Blog about illegal surveillance, severe human rights violations, extreme psychological torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, violence against women, hate crime, abuse of power, misfeasance in public office, state-sponsored harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, transnational repression, large-scale corruption, money laundering, mass misuse of private information, illegal data sales, human trafficking, systemic cover-ups, miscarriage of justice and more.
In addition to the direct unlawful acts allegedly committed against me, I have grave and urgent concerns about the apparent deployment of an individual / CHIS to target my daughter, aged 34 or 35, who also lives alone.
Following my complaints against some public officers’ misconduct in early 2023, my daughter experienced a sudden and unexplained breakup with her long-term partner of twelve years in or around August 2023. Shortly thereafter, she entered into a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online, whose behaviour raises serious concerns consistent with the characteristics of an unlawful CHIS operation.
Over the course of more than a year:
– This individual has reportedly never visited my daughter’s residence, despite the apparent seriousness of their relationship.
– My daughter’s communications with me abruptly deteriorated after forming the relationship.
– There have been signs suggesting leakage and misuse of her sensitive and private information, in a manner strikingly similar to the harassment, unlawful surveillance and misuse of private information that they have been subjecting me to.
I therefore fear that her private residence may have unlawfully been surveilled as well through hidden cameras, and that intimate footage may have been misused, constituting sexual exploitation and a profound breach of her rights under Articles 3, 8, and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The facts strongly indicate that the purpose of deploying an agent against my daughter was to gather intelligence about me and her as well, to control her, to suppress the truth, to sever our relationship, and to cause psychiatric harm — either now or when the deception is ultimately revealed.
Such conduct, if proven, would amount to:
Malfeasance in Public Office, given the abuse of public powers for improper motives with foreseeably harmful consequences;
Deceit, by inducing emotional reliance based on false identities for the purpose of surveillance and exploitation;
This pattern of behavior echoes well-documented abuses in the “spycops” cases (e.g., Police Spies Out of Lives litigation) where women were deceived into long-term intimate relationships with undercover officers, causing profound psychological harm.
This is precisely what I fear! Because I believe that one of the reasons they seemingly employ their agent / CHIS to fake a romantic relationship with my daughter, so that when his true identity and motives are discovered, she will likely suffer psychiatric injury and mental distress as a result of the deceit. If this is their true agenda, they act maliciously.
Thus, one of his evil tasks appears to be to make my daughter fall hard for him. So, once his mission is over, her heart will be severely broken. This looks therefore like a premeditated hate crime against her as well!
It therefore shows, they have no remorse, no concern, or whatsoever for my daughter’s welfare and constitute severe emotional and psychological abuse, including coercive control.
This woman is also one of them, wearing an army green jacket – one of the colours often associated with the harassment campaign against me. Her real photos with her face will also be presented in court! I may add her to a list of Respondents for my Norwich Pharmacal Order application as well.
Incident 1: At a hostel where I stayed at from 23-30 April 2025
On 28 April 2025, at approximately 10:00 pm, I attempted to use the bathroom facilities at my hostel. However, I discovered that all bathrooms — the one on the ground floor, the first floor, and the second floor — were unusually simultaneously occupied.
When I knocked on the door of the first-floor bathroom, a male voice responded, indicating occupancy. Upon ascending to the second floor, and just as I approached the second-floor bathroom door, I immediately heard loud, deliberate flatulence from inside the bathroom. Based on the sound, I reasonably believed it was made by a male occupant.
Given the precise timing — occurring just as I reached the door — and considering previous incidents where bodily functions have been used deliberately to harass and humiliate me, I believe this act was intentional, orchestrated as part of the ongoing harassment campaign against me.
This fits a broader pattern of behaviour where my real-time movements appear to be closely tracked and individuals are instructed to engage in degrading or disrespectful behaviour to cause distress.
Similar incidents have occurred previously, including:
Individuals deliberately called my phone while I was using the bathroom.
Individuals pretending to defecate loudly in adjacent bathrooms while I was showering at other hostels.
Bathrooms being consistently and unusually occupied to inconvenience me, particularly since I began preparing my urgent injunction application.
