Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
After discovering the shocking truth that I have been sexually exploited in secret for years via hidden cameras and distributed as if I am their property, I want to warn all single women out there to quickly find a partner or live with someone. Especially if you’re a woman of colour like me.
Because I believe one of the motives that they are targeting me is because I live alone. No partner. No friends. No family. This makes me the perfect victim to exploit, abuse and discriminate against. Then, they apparently block my access to lawyers as well, so that I cannot stop the abuse and exploitation that easily. It’s a wake-up call, indeed.
If I didn’t experience this myself, I wouldn’t believe that these kinds of illegal practices even exit where hidden cameras are being unlawfully and secretly installed in your accommodation to secretly film you and everything you do without your knowledge or consent. Then, the illegal footage would then be distributed and/or live streamed to various places, including dark web, to make money on you like some kind of cybersex trafficking.
I still can’t believe that this is actually happening to me and even worst when it still continues despite pending legal actions.
Therefore, if you’re a single woman and live alone, particularly if you’re a woman of colour, please take good care of yourself. Predators are almost everywhere nowadays, disguising themselves in suit & tie, respectable professions, wealth, and the like.
Access to justice should be a right, not a privilege reserved for those with influence or resources. Yet, for many victims of harassment, privacy violations, systemic abuse, discrimination and more that right is quietly eroded. I am now living through that erosion firsthand. It’s a clear due process violation.
Because of the seriousness of my case — involving multiple powerful defendants across various sectors — obtaining legal representation has become nearly impossible. Law firms that initially showed interest later withdrew without clear explanation, some after unusual delays or abrupt changes of tone. Others never replied at all. The pattern suggests not coincidence but pressure: subtle or overt signals that representing me would be “too risky” or “too political.” The result is that I have been forced to prepare every aspect of this complex litigation myself.
Each day and night, I work alone — drafting court documents, researching law, gathering evidence, organising exhibits, and defending myself against ongoing harassment. There is no team, no paralegal, no protection. I work in isolation, while those responsible for my suffering have access to institutional power, legal departments, and endless resources. This imbalance is not only emotionally exhausting; it is an affront to the very idea of a fair trial.
The consequences reach beyond the legal process. Since the harassment and surveillance began, almost every job I have applied for has been rejected. Employers either never respond or withdraw at the final stage without reason or with vague reason. This repeated pattern strongly suggests blacklisting or outside influence designed to isolate me economically — to ensure I remain vulnerable and without the financial means to pursue justice.
This is not simply about one individual being denied a lawyer. It is about a structural problem — where those with power can quietly suffocate a person’s access to justice by manipulating the professional networks, institutions, and gatekeepers meant to protect them.
Justice should not depend on who you are fighting against, or how powerful they are. But the reality I face shows otherwise. I continue to fight, document, and prepare my case — not because I have the resources to do so, but because I have no other choice.
It is a well-documented social pattern that women who report or talk about abuse are often subjected to renewed attacks, both personally and publicly. This phenomenon reflects a systemic failure to protect women from retaliatory harm. The harassment I am enduring — both online and offline — exemplifies this pattern and demonstrates how victim-blaming and misogynistic narratives continue to undermine justice.
The public campaign of humiliation against Amber Heard following the Depp–Heard trial is a clear precedent. That case, widely reported, revealed how digital platforms became tools for orchestrated harassment, disinformation, and the amplification of misogyny. According to multiple reports, including the Amber Heard Open Letter and subsequent investigations, there was extensive evidence of online abuse not only directed at Ms. Heard but also at those who publicly supported her. One supporter described enduring “weeks and weeks” of coordinated online attacks simply for expressing empathy.
This environment of intimidation, misinformation, and mob ridicule is not confined to celebrities. I am now subjected to a similar campaign of targeted harassment and mockery — one that operates with disturbing coordination and precision. The abuse extends across multiple platforms and even into public spaces. I am persistently subjected to hidden insults, coded references, and veiled allusions to my private life through social media content, advertisements, and videos. The timing and frequency of these acts indicate that they are not coincidental but deliberate efforts to degrade, silence, and intimidate me.
