I typed the below incident in my Witness Statement:
“On 5 May 2026, at approximately 5:53 am, while asleep, I heard a male housemate exiting the property and slamming the main door shut so loud that it woke me up and caused my ear to go deaf for a moment. I still have ringing in my left ear as I type this. I only feel the ringing in my left ear is because my right ear is deaf. The perpetrators appear to know this from unlawful information gathering. Hence, the housemate appeared to slam the main door shut with full force as soon as I turned around in bed from left to right, which would expose my left ear to the loud noise of door smacking. This is how they seem to use hidden cameras, not just to illegally monitor me for harassment and voyeurism purposes but also for planning their attacks!”
The timing is also significant. Because the time ended in number “53” (5:53 am), which could be read as 35 in reverse, and my daughter is approximately 35 years old. This is how they also use numbers to convey their secret communications such as (death) threats, human rights abuses. Because they also use numbers 3, 6 and 8 a lot in their harassment campaign against me to symbolically refer to the violations of my human rights article 3 (prohibition from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment), article 6 (right to a fair trial) and 8 (right to privacy) under the ECHR.
On 9 May 2026, at approximately 6:58 am, after allegedly reading what I wrote in my Witness Statement via unauthorised access to my devices regarding my left ear, as mentioned in the previous paragraph, the Defendants appeared to use this stolen information to attack me almost immediately, by apparently getting my housemate to slam the main door shut with full force – both to disrupt my sleep and to cause me bodily harm by attempting to damage my hearing.
Keir Starmer then posted his X post at precisely 2 minutes after the door-slamming-shut incident, strongly suggests that he may be behind the attack himself. See my tweet below:
I also think Keir Starmer may directly be behind this or complicit in this. Although I think the police and MI5 & MI6 may initially be behind this, he’s a head of state and has the power to stop this. But no, he seems to go along with this and even amplify the abuse and exploitation for his own personal, financial gain, including the alleged cover-up when no lawyers and organisations want to help me. My evidence and documents submitted for my injunction application and court proceedings also magically disappeared from the courthouse each submission. This is not the behaviour of innocent parties!
Because his social media posts often seem to be laced with his cryptic messages to me about what he and his co-defendants have done to me or are going to do to me. He did this very recently regarding my left ear, as I said earlier, to let me know that all the information I have privately typed in my legal documents has been unlawfully obtained via unauthorised access to my devices, which is then used to prepare their defence, harass, mock and intimidate me. Because I had just added the information about door slamming that affected my left ear in my Witness Statement on 8 May 2026 before submitting it via CE-filing. This very confidential information then appeared to be alluded to in Keir Starmer’s X post about just 2 minutes after the door slamming on 9 May 2026 at 6:58 am. See his X post above how he seems to convey his secret communications to me. This is just one of the many, which leads me to believe that he’s either complicit in this or directly behind this.
Because I am also personally suing him. So, he and his co-conspirators allegedly block my access to lawyers and illegally monitor all my online activities and communications at all times to gain insight into my legal strategy, to use the stolen information to gain an unfair advantage, to harass and intimidate me.
This conduct is clearly designed to obstruct justice and pervert the course of litigation. I believe that the Defendants are actively using information unlawfully gained through surveillance and hacking to gain an unfair advantage and to block my access to legal support and fair process.
The hidden cameras also appear to be used for torture to make me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing I am being constantly watched.
At approximately 19:39 pm, on 10 May 2026, immediately after typing the word “torture” into the previous paragraph, a housemate was heard humming loudly outside my room. It’s like the perpetrators enjoy seeing me suffering from their daily torture and express their sadism through my housemates, to induce anger even more and to let me know that everything I type is being read in real time. Hence, the immediate response to what I type. This is shocking despite the pending injunction application and anticipated proceedings, the defendants continue to commit illegal acts against me regardless. This is once again an abuse of power.
They, for example, get my housemates and others to:
- Exit/return to the property at the precise moment I am using the bathroom and slam the main door shut, sometimes very forcefully, finishing using the bathroom, starting/finishing cooking, getting up from bed, sitting down, starting to eat, finishing doing the dishes, and so on. It’s like some kind of ritual, in which each external sound coincides precisely with me beginning or finishing doing something.
