There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.
The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.
This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?
There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.
My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.
This also fits legal definitions of harassment:
Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.
Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.
Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:
Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.
Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.
For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”
This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.
This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.
This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.
“In the majority of stalking cases, secondary victims will be identified. Although stalkers may stalk more than one person at a time, this question relates to associates of a primary victim. Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.).
Source: College of Policing. Stalking or harassment guidance College of Policing Library.
Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.
Leave a comment