Tag Archives: Misuse of power

Investigative Journalists Attention

Posted on by
Reply

PRESS NOTICE: High-Profile High Court Action Issued Against Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer, the Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, Elon Musk, X Corp, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc., TikTok. Coca-Cola, Google, US Film Studios such as Warner Bros and Universal Pictures + Others – Claim No: KB-2025-004650 

For the attention of: The Legal Editor / Home News Desk

NOTICE OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS PURSUANT TO CPR 5.4C 

Please find notice of a high-value civil action newly listed as “Approved” in the High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division) under Claim Number: KB-2025-004650

Case Details:

Jurisdiction: High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division), London.

Claimant: Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt (Litigant in Person)

Defendants: (1) Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer (2) The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis (3) Elon Musk (4) X Corp (5) Mark Zuckerberg (6) Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) TikTok (8) Coca-Cola (9) Google (10) Warner Bros (11) Universal Pictures + Others 

Summary of Action:

The claim involves a high-value dispute pleaded on a joint and several liability basis, concerning systematic illegal surveillance, unlawful installation of hidden cameras and audio recording devices to non-consensually record and surveil the Claimant 24/7, dissemination / live-streaming of the illegal recordings for profit and harassment, cyberstalking, hacking, severe data breach, mass misuse of private information, commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, flagrant copyright infringement under Section 97(2) of the CDPA, gross human rights abuses, obstruction of justice, misfeasance in public office, large-scale corruption, cybersex trafficking ring, money laundering, and many more related illegal acts, committed against the Claimant, Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt, for more than a decade and still continuing despite pending injunction and court proceedings.

The shocking part is that the Primary UK State-Actor Defendants, such as Keir Starmer and the Police, may have also subjected the Claimant’s 35-year-old daughter to the exact same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras and via a honey trap. Particularly when every attempt to warn her daughter by the Claimant is met with evidence tampering, intimidation, manipulation, gaslighting, and an increase in severe harassment. This is therefore NOT the behavior of innocent parties!

The Particulars of Claim detail that proprietary data and sensitive private materials were unlawfully obtained, mostly via hidden cameras, as mentioned above, and subsequently exploited globally via international corporations, film distribution networks, streaming platforms, tech platforms, and more.

The First Defendant, Keir Starmer, abruptly resigned his public position on 22 June 2026, exactly 18 hours after being formally added to these High Court proceedings. An urgent application for an Interim Injunction carrying a Penal Notice is currently before the court. See below:

At around 14:50 pm on 21 June 2026, I formally submitted my injunction application and added Keir Starmer as a Respondent / Defendant as well. 18 Hours after, at 9 am on 22 June 2026, he abruptly resigned.

CRITICAL VERIFICATION UPDATE: The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, one of the defendants, have formally appointed global firm DWF Law LLP via Form N434 to manage the defense under High Court Claim KB-2025-004650. This confirms the proceedings are live, active, and escalating. Media verification can be completed immediately against DWF’s record on the CE-File registry.

I also face severe harassment and intimidation daily. It escalates day by day as I work on this case, even during pending injunction and court proceedings. That’s why I need the public to contact human rights organisations and journalists for me, since all my devices and communications are being unlawfully monitored by the UK State-actor Defendants 24/7.

You can read more about the escalating harassment and intimidation here  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s9uE79kueAtbYQdZhQwHpM0IeUd1LWd0/view?format=pdf

Media Access Instructions:

Pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 5.4C(1), members of the accredited press possess an automatic right to obtain copies of the Sealed Claim Form and Particulars of Claim directly from the High Court Central Office / King’s Bench Division Masters’ Secretary.

The Claimant welcomes transparent public scrutiny of these proceedings. Please quote Claim Number: KB-2025-004650 to the court clerk to secure the pleadings. 

Please send an email with the information above to newsdesk@courtnewsuk.co.uk and newsdesk@lawgazette.co.uk on my behalf since I can’t do it myself when all my devices and communications are being illegally monitored 24/7.

