Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
I wish to inform members of the public, journalists, human rights lawyers, human rights organisations, human rights watch and interested parties that I have issued a new press release concerning my ongoing High Court proceedings relating to serious and sustained privacy violations.
The press release outlines the nature of the claim that has now been formally filed, the legal framework relied upon, and the broader public-interest issues raised by the case. These include unlawful surveillance (both digital and physical), misuse of private information, hacking, cyberstalking, and the systemic risks posed by such conduct when left unaddressed.
I have published a new press release outlining the filing of my High Court claim concerning serious and ongoing digital privacy violations.
This case raises urgent questions about digital surveillance, misuse of private information, data protection failures, and the accountability of powerful actors in an increasingly intrusive online ecosystem. It concerns the alleged unlawful access to personal devices, illegal and intrusive surveillance, monitoring of private communications, and the exploitation and dissemination of private data without consent.
The purpose of releasing this information publicly is threefold:
– Transparency – to ensure the public record accurately reflects the nature of the claim and the relief sought.
– Protection – to deter further interference, retaliation, intimidation, or further misuse of private information while proceedings are ongoing.
– Public interest – to contribute to wider discussions around digital privacy, surveillance abuse, platform responsibility, and access to justice.
I encourage journalists, legal professionals, digital rights advocates, and members of the public to read the press release in full and draw their own conclusions based on the source material.
The press release sets out the legal basis of the claim, the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, and the remedies being sought through the courts. It does not speculate on outcomes and does not replace the formal judicial process. I will continue to provide updates responsibly and in accordance with legal advice as the case progresses.
Thank you to everyone who has shown support, professionalism, and respect for due process.
In any fair society, legal representation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental right. It is one of the few tools individuals have to defend themselves against injustice, abuse of power, and exploitation by those with more influence, resources, or institutional backing. When that right is deliberately withheld—especially in cases involving powerful individuals or state actors—it’s an insult to democracy!
It thus becomes a matter of public interest and human rights.
For probably over a decade, I have endured unrelenting harassment, continuing surveillance campaign and targeted intimidation, both online and offline, which intensifies each time I try to speak out and to do something to stop the ongoing abuse. The individuals and entities behind this campaign of abuse are not just random strangers — they include powerful people and state-affiliated actors. Yet, while they enjoy full access to legal representation to protect themselves and mount their defence, I have been systematically and deliberately deprived of the same basic right.
I write this from a deeply personal experience. I am someone who has been persistently targeted and harassed both online and offline for maybe more than a decade. My case involves highly sophisticated techniques of psychological manipulation, illegal surveillance, symbolic harassment, colour harassment, racial and sexual harassment, and repeated acts of intimidation. And yet, despite the seriousness and scale of this campaign against me, I have been systematically denied access to legal representation.
Why I Desperately Need Legal Representation
Having a lawyer or barrister would act as a protective buffer between me and those who are targeting me. Having access to legal representation is not just a procedural right — it is an essential lifeline, especially for individuals being targeted by powerful adversaries or those who wield institutional influence. A lawyer or barrister would:
Apply for emergency injunctions swiftly—even over the phone, on weekends, or outside court hours, which could stop the ongoing abuses in an instant.
Serve as a protective buffer against direct and retaliatory intimidation.
Help me swiftly seek protective orders in moments of urgent danger.
Navigate the complex legal system, which is quite overwhelming for those without support.
Protect my rights, safeguard my evidence, protect me from injustice and discrimination, prevent gaslighting and manipulation, and effectively defend my case and interests.
Challenge those who are using their institutional power to suppress and retaliate against me.
Advocate on my behalf to prevent further escalation or psychological harm.
Challenge any racial or discriminatory practices that are being used against me.
The very people or institutions harassing me already have legal representation—to defend themselves, to intimidate, and to delay or derail justice. The fact that I, the victim, am denied the same right is not only unjust—it is deliberate.
This is not just a personal struggle; it is a matter of public interest and a human rights issue.
Legal Representation: More Than Just a Right
Legal representation is not a luxury — it is a fundamental safeguard in any democratic society. It serves as a buffer between an individual and systemic abuse, offering protection, advocacy, and the ability to assert one’s legal rights within a complex judicial system. Especially for someone facing powerful adversaries — including institutions, corporations, and individuals with significant resources — access to a solicitor or barrister is critical.