Incident 2: At my current address
The Defendants, and/or those acting on their behalf or under their instruction, continue to engage in a systematic pattern of surveillance, harassment, and intimidation, designed to cause severe distress and obstruct my pursuit of legal remedies.
On Monday, 1 December 2025, at approximately 2:23 pm, immediately after I had been working extensively on my Witness Statement, adding crucial information relevant to these proceedings, I observed a clear instance of this ongoing surveillance and retaliation. Upon opening my door to use the shared bathroom (due to my own toilet being clogged), an elderly male housemate immediately entered the bathroom just before me. This incident, while seemingly minor in isolation, is part of a well-established pattern of behaviour observed across multiple accommodations and locations, including shared hostels, where individuals are seemingly instructed to occupy shared facilities precisely when I attempt to use them, thereby causing inconvenience, distress, and overtly signaling continuous monitoring of my movements. This pattern has consistently occurred following periods where I have made progress on legal documents, such as my injunction application, or documented instances of misconduct. These individuals and housemates have no idea that they could be called to testify under oath to disclose crucial information, such as who instructed them to harass me and to convey surveillance. If they deny being instructed but the evidence suggests otherwise, they risk committing perjury.
Shouting at Light Bulbs: Upon returning to my room, I verbally expressed my distress and frustration, specifically addressing the light fixtures in my room, as I reasonably believe these locations have been used for the illegal installation of hidden cameras, which also record audio. I stated that the perpetrators were ‘racist’ for continuing their abusive conduct despite pending legal actions / court proceedings.
Ambulance and Police Vehicle Sightings: Immediately following this verbal expression, at approximately 2:33 pm, I observed an ambulance driving past my window. Subsequently, at approximately 3:02 pm, I observed a police vehicle driving past my window.
Pattern of Sightings: These sightings are not isolated incidents but form part of a consistent pattern. Almost every time I document or expose the defendants’ alleged conspiracy and misconduct in my private legal documents, I subsequently and almost immediately observe emergency service vehicles (including police, ambulance, and sometimes fire trucks) driving past my window. This pattern appears to be a deliberate tactic to convey ongoing physical and digital surveillance and intimidation.
Evidence of Ongoing Surveillance and Monitoring: These incidents provide further evidence of the defendants’ alleged continuous and pervasive surveillance of my private activities, both within my personal living space and online communications. The immediate timing of these events following my legal work strongly suggests that my movements, communications, and legal preparations are being monitored in real-time.
Retaliation and Intimidation: The deliberate occupation of shared facilities and the subsequent appearance of emergency vehicles immediately after I engage in legal activities or express distress are interpreted as acts of retaliation and intimidation. These actions are designed to cause severe distress, disrupt my daily life, and discourage me from pursuing legal remedies. They serve to reinforce the message that my actions are constantly observed and that the defendants possess the means to exert control and inflict psychological harm.
Breach of Privacy and Harassment: These actions constitute further breaches of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and are consistent with the pattern of harassment and cyberstalking previously detailed in my previous blog posts. The use of emergency vehicles in this manner is particularly distressing, as it co-opts symbols of public safety for purposes of intimidation.
Conspiracy and Influence: The coordinated nature of these incidents, particularly the immediate response to my private legal work and verbal expressions, suggests a sophisticated and organised effort involving multiple individuals. The alleged influence over the appearance of emergency vehicles further supports the claim that the defendants are powerful individuals capable of orchestrating such events to convey their pervasive reach and control.
Impact on Well-being: These incidents cause severe emotional and psychological distress, contributing to the ongoing harm, as I said earlier. They create an environment of constant fear and anxiety, undermining my sense of safety and ability to live a normal life.
This tactic, obstruction of basic needs, has been employed repeatedly, particularly following periods when I have made progress in my legal preparations, such as drafting legal documents, adding crucial evidence, or preparing for court proceedings. The timing of such incidents strongly suggests that the Defendants, and/or those acting on their behalf, are monitoring my activities, including my legal work and online communications, and are using these incidents as a form of immediate retaliation and psychological intimidation. The clear message conveyed is that my movements are constantly monitored, and that access to basic facilities, much like access to legal representation, can be obstructed as ‘punishment’ for asserting my rights.