More places to send my press kit to:

  • National Legal Affairs Editors: Find the direct emails of journalists like Haroon Siddique (The Guardian Legal Affairs), or the investigative teams at The Times and The Independent.
  • Deliver my evidence directly to investigative press desks (such as the BBC Panorama, The Guardian, or Private Eye).
  • Contact the legal and public-interest desks of major outlets (e.g., The Guardian, The Times, BBC Panorama, or The Bureau of Investigative Journalism).
  • Investigatory Media: Investigative desks at major national newspapers (such as The Guardian, The Times, or The Financial Times) and independent investigative outlets like The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF) London Bureau: RSF specializes in breaking through state censorship and calling out governments globally. If you are in London, you can contact their UK desk directly at rsf-uk@rsf.org, or coordinate physical delivery to their office at 6th Floor, 2 London Wall Place, London, EC2Y 5AU.
  • The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) Campaigns Team: Reach out directly to the NUJ press and campaigns department at campaigns@nuj.org.uk or submit my case anonymously to the NUJ Journalists’ Safety Tracker. The NUJ has a direct mandate to raise national political and media alarms when a reporter’s safety and professional tools are weaponized against them.
  • Contact Private Eye (editorial@private-eye.co.uk), The Canary, or Novara Media. Give them my petition link and say this for me: “I am being monitored by UK officials for suing them, here is the proof https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk 

If one independent journalist tweets my petition, it can reach millions overnight.

  • Contact Digital Rights Groups: Reach out to UK organizations dedicated to internet privacy and anti-surveillance, such as Big Brother Watch or the Open Rights Group. Because your story involves digital monitoring and privacy violations, these groups have massive, ready-made email lists of thousands of activists who will sign and share your link instantly.
  • Big Brother Watch – Focuses on surveillance abuses – bigbrotherwatch.org.uk 
  • Privacy International – Addresses unlawful surveillance issues globally – privacyinternational.org 
  • Equality and Human Rights Commission – May investigate systemic abuses within public bodies – equalityhumanrights.com 

Please also visit this page to download all my evidence to pass it onto major news outlets, journalists, human rights organisations, human rights lawyers and more for me https://buppha.com/high-court-of-justice-kings-bench-division-london-uk/

Read more about it on my petition page, sign and share it to as many people as possible here https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk

Or just scan the QR Code below:

Sign the petition to help me fight the injustice

Obstruction of Basic Needs and Live Monitoring to Humiliate and Retaliate

Posted on by
Reply

Incident 1: At a hostel where I stayed at from 23-30 April 2025

  1. On 28 April 2025, at approximately 10:00 pm, I attempted to use the bathroom facilities at my hostel. However, I discovered that all bathrooms — the one on the ground floor, the first floor, and the second floor — were unusually simultaneously occupied.
  1. When I knocked on the door of the first-floor bathroom, a male voice responded, indicating occupancy. Upon ascending to the second floor, and just as I approached the second-floor bathroom door, I immediately heard loud, deliberate flatulence from inside the bathroom. Based on the sound, I reasonably believed it was made by a male occupant.
  1. Given the precise timing — occurring just as I reached the door — and considering previous incidents where bodily functions have been used deliberately to harass and humiliate me, I believe this act was intentional, orchestrated as part of the ongoing harassment campaign against me.
  1. This fits a broader pattern of behaviour where my real-time movements appear to be closely tracked and individuals are instructed to engage in degrading or disrespectful behaviour to cause distress.

Similar incidents have occurred previously, including:

  1. Individuals deliberately called my phone while I was using the bathroom.
  1. Individuals pretending to defecate loudly in adjacent bathrooms while I was showering at other hostels.
  1. Bathrooms being consistently and unusually occupied to inconvenience me, particularly since I began preparing my urgent injunction application.

