Blog about illegal surveillance, severe human rights violations, extreme psychological torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, violence against women, hate crime, abuse of power, misfeasance in public office, state-sponsored harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, transnational repression, large-scale corruption, money laundering, mass misuse of private information, illegal data sales, human trafficking, systemic cover-ups, miscarriage of justice and more.
On Tuesday, 9 December 2025, at approximately 2:25 pm, immediately after entering a convenience store nearby to purchase something, I observed a woman wearing an army green jacket also walking into the store.
She’s wearing an army green jacket; one of the colours frequently used in the harassment campaign against me to let me know it’s one of their known signifiers to signify intentional harassment, stalking, surveillance and control.
It’s a recurring pattern of coordinated harassment that happens daily. I can’t simply step outside my accommodation without individuals appearing immediately upon my exiting or entering the property, often wearing colours or using behavioural cues previously associated with the harassment campaign.
Then, whenever I enter the convenience store, shop, supermarket, or mall, moments later, several individuals also enter shortly thereafter, each wearing clothing in colour ranges repeatedly associated with the harassment pattern – most notably burgundy, green / army green, red and navy blue / blue – which have become consistent signalling mechanisms used to convey that the harassment is intentional, targeted, and coordinated. This phenomenon occurs on a DAILY basis, to the extent that I cannot leave my property without being subjected to orchestrated harassment, causing significant disruption and distress in my daily life.
This pattern is designed to intimidate, restrict my freedom of movement, and reinforce the perception of constant surveillance.
These incidents are consistent with a deliberate strategy to create the impression that I am being surveilled at all times, to induce fear, exert control, and interfere with my ability to carry out normal daily activities. This pattern forms part of the wider campaign of intimidation, surveillance, and psychological harassment documented throughout their harassment and intimidation campaign against me.
What I have endured is not an isolated or “localised” situation. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has itself published detailed lists of harassment techniques used globally against victims of covert surveillance and organised stalking. These methods are documented as forms of psychological torture and community-based harassment.
According to the OHCHR’s report (“Harassment Techniques,” OHCHR.org), such tactics include:
These techniques are not theoretical — they have been observed, documented, and submitted to the United Nations as evidence of psychological torture. Their cumulative impact is devastating: sleep deprivation, reputational destruction, discrediting, and total social isolation.
When such tactics are combined with the industrial-scale misuse of private data — including footage obtained through covert cameras and unlawful digital interception — the abuse transcends personal harassment and becomes a human rights crisis.
The OHCHR’s acknowledgment of these methods should be a wake-up call to lawmakers, journalists, and the public: this is not “paranoia” — it is a form of modern psychological warfare being waged against civilians in democratic societies.
On 27 August 2025 at approximately 3:05 pm, I stepped out of my accommodation to go to the library and print my settlement offer letters. Within seconds, I encountered yet another incident that fits the now-familiar pattern of mirroring and colour coding used to signal that I am being watched in real time.
As I walked down the street, a woman passed me wearing a combination of beige and dark grey—colours that have recently been used repeatedly in harassment tactics. More strikingly, she carried a bag over her shoulder in the exact same way I had carried my tote bag moments earlier while inside my room. She made deliberate eye contact and gave a subtle, knowing smile. She also wore wireless earbuds, which many of the harassers often wear to receive real-time instructions, how to harass me.
Individually, these details might appear insignificant. But in context, the timing, the mirroring of my items and movements, and the expression on her face were unmistakably calculated. Experiences like this have occurred consistently after I prepare legal documents, publish evidence, or take steps to assert my rights. It felt like yet another reminder that my private life is not private — that my daily movements, my belongings, even how I carry my bag are being watched, recorded, and reflected back at me through members of the public.
What makes these incidents especially distressing is the implication that hidden camera footage from inside my room is being accessed and circulated. This goes far beyond voyeurism. It points to large-scale misuse of private information, where my everyday life is being monitored, mirrored, and potentially monetised as if I were unwilling entertainment in a “Big Brother”-style illegal production. And the fact that these behaviours continue despite anticipated court proceedings makes the situation even more alarming.
The way she held her bag seemed to mirror me.This was how I carried my tote bag that day, and she appeared to hold her bag the same way to convey illegal surveillance that I am being constantly watched! She might not know that she was being used to convey surveillance.