I believe this continued harassment, occurring after I initiated steps to pursue legal action, constitutes retaliation, degrading treatment, and interference with my Article 3 and Article 8 rights under the Human Rights Act 1998.
It also exemplifies predatory stalking tactics involving humiliation, obstruction of daily life, and psychological intimidation designed to deter me from pursuing justice.
A Police vehicle was observed driving past my window on Monday, 1 December 2025, at approximately 3:02 PM, shortly after I angrily shouted at the light bulbs suspecting to conceal hidden cameras and audio recording devices!
On 27 August 2025 at approximately 3:05 pm, I stepped out of my accommodation to go to the library and print my settlement offer letters. Within seconds, I encountered yet another incident that fits the now-familiar pattern of mirroring and colour coding used to signal that I am being watched in real time.
As I walked down the street, a woman passed me wearing a combination of beige and dark grey—colours that have recently been used repeatedly in harassment tactics. More strikingly, she carried a bag over her shoulder in the exact same way I had carried my tote bag moments earlier while inside my room. She made deliberate eye contact and gave a subtle, knowing smile. She also wore wireless earbuds, which many of the harassers often wear to receive real-time instructions, how to harass me.
Individually, these details might appear insignificant. But in context, the timing, the mirroring of my items and movements, and the expression on her face were unmistakably calculated. Experiences like this have occurred consistently after I prepare legal documents, publish evidence, or take steps to assert my rights. It felt like yet another reminder that my private life is not private — that my daily movements, my belongings, even how I carry my bag are being watched, recorded, and reflected back at me through members of the public.
What makes these incidents especially distressing is the implication that hidden camera footage from inside my room is being accessed and circulated. This goes far beyond voyeurism. It points to large-scale misuse of private information, where my everyday life is being monitored, mirrored, and potentially monetised as if I were unwilling entertainment in a “Big Brother”-style illegal production. And the fact that these behaviours continue despite anticipated court proceedings makes the situation even more alarming.
The way she held her bag seemed to mirror me.This was how I carried my tote bag that day, and she appeared to hold her bag the same way to convey illegal surveillance that I am being constantly watched! She might not know that she was being used to convey surveillance.
Yesterday, 17 November 2025, I published a detailed blog post, explaining two crucial issues:
How imitation firearms have repeatedly been used to intimidate me, often at moments when I was on my way to consult solicitors.
Why I have been trying to apply for Judicial Review to challenge the illegality of certain public bodies whose conduct towards me has been unlawful for years.
As I explained, Judicial Review (JR) is the legal mechanism that allows courts to assess whether public authorities are acting lawfully. It deals with questions such as illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and breaches of legitimate expectation.
However, JR cannot award damages, only in rare circumstances, which is why I must pursue civil proceedings simultaneously. I have always intended to advance both, but my access to legal advice has repeatedly and systematically been obstructed, making JR nearly impossible without representation. As I wrote, judicial review is a complex and technical area of law. It requires legal support / lawyer, yet my access to lawyers has been obstructed at nearly every turn.
What I did not initially include—but must emphasise—is that my blog post about judicial review wasn’t just for documenting my own experience. It was written to help other victims of organised harassment, illegal surveillance, and abuse of power understand what options the law provides: judicial review, injunctions, civil actions, and how these routes differ.
Many or some victims do not know their legal rights, and that lack of knowledge keeps them vulnerable. My post had the potential to inform, empower, and protect others. And that is precisely why I believe the retaliation escalated almost immediately afterwards—because those responsible do not want the public, or other victims, to understand how they can fight back.
And this, I believe, is precisely why the retaliation began almost immediately.
Aerial Intimidation: The Aircraft “Drawing” in the Sky
On Tuesday, 18 November 2025, at approximately 1:11 pm, immediately after printing documents related to my injunction fee remission application, I witnessed yet another form of intimidation.