Legal professionals can swiftly apply for urgent injunctions, including out-of-hours or weekend applications, when safety or serious harm is at stake. I have been denied this protection. As a result, I have been left vulnerable to escalating retaliation, without a mechanism to enforce even the most basic boundaries.
A Pattern of Intimidation and Retaliation
Whenever I attempt to speak out about their harassment techniques, they almost immediately punish me!
The calculated nature of the punishment and retaliation — timed to moments of vulnerability or assertion — is intended to inflict emotional distress and reassert their control.
Escalation in Response to Resistance
Each time I attempt to document or speak publicly about these techniques, the harassment escalates dramatically. They replicate the exact same tactics — but ten times more intensely — to punish and provoke me. It’s a form of psychological warfare and coercive control, designed to deter me from resisting, and to enforce submission through retaliation.
This reaction further supports the theory that my activities — including writing, messaging, or any form of documentation — are being continuously and illegally monitored. The perpetrators sift through my private digital life to identify sensitive points, then design new harassment strategies in real-time.
Discrimination and Systemic Injustice
It is impossible to ignore the racial and discriminatory dimension of this abuse. I am a woman of colour. I am not white. And I believe that if I were white, I would never have been subjected to this kind of prolonged, targeted harassment — certainly not for over a decade, with state actors involved, and certainly not with such systematic barriers to legal help.
I have been left isolated, with no legal advocate, no protection, and no recourse — while my abusers continue their violations with impunity.
This is not just harassment. It is severe racial, psychological and mental abuse, fuelled by discriminatory bias and sustained by the denial of my rights.
The Public Interest.
This situation is not unique to me. When someone’s access to justice is systematically blocked — particularly while they are being abused — that is a matter of public interest. When powerful individuals or institutions seemingly collude to deny a person legal representation, weaponise surveillance, and escalate harassment as punishment for speaking out, it goes beyond personal grievance.
It becomes a threat to the rule of law itself.
I Refuse to Be Silent Any Longer
For years, I stayed silent, hoping that enduring would somehow lead to an end. But silence has only emboldened them. My refusal to be abused is not defiance — it is survival. And now, I am speaking out not only for myself, but for everyone whose rights are quietly stripped from them while their pain is mocked or ignored.
It is time for this to end.
I don’t want to suffer in silence anymore.
I demand what every person is entitled to under law: the right to safety, dignity, and legal protection.
Instead, I have been left completely unrepresented — deliberately denied the legal help I urgently need, while my abusers exploit their access to power, law enforcement, and professional networks to continue harming me with impunity.
Insights from the Medium article
What I Read — And How They Retaliated
Recently, I came across a powerful Medium article titled Understanding Gangstalking: Methods and Protection. It captured with startling accuracy the very tactics used against me — and the moment I began reading it, I was again harassed in real-time, with throat-clearing noises from my neighbour (because they appear to turn everyone against me, even the community I live in) to imply coercive control and other signs of constant surveillance both digitally and physically. Those around me are then instructed to act as messengers to deliver hidden messages that they are illegally monitoring me around the clock!
Here are a few key takeaways from the article that resonate deeply with my own experience:
Abuse of Power and Influence
The perpetrators include individuals in positions of authority — even those with “public-facing” roles — who manipulate systems (such as law enforcement or social services) to isolate and discredit their victims.
Invasion of Privacy
Like many victims, I’ve experienced 24/7 illegal surveillance – both online and offline. My confidential information appears to be broadcast or shared with various places and companies, who then recycle it into mocking, targeted content meant to cause distress.
Slander, Rumors, and Gossip
They use untruths to create division between their victims and people in their community — from landlords to coworkers to acquaintances — spreading lies to isolate the victims and destroy their support network.
Unofficial “Games” and Entertainment
This was especially chilling. The article describes how some perpetrators treat the abuse as entertainment — as a kind of sick, sadistic sport. They view a victim’s suffering, even breakdowns or cries for help, as amusement. I, too, have been treated like a source of “entertainment” rather than a human being. This explains why they seem to escalate when I’m in distress, turning even my pain into a cruel spectacle. It’s a chilling form of psychological torture.
The information below is what I read on Medium, which triggered the throat-clearing harassment and intimidation that I had just experienced earlier this morning:
Abuse of Power and Influence: Perpetrators in positions of authority, including those within religious or spiritual groups, and even “unseen” with public fronts, often use their roles to facilitate harassment. This may involve manipulating law enforcement, leveraging influence over community resources, or using professional networks to isolate and strategically target individuals.