Incident 2: At my current address

  1. The Defendants, and/or those acting on their behalf or under their instruction, continue to engage in a systematic pattern of surveillance, harassment, and intimidation, designed to cause severe distress and obstruct my pursuit of legal remedies.
  1. On Monday, 1 December 2025, at approximately 2:23 pm, immediately after I had been working extensively on my Witness Statement, adding crucial information relevant to these proceedings, I observed a clear instance of this ongoing surveillance and retaliation. Upon opening my door to use the shared bathroom (due to my own toilet being clogged), an elderly male housemate immediately entered the bathroom just before me. This incident, while seemingly minor in isolation, is part of a well-established pattern of behaviour observed across multiple accommodations and locations, including shared hostels, where individuals are seemingly instructed to occupy shared facilities precisely when I attempt to use them, thereby causing inconvenience, distress, and overtly signaling continuous monitoring of my movements. This pattern has consistently occurred following periods where I have made progress on legal documents, such as my injunction application, or documented instances of misconduct. These individuals and housemates have no idea that they could be called to testify under oath to disclose crucial information, such as who instructed them to harass me and to convey surveillance. If they deny being instructed but the evidence suggests otherwise, they risk committing perjury.
  1. Shouting at Light Bulbs: Upon returning to my room, I verbally expressed my distress and frustration, specifically addressing the light fixtures in my room, as I reasonably believe these locations have been used for the illegal installation of hidden cameras, which also record audio. I stated that the perpetrators were ‘racist’ for continuing their abusive conduct despite pending legal actions / court proceedings. 
  1. Ambulance and Police Vehicle Sightings: Immediately following this verbal expression, at approximately 2:33 pm, I observed an ambulance driving past my window. Subsequently, at approximately 3:02 pm, I observed a police vehicle driving past my window. 
  2. Pattern of Sightings: These sightings are not isolated incidents but form part of a consistent pattern. Almost every time I document or expose the defendants’ alleged conspiracy and misconduct in my private legal documents, I subsequently and almost immediately observe emergency service vehicles (including police, ambulance, and sometimes fire trucks) driving past my window. This pattern appears to be a deliberate tactic to convey ongoing physical and digital surveillance and intimidation.
  3. Evidence of Ongoing Surveillance and Monitoring: These incidents provide further evidence of the defendants’ alleged continuous and pervasive surveillance of my private activities, both within my personal living space and online communications. The immediate timing of these events following my legal work strongly suggests that my movements, communications, and legal preparations are being monitored in real-time.
  4. Retaliation and Intimidation: The deliberate occupation of shared facilities and the subsequent appearance of emergency vehicles immediately after I engage in legal activities or express distress are interpreted as acts of retaliation and intimidation. These actions are designed to cause severe distress, disrupt my daily life, and discourage me from pursuing legal remedies. They serve to reinforce the message that my actions are constantly observed and that the defendants possess the means to exert control and inflict psychological harm.
  5. Breach of Privacy and Harassment: These actions constitute further breaches of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and are consistent with the pattern of harassment and cyberstalking previously detailed in my previous blog posts. The use of emergency vehicles in this manner is particularly distressing, as it co-opts symbols of public safety for purposes of intimidation.
  6. Conspiracy and Influence: The coordinated nature of these incidents, particularly the immediate response to my private legal work and verbal expressions, suggests a sophisticated and organised effort involving multiple individuals. The alleged influence over the appearance of emergency vehicles further supports the claim that the defendants are powerful individuals capable of orchestrating such events to convey their pervasive reach and control.
  7. Impact on Well-being: These incidents cause severe emotional and psychological distress, contributing to the ongoing harm, as I said earlier. They create an environment of constant fear and anxiety, undermining my sense of safety and ability to live a normal life.
  8. This tactic, obstruction of basic needs, has been employed repeatedly, particularly following periods when I have made progress in my legal preparations, such as drafting legal documents, adding crucial evidence, or preparing for court proceedings. The timing of such incidents strongly suggests that the Defendants, and/or those acting on their behalf, are monitoring my activities, including my legal work and online communications, and are using these incidents as a form of immediate retaliation and psychological intimidation. The clear message conveyed is that my movements are constantly monitored, and that access to basic facilities, much like access to legal representation, can be obstructed as ‘punishment’ for asserting my rights.
  9. I believe this continued harassment, occurring after I initiated steps to pursue legal action, constitutes retaliation, degrading treatment, and interference with my Article 3 and Article 8 rights under the Human Rights Act 1998.
  10. It also exemplifies predatory stalking tactics involving humiliation, obstruction of daily life, and psychological intimidation designed to deter me from pursuing justice.
Police car
A Police vehicle was observed driving past my window on Monday, 1 December 2025, at approximately 3:02 PM, shortly after I angrily shouted at the light bulbs suspecting to conceal hidden cameras and audio recording devices!

