Category Archives: perverting the course of justice

The Institutional Citadel

Posted on by
Reply

When a criminal enterprise achieves total penetration of a state’s infrastructure, the traditional sanctuaries established to protect the vulnerable are transformed into frontline nodes of exploitation. By 2025, stripped of my career, frozen out of the economic market by coordinated industry blacklisting, and facing an environment of escalating physical and digital hostility, I sought what should have been absolute sanctuary. I entered a facility operated by the Danish Red Cross—a globally renowned international humanitarian organization explicitly mandated to provide shelter, safety, and refuge to individuals in crisis.

What I encountered inside that facility was a profound betrayal of international humanitarian principles. The institutional citadel did not offer refuge; it functioned as an active extension of the surveillance network.

Within the very rooms assigned to me for shelter, the precise technical signature of the enterprise was re-established. Pinhole camera arrays and high-sensitivity audio interception nodes were covertly installed inside the Red Cross facility, capturing my most private moments during a period of extreme vulnerability. The involvement of an internationally recognized humanitarian organization elevates this operation from a domestic cover-up to an international public interest scandal of unprecedented scale. The data harvested from within this sanctuary was fed directly back into the same commercial distribution networks, proving that the reach of this enterprise respects no humanitarian boundaries, ethical codes, or international charters.

When I attempted to hold these systems accountable, I ran directly into a synchronized, multi-jurisdictional wall of judicial and administrative denial. In the United Kingdom, I brought formal civil claims before the High Court of Justice, detailing severe human rights abuses, the systematic misuse of private information, illicit hacking, and egregious misfeasance in public office. The response of the judiciary was swift and punitive. On two separate occasions, the UK High Court summarily threw out my claims without an open evidentiary hearing, deliberately suppressing my evidence, shielding the corrupt actors from public cross-examination, and directly violating my right to an effective remedy under Article 13 of the ECHR.

The absolute synchronization of this cross-border containment strategy was laid bare on 14 September 2026. Having exhausted every domestic avenue, I executed a multi-page emergency application for Rule 39 Interim Measures directly to the European Court of Human Rights, establishing an unchangeable international legal timeline. On that exact same day, the Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed (DUP)—the Independent Police Complaints Authority in Denmark—issued a rapid, sweeping rejection of the formal police complaint I had submitted just forty-eight hours prior.

The DUP’s formal notice, issued under File Number 26-349-2070, summarily concluded that the actions of the state actors fell entirely outside their jurisdiction and stated that they would take no further action. The fact that an administrative body could review, process, and dismiss a complex complaint involving cross-border corruption on the precise afternoon an international court injunction was filed is a mathematical impossibility under standard administrative timelines. It provides definitive, contextual proof of the real-time interception, endpoint monitoring, and high-level institutional collusion designed to protect this illicit enterprise at all costs.

My complaint to the DUP on 12 September 2026, which they refused to investigate. Even when it contains the crucial information about my daughter that she may also be sexually abused & exploited via hidden cameras without her knowledge or consent.
The rejection letter from the DUP was sent to me on 14 September 2026. The exact same day I also received a rejection letter from the ECHR, and I hadn’t even opened my rejection letter from the ECHR yet at the time I received a rejection letter from the DUP. See below:
A rejection letter received from the ECHR on 14 September 2026, the exact same day I also received a rejection letter from the Danish Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndighed (DUP). Isn’t it a perfect coincidence?
Caption: A rejection letter from the ECHR dated 11 September 2026, sent to me by Helle Pøhl (Legal Secretary). I received and opened it on 29 September 2026.

In the letter, it states that “in most cases where Rule 39 is applied, evidence available points to a clearly arguable case or a genuine threat and limb, with ensuing real risk of grave harm in breach of the core provisions of the Convention.” This appears odd when I have submitted extensive evidence. Particularly the evidence regarding the attack on 12 August 2026, with the police report and medical note.

Oddly, only Denmark was rejected, no mention of the UK at all. But both states have been added in my application.