The retaliation has also extended to my daughter, who has been drawn into this campaign as part of a wider pattern of coercion, exploitation, psychological abuse and mental abuse. This conduct represents a grave violation of our rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights — protection from degrading treatment and respect for private and family life. It also constitutes ongoing harassment and victimisation within the meaning of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 as well as The Malicious Communications Act 1988 (MCA), which is illegal in England and Wales to “send or deliver letters or other articles for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety.” It also applies to electronic communications. This is exactly what happens in my case.
The behaviour I face today mirrors the public hostility women experience when they challenge abuse. It is an extension of the same misogynistic system that weaponises social media, institutional bias, and societal prejudice to silence female victims and protect abusers.
This continued harassment, intimidation, and psychological manipulation are not isolated acts but a coordinated campaign that undermines my access to justice.
References
Amber Heard Open Letter (2022): “Support for Amber Heard” — signed by women’s rights organisations and legal experts, denouncing disinformation and online misogyny. Available at: https://amberopenletter.com
It has often left me speechless how, even after I’ve written openly about the years of harassment and exploitation that my daughter and I have endured, there are still people who choose to join in the abuse, harassment, bullying, stalking, etc. I have described in painful detail what it feels like to be watched, mocked, sexually humiliated, and manipulated — and yet, instead of empathy, some respond with more cruelty by continuing to harass me more. But remember, hate has no place in this world.
When people read about someone’s suffering, there are usually two paths they can take: compassion or complicity. Compassion means recognising the humanity of another person and standing against injustice. Complicity means either silently approving or actively taking part in harm. What I see happening around me suggests that many have chosen the latter.
It’s difficult to understand what drives this. Perhaps some have been deliberately misled — fed misinformation by those who wish to cover up their wrongdoing. Perhaps they’ve been told lies about who I am, what I’ve done, or why this is happening, so they feel justified in their cruelty. Or perhaps, for others, the power to join in the humiliation of another person is itself an intoxicating form of control or pure entertainment seeing another human being suffering.
But regardless of motive, the result is the same: the perpetuation of abuse. Every act of mockery, every knowing smirk, every participation in the coordinated harassment keeps the cycle of violence alive. It is not merely “following instructions” or “going along with it.” It is a moral choice — and each person who participates in becomes part of the harm.
What makes this especially alarming is that many of these individuals cannot claim ignorance. They have read my words. They know the toll this has taken on me and my daughter — emotionally, psychologically, and even physically. They know about the sleepless nights, the fear, the humiliation, the destruction of privacy, and the blocking of my access to lawyers. And yet, even with that knowledge, they continue.
When someone can look at suffering, fully informed, and still decide to contribute to it, that reveals something dark about human nature. It exposes how easily prejudice, misinformation, or simple indifference can override empathy. It shows how a society can be conditioned to dehumanise a person — to treat someone’s pain as entertainment or as a tool for manipulation. If this is the case, what’s wrong with the world today?
There’s also another layer to this: bias. Some people are quick to dismiss my experiences because of who I am — a woman of colour, an outsider, a person without institutional power. They assume that if powerful organisations or individuals are involved, then the victim must be exaggerating. This reflexive bias allows abusers to continue unchallenged, hiding behind their reputations and resources.
To those who have read my blog and still choose to side with cruelty, ask yourself this: If something like this happens to you or your loved ones, what would you do? Do you have a daughter, and what would you feel if they’re doing this to your daughter as well?
If you have involved yourself in this harassment in any way — through mockery, gossip, or passive observation — you still have a choice. You can refuse to participate further. You can choose empathy over exploitation and abuse.
I am shocked that no one says, “I don’t want to be a part of this. This is just so wrong.”
