Tag Archives: abuse of process

Perverting the Course of Justice

Posted on by
Reply

As I said in one of my blog posts that the Defendants and/or their associates appear to have repeatedly manipulated my daughter, ex-husband, ex-boyfriend, the people I know, and even medical professionals not to believe what I say, to trap me and my daughter in their ongoing sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras. It’s both coercive control and perverting the course of justice (tampering with evidence).

My ex-husband, Jørgen Mortensen, a white Danish man, has no idea that the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his associates may be sexually abusing and exploitating his own daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming under the noses of everyone. Particularly when my every attempt to warn our daughter and him is met with evidence tampering to suppress the truth, as I said earlier.

Keir Starmer also has a daughter himself. How can he look his own daughter in the eye while at the same time appearing to sexually abuse my daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming her life for profit? If he’s done nothing wrong, I invite him to publicly clarify it, and we should fight fairly in court without my access to lawyers being blocked.

It’s cheating and an abuse of process to prevent a citizen from having legal representation and simultaneously also illegally monitor all their legal strategies, so you can automatically win the case, which may also constitute perverting the course of justice.

If they have nothing to hide, there’s no need to manipulate or gaslight others into not believing me. They also isolate me as much as they can, to cut all help and support I could get. I now live in complete isolation. To make matter worse, they even block my access to lawyers. Again, this is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

At approximately 21:29 pm, immediately upon typing the above-mentioned paragraph, I heard someone suddenly begin to make some noise near my room. This is what the State Actor Defendants seem to be doing by cyberstalking me 24/7, and then as soon as I begin to expose their wrongdoing – either privately or publicly – they would immediately instruct an individual to come out of their room and begin to rummage in the kitchen near my room. Sometimes, the individual would close the microwave or something very loudly as a form of intimidation and discreet censorship, to make me feel intimidated.

Every time I begin to edit my injunction application bundle, housemates also begin to exit/return to the property and violently slam the main door near my room shut. This is a classic witness intimidation. Despite knowing full well that I am preparing my injunction application, the torture, abuse, illegal surveillance, secret filming, live-streaming / distributing the non-consensually recordings for profit, mass misuse of private information, witness intimidation and severe harassment just continue unabated, suggesting that they act with impunity.

At approximately 22:31 pm, another discreet witness intimidation occurred again. Because immediately after I added some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer in my Tumblr post before posting it, I heard someone return to the property and start making noises. I then opened my door to look this time, the individual was the one residing in room 3, wearing a very bright red jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, as if the State Actor Defendants could guess that I would come out of my room again to see who it was, they then appear to get him to wear a red jumper ready for me to see as a form of colour harassment.

This is how they also use hidden cameras to torture me daily and to plan their attacks, harassment and intimidation. Because just moments earlier, at approximately 21:29 pm, I heard some noise in the kitchen, as I said earlier, and went out to investigate. But the individual quickly disappeared as usual. The state actor defendants could then see via hidden cameras and CCTV in the house that I went out of my room to investigate, they then seem to get my housemate in room 3 to suddenly return home and make lots of noise at the exact moment I typed some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer, to make me go out and look. I would then see him wearing a very bright red jumper. This is how they try to be one step ahead of me using hidden cameras as their weapons to plan their next moves. They also seem to derive some kind of satisfaction from playing cat and mouse with me. This is like violence against women. They then also block my access to lawyers, to make it difficult for me to stop the abuse.

CCTV cameras in the house and everywhere, including on public transport, such as on buses and trains, are also being misused for malicious purposes, such as to surveil me at all times when I am not inside my room to let me know, they’re going to surveil me to death and everywhere! Because they intentionally let me know that they are also illegally surveilling me while I am traveling by bus or train by reflecting everything back to me, to let me know everything has been observed and recorded.

This is a misuse of power, a form of extreme torture and gross human rights violations violating both the domestic and international law. If Keir Starmer is also behind this, then it makes this case even more shocking and unprecedented. Particularly when he used to be a human rights lawyer himself, and now he’s running the country!

This is the post that I was just about to publish on Tumblr with some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer before a housemate suddenly returned home and began to make loud noises, to make me feel intimidated.

By preventing me from having legal representation, they don’t just try to protect themselves from being held accountable but also to allow themselves to continue to sexually abuse and exploit me and my daughter via hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking to no end. They must be making lots of money on us when they appear to do whatever they can to carry on their illegal enterprise under the radar, amounting to perverting the course of justice and money laundering.

They simply treat us as their properties, matching the definition of modern slavery in all its forms, which also includes sex trafficking and human trafficking.

Sexual Offences Act 2003 and Related Legislation

  • Secret filming of intimate acts without consent falls under voyeurism (section 67).
  • Dissemination of such recordings constitutes sexual exploitation and may fall under revenge pornography offences (Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, section 33).

Modern Slavery Act 2015

  • Treating me and my daughter as “properties for business” by generating ongoing profits from the non-consensual distribution of our private lives amounts to exploitation through slavery and servitude.
  • Section 1 prohibits holding a person in slavery or servitude. Section 2 criminalises human trafficking, including sexual exploitation for profit.
  • The pattern of repeated exploitation despite pending injunction application and court proceedings shows we are being used as assets in an illegal enterprise.

On 6 June 2026, at precisely 01:03 am, immediately upon typing “They simply treat us as their properties” into the previous paragraph, I heard someone suddenly return home and slam the main door shut. The timing of this incident is significant, as the minute ended in the number 3, which I believe was used to symbolically reference Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the very right that prohibits torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. This incident is consistent with the ongoing pattern of harassment, where external noises, actions and symbolic harassment are deliberately synchronized with my private activities, clearly indicating that all my devices are being constantly monitored and that they intend for me to know it.