- Sexually humiliate me by having a kid to shout loudly while walking past my window, a motorcycle or a heavy vehicle to accelerate past my window, sometimes even a police vehicle themselves, a housemate to exit/return to the property and slam the main door shut, someone to call me or send me a text message, or an app (my bank app, Instagram app) to send me a push notification at the exact moment I finish using the bathroom and begin to wipe myself, to cause me extreme humiliation and mental anguish knowing even this very private moment is being observed and humiliated as a form of psychological torture. At approximately 19:58 pm on 10 May 2026, immediately after writing this, a housemate was heard returning to the property and slamming the main door shut. This is how they use third parties to convey surveillance and as tools for harassment and intimidation.
- Every time I turn around in bed from left to right, and vice versa, I will hear a car door slam shut outside, a motorcycle or a heavy vehicle suddenly accelerates past my window, or sometimes a housemate suddenly exits/returns to the property and slams the main door shut – even in the middle of the night.
The list can go on and on. These are just some examples of the insidious methods they use to torture me daily, not to mention that everything also seems to be non-consensually filmed and live-streamed for profit as well.
Consequently, my life and my human rights are at serious risk. I therefore need to go public, so that they cannot operate and mislead the court under the radar!
Public Interest Disclosure and the Right to Truth
Public Interest Disclosure and the State’s Obligation to Investigate
I maintain that my public disclosures via social media and my blog are protected acts of Public Interest Disclosure. Under Article 10 ECHR, the public has a fundamental right to receive information concerning the unlawful actions and misconduct of public officials. My choice to “go public” is not a mere grievance but a necessary measure of self-preservation and a demand for the Right to Truth—a principle recognised in international law as essential where grave violations of human rights occur.
I believe the Defendants’ persistent silence and their active attempts to intimidate me into silence constitute an admission by conduct. If the public officials involved have committed no wrongdoing, they should have no reason to obstruct my access to lawyers and an independent investigation. In civil proceedings, the Court is entitled to draw adverse inferences from a party’s failure to provide a credible explanation for serious allegations.
Furthermore, under the Human Rights Act 1998, the state has a positive obligation to investigate credible threats to life and safety, particularly when they involve violence or intimidation against women. By escalating their harassment in response to my disclosures, the Defendants are not only breaching this obligation but are actively attempting to suppress evidence.
Like the victims in high-profile cases of systemic abuse, such as the Epstein matter, I am seeking accountability at significant personal risk. I frame these disclosures as a vital tool for transparency; if the state fails to investigate its own actors, the public eye is the only remaining safeguard against the continued perversion of the course of justice.
The Defendants are allegedly monitoring my private communications at all times. They cannot, therefore, claim in good faith that they are ‘unaware’ of my filings or my evidence. This is a gross breach of the Common Law Duty of Candour and the spirit of the Hillsborough Law. They are using their power to deceive the court while watching my every move.
Interception as a Tool of Coercive Control
Their actions in denying me legal representation and external help mirror the tactics of coercive control used by abusers to subjugate their victims. By cutting off all my routes to help, they have intentionally created a climate of fear and helplessness, designed to keep me under their absolute control and prevent any accountability for their actions.
Therefore, their systematic interception of my private communications serves as a core mechanism of the coercive control exerted against me. By monitoring and obstructing my digital and telephonic interactions, the authorities have effectively isolated me from all support networks, specifically my legal counsel. This is not merely an invasion of privacy under Article 8 of the ECHR; it is a strategic effort to dismantle my ‘space for action’ and prevent me from exercising my Right to an Effective Remedy. The deliberate targeting of legally privileged communications creates a dynamic of entrapment, where the very tools meant to facilitate my defence are instead used to monitor, intimidate, and dominate me, mirroring the tactics used by abusers to maintain absolute power over their victims.
If you’re reading this and you believe in justice, transparency, or the right to live free from surveillance and intimidation, I ask you to stand with me. Speak out. Share. And demand that victims like me are given the legal tools to fight back by entering your postcode to find your local representative and send an email directly to them to report severe human rights abuses and obstruction of justice
Here’s the link WriteToThem – https://www.writetothem.com/
Leave a comment