And to those who still have the courage to see beyond the lies and manipulation — who recognise the human cost of what is being done — your understanding matters more than you know.
I continue to write because silence would mean acceptance. And I will not accept being silenced, erased, or dehumanised by those who profit from cruelty or those who enable it.
Because hate has no place in this world.
Therefore, I am taking important steps to hold those responsible accountable. The harassment, exploitation, deception and unlawful use of private information will not go unchallenged. I will be pursuing formal legal action against the perpetrators and all entities involved, to ensure that justice is served and that the full scope of wrongdoing is exposed.
In September 2003, Baha Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel receptionist, was detained by British Forces in Basra, Iraq. Within just 36 hours, he was dead.
The public inquiry revealed that Mousa and nine others were subjected to brutal “conditioning techniques” — hooding, sleep deprivation, stress positions, and relentless coercion.
“Detainees deemed uncooperative were beaten, shouted at, and sexually humiliated. The Inquiry found “that most, if not all, of the Detainees were the victims of serious abuse and mistreatment by soldiers during their detention.
After withstanding 36 hours of this treatment, Baha Mousa was found having removed his hood and hand restraints. Perceiving this as an escape attempt, 1QLR’s Corporal Donald Payne brought Mousa to the floor and knelt on his back whilst attempting to re-apply the restraints. According to witness testimony, frustrated that Mousa was not submitting easily, Payne ‘lost control of himself’, punching and kicking the detainee and slamming his head against a concrete wall.”
Two decades on, similar patterns of psychological abuse can still be observed — though they now take covert and technological forms rather than physical ones.
In my own case, I have been subjected to what I can only describe as modern conditioning techniques:
Sleep deprivation, through deliberate noise harassment designed to disrupt rest and recovery.
Psychological intimidation, such as the constant slamming of doors or sudden noises by the housemates each time I move or use the bathroom — signalling that I am under constant surveillance.
Just as the soldiers in Basra used physical violence and sexual degradation to assert dominance over detainees, my abusers use technology, surveillance, and coordinated harassment to assert psychological control and public degradation. Both methods share the same goal — to dehumanise, break down resistance, and condition compliance through fear, humiliation and coercion.
“Escape” Analogy
When I tried to escape the abuse by relocating to Denmark, the abuse, exploitation, intimidation and harassment appeared to follow me. This continuity mirrors a symbolic parallel with the Baha Mousa case: when Baha attempted to remove his hood and restraints — an act perceived as escape — his guards retaliated with fatal violence.
In my case, attempts to regain autonomy and safety have seemingly triggered institutional retaliation, with similar patterns of intimidation reappearing across borders. While the methods differ, the underlying message remains chillingly familiar: “You cannot escape.”
This powerfully illustrates their relentless pursuit and control, and the psychological impact of being unable to escape the abuse.
But it doesn’t stop there. My life is being monetised without consent. Films, commercials, and other media use my private experiences as entertainment, generating profit while causing ongoing harm. It’s like being trapped in a real-life Big Brother, where every moment is exploited.
The exploitation, echoing cases like Fiona Harvey’s, where private lives are turned into entertainment. Films, commercials, and content derived from my life have been distributed internationally, generating profit while inflicting ongoing psychological harm.
It’s systematic, calculated, and retaliatory. Every move I make is tracked. Every personal detail is weaponised and exploitated.
My fight isn’t just for myself — it’s to expose the abuse, hold the perpetrators accountable, and reclaim human dignity in an age where privacy and personal freedom can be stolen with a click.
Intentional Violation of Article 3 ECHR Through Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
What happened to Baha Mousa was officially condemned as inhuman and degrading treatment, a breach of both the Geneva Conventions and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Yet, the psychological equivalents of those banned techniques — sleep deprivation, humiliation, coercion, and sexual degradation — still appear to be used today under new disguises: digital surveillance, social control, and technological intrusion.
These acts are not mere harassment; they constitute a continuation of systemic abuse and conditioning, weaponising humiliation as a tool of domination.