Invasion of Privacy: Victims frequently report extensive breaches of privacy, such as unauthorized surveillance and hacking of electronic devices. This indicates deep intrusions into personal lives, with perpetrators — sometimes part of unseen groups or secretive organizations — accessing confidential information to manipulate and control.
Slander, Rumors, and Gossip: An additional and potent tool in the gangstalking arsenal is the strategic use of slander, rumors, and gossip to discredit and isolate the victim within their community. By spreading untruths and manipulative stories, harassers create environments of mistrust and fear, often pitting friends, family, and colleagues against the victim. This tactic not only undermines the victim’s support network but also serves as a psychological weapon, further entrenching feelings of helplessness and isolation.
Divide and Conquer Techniques: These methods are linked with spreading rumors and fostering distrust. By creating and exacerbating rifts between the victim and those in their immediate social or professional circles, perpetrators can more effectively control and manipulate situations to their advantage, weakening the victim’s defenses and ability to seek help.
Motives Behind Gangstalking:
The motives for gangstalking are diverse and often disturbing, reflecting a range of unethical intentions:
Silencing Dissent: This motive is frequently cited in instances where the target is involved in activism or has acted as a whistleblower. Perpetrators, often representing powerful interests or entities, use gangstalking tactics to suppress and discourage any opposition that could threaten their status quo or expose wrongdoing.
Social Manipulation: Gangstalking is also described as a tool for broad societal control, orchestrated by influential groups aiming to destabilize or manipulate specific communities or individuals. This tactic can be employed to enforce conformity, discourage certain behaviors, or even as a means of social experimentation.
Unofficial Competitions and “Games” of Entertainment: Another unsettling motive involves gangstalking being used as a form of entertainment for the perpetrators, who may treat the harassment like a game or competition. This often sadistic perspective is especially troubling as it turns the severe distress and harm of victims into a source of amusement and competition among groups. This kind of motive underscores a deep lack of empathy and disregard for human rights, as participants in these “games” seek thrills at the expense of another’s well-being.
Building Awareness and Community Support: Engaging with supportive communities can significantly reduce feelings of isolation and help validate the experiences of those targeted. Joining or forming support groups, participating in forums, and educating the local community about gangstalking can foster a supportive network. Public speaking, blogging, and social media can also be powerful tools for raising awareness and connecting with others who share similar experiences.
Legal Recourse: Consulting with legal professionals is crucial. They can offer guidance on the feasibility of legal action based on evidence, help obtain restraining orders, and navigate the complexities of privacy laws. Understanding one’s legal rights is essential for effectively addressing and documenting instances of harassment.
Another interesting post below about stalking and harassment also perfectly matches my situation:
What may prevent a victim from seeking help?
Not understanding that what is happening to them is stalking and/or illegal.
Fear that others will think they are over-reacting or that they will be blamed for somehow having encouraged the stalker in the first place.
Trying to pretend that it is not happening. Believing that they should be able to deal with the situation, thinking that the stalker will see reason.
Fears about how the stalker will respond either to them or those that they love or care for.
Direct threats from the stalker. This is what they also appear to do to me by sending me implied threats (for example, death threats and kidnapping) both against me and my daughter.
Feeling isolated in their plight, believing that there is nothing that can be done to help them, or not knowing who to go to.
Previous requests for help being ignored.
Financial limitations in regard to seeking legal advice or taking time off to seek help.
Limited options in respect to changing their situation e.g. relocation to safer housing.
What makes this all even more harrowing is that every time I document or speak about these abuses, there is an immediate, traceable retaliation.
If I write about being harassed by a police van, another one appears within minutes.
If I speak out online, push notifications or advertisements arrive within seconds with encoded insults or mocking messages.
When I began reading the Medium article, I was immediately targeted with loud throat-clearing — a known form of signal harassment and coercive control.
This pattern strongly suggests that my devices and online activity are being illegally monitored, including phone tracking — not just passively, but to generate targeted, real-time abuse meant to silence me and enforce control.
This Is Also Racial Discrimination
It’s impossible to separate this abuse from my identity. I strongly believe that if I were white, I would not be subjected to this kind of targeted, prolonged abuse, nor denied legal representation for over a decade.
I am a woman of colour — and my rights, my privacy, and my humanity have all been treated as disposable. The systemic denial of legal help, coupled with sustained, racially charged abuse, points clearly to institutional discrimination.
Silence Helps Them — So I Am Speaking Out
The Medium article also encouraged victims to reclaim their voice:
> “Public speaking, blogging, and social media can be powerful tools for raising awareness and connecting with others who share similar experiences.”