This is why I think they want to keep illegally monitoring all my devices, online activities and communications 24/7, to be able to control, intimidate and provoke me just at the right time. Again, that is why it’s important for them to keep unlawfully cyberstalking me at all times, so that as soon as I type in sensitive information, they will detect it right away and immediately orchestrate the harassment or intimidation. This is one of their methods of psychological torture. It’s also a form of Tech Abuse, which many women face. But typically by their own partners.

On 4 June 2026, at precisely 00:01 am, soon after publishing this blog post, I observed a helicopter flying low over my residence passing my window as if intentional as always. Because this is not an isolated incident. It has happened many times before. The timing of this incident is significant once again, as the minute ended in the number “01,” which I believe was used to symbolically reference the “No.10.” Because they have been using “No.01” or “No.10” persistently lately to harass me and to refer to something or someone as usual. For example, on one occasion, while walking on the street, two women walked past me, which seemed intentional. At the precise moment they were about to walk past me, one of them then suddenly pointed to something in a shop and loudly said, almost like shouting: “Look, it’s only £10!”

This is just one of the many incidents that No.10 seems to be uttered loudly within my earshot, or embedded in email correspondence, advertisements, social media posts and even in films, suggesting an industrial harassment campaign against me using all kinds of harassment techniques. “No.10” is one of them.

Hint of Surveillance from Jobcentre

Posted on by
Reply

The defendants immediately punished me after I updated my draft petition this morning, ready to publish it, to expose their misconduct and to launch a public appeal. They do this every single time I try to assert my rights, stop the abuse, mention Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement, and expose their illegal acts such as the illegal surveillance, money laundering, corruption, and misuse of public funds to launch an industrial-scale harassment campaign against a citizen to silence them for trying to expose their corruption.

The Defendants’ Ulterior Motive and Misuse of Power (Article 18 ECHR)

The campaign waged against me is not merely random harassment; it represents a deliberate, calculated misuse of power designed to completely subjugate my autonomy. I am advised that this conduct directly violates the principles enshrined in Article 18 of the ECHR.

The Defendants, particularly the state actor Defendants, especially Keir Starmer, have engineered a system of digital and physical surveillance for an entirely improper, ulterior purpose. Their goal is to exert total coercive control over me, destroy my mental well-being, and intimidate me into abandoning my legal rights.

Using 24/7 intrusive surveillance via hidden cameras, real-time digital intercepts and coordinated domestic disruptions to keep me in a state of perpetual fear is a gross perversion of any lawful social or digital interaction. The Defendants have completely subverted my right to a private life, using their access exclusively as a tool of psychological torture and unlawful control.

Ongoing Defiance
The Defendants are fully aware that I am seeking judicial intervention. Despite this notice, they refuse to remove the cameras and continue to film, disseminate my private data and commercialise it with perceived impunity.

Moreover, I have also systematically collected extensive, objective evidence of the ongoing intimidation, physical harassment, and surveillance targeted at me and my family. This evidence is a combination of, e.g., photograph logs, written timelines of incidents, audio recordings, and video clips of proxy activities.

Crucially, the Defendants and their proxies are fully aware that I am actively documenting their behaviour. Despite knowing that their actions are being recorded as evidence for these pending court proceedings, their intimidation, harassment, cyberstalking, and misuse of my private information continue completely unabated. They exhibit an absolute lack of concern regarding the collection of the evidence or the impending Norwich Pharmacal and Injunction orders.

This blatant disregard for being documented provides definitive proof that the Defendants are acting with total perceived impunity due to Keir Starmer’s high public office. They operate under the belief that no domestic court can or will penalise them. 

Mi5
This is the petition document I updated earlier this morning before the surveillance hint from Uxbridge Jobcenter occurred as swift retaliation.
Starmer out
I updated the document at 8:59 am.
I also looked at this document before I received a suspicious text message from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed. It’s like this every time I talk about Keir Starmer and his alleged involvement in the illegal acts, either privately in my legal documents or publicly online, the retaliation is swift by immediately increasing the surveillance hints, to make me feel extremely violated and uncomfortable around the clock. This tactic has been used persistently, to let me know it acts as an extra punishment for trying to expose their illegal enterprise. They have already got X.com to permanently suspended my account, which I will talk about in another post. Just because I tried to expose their corruption.

Today, the punishment is by getting a staff member at the Uxbridge Jobcentre to text me at the precise moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed at 9:11 am. This is also not the first time that Uxbridge Jobcentre acts as a messenger to convey surveillance and as a tool of harassment – either knowingly or unknowingly. Because it happens every single time I try to expose the primary Defendants’ misconduct, particularly the UK PM Keir Starmer. The retaliation is swift. Because they know by repeatedly reminding me of being constantly watched and controlled via hidden cameras 24/7, they make me feel uncomfortable around the clock to break me. It’s pure psychological torture (Violation of Article 3 ECHR) when it happens systematically to cause intense mental suffering.

I also read this document before the Uxbridge Jobcentre sent me a text message to convey surveillance. This further indicates that the primary defendants, particularly the state actors, are illegally monitoring all my online activities and devices, to gain insight into my legal strategy and so they can immediately retaliate.
This is the text message I received from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I came out of the bathroom and laid back down in my bed.
Jobcenter plus
This is the actual message on my journal that I received from Uxbridge Jobcentre at the exact moment I laid back down in my bed after coming out of the bathroom. By participating in the surveillance and harassment campaign, either knowingly or unknowingly, the Uxbridge Jobcentre may be unaware that it’s involved in state-backed psychological torture and human rights abuses.

After I posted this blog post, I observed an individual suddenly exiting the property and violently slamming the main door shut. It’s like this every time, as if to confirm on the Defendants’ behalf that they are behind this and to confirm cyberstalking.