Buppha Witt

Yesterday, 17 November 2025, I published a detailed blog post, explaining two crucial issues:

1. How imitation firearms have repeatedly been used to intimidate me, often at moments when I was on my way to consult solicitors.
2. Why I have been trying to apply for Judicial Review to challenge the illegality of certain public bodies whose conduct towards me has been unlawful for years.

As I explained, Judicial Review (JR) is the legal mechanism that allows courts to assess whether public authorities are acting lawfully. It deals with questions such as illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and breaches of legitimate expectation.

However, JR cannot award damages, only in rare circumstances, which is why I must pursue civil proceedings simultaneously. I have always intended to advance both, but my access to legal advice has repeatedly and systematically been obstructed, making JR nearly impossible without representation. As I wrote, judicial review is a complex and technical area of law. It requires legal support / lawyer, yet my access to lawyers has been obstructed at nearly every turn.

What I did not initially include—but must emphasise—is that my blog post about judicial review wasn’t just for documenting my own experience. It was written to help other victims of organised harassment, illegal surveillance, and abuse of power understand what options the law provides: judicial review, injunctions, civil actions, and how these routes differ.

Many or some victims do not know their legal rights, and that lack of knowledge keeps them vulnerable. My post had the potential to inform, empower, and protect others. And that is precisely why I believe the retaliation escalated almost immediately afterwards—because those responsible do not want the public, or other victims, to understand how they can fight back.

And this, I believe, is precisely why the retaliation began almost immediately.

Aerial Intimidation: The Aircraft “Drawing” in the Sky

On Tuesday, 18 November 2025, at approximately 1:11 pm, immediately after printing documents related to my injunction fee remission application, I witnessed yet another form of intimidation.

An aircraft appeared and “drew a line” across the sky directly in my line of sight!

This was not an isolated incident. In the past, aircraft have formed:

• Large X symbols near my vicinity and sometimes right outside my window 
• Nazi‑like swastika‑shaped patterns right outside my window 
• Other threatening aerial symbols

On Wednesday, 19 November 2025, at precisely 8:00 a.m., only moments after I had typed the above-mentioned incident how the perpetrators appear to use timestamps containing symbolic numbers—particularly 3, 6, and 8—to reference the alleged violations of my human rights under Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (right to a fair trial), and Article 8 (respect for private and family life) of the Human Rights Act 1998, an incident occurred that appeared to reinforce this pattern.

At that exact moment, I heard a knock on the main door. When I looked through the window, I observed a Black man wearing a navy-blue jacket walking away from the property and returning to his vehicle parked on the side road across the street. The choice of colour—navy blue, along with burgundy and green, for instance, has been used repeatedly throughout the harassment campaign to convey themes of surveillance, intimidation and behavioural conditioning. The timing of his appearance at precisely 8:00 a.m., immediately after my written reference to Article 8, strongly suggested that the knock was intended as a signal—an assertion that my online activities and legal work continue to be subject to unlawful monitoring, and a reminder of the perpetrators’ perceived ability to interfere with my private life at will.

This incident is consistent with an established pattern in which unknown individuals or mailmen are made to knock on the door at strategically symbolic times—often ending in 6, 8, or 10—or my housemates’ movements are similarly orchestrated to coincide with significant timestamps or moments when I am drafting key legal materials. These timed intrusions function as a method of intentional harassment and psychological pressure, designed to communicate surveillance, assert control, and discourage me from pursuing legal accountability.

Always in direct connection with my taking legal steps (e.g., on the verge of initiating court proceedings, applying for urgent privacy and harassment injunctions) or exposing their misconduct.

This time, the timing was unmistakable:
I had just published a blog post talking about imitation firearms and outlining judicial review rights — something that could help others.

I had just printed court documents and was on my way to the Royal Court of Justice to apply for help with court fees.

And I had just made clear my intention to potentially add additional defendants to these proceedings, believed to be involved in the abuse, exploitation, illegal surveillance, harassment and intimidation. 

Within minutes, the sky became a canvas for intimidation.

This was not a coincidence. It was retaliation.

 A direct message:

 “We are watching everything. Do not continue.”

I therefore believe that the precise timing and nature of this aerial display, occurring immediately after specific legal actions, provide compelling evidence that they’re still illegally monitoring all my online activities, communications, and physical movements.

This incident constitutes a further act of harassment, intimidation, and a deliberate breach of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, designed to deter me from pursuing legal remedies and to cause me fear and distress.

The Bus Advertisements: Psychological Warfare in Broad Daylight

On the same day — 18 November 2025 — as I travelled to the Royal Court of Justice to apply yet again for fee remission (because previous attempts expired due to illegally intrusive surveillance 24/7 that has caused me so much distress, knowing being non-consensually watched and live-streamed via hidden  cameras at all times, and harassment‑and-intinidation-induced delays), the psychological harassment continued.

While awaiting a bus en route to the Royal Court of Justice, I observed a bus stopping on the opposing side of the road displaying an advertisement on its side with the prominent text: ‘Lost? Find yourself in coconut.’ I contend that the word ‘Lost?’ was specifically intended to taunt me about my ongoing legal battle and struggles allegedly caused by their own obstruction, forming part of a pattern of targeted psychological harassment. 

Later, at approximately 4:00 pm on the same day, immediately after exiting the courthouse having got my remission certificate for help with court fees, I observed another bus driving past me, displaying an advertisement that read: ‘Someone is about to…’ I interpret this incomplete phrase as an implied death threat, consistent with previous such threats I have received. 

These incidents, involving the deliberate use of public advertisements to convey targeted and distressing messages, constitute further acts of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a breach of my right to access justice, to live free from fear, intimidation and illegal surveillance. 

Helicopter Intimidation: A Consistent Pattern — Now Hidden Behind Buildings

Inside the Royal Court of Justice courthouse, I again heard a helicopter hovering above.

This has happened numerous times during court visits.

But this time, they adapted their tactic.

When I stepped outside to document the helicopter as I normally do, I could not see it — only hear it.

They were hiding the helicopter behind buildings to avoid being photographed while still maintaining the psychological pressure they rely on.

This is not normal.
This is not a coincidence.
This is witness intimidation and an attempt to pervert the course of justice.

24/7 Illegal Monitoring: Retaliation for Exercising My Rights

Over the past 24 hours, the frequency of “hints” showing that I am under constant, illegal, real‑time surveillance has sharply increased.

This includes:

• Behavioural mimicry
• Location‑specific responses within seconds
• Real‑time reactions to things I do inside my own home
• Subtle but deliberate signs meant to provoke fear and distress

This surge began immediately after I published my judicial review post yesterday, confirming again that:

They punish me every time I assert my rights or expose the truth.

And the reason is clear:

My writing empowers other victims.

Because some or many people suffering from covert harassment and illegal surveillance do not know the law.
They do not know that judicial review exists.
They do not know that injunctions can be applied for.
They do not know that civil proceedings can be initiated simultaneously.
My blog post sheds light on this — and for those committing these abuses, that is dangerous.

Knowledge is power.
And they fear victims gaining it.

Why I Continue to Speak Out

I will continue documenting everything publicly because:

• The truth matters.
• Legal rights matter.
• Victims deserve to know their options and how to protect their rights 
• Harassment, abuse, exploitation and illegal surveillance thrive in silence.
• Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

What happened to me should never happen to anyone — not in a democratic society, not under the noses of the public, and certainly not with the involvement of public bodies.

The intimidation only reveals one thing:

They are terrified of accountability.

And that only strengthens my resolve to keep going.