An aircraft appeared and “drew a line” across the sky directly in my line of sight!
This was not an isolated incident. In the past, aircraft have formed:
Large X symbols near my vicinity and sometimes right outside my window
Nazi‑like swastika‑shaped patterns right outside my window
Other threatening aerial symbols
The aircraft was “drawing a line” right before my eyes on 18 November 2025.On Sunday, 10 August 2025, at approximately 6:28 a.m., after I got up and was about to leave my room to go to the kitchen, I observed several large “X” symbols being drawn in the sky directly outside my window. The aircraft responsible continued to draw additional markings as I watched. The time also contains digits ‘6’ and ‘8’ (6:28 a.m.) and the numbers ‘6’ and ‘8’ have been consistently used in the ongoing harassment campaign against me to signify surveillance, intentional harassment, and the alleged violations of my human rights Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (respect for your private and family life) of The Human Rights Act 1998. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to connect the implied threat directly to me through specific numerical and contextual cues known to the perpetrators.
At that exact moment, I heard a knock on the main door. When I looked through the window, I observed a Black man wearing a navy-blue jacket walking away from the property and returning to his vehicle parked on the side road across the street. The choice of colour—navy blue, along with burgundy and green, for instance, has been used repeatedly throughout the harassment campaign to convey themes of surveillance, intimidation and behavioural conditioning. The timing of his appearance at precisely 8:00 a.m., immediately after my written reference to Article 8, strongly suggested that the knock was intended as a signal—an assertion that my online activities and legal work continue to be subject to unlawful monitoring, and a reminder of the perpetrators’ perceived ability to interfere with my private life at will.
This incident is consistent with an established pattern in which unknown individuals or mailmen are made to knock on the door at strategically symbolic times—often ending in 6, 8, or 10—or my housemates’ movements are similarly orchestrated to coincide with significant timestamps or moments when I am drafting key legal materials. These timed intrusions function as a method of intentional harassment and psychological pressure, designed to communicate surveillance, assert control, and discourage me from pursuing legal accountability.
On closer inspection, the way these “X” shapes were layered and arranged resembled a swastika, the Nazi symbol. This not only adds a clear hate-crime and intimidation element to the harassment but also shows deliberate planning to evoke fear and distress, especially given the historically racist and violent connotations of the symbol. It also looks like a ‘W.’ My surname also starts with ‘W.’ It is therefore understood to refer directly to me, further personalising this implied threat. This incident reflects both the racially motivated undertones and the ongoing psychological harassment by way of constant signals, symbolic timing and visible intimidation. I believe this was a deliberate act of witness intimidation and harassment. The timing was significant: the previous day I had written in my legal documents about my daughter, saved on my devices and had not shared with anyone, expressing concerns that she might also be sexually exploited via hidden cameras. Because they kept implying this themselves. I had also stated my intention to go public to raise awareness. The aerial markings occurred less than 24 hours later, in close proximity to my accommodation, suggesting a direct cause-and-effect link to my protected activities. I consider this to be a continuation of targeted harassment and an attempt to deter me from pursuing my legal claims or speaking publicly.
This time, the timing was unmistakable: I had just published a blog post talking about imitation firearms and outlining judicial review rights — something that could help others.
I had just printed court documents and was on my way to the Royal Court of Justice to apply for help with court fees.
And I had just made clear my intention to potentially add additional defendants to these proceedings, believed to be involved in the abuse, exploitation, illegal surveillance, harassment and intimidation.
Within minutes, the sky became a canvas for intimidation.
This was not a coincidence. It was retaliation.
A direct message:
“We are watching everything. Do not continue.”
I therefore believe that the precise timing and nature of this aerial display, occurring immediately after specific legal actions, provide compelling evidence that they’re still illegally monitoring all my online activities, communications, and physical movements.
This incident constitutes a further act of harassment, intimidation, and a deliberate breach of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, designed to deter me from pursuing legal remedies and to cause me fear and distress.