Helicopter Harassment and Intimidation

Posted on by
Reply

I am talking about the horrific incident not long ago, in which a helicopter would appear almost every time I go out to harass and intimidate me as their way to restrict my freedom of movement. They’re hunting me like prey in broad daylight!

This is violence against women and may constitute witness intimidation as well due to the anticipated / pending court proceedings.

It demonstrates how high-stakes this case is.

This will form part of my upcoming documentary.

Hate Has No Place In This World

Posted on by
Reply

It has often left me speechless how, even after I’ve written openly about the years of harassment and exploitation that my daughter and I have endured, there are still people who choose to join in the abuse, harassment, bullying, stalking, etc. I have described in painful detail what it feels like to be watched, mocked, sexually humiliated, and manipulated — and yet, instead of empathy, some respond with more cruelty by continuing to harass me more. But remember, hate has no place in this world. 

When people read about someone’s suffering, there are usually two paths they can take: compassion or complicity. Compassion means recognising the humanity of another person and standing against injustice. Complicity means either silently approving or actively taking part in harm. What I see happening around me suggests that many have chosen the latter.

It’s difficult to understand what drives this. Perhaps some have been deliberately misled — fed misinformation by those who wish to cover up their wrongdoing. Perhaps they’ve been told lies about who I am, what I’ve done, or why this is happening, so they feel justified in their cruelty. Or perhaps, for others, the power to join in the humiliation of another person is itself an intoxicating form of control or pure entertainment seeing another human being suffering. 

But regardless of motive, the result is the same: the perpetuation of abuse. Every act of mockery, every knowing smirk, every participation in the coordinated harassment keeps the cycle of violence alive. It is not merely “following instructions” or “going along with it.” It is a moral choice — and each person who participates in becomes part of the harm.

What makes this especially alarming is that many of these individuals cannot claim ignorance. They have read my words. They know the toll this has taken on me and my daughter — emotionally, psychologically, and even physically. They know about the sleepless nights, the fear, the humiliation, the destruction of privacy, and the blocking of my access to lawyers. And yet, even with that knowledge, they continue.

When someone can look at suffering, fully informed, and still decide to contribute to it, that reveals something dark about human nature. It exposes how easily prejudice, misinformation, or simple indifference can override empathy. It shows how a society can be conditioned to dehumanise a person — to treat someone’s pain as entertainment or as a tool for manipulation. If this is the case, what’s wrong with the world today?

There’s also another layer to this: bias. Some people are quick to dismiss my experiences because of who I am — a woman of colour, an outsider, a person without institutional power. They assume that if powerful organisations or individuals are involved, then the victim must be exaggerating. This reflexive bias allows abusers to continue unchallenged, hiding behind their reputations and resources.

To those who have read my blog and still choose to side with cruelty, ask yourself this: If something like this happens to you or your loved ones, what would you do? Do you have a daughter, and what would you feel if they’re doing this to your daughter as well? 

If you have involved yourself in this harassment in any way — through mockery, gossip, or passive observation — you still have a choice. You can refuse to participate further. You can choose empathy over exploitation and abuse.  

I am shocked that no one says, “I don’t want to be a part of this. This is just so wrong.”

And to those who still have the courage to see beyond the lies and manipulation — who recognise the human cost of what is being done — your understanding matters more than you know.

I continue to write because silence would mean acceptance. And I will not accept being silenced, erased, or dehumanised by those who profit from cruelty or those who enable it.

Because hate has no place in this world.

Therefore, I am taking important steps to hold those responsible accountable. The harassment, exploitation, deception and unlawful use of private information will not go unchallenged. I will be pursuing formal legal action against the perpetrators and all entities involved, to ensure that justice is served and that the full scope of wrongdoing is exposed.

Buppha Witt

The Baha Mousa Case and Modern-Day Conditioning Techniques

Posted on by
Reply

In September 2003, Baha Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel receptionist, was detained by British Forces in Basra, Iraq. Within just 36 hours, he was dead.