I have also submitted evidence and information about the extreme psychological torture via 24/7 non-consensual recording and live-streaming with hidden cameras & audio recording device, forcing me to live without being able to take a shower for about 3 months now.
That’s why they want to keep monitoring all my devices, to detect when I am going to submit my Rule 39 application and what will be submitted.

To prevent the suppression of this information, a complete, unencrypted evidence archive detailing large-scale corruption, systemic surveillance, illegal government tracking, corporate misconduct, gross human rights violations, sex-trafficking ring, money laundering, and more, has been permanently deployed to the decentralized InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). 

These are not standard cloud storage links. They are cryptographic IPFS gateway paths routing to a permanent, decentralized data hash to prevent state-level URL takedowns.

Because this network is decentralized, it cannot be taken down or censored by state authorities. 

📥 INSTANT DOWNLOAD & ACCESS LINKS:

Please copy and paste these links into any standard web browser for immediate access to the raw files:

Primary Mirror:

1. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

2. https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

3. https://dweb.link/ipfs/QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

If standard web gateways are blocked by network firewalls, you can pull the data natively from the IPFS network using this Content Identifier (CID).

RAW DATA CONTENT IDENTIFIER (For secure newsroom extraction):

QmUNy8LSYHZNS4rRVt3RDMbEJ7n4Xpdt6eamVZqbrmqjUY

SUMMARY OF CONTAINED EVIDENCE:

– Urgent injunction and court proceedings filed at the Danish Copenhagen City Court (Københavns Byret) on 5 October 2026 (Case Number: BS-47916/2026-KBH).

– New Rule 39 Interim Measure application package.

– Petition bundle detailing how UK state actors sexually abuse and exploit me via hidden cameras for more than a decade and even continue their illegal enterprise into Denmark within the Danish Red Cross Shelter for Women in Hvidovre by also unlawfully installing hidden cameras and audio recording devices in my room, including in shared bathroom and shower facilities as well violating the privacy of other vulnerable women in the process. Or, maybe they have manipulated and instructed the Danish authorities to carry on the abuse for them in Denmark instead. This archive details the abuse and exploitation they have been doing to me and my daughter for years, including how they got the UK Court to strike out my claims repeatedly to avoid accountability and to continue their crimes under the radar.

– How they block my access to lawyers, so they can continue their illegal enterprise and organised crime uninterrupted!

– And many more pieces of evidence related to this matter.

*Please download, duplicate, and host these files locally to ensure they remain accessible to the global public.*

You can also sign my petition here as well to support my case https://c.org/Rw7KMS6ghH

Back to Denmark

Posted on by
Reply

Unfortunately, soon after the court sealed my injunction application, see below, the defendants escalated their witness intimidation so much that they forced me to flee the UK back to Denmark. So, I am now back in Denmark and start my life all over again here.

The court sealed my injunction application on 21 June 2026, just the day before Keir Starmer resigned as the UK PM on 22 June 2026, who had also been added as a Respondent / Defendant.

But that’s not the end of it. The witness intimidation, large-scale harassment, and the illegal installation of hidden cameras in every place I live in Denmark, including in shared rooms and bathrooms in hostels, to sexually abuse, sexually humiliate, harass me, exploit and psychologically torture me continue unabated in Denmark as well. This is shocking despite the lawsuit having already been initiated, the injunction application having already been sealed and their lawyers having already been served the claim form and the injunction, they just boldly continue the abuse into Denmark regardless. This makes me think that the Danish police and/or authorities may be involved in this as well.

Every day I face severe harassment everywhere I go in Denmark and even inside my current accommodation. People are told to wear Adidas and Nike brands; the brand names they often use to harass me with. The same with the colours red, navy blue, burgundy, orange and pink, which are the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, in which civilians are told / paid to wear these colours to harass me. They often intensify the colour and brand harassment whenever I try to assert my legal rights or make progress in this case, replicating the exact same harassment techniques used in the UK before I fled the country! This strongly suggests that the same perpetrators are behind this. Probably the British police, Keir Starmer and their Co-defendants, again, to try to silence me.