The Bus Advertisements: Psychological Warfare in Broad Daylight
On the same day — 18 November 2025 — as I travelled to the Royal Court of Justice to apply yet again for fee remission (because previous attempts expired due to illegally intrusive surveillance 24/7 that has caused me so much distress, knowing being non-consensually watched and live-streamed via hidden cameras at all times, and harassment‑and-intinidation-induced delays), the psychological harassment continued.
While awaiting a bus en route to the Royal Court of Justice, I observed a bus stopping on the opposing side of the road displaying an advertisement on its side with the prominent text: ‘Lost? Find yourself in coconut.’ I contend that the word ‘Lost?’ was specifically intended to taunt me about my ongoing legal battle and struggles allegedly caused by their own obstruction, forming part of a pattern of targeted psychological harassment.
Later, at approximately 4:00 pm on the same day, immediately after exiting the courthouse having got my remission certificate for help with court fees, I observed another bus driving past me, displaying an advertisement that read: ‘Someone is about to…’ I interpret this incomplete phrase as an implied death threat, consistent with previous such threats I have received.
These incidents, involving the deliberate use of public advertisements to convey targeted and distressing messages, constitute further acts of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a breach of my right to access justice, to live free from fear, intimidation and illegal surveillance.
Helicopter Intimidation: A Consistent Pattern — Now Hidden Behind Buildings
Inside the Royal Court of Justice courthouse, I again heard a helicopter hovering above.
This has happened numerous times during court visits.
But this time, they adapted their tactic.
When I stepped outside to document the helicopter as I normally do, I could not see it — only hear it.
They were hiding the helicopter behind buildings to avoid being photographed while still maintaining the psychological pressure they rely on.
This is not normal. This is not a coincidence. This is witness intimidation and an attempt to pervert the course of justice.
Outside The Royal Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, in London.
24/7 Illegal Monitoring: Retaliation for Exercising My Rights
Real‑time reactions to things I do inside my own home
Subtle but deliberate signs meant to provoke fear and distress
This surge began immediately after I published my judicial review post yesterday, confirming again that:
They punish me every time I assert my rights or expose the truth.
And the reason is clear:
My writing empowers other victims.
Because some or many people suffering from covert harassment and illegal surveillance do not know the law. They do not know that judicial review exists. They do not know that injunctions can be applied for. They do not know that civil proceedings can be initiated simultaneously. My blog post sheds light on this — and for those committing these abuses, that is dangerous.
Knowledge is power. And they fear victims gaining it.
Why I Continue to Speak Out
I will continue documenting everything publicly because:
The truth matters.
Legal rights matter.
Victims deserve to know their options and how to protect their rights
Harassment, abuse, exploitation and illegal surveillance thrive in silence.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
What happened to me should never happen to anyone — not in a democratic society, not under the noses of the public, and certainly not with the involvement of public bodies.
The intimidation only reveals one thing:
They are terrified of accountability.
And that only strengthens my resolve to keep going.
⚠️ Content Warning This blog post contains descriptions of 24/7 illegal, obsessive and intrusive surveillance, daily voyeurism, sexual exploitation / cybersex trafficking, and psychological abuse. Some readers may find these accounts distressing. Reader discretion is advised.
15/5/25
Voyeurism: Confirmed Surveillance via Hidden Cameras
During my stay at a hostel near King’s Cross Station.
Early in the morning at around 5:00 a.m., I woke up to go to the bathroom. The very moment I touched and opened the door handle, I heard another door open in precise synchrony—even though I had not stepped out into the hallway. My mobile phone was turned off, and I had made no noise that could have triggered this response. CCTV cannot explain this real-time reaction, as I had not yet exited the room. The only plausible explanation is the presence of hidden surveillance cameras inside the room that captured my movement. This suggests the harassers knew in advance that I was awake and about to leave the room, and coordinated another person to open a door in sync with mine to signal that I am being constantly watched. This is a direct violation of my privacy, and constitutes ongoing psychological harassment, especially as it occurred at such an early hour. The intrusion is profound and confirms that the surveillance is 24/7, including in vulnerable and private moments. When I came out of the room, I saw a Chinese-looking man also just came out of his room (Number 27). I stayed in room 23. So, it’s him who opened the door at the same time I did.