The public inquiry revealed that Mousa and nine others were subjected to brutal “conditioning techniques” — hooding, sleep deprivation, stress positions, and relentless coercion.

“Detainees deemed uncooperative were beaten, shouted at, and sexually humiliated. The Inquiry found “that most, if not all, of the Detainees were the victims of serious abuse and mistreatment by soldiers during their detention.

After withstanding 36 hours of this treatment, Baha Mousa was found having removed his hood and hand restraints. Perceiving this as an escape attempt, 1QLR’s Corporal Donald Payne brought Mousa to the floor and knelt on his back whilst attempting to re-apply the restraints. According to witness testimony, frustrated that Mousa was not submitting easily, Payne ‘lost control of himself’, punching and kicking the detainee and slamming his head against a concrete wall.”

Source: 

The Shadow of Impunity: Justice for the killing of Baha Mousa and lessons for Afghanistan

The Modern Echoes of Conditioning and Control

Two decades on, similar patterns of psychological abuse can still be observed — though they now take covert and technological forms rather than physical ones.

In my own case, I have been subjected to what I can only describe as modern conditioning techniques:

Just as the soldiers in Basra used physical violence and sexual degradation to assert dominance over detainees, my abusers use technology, surveillance, and coordinated harassment to assert psychological control and public degradation. Both methods share the same goal — to dehumanise, break down resistance, and condition compliance through fear, humiliation and coercion. 

“Escape” Analogy

When I tried to escape the abuse by relocating to Denmark, the abuse, exploitation, intimidation and harassment appeared to follow me. This continuity mirrors a symbolic parallel with the Baha Mousa case: when Baha attempted to remove his hood and restraints — an act perceived as escape — his guards retaliated with fatal violence.

In my case, attempts to regain autonomy and safety have seemingly triggered institutional retaliation, with similar patterns of intimidation reappearing across borders. While the methods differ, the underlying message remains chillingly familiar: “You cannot escape.”

This powerfully illustrates their relentless pursuit and control, and the psychological impact of being unable to escape the abuse.

But it doesn’t stop there. My life is being monetised without consent. Films, commercials, and other media use my private experiences as entertainment, generating profit while causing ongoing harm. It’s like being trapped in a real-life Big Brother, where every moment is exploited.

The exploitation, echoing cases like Fiona Harvey’s, where private lives are turned into entertainment. Films, commercials, and content derived from my life have been distributed internationally, generating profit while inflicting ongoing psychological harm.

It’s systematic, calculated, and retaliatory. Every move I make is tracked. Every personal detail is weaponised and exploitated.

My fight isn’t just for myself — it’s to expose the abuse, hold the perpetrators accountable, and reclaim human dignity in an age where privacy and personal freedom can be stolen with a click.

Intentional Violation of Article 3 ECHR Through Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment

What happened to Baha Mousa was officially condemned as inhuman and degrading treatment, a breach of both the Geneva Conventions and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Yet, the psychological equivalents of those banned techniques — sleep deprivation, humiliation, coercion, and sexual degradation — still appear to be used today under new disguises: digital surveillance, social control, and technological intrusion.

These acts are not mere harassment; they constitute a continuation of systemic abuse and conditioning, weaponising humiliation as a tool of domination.

My experience underscores a grim truth: that the instruments of torture have evolved, but the mindset behind them — the belief that one can strip another person of dignity, autonomy, and privacy — remains unchanged.

A Call for Accountability

Baha Mousa’s case prompted public outrage and an inquiry into institutional responsibility. My experience raises similar questions in a modern context:

  • How far can surveillance and psychological manipulation go before it becomes state-sanctioned abuse?
  • What accountability exists when conditioning is conducted through covert technologies and coordinated behaviour rather than physical violence?

The lessons from Baha’s death should not be forgotten. Whether in a military detention centre or a civilian apartment, inhuman and degrading treatment is never acceptable. The methods may differ, but the moral violation is the same.

Author’s Note:

This article forms part of my ongoing documentation of human rights violations and systemic abuse, as referenced in my forthcoming legal proceedings. The experiences described are intended to provide context for broader patterns of coercion, exploitation, and illegal surveillance, and to inform public understanding of modern forms of inhuman and degrading treatment.

Torture