Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms and Others Sued in UK For Privacy Violations, Retaliation, Harassment

I have filed a claim in the High Court of England and Wales (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division – Claim No. KB-2025-004650) against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook/Instagram), Elon Musk, X.com (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and other parties.


According to the claim, I allege decade-long, continuous unlawful surveillance, even after the initiation of court proceedings, severe breach of privacy, misuse of private information on a massive scale, hacking/cyberstalking, organised harassment, conspiracy to injure and to pervert the course of justice, retaliation, blacklisting, obstruction of justice, gross human rights abuses, and related causes of action.


The claim further alleges that my original literary and creative works were unlawfully accessed through hacking and disseminated to third parties without my consent, resulting in loss of income, loss of future professional opportunities, and significant psychological harm such as PTSD, severe emotional distress.


Some Defendants deny liability. Through their legal representatives, certain Defendants, including the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, have stated that the allegations are denied and that they intend to defend the claim.


On 19 December 2025, the court stayed the proceedings to permit the filing of amended Particulars of Claim, which I am currently preparing in accordance with the court’s directions.

Social Media

New Press Release: High Court Claim Filed Over Serious Digital Privacy Violations

I wish to inform members of the public, journalists, human rights lawyers, human rights organisations, human rights watch and interested parties that I have issued a new press release concerning my ongoing High Court proceedings relating to serious and sustained privacy violations.

The press release outlines the nature of the claim that has now been formally filed, the legal framework relied upon, and the broader public-interest issues raised by the case. These include unlawful surveillance (both digital and physical), misuse of private information, hacking, cyberstalking, and the systemic risks posed by such conduct when left unaddressed.

I have published a new press release outlining the filing of my High Court claim concerning serious and ongoing digital privacy violations.

This case raises urgent questions about digital surveillance, misuse of private information, data protection failures, and the accountability of powerful actors in an increasingly intrusive online ecosystem. It concerns the alleged unlawful access to personal devices, illegal and intrusive surveillance, monitoring of private communications, and the exploitation and dissemination of private data without consent.

The purpose of releasing this information publicly is threefold:

– Transparency – to ensure the public record accurately reflects the nature of the claim and the relief sought.

– Protection – to deter further interference, retaliation, intimidation, or further misuse of private information while proceedings are ongoing.

– Public interest – to contribute to wider discussions around digital privacy, surveillance abuse, platform responsibility, and access to justice.

I encourage journalists, legal professionals, digital rights advocates, and members of the public to read the press release in full and draw their own conclusions based on the source material.

📄 View or Download the Press Release

HTML versions

Full URL: https://www.prlog.org/13119343-high-court-claim-filed-over-serious-digital-privacy-violations.html

Short URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343.html

PDF versions
Full URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343-high-court-claim-filed-over-serious-digital-privacy-violations.pdf

Short URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343.pdf

The press release sets out the legal basis of the claim, the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, and the remedies being sought through the courts. It does not speculate on outcomes and does not replace the formal judicial process.
I will continue to provide updates responsibly and in accordance with legal advice as the case progresses.

Thank you to everyone who has shown support, professionalism, and respect for due process.

Article 6 violation