These two, probably father and son, also wore Adidas shoes. The father also wore a navy blue jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me.

The amount of money they have spent so far to launch a cross-border intimidation and harassment campaign against me may have already exceeded the compensation I have asked them for. This is insane.

Well, I’m telling you now, I am not done with you yet. I will continue to pursue justice from Denmark instead. There’s no way I will back down! You have crossed the line by not just abusing me but my daughter as well.

Also here, Adidas shoes and pants.
Adidas top.
Adidas backpack. The man also wore a pair of navy blue shorts, to make it more obvious to me that this is intentional harassment.

Letter to Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, 10 July 2026, I was on my way to send my settlement offer letter to Elon Musk, one of the defendants in my claim, and experienced severe harassment as usual. Everywhere I went, even in a shop or post office, someone or even the staff there themselves would suddenly emerge from round the corner to startle me, intimidate and to figuratively block my way out!

This tactic has been employed every single time I make progress in my claim or just try to assert my legal rights, such as sending my settlement offer letter to certain defendants or applying for an urgent injunction, the retaliation is swift! Again, this is an abuse of power.

This also strongly suggests that all my devices and physical movements are being unlawfully monitored at all times, severely violating my Human Right Article 8 (Right to Privacy) under the ECHR.

My physical movements are being tracked both via phone tracking and via their proxy agents (stalking by proxy) to ensure that even if I don’t have my phone with me, they can still track me.

This is my settlement offer letter package sent to Elon Musk yesterday to his registered office in London, sent by special delivery. So, he should have received it by Monday 13 next week.

On 7 July 2026, after drafting my settlement offer letter to Warner Bros as well ready to send it on 8 July 2026, I also experienced severe air harassment as usual. The aircraft would “draw lines” and “target-like” or “No.10” symbols right outside my window and everywhere I went.

The aircraft began to actively “draw a line” at the very moment I planned to leave the property, suggesting once again that all my movements were being unlawfully monitored at all times from within my room via hidden cameras before I even left my room.
Same here.
Another “target-like” or “X” or even “no.10” symbol was drawn by the aircraft right overhead.
Another one here as well, looking more like “no.10” symbol.
Everywhere I went, I was subjected to a sustained campaign of colour harassment and intimidation. Particularly, the use of the blue-and-red colour combination as seen in the photo above.
When I went to Boots to collect my prescription for my toothache, this elderly man wearing a red sports t-shirt with a cryptic message was already in the queue before I even arrived, suggesting once again that all my movements are being unlawfully tracked for malicious purposes. Red colour has also been used in the harassment campaign against me a lot, among navy blue and green, to let me know this is intentional. The number “26” also appears to allude to Keir Starmer who’s born on 2 Sept 1962 (63 years).
This is the man who wears the number “26” red top.
The aircraft were actively “drawing lines” and “symbols” everywhere I went on 7 July 2026; the date I finished preparing my settlement offer letter to Warner Bros.

Because Warner Bros is also one of the defendants in my claim for misusing my private information by making references to / incorporating my private information, intimate materials and/or creative works into their films such as the films Superman (2025) and The Bride! (2026). Warner Bros and its creative team may have received my private information and intimate materials from somewhere or someone – probably from Keir Starmer himself. He may even receive lifetime royalties for it! He simply treats me as his property, to do whatever he wants with me and make money on me. That’s why I am suing him as well in his personal capacity for his personal misconduct.

He and his co-conspirators may even do the same thing to my daughter. They even keep suggesting that they are also sexually abusing and exploiting her via hidden cameras, exactly the same way they do to me.