My experience underscores a grim truth: that the instruments of torture have evolved, but the mindset behind them — the belief that one can strip another person of dignity, autonomy, and privacy — remains unchanged.
A Call for Accountability
Baha Mousa’s case prompted public outrage and an inquiry into institutional responsibility. My experience raises similar questions in a modern context:
How far can surveillance and psychological manipulation go before it becomes state-sanctioned abuse?
What accountability exists when conditioning is conducted through covert technologies and coordinated behaviour rather than physical violence?
The lessons from Baha’s death should not be forgotten. Whether in a military detention centre or a civilian apartment, inhuman and degrading treatment is never acceptable. The methods may differ, but the moral violation is the same.
Author’s Note:
This article forms part of my ongoing documentation of human rights violations and systemic abuse, as referenced in my forthcoming legal proceedings. The experiences described are intended to provide context for broader patterns of coercion, exploitation, and illegal surveillance, and to inform public understanding of modern forms of inhuman and degrading treatment.
On Tuesday, 21 October 2025, at around 4:06 p.m., they used subtle, calculated sexual harassment technique again, which I continue to experience. Moments after I stepped into the hallway to check my post, an elderly man appeared, walking past me in a narrow space, carrying a navy-blue backpack — one of the main colours repeatedly used in the harassment campaign against me.
It’s the same tactic being routinely used by sending an elderly man out to walk part me in a narrow space, sit near me at a bus stop, sit right next to me on a bus or train, stand right in front of me on a bus and similar to make me feel uncomfortable. Especially as a punishment every time I try to stop the ongoing abuse and exploitation.
The timing (Starting in the number 4 and ending in the number 6) and the immediate response after I moved both point to deliberate monitoring of my actions. These moments are designed to make me feel unsafe in my own environment — reminders that I am being constantly watched.
I did not take pictures of him as proof this time due to the shock and distress that I have to endure each day. I cannot take pictures of every incident each time it happens — it is simply overwhelming. I only document significant events to avoid exhausting myself.
The escalation in retaliation and harassment also occurred shortly after I had shared my blog post on social media about how hacking has hindered my ability to pursue my dream careers as a writer and filmmaker. The retaliation was swift, clearly intended as a punishment for speaking out.
What makes this kind of harassment so distressing is its precision. Every tiny lapse in vigilance is exploited. Every pattern I try to avoid is used again. It’s psychological warfare conducted through ordinary acts — walking, checking mail, or just existing.
Even so, I refuse to be silenced. Exposing these patterns is part of reclaiming my power — because once you name what’s happening, it loses some of its hold over you.
This is just one of many incidents in which elderly men are deliberately sent to harass me — a tactic seemingly designed to sexually humiliate and degrade me as part of a relentless campaign of punishment, dehumanisation and retaliation.
Even the timing of the incident carried symbolic meaning. The numbers 4 and 6 are often used in this harassment campaign as sexual innuendoes: 6 referring to “sex,” and 4 carrying a similar connotation in Thai slang meaning “make love.” I am from Thailand, so these references are deliberately chosen to make the abuse more personal and demeaning. The number 4 may also symbolically reference Article 4 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, which prohibits all forms of slavery — including sexual exploitation (sex trafficking / cybersex trafficking). Thus, it’s one of their covert communications to signal to me that they are also violating my Human RightsArticle 4 via non-consensual filming and distribution (cybersex trafficking).
While the isolated use of numbers ‘4’ and ‘6’ might appear innocuous to an uninformed observer, I have been subjected to a prolonged campaign by them wherein everyday language and personal expressions from my private communications are systematically twisted into sinister, immoral, or sexualised contexts. This repeated conditioning has created a heightened sensitivity and awareness in me to such manipulations, rendering the current uses of numbers ‘4’ and ‘6’ a clear and intentional act of mental abuse and an intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Consequently, through such calculated use of language, numbers, and timing, they have turned ordinary moments into tools of psychological manipulation, designed to degrade me and retaliate for my attempts to assert my rights.