I have just created a dedicated YouTube channel specifically about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, exploitation and more. You can visit and follow me here https://youtube.com/@organisedharassment
It’s a good place to educate yourself about the cruel kinds of harassment techniques that you may not know exist. If I didn’t experience this myself, I wouldn’t believe it either. I therefore want to share my horrific experiences with illegal surveillance, covert harassment, sexual abuse via voyeurism, and commercial exploitation, misuse of private information on an industrial scale, gross human rights violations and many more.
This matter is therefore of public interest, and the world needs to know about the illegal practices hidden in plain sight!
Yesterday, 17 November 2025, I published a detailed blog post, explaining two crucial issues:
How imitation firearms have repeatedly been used to intimidate me, often at moments when I was on my way to consult solicitors.
Why I have been trying to apply for Judicial Review to challenge the illegality of certain public bodies whose conduct towards me has been unlawful for years.
As I explained, Judicial Review (JR) is the legal mechanism that allows courts to assess whether public authorities are acting lawfully. It deals with questions such as illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and breaches of legitimate expectation.
However, JR cannot award damages, only in rare circumstances, which is why I must pursue civil proceedings simultaneously. I have always intended to advance both, but my access to legal advice has repeatedly and systematically been obstructed, making JR nearly impossible without representation. As I wrote, judicial review is a complex and technical area of law. It requires legal support / lawyer, yet my access to lawyers has been obstructed at nearly every turn.
What I did not initially include—but must emphasise—is that my blog post about judicial review wasn’t just for documenting my own experience. It was written to help other victims of organised harassment, illegal surveillance, and abuse of power understand what options the law provides: judicial review, injunctions, civil actions, and how these routes differ.
Many or some victims do not know their legal rights, and that lack of knowledge keeps them vulnerable. My post had the potential to inform, empower, and protect others. And that is precisely why I believe the retaliation escalated almost immediately afterwards—because those responsible do not want the public, or other victims, to understand how they can fight back.
And this, I believe, is precisely why the retaliation began almost immediately.
Aerial Intimidation: The Aircraft “Drawing” in the Sky
On Tuesday, 18 November 2025, at approximately 1:11 pm, immediately after printing documents related to my injunction fee remission application, I witnessed yet another form of intimidation.
An aircraft appeared and “drew a line” across the sky directly in my line of sight!
This was not an isolated incident. In the past, aircraft have formed:
Large X symbols near my vicinity and sometimes right outside my window
Nazi‑like swastika‑shaped patterns right outside my window
Other threatening aerial symbols
The aircraft was “drawing a line” right before my eyes on 18 November 2025.On Sunday, 10 August 2025, at approximately 6:28 a.m., after I got up and was about to leave my room to go to the kitchen, I observed several large “X” symbols being drawn in the sky directly outside my window. The aircraft responsible continued to draw additional markings as I watched. The time also contains digits ‘6’ and ‘8’ (6:28 a.m.) and the numbers ‘6’ and ‘8’ have been consistently used in the ongoing harassment campaign against me to signify surveillance, intentional harassment, and the alleged violations of my human rights Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (respect for your private and family life) of The Human Rights Act 1998. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to connect the implied threat directly to me through specific numerical and contextual cues known to the perpetrators.
At that exact moment, I heard a knock on the main door. When I looked through the window, I observed a Black man wearing a navy-blue jacket walking away from the property and returning to his vehicle parked on the side road across the street. The choice of colour—navy blue, along with burgundy and green, for instance, has been used repeatedly throughout the harassment campaign to convey themes of surveillance, intimidation and behavioural conditioning. The timing of his appearance at precisely 8:00 a.m., immediately after my written reference to Article 8, strongly suggested that the knock was intended as a signal—an assertion that my online activities and legal work continue to be subject to unlawful monitoring, and a reminder of the perpetrators’ perceived ability to interfere with my private life at will.
This incident is consistent with an established pattern in which unknown individuals or mailmen are made to knock on the door at strategically symbolic times—often ending in 6, 8, or 10—or my housemates’ movements are similarly orchestrated to coincide with significant timestamps or moments when I am drafting key legal materials. These timed intrusions function as a method of intentional harassment and psychological pressure, designed to communicate surveillance, assert control, and discourage me from pursuing legal accountability.