This act was clearly deliberate, invasive, and psychologically disturbing, reinforcing that I am being monitored around the clock, even during private and vulnerable moments. The fact that this harassment occurred at 5 a.m. further illustrates the level of obsessive, inhumane surveillance I am being subjected to.
Subscribe
Enter your email below to receive updates.
5/8/25
At precisely 3:46 pm, immediately after I finished using the bathroom, one of my housemates walked past my room, cleared her throat twice, and then opened the main door to exit the house. The timing again ended with the number “6,” a number repeatedly used in this harassment to signal intentionality.
17/8/25
1:12 am – Immediately after I made a turn in bed from left to right, I heard a motorcycle riding past my window.
1:15 am – Minutes later, I also heard the sound of someone making some noise – probably the neighbour next door as usual.
1:57 am – Again, immediately after I shifted my sleeping posture slightly, I heard someone slam the car door shut outside.
4:05 am – Immediately after I turned around in bed from left to right, I heard a thud sound coming from nearby or outside. Probably someone was closing a car door.
6:40 am – Immediately after I stretched myself in bed a bit, I heard the neighbour opening the door.
7:20 am – Immediately after I scratched my foot a bit, I heard someone cough outside.
7:25 am – Immediately after I sat down to pee in the bathroom, I heard a thud outside.
21/8/25 At approximately 1:40 PM, immediately after I finished brushing my teeth, I heard some individuals begin to converse outside while walking past my window. I managed to take a picture of them. One of them also wore a navy blue jacket, one of the colour ranges consistently used in the harassment campaign against me.
These are just some of the daily hints that they give me on a daily basis to let me know that I am being constantly watched via hidden cameras, which also record audio!
It’s pure psychological torture and conditioning techniques, as if to see how long I will last being psychologically tortured daily for an extended period.
This synchronised behaviour unequivocally demonstrates that my every movement, however minute, is being meticulously observed in real-time and daily through illegal surveillance methods, including but not limited to hidden cameras, with audio recording as well. The deliberate timing of these responses serves no purpose other than to intimidate me, instill profound paranoia, and convey the chilling message that my life is under constant, inescapable scrutiny. This technique is a direct and calculated assault on my mental well-being and my fundamental right to privacy and security within my own home, causing severe distress and an inability to feel safe or unobserved.
These incident match a consistent pattern where external noises and timed movements are used to communicate that my private activities are being watched in real time.
📄 Relevancy to the Case: At night, when external activity is minimal, the perpetrators appear to use passing vehicles to hint at surveillance whenever I turn in bed, go to the bathroom, or engage in other private activities. In the daytime, they employ more varied methods:
Housemates coughing, clearing their throats, or conversing at key moments.
Motorcycles or cars accelerating past my window during private activities.
These cues are frequently timed to end in 3, 6, 7, or 8—numbers used repeatedly in this harassment campaign against me to suggest deliberateness and coordination.
This pattern reinforces my evidence that the perpetrators (directly or indirectly) use external actors and sensory cues to convey surveillance and intimidate me, violating my privacy and creating a constant sense of being watched. It supports my claim that covert monitoring (including hidden cameras) is paired with psychological tactics to make the surveillance known and distressing.
If you’re reading this and experiencing similar things, then you’re being watched just like me! Therefore, this post is also to help other victims to recognise the pattern of abuse and illegal surveillance, so that you can protect yourself and your rights. It took me more than a decade to find out I have been secretly filmed and distributed for years. Therefore, this blog post is not just to share my experience but to raise awareness as well and to help other victims who may not yet know they’re a victim of illegal surveillance and voyeurism.
What they are doing to me daily match a ‘Gangstalking’ Training Manual below:
What I am experiencing daily precisely matches the description in the ‘Gangstalking’ Training Manual above: “Agents aim to make the target uncomfortable around the clock.”‘Gangstalking’ Training ManualThe red arrow in the image above shows you the link to download the ‘Gangstalking’ Training Manual on https://bounceblack.org/resources/organised-harassment/
The day I opened the first draft of my legal documents, I remember feeling the same cold steadiness that comes after a long storm. But I said to myself: “This is it. Today’s the day. I have to do it or be tortured to death! I couldn’t let them do this to me and my daughter anymore. Enough is enough. I am going to stop this once and for all.”