A new wave of attention has turned to the Spycops scandal — one of the most talked about chapters in modern British policing. The revelations are disturbing: undercover Metropolitan Police officers infiltrated themselves in activist groups, formed intimate relationships under false identities, fathered children, and then vanished without warning.
A recent ITV documentary, The Spycops Scandal, reviews the immense human cost of this systematic deception. One woman, Helen, believed she had found a true partner in a fellow Greenpeace activist, John Barker. They shared a home, a vision, and even talked about starting a family. Years later, she discovered that “John” never existed. He was an undercover officer sent to insinuate himself into her world — and her life.
As Helen told reporters, “This isn’t an accident or an isolated case of a rogue officer. This is institutional sexism being handed from officer to officer – how to deceive women into relationships and use them for cover, for sex, or whatever purpose they were using us for.”
The Spycops inquiry has exposed how severely such deceptions can injure those targeted — not only breaching privacy and autonomy, but also inflicting lasting psychological harm / psychiatric injury. Many victims were left devastated and lost their ability to trust again.
Reading these accounts, I couldn’t help but see a version of my own experience. I, too, believe that I have been subjected to intrusive and unlawful surveillance — cameras covertly installed in my accommodation, and still continuing to the present day, and constant digital and physical monitoring that mirrors the tactics once used by undercover police. But unlike the Spycops of the past, this network appears far broader, blending state and private actors, and civilians under their influence.
Worse still, I believe similar tactics are now being used against my daughter. In particular, I have strong reason to believe that someone has been deliberately placed in her life — a man from Spain — to feign a romantic relationship. This, I fear, is not genuine affection but a calculated attempt to control her, gather information, prevent her from contacting me freely, and hinder her from ever knowing the truth that she may also be exploited.
The purpose appears twofold: to manipulate her emotionally and psychologically, and to isolate both of us from one another — a deliberate act of retaliation and victimisation. The parallels to the Spycops scandal are chilling. In both cases, deception is used as a weapon: intimacy becomes infiltration, and love becomes a tool for exploitation.
I very worry about the long-term consequences. The women deceived by Spycops officers described profound trauma and psychiatric injury when their partners disappeared after years of deceit. If the same manipulation is happening to my daughter — if she is made to fall deeply for someone whose loyalty lies elsewhere — then the aftermath could be devastating for her, too.
These tactics go beyond surveillance; they are psychological warfare. They aim not only to monitor but to break — to dismantle one’s sense of safety, love, and honesty.
The goal seems clear — to destabilise, silence, and destroy from within. Like the Spycops victims, we are forced to question who we can trust and whether love itself can be genuine in the face of deceit.
The Spycops inquiry proves that such abuse of power is real and can have devastating human consequences. Our stories remind the world that surveillance isn’t only about technology — it’s about control, identity, and the right to live without fear of being illegally monitored and filmed 24/7 for malicious purposes.
It began in early 2023, when I submitted several formal complaints regarding individuals within different public and private sectors. At the time, I was unaware that these matters might be interconnected, but over time it has become apparent that they may stem from the same underlying network or entities.
I could not have anticipated that this would mark the start of a sequence of events that would completely upend my life — both personally and creatively.
Around August 2023, my daughter and her long-term partner of 12 years suddenly broke up. The timing felt abrupt, and almost immediately after, around September, I think, she began dating a much younger man from Spain (10 years younger) — a streamer she met online through mutual gaming friends. Despite their relationship now lasting around two years, he has never once visited her home. It’s always her who travels to Spain or meets him elsewhere on holiday. This detail has never sat easily with me; it raises questions about her safety and whether her home environment is secure.
Not long after this new relationship began, I started seeing something deeply unsettling. Films, commercials, and online content began appearing that seemed to reference her — including details about her personal life, even medical information, in ways that mirrored my own experiences of being mimicked and exposed. The parallels were too precise to dismiss as coincidence.