On closer inspection, the way these “X” shapes were layered and arranged resembled a swastika, the Nazi symbol. This not only adds a clear hate-crime and intimidation element to the harassment but also shows deliberate planning to evoke fear and distress, especially given the historically racist and violent connotations of the symbol. It also looks like a ‘W.’ My surname also starts with ‘W.’ It is therefore understood to refer directly to me, further personalising this implied threat. This incident reflects both the racially motivated undertones and the ongoing psychological harassment by way of constant signals, symbolic timing and visible intimidation. I believe this was a deliberate act of witness intimidation and harassment. The timing was significant: the previous day I had written in my legal documents about my daughter, saved on my devices and had not shared with anyone, expressing concerns that she might also be sexually exploited via hidden cameras. Because they kept implying this themselves. I had also stated my intention to go public to raise awareness. The aerial markings occurred less than 24 hours later, in close proximity to my accommodation, suggesting a direct cause-and-effect link to my protected activities. I consider this to be a continuation of targeted harassment and an attempt to deter me from pursuing my legal claims or speaking publicly.
This time, the timing was unmistakable: I had just published a blog post talking about imitation firearms and outlining judicial review rights — something that could help others.
I had just printed court documents and was on my way to the Royal Court of Justice to apply for help with court fees.
And I had just made clear my intention to potentially add additional defendants to these proceedings, believed to be involved in the abuse, exploitation, illegal surveillance, harassment and intimidation.
Within minutes, the sky became a canvas for intimidation.
This was not a coincidence. It was retaliation.
A direct message:
“We are watching everything. Do not continue.”
I therefore believe that the precise timing and nature of this aerial display, occurring immediately after specific legal actions, provide compelling evidence that they’re still illegally monitoring all my online activities, communications, and physical movements.
This incident constitutes a further act of harassment, intimidation, and a deliberate breach of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, designed to deter me from pursuing legal remedies and to cause me fear and distress.
The Bus Advertisements: Psychological Warfare in Broad Daylight
On the same day — 18 November 2025 — as I travelled to the Royal Court of Justice to apply yet again for fee remission (because previous attempts expired due to illegally intrusive surveillance 24/7 that has caused me so much distress, knowing being non-consensually watched and live-streamed via hidden cameras at all times, and harassment‑and-intinidation-induced delays), the psychological harassment continued.
While awaiting a bus en route to the Royal Court of Justice, I observed a bus stopping on the opposing side of the road displaying an advertisement on its side with the prominent text: ‘Lost? Find yourself in coconut.’ I contend that the word ‘Lost?’ was specifically intended to taunt me about my ongoing legal battle and struggles allegedly caused by their own obstruction, forming part of a pattern of targeted psychological harassment.
Later, at approximately 4:00 pm on the same day, immediately after exiting the courthouse having got my remission certificate for help with court fees, I observed another bus driving past me, displaying an advertisement that read: ‘Someone is about to…’ I interpret this incomplete phrase as an implied death threat, consistent with previous such threats I have received.
These incidents, involving the deliberate use of public advertisements to convey targeted and distressing messages, constitute further acts of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a breach of my right to access justice, to live free from fear, intimidation and illegal surveillance.
Helicopter Intimidation: A Consistent Pattern — Now Hidden Behind Buildings
Inside the Royal Court of Justice courthouse, I again heard a helicopter hovering above.
This has happened numerous times during court visits.
But this time, they adapted their tactic.
When I stepped outside to document the helicopter as I normally do, I could not see it — only hear it.
They were hiding the helicopter behind buildings to avoid being photographed while still maintaining the psychological pressure they rely on.
This is not normal. This is not a coincidence. This is witness intimidation and an attempt to pervert the course of justice.
Outside The Royal Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, in London.
24/7 Illegal Monitoring: Retaliation for Exercising My Rights
Real‑time reactions to things I do inside my own home
Subtle but deliberate signs meant to provoke fear and distress
This surge began immediately after I published my judicial review post yesterday, confirming again that:
They punish me every time I assert my rights or expose the truth.
And the reason is clear:
My writing empowers other victims.
Because some or many people suffering from covert harassment and illegal surveillance do not know the law. They do not know that judicial review exists. They do not know that injunctions can be applied for. They do not know that civil proceedings can be initiated simultaneously. My blog post sheds light on this — and for those committing these abuses, that is dangerous.
Knowledge is power. And they fear victims gaining it.
Why I Continue to Speak Out
I will continue documenting everything publicly because:
The truth matters.