They even ignored my past warnings and settlement offers. This warning and settlement offer package sent to Warner Bros on 8 July 2026 is therefore my final negotiation and warning.
But my package to Warner Bros was somehow not delivered on Thursday, 9 July 2026, when it was supposed to be delivered the next day by 1 pm since it’s a special delivery?! The screenshot above showed “due to be delivered today” but that did not happen. I then rang royal mail yesterday and was assured that it would be delivered on Monday 13 next week instead.
Today, 11 July 2026, at approximately 11:45 am, as I wrote this blog post, I heard a loud car horn outside, as if to make me go look out the window as usual. When I did, I observed the aircraft “drawing a line” right outside my window again.
At precisely 11:46 am, I also observed a car driving past my window, after seeing the line in the sky drawn by the aircraft, containing the “no.10” in its license plate as well. The time also symbolically ended in the number 6, as if to refer to the violation of my human right article 6 (right to a fair trial) under the ECHR as usual. Because I have also said many times that I think Keir Starmer has blocked my access to lawyers, so that I cannot hold him and his co-conspirators accountable for illegal surveillance, misusing my private information for profit, severe harassment, intimidation and many more illegal acts committed against me and my daughter.
A close-up of the car with its number plate containing the “no.10” as well.

Perverting the Course of Justice

Posted on by
Reply

As I said in one of my blog posts that the Defendants and/or their associates appear to have repeatedly manipulated my daughter, ex-husband, ex-boyfriend, the people I know, and even medical professionals not to believe what I say, to trap me and my daughter in their ongoing sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras. It’s both coercive control and perverting the course of justice (tampering with evidence).

My ex-husband, Jørgen Mortensen, a white Danish man, has no idea that the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his associates may be sexually abusing and exploitating his own daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming under the noses of everyone. Particularly when my every attempt to warn our daughter and him is met with evidence tampering to suppress the truth, as I said earlier.

Keir Starmer also has a daughter himself. How can he look his own daughter in the eye while at the same time appearing to sexually abuse my daughter via hidden cameras and live-streaming her life for profit? If he’s done nothing wrong, I invite him to publicly clarify it, and we should fight fairly in court without my access to lawyers being blocked.

It’s cheating and an abuse of process to prevent a citizen from having legal representation and simultaneously also illegally monitor all their legal strategies, so you can automatically win the case, which may also constitute perverting the course of justice.

If they have nothing to hide, there’s no need to manipulate or gaslight others into not believing me. They also isolate me as much as they can, to cut all help and support I could get. I now live in complete isolation. To make matter worse, they even block my access to lawyers. Again, this is not the behaviour of innocent parties.

At approximately 21:29 pm, immediately upon typing the above-mentioned paragraph, I heard someone suddenly begin to make some noise near my room. This is what the State Actor Defendants seem to be doing by cyberstalking me 24/7, and then as soon as I begin to expose their wrongdoing – either privately or publicly – they would immediately instruct an individual to come out of their room and begin to rummage in the kitchen near my room. Sometimes, the individual would close the microwave or something very loudly as a form of intimidation and discreet censorship, to make me feel intimidated.

Every time I begin to edit my injunction application bundle, housemates also begin to exit/return to the property and violently slam the main door near my room shut. This is a classic witness intimidation. Despite knowing full well that I am preparing my injunction application, the torture, abuse, illegal surveillance, secret filming, live-streaming / distributing the non-consensually recordings for profit, mass misuse of private information, witness intimidation and severe harassment just continue unabated, suggesting that they act with impunity.

At approximately 22:31 pm, another discreet witness intimidation occurred again. Because immediately after I added some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer in my Tumblr post before posting it, I heard someone return to the property and start making noises. I then opened my door to look this time, the individual was the one residing in room 3, wearing a very bright red jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, as if the State Actor Defendants could guess that I would come out of my room again to see who it was, they then appear to get him to wear a red jumper ready for me to see as a form of colour harassment.

This is how they also use hidden cameras to torture me daily and to plan their attacks, harassment and intimidation. Because just moments earlier, at approximately 21:29 pm, I heard some noise in the kitchen, as I said earlier, and went out to investigate. But the individual quickly disappeared as usual. The state actor defendants could then see via hidden cameras and CCTV in the house that I went out of my room to investigate, they then seem to get my housemate in room 3 to suddenly return home and make lots of noise at the exact moment I typed some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer, to make me go out and look. I would then see him wearing a very bright red jumper. This is how they try to be one step ahead of me using hidden cameras as their weapons to plan their next moves. They also seem to derive some kind of satisfaction from playing cat and mouse with me. This is like violence against women. They then also block my access to lawyers, to make it difficult for me to stop the abuse.

CCTV cameras in the house and everywhere, including on public transport, such as on buses and trains, are also being misused for malicious purposes, such as to surveil me at all times when I am not inside my room to let me know, they’re going to surveil me to death and everywhere! Because they intentionally let me know that they are also illegally surveilling me while I am traveling by bus or train by reflecting everything back to me, to let me know everything has been observed and recorded.

This is a misuse of power, a form of extreme torture and gross human rights violations violating both the domestic and international law. If Keir Starmer is also behind this, then it makes this case even more shocking and unprecedented. Particularly when he used to be a human rights lawyer himself, and now he’s running the country!

This is the post that I was just about to publish on Tumblr with some negative hashtags regarding Keir Starmer before a housemate suddenly returned home and began to make loud noises, to make me feel intimidated.

By preventing me from having legal representation, they don’t just try to protect themselves from being held accountable but also to allow themselves to continue to sexually abuse and exploit me and my daughter via hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking to no end. They must be making lots of money on us when they appear to do whatever they can to carry on their illegal enterprise under the radar, amounting to perverting the course of justice and money laundering.

They simply treat us as their properties, matching the definition of modern slavery in all its forms, which also includes sex trafficking and human trafficking.

Sexual Offences Act 2003 and Related Legislation

  • Secret filming of intimate acts without consent falls under voyeurism (section 67).
  • Dissemination of such recordings constitutes sexual exploitation and may fall under revenge pornography offences (Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, section 33).

Modern Slavery Act 2015

  • Treating me and my daughter as “properties for business” by generating ongoing profits from the non-consensual distribution of our private lives amounts to exploitation through slavery and servitude.
  • Section 1 prohibits holding a person in slavery or servitude. Section 2 criminalises human trafficking, including sexual exploitation for profit.
  • The pattern of repeated exploitation despite pending injunction application and court proceedings shows we are being used as assets in an illegal enterprise.

On 6 June 2026, at precisely 01:03 am, immediately upon typing “They simply treat us as their properties” into the previous paragraph, I heard someone suddenly return home and slam the main door shut. The timing of this incident is significant, as the minute ended in the number 3, which I believe was used to symbolically reference Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the very right that prohibits torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. This incident is consistent with the ongoing pattern of harassment, where external noises, actions and symbolic harassment are deliberately synchronized with my private activities, clearly indicating that all my devices are being constantly monitored and that they intend for me to know it.

This is why I think they want to keep illegally monitoring all my devices, online activities and communications 24/7, to be able to control, intimidate and provoke me just at the right time. Again, that is why it’s important for them to keep unlawfully cyberstalking me at all times, so that as soon as I type in sensitive information, they will detect it right away and immediately orchestrate the harassment or intimidation. This is one of their methods of psychological torture. It’s also a form of Tech Abuse, which many women face. But typically by their own partners.

On 4 June 2026, at precisely 00:01 am, soon after publishing this blog post, I observed a helicopter flying low over my residence passing my window as if intentional as always. Because this is not an isolated incident. It has happened many times before. The timing of this incident is significant once again, as the minute ended in the number “01,” which I believe was used to symbolically reference the “No.10.” Because they have been using “No.01” or “No.10” persistently lately to harass me and to refer to something or someone as usual. For example, on one occasion, while walking on the street, two women walked past me, which seemed intentional. At the precise moment they were about to walk past me, one of them then suddenly pointed to something in a shop and loudly said, almost like shouting: “Look, it’s only £10!”

This is just one of the many incidents that No.10 seems to be uttered loudly within my earshot, or embedded in email correspondence, advertisements, social media posts and even in films, suggesting an industrial harassment campaign against me using all kinds of harassment techniques. “No.10” is one of them.