By October 2023, I began to suspect that my private and sensitive information — and perhaps even my daughter’s — had been leaked or shared illegally.
Around summer of 2024, I began writing on my previous blog, buppha.com, about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, stalking and tech abuse. I wrote from a place of curiosity and outrage, unaware that I was, in fact, describing my own lived reality. Soon after I started publishing those posts, the harassment escalated beyond anything I had experienced before.
Then came the realisation that changed everything: by late 2024, I began piecing together evidence that my private life — my most intimate, personal moments — had likely been secretly filmed and distributed for years, perhaps for more than a decade.
By early 2025, I decided to act. I began the formal legal process, sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters to those I believed responsible or complicit. Instead of stopping the abuse, this triggered an escalation — retaliation in new and alarming forms.
And then, the final straw came in the spring and summer of 2025, when I tried to apply for an urgent injunction multiple times through the King’s Bench Division. Each time, my evidence — carefully compiled, documented, and submitted — inexplicably disappeared?!
Now, looking back, this timeline is more than just a sequence of events. It tells the story of a pattern — of power, silence, and retaliation. It’s the record of how justice can be obstructed and delayed when those with influence abuse the very systems meant to protect.
But it’s also a record of endurance — of my determination to keep documenting, exposing, and standing up for myself.
What I have described in this blog is not simply harassment — it is a sustained violation of human rights: years of illegal surveillance, voyeurism, hacking, phone tracking, commercial exploitation, and the misuse of private information on a scale few could imagine. These are not isolated acts of cruelty; they form part of an organised effort to silence, control, and destroy lives.
For those reading this — I ask only this: do not turn away. Because silence and indifference allow these abuses to continue unchecked. When people witness wrongdoing and stay silent, it emboldens those who commit it.
I cannot safely reach out for help myself. My access to lawyers and other forms of support appears to have been blocked, and my digital activities — even in public libraries — are closely monitored. Those who should protect me seem to look the other way.
That is why I ask you: if you see something, say something. If you can, act. Contact human rights organisations, lawyers, journalists, or advocates who may have the power to investigate and bring accountability. Help ensure that what is happening is not buried in silence.
Because when people are silenced through fear and isolation, it takes the courage of others to break that silence. And one day, your voice might be the one that saves a life.
1. Early 2023 I submitted some formal complaints concerning the conduct of certain individuals working across different public bodies.
2. August 2023 My daughter and her long-term partner of twelve years unexpectedly separated.
3. September 2023 She began a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online. Who is 10 years younger than her and who works as a streamer. Despite their relationship lasting around two years, he has never visited her home. It’s always her who goes visit him in Spain or they meet elsewhere to go on holidays together, which raises concerns that her home environment might not be safe or private.
4. Autumn 2023 Shortly after this new relationship began, I started noticing films, commercials, and online content that appeared to reference or echo my daughter’s personal life — including details that seemed drawn from sensitive or private information. This mirrored the way my own private materials and experiences have been repeatedly misused and echoed in media content.
5. October 2023 I began to suspect that my own personal and sensitive information may have been illegally shared with third parties without my knowledge or consent.
6. Summer 2024 On my previous blog, http://www.buppha.com, I began writing about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, and tech abuse — unaware that I was myself a victim of the very illegal acts I was describing. Soon after, the harassment and excessive surveillance campaign against me started!
7. Late 2024 I began to realise that my private activities at home may have been secretly filmed and distributed for years — likely for over a decade — without my consent.
8. Early 2025 After I attempted to stop the abuse lawfully by sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters, the illegal surveillance and harassment campaign against me intensified dramatically.
9. Spring & Summer 2025 My access to legal representation also appears to have been blocked. Consequently, I had no choice but to try to apply for an urgent injunction myself. I then made several attempts to apply for an urgent injunction through the King’s Bench Division, but each time my evidence and documents mysteriously disappeared after submission?!