I had gathered months of evidence, each screenshot, email, photograph, etc. My computer had become both a weapon and a witness. Every time I typed, I was not just writing — I was reclaiming what had been stolen: my voice, my story, my right to exist without 24/7 intrusive surveillance.
Still, I hesitated before naming names. I knew the scale of what I was confronting — powerful entities, global platforms, entertainment companies, and the like.
So I wrote carefully. Deliberately. Fact by fact. I numbered each paragraph of my documents ready to file, as if each line was a step on a staircase I was building toward daylight and freedom from torture.
I described what had been done to me and my daughter — which is shockingly still ongoing — the illegal filming, the manipulation, harassment, intimidation, the coded messages in advertising and posts, the psychological torment — not as chaos, but as evidence. I was learning the language of law, teaching myself to translate pain into proof.
It was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.
This is the first page of Chapter 6: Time to Seek Justice of my upcoming ebook: Predators.
I am talking about the horrific incident not long ago, in which a helicopter would appear almost every time I go out to harass and intimidate me as their way to restrict my freedom of movement. They’re hunting me like prey in broad daylight!
Sometimes, trying to do the right thing—following the legal process, serving documents properly, or attempting to settle a dispute out of court—can feel impossible. I recently experienced this firsthand with a major social media platform.
I needed the address of their legal representative so I could serve them with court documents, include the correct information in my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, and even send settlement offers to try to resolve the matter without a full-blown trial. What should have been a straightforward request turned into a confusing back-and-forth.
First, I was directed to their European headquarters, which seemed like a logical starting point given my location and the company’s presence there. However, later, I was informed that I needed to contact the company’s legal department in the United States instead. This circular referral delayed my ability to proceed with legal filings and added unnecessary stress to an already difficult situation.
The experience illustrates a wider problem: even when we follow the rules and take steps to resolve disputes amicably, large organisations can inadvertently—or sometimes seemingly intentionally—make the process more complicated than it should be. For someone trying to navigate legal procedures, this kind of bureaucratic maze is exhausting and frustrating.
While I am not naming specific individuals or agencies involved in the initial harm at this stage, I believe it is crucial to highlight how even well-known platforms can complicate the pursuit of accountability. Every obstacle, no matter how procedural, adds to the stress and difficulty of trying to resolve the matter, preferably out of court—and that experience deserves to be acknowledged.
I’m sharing this not to attack the platform itself, but to highlight the real obstaclesindividuals face when trying to engage with powerful entities in a legal context. A simple request for an address should not be this complicated—but in practice, it can be.
The industrial-scale harassment, sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, commercial exploitation, reputational sabotage, hacking, phone tracking, intimidation, and human rights abuses just continue despite pending legal actions. It’s something I have to live with daily — constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded in every way possible and my safety compromised.
Furthermore, they also keep implying to me that they’re also doing the same thing to my daughter. It’s one of the most evilest thing I have ever experienced.
Earlier this year, I tried to apply for an injunction several times already. I submitted my documents and evidence to the King’s Bench Division through the secure Dropbox system provided for court filings. Each time, I followed the process carefully — yet somehow, my documents, including my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, simply vanished. They never reached the court. This happened not once, but two or three times, causing significant delays to my case and prolonging the harm I continue to suffer.
Now, I’m preparing to apply again as well as initiating court proceedings. This injunction is not just another filing; it is a vital legal step to protect myself & my daughter and to hold those responsible accountable. The ongoing obstruction of justice, harassment, intimidation, invasion of privacy, voyeurism, hacking, cyberstalking, phone tracking, and misuse of my private information have taken a serious toll on my wellbeing.
The injunction represents more than just paperwork — it’s about survival, dignity, and the right to live without fear. Everyone deserves to feel safe, to be free from harassment and invasion of privacy. And when that safety and right to privacy are taken away, the law must step in.