Legal rights matter.
Victims deserve to know their options and how to protect their rights
Harassment, abuse, exploitation and illegal surveillance thrive in silence.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
What happened to me should never happen to anyone — not in a democratic society, not under the noses of the public, and certainly not with the involvement of public bodies.
The intimidation only reveals one thing:
They are terrified of accountability.
And that only strengthens my resolve to keep going.
There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.
The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.
This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?
There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.
My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.
This also fits legal definitions of harassment:
Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.
Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.
Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:
Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.
Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.
For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”
This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.
This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.
This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.
Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
Understanding Image-based Abuse Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003
The right to privacy is not a privilege — it’s a fundamental human right. Yet for many victims of voyeurism, illegal surveillance, and image-based abuse, this right is routinely violated in the most degrading ways imaginable.
Under Section 66(b) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, it is a criminal offence to share or threaten to share an intimate photograph or film of a person without their consent. The law recognises several situations in which a person is considered to be in an intimate state — including acts of a sexual nature, exposure of genitals or breasts, urination or defecation, and any act of personal care related to those functions.
In short, the law is clear: recording or distributing such material without consent is a form of sexual abuse.
What Counts as an “Intimate State”?
The College of Policing guidance defines it precisely. A person is in an intimate state if:
They are participating in or engaging in a sexual act;
They are doing something a reasonable person would consider sexual;
Their genitals, buttocks, or breasts are exposed;
They are urinating or defecating; or
They are carrying out personal care associated with those acts.
These definitions capture not only overtly sexual acts but also moments of bodily vulnerability — the private routines we all expect to perform in absolute privacy.
The Role of Intention and Harm
According to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidance, a crucial element in prosecuting these offences is intent to cause alarm, distress, or humiliation. This is why victim impact statements are vital — they communicate the devastating emotional and psychological effects of these violations.
When Harassment Becomes Psychological Torture
In my own experience, this abuse manifests through constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded — often in ways that appear choreographed to humiliate.
There are times when, immediately after I engage in a private act such as using the bathroom, some individuals outside begin chatting loudly, or a housemate exits / returns to the property as if on cue. These synchronised acts, repeated over time, send a clear message: you are being watched.
Such experiences go far beyond harassment. They are psychological tactics designed to reinforce powerlessness and fear, to make the victim feel that even their most private bodily functions are subject to surveillance and mockery.
The Human Cost
The emotional impact of these invasions cannot be overstated. To know or even suspect that one’s most intimate moments have been observed, recorded, or broadcast — and then weaponised to cause humiliation — is to live in a constant state of distress. It erodes dignity, safety, and trust in the world around you.
I have felt violated, degraded, and stripped of my humanity.
A Call for Recognition and Justice
This form of abuse — the deliberate exploitation of privacy through hidden surveillance, image-based abuse, and sexual humiliation — must be recognised for what it is: a serious sexual offence under UK law.
Victims deserve to be believed, protected, and empowered to seek justice. Law enforcement and the public must understand that these acts are not “pranks” or coincidences — they are orchestrated violations designed to cause trauma and control.
Privacy is sacred. The law exists to defend it. And silence only protects the perpetrators.
The day I opened the first draft of my legal documents, I remember feeling the same cold steadiness that comes after a long storm. But I said to myself: “This is it. Today’s the day. I have to do it or be tortured to death! I couldn’t let them do this to me and my daughter anymore. Enough is enough. I am going to stop this once and for all.”
I had gathered months of evidence, each screenshot, email, photograph, etc. My computer had become both a weapon and a witness. Every time I typed, I was not just writing — I was reclaiming what had been stolen: my voice, my story, my right to exist without 24/7 intrusive surveillance.
Still, I hesitated before naming names. I knew the scale of what I was confronting — powerful entities, global platforms, entertainment companies, and the like.
So I wrote carefully. Deliberately. Fact by fact. I numbered each paragraph of my documents ready to file, as if each line was a step on a staircase I was building toward daylight and freedom from torture.
I described what had been done to me and my daughter — which is shockingly still ongoing — the illegal filming, the manipulation, harassment, intimidation, the coded messages in advertising and posts, the psychological torment — not as chaos, but as evidence. I was learning the language of law, teaching myself to translate pain into proof.
It was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.
This is the first page of Chapter 6: Time to Seek Justice of my upcoming ebook: Predators.