This is what I am doing now. Because staying silent has only empowered the abusers. It made them believe they could continue — unchecked, unchallenged, and invisible.
But I will no longer be invisible.
I will speak up. I will document. I will resist.
What Needs to Happen
1. Immediate access to legal representation. I need a lawyer or barrister urgently to apply for injunctions, challenge the abuse, and assert my legal and human rights.
2. Investigation into illegal surveillance and discrimination. My case needs to be heard. Not silenced, not buried. This includes an inquiry into institutional complicity and digital misconduct (Malicious Communications Act 1988, Computer Misuse Act 1990, Online Harassment, Cyberstalking, etc.).
3. Community and legislative awareness. We must educate others — including legal professionals, mental health workers, and the general public — about how gangstalking or organised harassment operates and the real harm it causes.
Conclusion: My Story Is a Warning
The abuse I face is not just about me. It is about what happens when institutions fail to protect the vulnerable and side with those in power. It’s about how technology is used not just to monitor — but to torment. And it’s about what happens when access to justice is blocked in plain sight. Gangstalking or covert harassment is not a conspiracy theory. It is a real, complex, and deeply traumatising form of harassment — and the longer we pretend it’s not happening, the more people will suffer in silence, which may lead to self harm or even suicide.
I refuse to suffer in silence any longer.
How Do They Know Everything I Do?
This is the question I keep asking: How do they always know what I’m writing, reading, or thinking — in real time? The only explanation is that they are illegally monitoring my devices, my communications, and possibly my physical location through hidden surveillance cameras or spyware. This surveillance is not passive. It is designed to detect sensitive moments and weaponise them instantly — through gestures, alerts, messages, or staged events.
This is why I can no longer remain silent. I believe that my silence — my attempts to remain composed, dignified, and private — is part of what emboldened them. By never publicly naming what they were doing, I gave them room to continue. That stops now.
Denial of Legal Representation Is Part of the Abuse
All of this leads back to the legal system. Why am I being denied access to a solicitor or barrister when I need them most? Why am I being forced to navigate complex, urgent court procedures alone — while the other side uses lawyers, influence, and insider knowledge to protect themselves?
The denial of legal representation is not just an administrative failure. It is part of the broader pattern of discrimination, obstruction, and psychological warfare being waged against me.
I Am Fighting Back
This blog post is not just a personal outcry. It is a public declaration of intent. I will continue to document every incident — every insult, every signal, every escalation — and expose the tactics used to isolate, silence, and destroy victims of harassment.
I will not stop seeking justice. I will not be silenced by fear or shame.
And I will continue to demand legal representation — not just for myself, but for every person who is silenced, surveilled, and excluded from justice because they do not have power or protection.
If you’re reading this and you believe in justice, transparency, or the right to live free from surveillance and intimidation, I ask you to stand with me. Speak out. Share. And demand that victims like me are given the legal tools to fight back.
For years, I have endured unrelenting harassment, stalking, and invasive surveillance — often in the very spaces where I should feel safe: my home, my room, in shared accommodations and even in public bathrooms. Despite filing a formal legal claim and applying for an urgent injunction in court, the abuse has not stopped. In fact, it has intensified.
Most alarming is that the evidence and documents I submitted to the court have mysteriously disappeared — twice. Following each submission, the content appears to be used to mock and intimidate me through coordinated public harassment and symbolic gestures.
I now face daily, escalating acts of psychological abuse, mental abuse, financial abuse, including sexual harassment, racial harassment, discriminatory targeting, and threatening messages or hidden death threats through signs, clothing, behaviour from strangers, emails, and more.
Worse still, my access to legal representation appears to have been systematically blocked. Every attempt to secure a solicitor has been sabotaged. Because I have contacted about 200-300 law firms so far, including top human rights solicitors, and no one wants to help me. Something just does not seem right, and it’s undemocratic.
They would also intimidate me to death every time I try to seek help from a lawyer. Especially when I go see them in person. I have not visited any solicitors since in fear for my safety, especially of being shot. This is not right!
Consequently, I have no one to protect my rights, my privacy, or my safety, including protecting me from discrimination and injustice. I am alone in this fight — legally, emotionally, and physically — while being severely harassed both racially and sexually, intimidated and illegally monitored around the clock – both online and offline – amounting to a premeditated hate crime and a violence against women.
Having legal representation is crucial because it ensures a fair legal process, protects yout rights, and helps navigate complex legal situations.
Lawyers can interpret the law, provide expert guidance, and represent you effectively in court, potentially leading to better outcomes and reducing stress.
A more detailed look at the importance:
1. Fair Trial and Protection of Rights:
Everyone is entitled to legal representation in court, which ensures a fair trial.
Legal representation acts as a safeguard against potential abuses of power and ensures your rights are upheld.
Lawyers can navigate the complexities of legal proceedings, ensuring you understand your rights and obligations.
2. Expert Guidance and Navigation of Legal Processes:
Lawyers can help you understand the intricacies of the law and how it applies to your specific situation.
They can provide expert advice on navigating complex legal processes and make sure you don’t make decisions that could harm your case.
They can also help you identify potential issues and strategies to protect your interests.
3. Negotiation and Conflict Resolution:
Lawyers can negotiate on your behalf and help you reach a resolution without resorting to lengthy court battles.
They can also help mediate disputes and find solutions that are mutually agreeable
Thus, being refused legal aid/representation would infringe:
My rights under the European Convention on Human Rights
My retained EU rights to legal representation
Therefore, I cannot stay silent any longer when my human rights are at risk. Especially Article 3 (Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), the torture I have to go through each day is very severe in my case – hence, I urgently need a solicitor to help me stop this, Article 6 (Right to a fair trial), Article 8 (Respect for your private and family life), this one is also crucial when my privacy is being severely violated in every way possible, Article 10 (Freedom of expression) and Article 14 (Protection from discrimination) under the Human Rights Act 1998.
My life is also at risk due to the relentless campaigns of racial & sexual harassment and intimidation against me, which escalate day by day, causing me severe emotional distress, stress, anxiety and exhaustion. It’s like public lynching.
I also have to do everything myself from gathering evidence, drafting legal documents, filing court papers and so on. It’s overwhelming when I don’t have a solicitor to help me with all of this and to give me legal advice, or represent me, causing me additional stress and frustration. This has consumed all of my time and energy, unable to do anything else.
This is no longer just about justice for me — it is about exposing deliberate obstruction of justice and survival. Because I am too distressed by now to even function. Completely isolated. No help and support left. I cannot go anywhere either without being surveilled, intimidated, racially and sexually harassed. It’s too much!
In light of these events, I have no choice but to go public. This blog and the accompanying press release mark the beginning of a campaign for transparency and accountability. I will also contact many organisations, like organisations specialising in women’s rights advocacy and sexual abuse awareness, to ask for help and support. If I managed to get them to help me. Because all my online activities and communications also appear to be illegally monitored to prevent me from seeking help. Because whomever I have emailed or called asking for help seems to have been contacted afterwards and subsequently influenced not to help me. Even my physical posts appear to have been opened or hijacked, as if all my avenues of getting help are being deliberately blocked. It’s a form of coercive control, similar to a coercive control in a relationship, to prevent me from escaping the abuse.
I invoke my legal right to speak out, including:
Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): the right to life — which imposes a duty on the state to protect those at real and immediate risk.
Article 10 ECHR: the right to freedom of expression — especially in matters of public interest and imminent harm.
Qualified privilege (common law): which protects statements made in good faith to raise awareness of danger, obstruction, or ongoing violations.
Even victims with legal teams often run campaigns for justice. In my case, where I am allegedly being denied access to legal protection and court evidence has gone missing, I must ensure transparency myself. Because if I stay silent, I might not survive. My time is therefore running out.
I believe the public has a right to know. I think this case is a matter of public interest, involving institutional failures, denial of rights, and ongoing violence against women.
If you are a journalist, legal professional, human rights advocate, or simply someone who believes in justice — I invite you to read my story, share it, and help make sure it is not buried.
This is not just my fight — it is a fight for fairness, dignity, severe discrimination, racism, and human rights in the face of unchecked abuse.
“If you are approached to participate in questionable surveillance, intimidation, or harassment—say no. The long-term consequences outweigh any short-term gains. History has shown that these unethical practices are eventually exposed, and those responsible rarely escape accountability. Stand on the right side of history.”
Share my campaign by clicking on the link below and share this blog post to as many people as possible to raise public awareness of unethical covert surveillance and organised harassment.
P.S. I don’t think any woman on earth has been through what I have been through and still have to go through each day! This happens under the nose of everyone in a democratic society. It’s shocking. I still think I’m dreaming. This can’t be right.
