

This is not just about my case. Many people facing digital privacy violations struggle to obtain legal support due to systemic barriers. I’m speaking out because access to justice is a human right, and it must be protected.

My campaign is about raising awareness, promoting transparency, and encouraging accountability. Everyone deserves safety. Everyone deserves privacy. And everyone deserves a fair trial.