I’m sharing this because no one should have to face harassment in silence. If you’ve experienced similar obstruction or intimidation, know that you’re not alone — and that persistence matters.
This application is my way of standing firm, refusing to be silenced, and demanding the protection and justice I should have received long ago.
Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:
#JusticeForBuppha
#JusticeForMyDaughter
#HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK
King’s Bench Division in London where I am going to apply for urgent injunctions and initiate court proceedings.
“Anonymity, secrecy, or acting under someone else’s instruction does not protect you from liability. Justice moves with precision.”
Some individuals involved in the harassment, intimidation, data breach, misuse of private information, and defamation campaign against me may believe they are shielded by anonymity. They may think that if I don’t know their names or exact roles, they can evade justice. However, the law provides powerful tools to uncover hidden perpetrators and hold them accountable.
1. Norwich Pharmacal Orders: Compelling Disclosure from Third Parties
A Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) is a court order compelling a third party—such as an internet service provider, social media platform, email provider, or individual—to disclose information identifying wrongdoers.
This legal mechanism originated from Norwich Pharmacal Co. v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, where the House of Lords held that courts can order an innocent third party “mixed up” in wrongdoing to reveal the wrongdoer’s identity.
Real-life example:
In Filatona Trading Ltd v Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP (2024), the High Court granted a Norwich Pharmacal order against a law firm to reveal the source of a confidential report used in litigation. Even reputable institutions can be compelled to disclose identifying information when they are inadvertently entangled in wrongdoing. (Osborne Clarke, 2024)
Key takeaways:
NPOs can identify anonymous users behind fake profiles or emails.
Third parties must comply once ordered by the court.
Courts grant NPOs when a claimant shows a credible case of wrongdoing and that disclosure is essential to identify the wrongdoer.
2. Early Disclosure Orders and Specific Disclosure
An Early Disclosure Order under CPR 31.16 enables a person to obtain documents before starting formal proceedings—vital in cases where identifying the wrongdoer is a necessary first step.
Specific Disclosure under CPR 31.12 can compel a defendant or third party to hand over key documents during proceedings.
Real-life example:
In EUI Ltd v Charles and Others (2018), the court granted pre-action disclosure in a suspected fraud case, confirming that early disclosure may be appropriate where evidence is at risk or where identity must be established before the claim can proceed. (Westlaw Practical Law)
Key takeaways:
Early disclosure uncovers hidden abusers before proceedings.
Specific disclosure can obtain crucial documents revealing who is responsible.
Courts ensure disclosure is necessary to deal with the case fairly.
3. Witness Summons and Testimony Under Oath
A witness summons is a court order requiring a person to attend court and give evidence—or produce documents—under oath. False testimony constitutes perjury, a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment.
Real-life example:
In Johnson v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2019] EWHC 1709 (Admin), the High Court reviewed the process of summoning Boris Johnson to answer allegations of misconduct. This case illustrates that even high-profile individuals can be required to testify or face examination under oath. (Judiciary.uk)
Key takeaways:
Witnesses can be compelled to reveal who instructed or coordinated the wrongdoing.
False statements under oath carry criminal penalties.
Testimony can expose the full chain of conspirators.
When someone is summoned as a witness, they are legally required to tell the truth. Testifying under oath carries the risk of perjury, a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. Once under oath, they cannot lie about who instructed them, what they were told to do, or how far the conspiracy extends — without exposing themselves to serious legal consequences.
Testimonies under oath can provide direct evidence of coordination, conspiracy, or misconduct, confirming the links between the visible and hidden participants in a campaign of wrongdoing.
4. The Message
For anyone involved — whether as a main perpetrator or an enabler — it’s important to understand that silence and secrecy do not guarantee safety. The legal system is built to pierce through layers of concealment.
For readers facing similar challenges: you do not have to feel powerless just because you don’t yet know every name. The law gives you a pathway to find the truth.
Every order, every summon, and every piece of testimony brings accountability closer.
Please share this post to as many people as you can, including the hashtags:
