Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
Every time I go online, like or comment on a post about Keir Starmer, particularly concerning the negativity surrounding him and how badly people thik he runs the country, or privately type something in my legal documents, the retaliation is swift! Because immediately after, I will hear housemates exit/return to the property and slam the main door shut – sometimes very forcefully, as if to make me feel intimidated. My room is also next to the main door and they are illegally observing me via hidden cameras 24/7. So, they know very well the considerable impact of the door slamming will give me. This looks therefore like it’s not just mere intimidation but also repeated attempts to cause me bodily harm. My housemates may not be aware of that their actions are intended to contribute to a slow kill!
If Keir Starmer is behind this by having his people unlawfully monitored my devices at all time, and then retaliate immediately every time I go online or like some negative social media posts about him, then he’s a dictator and a very dangerous man, who can’t be trusted!
It looks therefore like his another attempt to also violate my human right article 10 (freedom of expression) under the ECHR, among many other human rights articles that he and his co-conspirators are allegedly violating.
That’s why I need to go public and document EVERYTHING. If something happens to me or my daughter. Then, you will know who may be behind this. Because he has also allegedly blocked my access to lawyers. So, I have no one to protect me and my rights. Going public is therefore my only way to bring the national and international attention to his alleged attempts to control and harm me and my daughter. He and his co-conspirators must not be allowed to commit crimes against me and my daughter under the radar!
At 18:45 pm, immediately after taking a screenshot of Keir Starmer's post, a housemate was heard exiting the property & slamming the door shut. Upon her return, she slammed the main door shut even more forcefully! Clearly, all my online activities are being illegally monitored. pic.twitter.com/xdXiYqhdMq
You may wonder why I keep talking about how they relentlessly and illegally install hidden cameras in every place I live or go and even across Europe, including Denmark, non-consensually film me 24/7, distribute or live-stream the illegal footage for their own financial gain (illegal enterprise), misuse my private information on a massive scale, commercialise my private life, harass and intimidate me on a daily basis but do nothing about it to stop it and to hold my perpetrators accountable.
Believe me, I have tried all I can to stop the abuse. But they actively prevent me from getting any help and support to stop it by, for example:
Influencing human rights lawyers and human rights organisations not to help me. Even Amnesty refused to help me. There’s something not quite right going on.
Intimidating me every time I physically try to go to a law firm to talk to a lawyer face-to-face instead. Because I know all my online activities and communications are being illegally monitored at all times, making it impossible for me to contact anyone for help. They even go as far as to get some men to use imitation firearms to pretend to shoot me with when I am on my way to consult a solicitor. Sometimes also employ a helicopter or two to chase me across London!
Unlawfully monitoring me via hidden cameras around the clock, which also record audio, to make sure if someone visits me and I ask for help, they will immediately know it, including what we’re talking about. They will then be able to contact the individual to manipulate, influence, or even intimidate them not to help me.
Unlawfully monitoring all my online activities and communications at all times to detect any help I attempt to seek via emails, phone calls, online submissions, etc. Even the computers at the public libraries are being monitored. So, I cannot use the computers there to seek help either.
Turning everyone against me – even my own housemates, unions, employers, potential employers, colleagues, GPs, hospitals, medical professionals, staff at the supermarkets, security personnel, staff at the Jobcentres, and just almost everyone – so I can’t ask them for help either. To make the matter worse, they also use these people as tools for harassment and intimidation as well, to make me think it’s hopeless trying to get help and may eventually give up. They simply try to isolate me and block all routes for help and support as much as possible. It’s like psychological murder.
Constantly monitoring me on social media as well.
Apparently making my court documents and evidence disappear each time I try to apply for injunction and initiate court proceedings. Because how on earth my important documents and evidence can just easily vanish from such a sensitive location (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division), and it’s not just once but 2-3 times already.
Spreading misinformation to control the narrative and even appearing to pay journalists to write insulting articles to indirectly target me and my daughter.
Economically sanctioning me by allegedly telling everyone not to hire me. So, I will remain vulnerable both financially and socially. This seems to serve two purposes: Sabotage my livelihoods and relationships. Because if I have a job, I will be talking to people and build a relationship or make friends, which may eventually expose their crimes against me and my daughter and may help stop the abuse, at long last. So, they don’t want that. Therefore, the economic sabotage is for the purpose of preventing me from getting help as well. They then appear to spread lies that I am lazy, don’t want to work and just want to receive benefits when it’s not true. I am a woman of colour, so it’s easy for them to make people think I just want to receive benefits to incite hatred as well.
The illegal footage unlawfully taken with the hidden cameras over the years then appears to be used as a tool of humiliation as well by disseminating it to third parties and platforms as much as they can, to cause me severe distress, embarrassment and humiliation and to defame me. Simultaneously, they also make money from it at my expense by distributing or live-streaming it to various places, amounting to illegal enterprise, unjust enrichment and organised crime.
Unlawfully obtaining my private information via various means. Mostly through the use of their agents to extract my sensitive and confidential information from almost everybody I know and then use that information to harass and intimidate me, to let me know that they are violating my privacy in every way possible. Moreover, they also appear to make profits from my private information as well by selling it to third parties. They simply treat me and my private information as their property and assets to use it however they want.
Using my housemates to constantly remind me of how they violate my human rights in very way possible – particularly article 3 (prohibition from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment), article 6 (right to a fair trial) and article 8 (right to privacy) under the ECHR. For example, almost every time I privately write in my document on my device about the hidden cameras, secret filming and distribution, they then appear to send my housemate to pretend to cough loudly while walking past my room before exiting the house when the time concludes with the digit 8, which symbolically refers to article 8 (right to privacy). They then do this repeatedly, so I know they are not coincidences but are signals to let me know that all my online activities are being illegally monitored by responding to what I type in real time while also making reference to article 8. It’s both psychological torture and coercive control or suppression of freedom of expression, to make me feel intimidated that everything I write is being illegally monitored at all times as well. And the more I talk about it, the more they will do it as a form of discreet censorship and punishment. So I may eventually stop exercising my rights due to fear of retaliation.
These are just some of the vicious, illegal acts committed against me, and possibly against my daughter as well.
They do all of this to me, not just to prevent me from getting help and support but to also cause me severe distress and humiliation, knowing that they don’t respect my rights and privacy. This is also intentional infliction of emotional distress.
So, although I don’t want any of this but due to their persistent attempts to prevent me from stopping the abuse and exploitation, as mentioned above, I am trapped in their ongoing abuse, prolonging my pain and suffering, unable to move on with my life, form relationships, or earn a living.
Every attempt to stop the abuse and exploitation has been met with more obstruction, abuse, intimidation, harassment, retaliation and victimisation, as described above. This is an abuse of power at its finest, including severe discrimination amounting to hate crime and crimes against humanity.
This appears to exceed the police power. Especially, when even top human rights lawyers and organisations refuse to help me. I therefore feel because I am suing the police and someone is covering up for the police; someone with power beyond police power. Thus, the name Keir Starmer, the British PM, came to mind. Particularly, when he used to be a human rights lawyer himself. If he is directly behind this or complicit in this, I should be able to sue him as well. No one is above the law. Even (prince) Andrew, Boris Johnson and other public figures have been sued. Maybe that’s why he blocks my access to lawyers, so that I cannot hold him accountable as well, and so that he and his gang can continue to abuse and exploit me and my daughter to no end. If this is true, he may be liable for malfeasance in public office among many other illegal acts committed against me and my daughter, including cybersex trade. The money from the illegal enterprise may go straight to his own pocket, constituting corruption.
Thus, cybersex trafficking and selling my and my daughter’s private information may be his side hustle beside his real job as a Prime Minister. He and his gang may make more money from this illegal enterprise. Because I believe it’s not just me who’s being secretly filmed and distributed but maybe my daughter as well due to lots of hints from their associates as if intentional, to induce anger and severe emotional distress. She is much younger than me (approximately 35 years old). So, they probably make lots of money on her. If this is true, he’s no difference than a pimp! His wife and kids should know this as well what he may have been doing behind their backs.
Maybe that’s why they continue to illegally install hidden cameras everywhere I live to carry on the abuse and exploitation since it’s a huge business for them. This looks more and more like organised crime as well.
He also appears to use public resources for his own personal gain by using public money or tax money to hire civilians to harass me on a daily basis (harassment for hire, which I will talk about it in another post). The amount of money being spent daily to harass me since 2024 when he came into power may have exceeded millions of pounds, if not billions, already. Therefore, this is a matter of public interest when a public servant abuses his power, commits crimes and misuses public resources. Thus, the public deserves to know about it and there must be an investigation. Because no one is above the law.
The video below shows Keir Starmer talking about how he’s tackling violence against women and girls. But he appears to be behind or complicit in the sexual abuse and exploitation of me, and possibly of my daughter as well, via the hidden cameras and cybersex trafficking himself. If this is true, the man is a complete hypocrite and dangerous, who should not be anywhere near women and girls and should certainly not run the country!
I managed to initiate court proceedings (Claim number KB-2025-004650), at long last. But the court stayed the proceedings for the time being to allow me time to amend my claim. I am now working day & night to amend my claim and to prepare for an urgent injunction application. Because my access to legal representation seems to be blocked, as I said earlier, so I must do everything myself for now.
If you care about justice, human rights, equality and crimes against humanity, please do not just read my blog but contact human rights lawyers, human rights organisations, investigative journalists and so fort for me. Because I can’t do this myself when I am being constantly monitored both online and offline. Clearly, they don’t want the truth to come out.
Yesterday, I published a blog post talking about witness intimidation, illegal surveillance, cybersex trafficking, the obstruction of justice, evidence tampering, the severe violations of my Human Rights, particularly Article 3 (prohibition from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 8 (right to privacy) under the ECHR, and more.
I also raised serious concerns about the possibility that the state-actor defendants may have also subjected my adult daughter to the same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras and cybersex trade. I subsequently shared a link to my blog post on X. See below.
The same day, I also posted on X about MI5 and MI6 regarding illegal surveillance that violates Article 8.
Later, my X account has suspiciously been restricted after talking a lot about Keir Starmer and my daughter. Because I reasonably believe he has ordered the hidden cameras and audio recording devices to be illegally installed in her accommodation as well, to sexually abuse and exploit her – just like what they do to her mother (Me). I also believe he’s directly behind or complicit in the sexpionage operation as well. So, if you click on the links of my X posts, you may see nothing.
Article 10 "Beth" – MI5’s illegal access to her phone data was found to threaten the confidentiality of journalistic sources. Courts apply "heightened scrutiny" when the state spies on journalists, such actions chill free speech.
I also posted about the unlawful blocking of my access to lawyers and compared my case to Epstein’s case as the British version of it. My case is more of a cybersex trade. But it does also involve powerful men and entities, money laundering, large-scale corruption and a sex trafficking ring. Just like his case in the US.
Same here. All co-conspirators, who help them commit abuse and crimes against humanity, should equally be held accountable. Sadly, my access to lawyers seems to be blocked. I have therefore no one to help me protect my rights like these women have. https://t.co/nhara8OsuU
Article 8: Right to Respect for Private and Family Life This is the "heavy hitter" in surveillance cases. To be lawful, any interference by the state (e.g., MI5 and MI6) must be "in accordance with the law" and "necessary in a democratic society."
Then, at approximately 2 pm onwards today, I observed multiple threatening lines and symbols in the sky drawn by the aircraft right outside my window and near my residence.
The prolonged covert surveillance and organised harassment I’ve endured have manifested in increasingly insidious ways, extending beyond direct observation to a sophisticated campaign of psychological manipulation. It appears they employ various methods to convey hidden messages, demonstrating an alleged unlawful gathering of information about my life, possessions, and even my past.
One recurring pattern involves the use of numbers. For instance, I’ve observed repeated instances where numbers like 3, 6, 8, and 10 appear in contexts that, to me, seem to symbolically reference alleged violations of my human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. Similarly, the number 4 has appeared in ways that I interpret as alluding to Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which prohibits slavery in all its forms. These are not isolated occurrences but form part of a continuous campaign of intimidation.
Beyond numbers, I have noticed a consistent use of everyday objects and situations to convey these messages. This includes specific number plates, symbols, imagery, clothing, colours, and even brand names such as Adidas, Nike, and Puma. The language used in certain interactions also appears to be deliberately chosen.
The surveillance itself is pervasive and designed to be overtly acknowledged. A recent example highlights this: After experiencing a bout of sneezing and using tissues before leaving my home. Later that day, while on public transport, I observed several individuals who, shortly after sitting near or opposite me, began to sneeze and blow their noses with tissues in a manner that mirrored my earlier actions. This pattern of mirroring my private actions in public spaces is a frequent occurrence and contributes significantly to my sense of being under continuous surveillance.
They also appear to leverage knowledge of my past. For instance, I’ve observed a notable increase in the appearance of specific car brands that I used to own, such as Ford, or brands that allude to individuals I once knew. This suggests an extensive and unlawful information gathering operation, seemingly designed to humiliate and intimidate me by demonstrating their intimate knowledge of my personal history. More recently, I’ve noticed a particular car brand, KIA, appearing with unusual frequency. While I’ve never owned a KIA nor do I know anyone who does, its repeated appearance suggests another layer of their coded communication, the meaning of which remains unclear to me.
My experience resonates deeply with accounts from other victims of organised harassment. For example, a UK blogger, whose ordeal includes stalking, sabotage, cyberattacks, and even alleged attempts at poisoning, has spoken publicly about her experiences, including at the Houses of Parliament. She describes constant surveillance, with individuals and vehicles following her, and notes that license plates are often used for ‘secret communication,’ including veiled threats. Her description of her situation as a ‘psychological thriller and COINTELPRO 2.0’ mirrors the unsettling reality I face daily. This shared experience underscores that these are not isolated incidents but a pattern of sophisticated, organised harassment affecting multiple individuals.
Most people never have to think about Article 6 of the Human Rights Act. But when something goes wrong — when your privacy is violated, when you need legal protection, when you’re suddenly navigating the court system — Article 6 becomes one of the most important rights you have.
So what is Article 6?
Article 6 = The Right to a Fair Trial
In simple terms, Article 6 protects your right to:
– be heard – have a fair process – access legal advice – have equal footing with the other side – participate effectively in your own case
It exists to stop situations where one side has all the power, resources, or representation — and the other side is left unprotected.
Why Article 6 Matters in My Case
In my situation, there appear to be barriers preventing me from securing legal representation, while the opposing side has full legal support. This creates an imbalance that undermines the fairness of the proceedings.
A fair trial requires equality of arms — meaning both sides should have a fair chance to present their case.
When one side has lawyers and the other is prevented from obtaining them, that balance is lost.
Why I’m Seeking an Urgent Injunction
To restore fairness, I am seeking an urgent injunction to also prevent any interference with my ability to obtain legal representation, including any actions that discourage, influence, or obstruct lawyers or organisations from providing me with impartial advice. Without legal advice, it becomes impossible to navigate complex digital privacy issues or defend my rights effectively.
Because access to legal representation is essential for a fair trial, and any obstruction undermines my Article 6 rights.
This is not just about me — many people facing digital harms struggle to obtain legal support. Article 6 exists to protect all of us.
Why This Is a Public‑Interest Issue
Digital privacy violations are increasing. So are barriers to justice. When people cannot access lawyers, the system fails.
By speaking out, I hope to:
– raise awareness – encourage transparency – highlight systemic barriers – protect my rights – support others facing similar obstacles
Access to justice is a human right. Article 6 protects that right — and it must be upheld.
I am very busy with lots of things at once. Mostly working on this case alone without a solicitor due my access to lawyers appears to have been obstructed. I have to prepare lots of legal paperwork, gather information and evidence, study specific areas of law related to my claim, drafting an injunction application, Particulars of Claim, and many more.
It’s overwhelming when you don’t have legal representation. Especially when this case involves multiple defendants – most of them are large corporations and powerful individuals, residing both inside and outside the UK – making this case an exceptionally high-profile and high-stakes case.
Therefore, this is so wrong when they apparently prevent me from having legal representation, to make it difficult for me as much as possible to challenge their illegal enterprises.
Furthermore, they seem to continue to install hidden cameras and keep giving me hints that they are still unlawfully observing everything I do and disseminating/live-streaming the illegal footage far and wide.
They also appear to cyberstalk me 24/7 and then use the stolen information to harass, intimidate, gain insight into my legal strategies, and share the illegally obtained information to various places to violate my privacy even further as a form of unlawful retaliation and victimisation for trying to assert my rights.
This has caused me severe emotional distress, humiliation and the feeling that my privacy has severely been violated on every level.
Plus, I have to prepare a complex case alone without formal legal training while enduring daily abuse, racial and sexual harassment, intimidation and humiliation since I still live under 24/7 illegal surveillance, knowing that everything has been non-consensually filmed, both with video and audio, and has subsequently been distributed or sold to various places for profit as well.
While I am typing this blog post, at approximately 10:10 am, I hear someone cough outside. This is what they appear to do by cyberstalking me around the clock and then constantly giving me hints via various means, such as someone coughing or conversing loudly nearby, as soon as I type some crucial or sensitive information into my legal documents, especially regarding sexual abuse via hidden cameras. This seems to serve two purposes: To let me know that they are also constantly watching me online via cyberstalking/hacking to make me feel intimidated that they are still illegally monitoring me both online and offline, to demonstrate that nothing in my life is private anymore, and to induce anger by giving me hints at the precise moment I detail the horrific crimes allegedly committed against me. It’s one of their sadistic ways to consistently confirm and remind me of their evil, illegal practices.
This is an extreme form of human rights violations under the ECHR, particularly Article 8: Respect for your private and family life.
Again, at approximately 10:36 am, immediately upon finishing drafting this blog post, I hear some housemates begin to converse loudly right outside my room to mock and confirm their constant monitoring of all my online activities by getting the housemates to do the exact same thing I have just typed in my legal note on my mobile phone. The time contains numbers 3 and 6 again, the numbers often used in the harassment campaign against me, including number 8, to constantly and symbolically refer to their alleged violations of my human rights Article 3 (Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (Right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (Respect for your private and family life) under the ECHR.
The hidden surveillance cameras used to monitor me without consent do not merely record my movements visually, but also capture audio, including private conversations, thoughts spoken aloud, moments of distress and in intimate states. These recordings are not kept privately, nor are they isolated breaches. Instead, I believe they have been unlawfully distributed and even broadcast live to various third parties, including pornographic websites, others known to me and to my daughter, and others known to the Defendants.
This exploitation has persisted for years and appears to be commercial in nature, weaponising my privacy, body, and identity for financial gain. The level of cruelty, humiliation, and psychological abuse resulting from this long-term monetised voyeurism is beyond comprehension. The invasion is total — affecting my physical safety, mental health, and ability to function as a normal human being. I believe this form of organised, profit-driven exploitation not only exceeds anything described in comparable witness accounts, but also constitutes a psychological torture, a modern form of enslavement and cybersex trafficking.
Based on clear and repeated patterns of behaviour — including highly specific, sexually explicit references used to taunt me — I believe the perpetrators have been unlawfully observing and filming me over many years inside my private accommodation, Putney flat, where I lived for over a decade, including many other places afterwards.
These individuals appear to have detailed knowledge of my private and intimate life and even verbal expressions during such private moments. These are facts no one could know unless they had been watching me live or accessing recorded footage through hidden cameras.
I strongly believe the recordings were not only stored but also distributed, possibly broadcast live to pornographic platforms, the dark web, or even to individuals known to me, in an effort to destroy my dignity, reputation, and relationships.
This is the longest, most invasive, and cruel form of image-based sexual abuse I have ever encountered. It constitutes gendered violence, racial exploitation of a vulnerable South East Asian woman, and human rights violations under Article 3 and Article 8 ECHR.
The psychological trauma has been immense. This is mental abuse by design — intended to cause maximum anguish through a combination of sexual exploitation, degradation, surveillance, and total loss of autonomy over my body and private life.
I believe the Defendants have also profited from this abuse, and have treated me as an object of ongoing illegal human experimentation, retaliating and escalating the abuse whenever I try to resist, speak out, or seek protection.
When I fled the UK to seek refuge in Denmark, the abuse intensified, with the same patterns of surveillance, voyeurism, misuse of private information, taunts, colour-coded harassment, and symbolic intimidation continuing there — but with even more cruelty and sadism, strongly suggesting that the Defendants instructed Danish actors or other actors to continue the harassment and abuse abroad.
Moreover, I have not only experienced severe and prolonged surveillance, harassment, and retaliation—both online and offline—but I have also been completely obstructed from accessing legal representation, thereby preventing me from stopping the abuse.
They have been subjecting me to illegal surveillance via hidden cameras, repeated sexual abuse through unlawful live broadcasting, and coordinated campaigns of intimidation and humiliation, including smear tactics, symbolic stalking, death threats, and harassment and exploitation of my daughter. Each time I attempt to seek help or assert my rights—whether by consulting organisations, approaching solicitors, or submitting claim forms—the harassment escalates immediately, confirming that I remain under hostile and illegal surveillance.
Thus, they have allegedly persistently denied me legal assistance and isolated me from support systems, so that the abuse can continue to escalate unchecked. This demonstrates the calculated, retaliatory, and cruel nature of the treatment they are giving me.
For the past several years, I truly believe I have been living a normal life. Just like everyone else. But in reality, I have been subjected to what I can only describe as obsessive and intrusive surveillance.
After finding out that I have been secretly and sexually exploiting via hidden cameras for more than a decade late last year, 2024, and trying to legally stop it, the severe harassment campaign against me started!
The campaign of excessive surveillance and covert harassment against me has now reached an industrial scale where I can’t go anywhere without being harassed, sexually harassed, stalked, and sometimes even intimidated. It’s like public lynching, which is a form of unlawful retaliation and victimisation.
As a 54-year-old South East Asian woman living alone, I have become an easy target for tactics that exploit vulnerability and isolation. This may constitute race, age and gender abuse / discrimination, amounting to violence against women and a possible hate crime as well. This campaign of intimidation, covert harassment and intrusive surveillance has left me fearful, anxious, and exhausted, yet determined to share my story to raise awareness and advocate for justice.
Copenhagen, Denmark.
The systematic and illegal surveillance includes the non-consensual installation of hidden cameras in my private residences, and even in shared rooms and bathrooms at every hostel I have stayed at both in the UK and Denmark, the live broadcasting of my intimate life, and the widespread distribution of these images to pornographic sites, individuals I know, social media sites, tech platforms, and God knows where else they have distributed / live streamed to! They have also engaged in constant cyberstalking, racial and sexual harassment, and intimidation tactics, including displaying imitation firearms when I sought legal counsel.
Many human rights experts have described as covert surveillance and organised harassment. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has even documented these techniques: stalking, sound campaigns, conditioning, gaslighting, sleep deprivation, and targeted disinformation to discredit victims. Every tactic they list matches my experience — in detail and intent.
I am constantly monitored through covert means. Each movement in my home seems mirrored by external signals — footsteps, doors closing, whistling, loud conversations, or vehicles driving past my window at precisely timed moments. People appear wearing coordinated colours — navy blue, army green, burgundy, red, and orange, for instance — that have been repeatedly used in this harassment campaign as psychological triggers.
Their actions go far beyond illegal voyeuristic surveillance. The hidden cameras installed in all my accommodations, both past and present, are used not only to record me for distribution purposes but also to excessively monitor me in real time, 24/7. This allows them to coordinate harassment strategies with precision.
For example, when I step into the kitchen, I frequently observe individuals emerging outside almost simultaneously, visible through the small gap of the window. The timing is so exact that it cannot be coincidental; it reflects an immediate response to my private movements. This demonstrates that individuals are being stationed in nearby “holding areas” ready to be deployed at any moment, proving that the surveillance is actively used to harass and intimidate me.
Furthermore, these individuals often wear or carry items in specific colour ranges, as I said earlier, consistently associated with the harassment campaign against me. The repetition of these symbolic colours makes clear that their presence is not accidental but a deliberate sign intended to remind me that I am being constantly watched.
They use conditioning techniques—repeated visible cues such as people coughing, repeated use of specific clothing colours, and people walking past my window at precisely the moments I move—to sensitise and intimidate me and to make me self-police. These tactics, described by OHCHR as recognised harassment techniques, correspond with covert, real-time surveillance of my movements. It’s psychological torture by making me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing I am being constantly watched.
To reclaim a sense of agency and to gather irrefutable evidence of the external activities associated with this surveillance, I am exploring the installation of external recording devices. This is a necessary measure to document the ongoing nature of these crimes and to support my pursuit of justice against those responsible for this egregious human rights violation.
The fear of being recorded has affected my daily routines, including basic self-care. I have avoided showering for days, fearing that intimate footage may be captured and distributed without my consent. The strain on my health, hygiene, and emotional well-being is profound. It’s pure torture when I can’t even take a shower.
Please donate. Just scan the code on the image above or click on it to be taken to my GoFundMe page.
Psychological and Emotional Impact
The tactics used in this harassment campaign mirror those documented by human-rights organizations: conditioning, sleep deprivation, gaslighting, sound campaigns, and repeated hints of being constantly watched to make the victims feel uncomfortable around the clock. These practices are designed to instill fear, self-doubt, and paranoia, ultimately isolating the victim from support networks and normal life. The emotional toll is immense. Feeling constantly watched, and knowing my private life could be misused, has caused severe distress.
A Call to Action
No one should live in fear in their own home. Harassment and invasion of privacy can happen to anyone, but marginalised or isolated individuals are particularly at risk.
So, I want to seek justice, aim to prevent others from suffering similar abuse, and expose systemic corruption. We can create a safer environment for everyone by talking openly about these issues. It is important to support victims. We should thus advocate for stronger protections to guarantee justice.
Please share this post to as many people as you can, including the hashtags: #JusticeForBuppha #HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK
The Cunning Tactic of Using Civilians to Stalk, Harass and Intimidate Me Daily (Stalking by Proxy)
I want to share a disturbing reality that I face every day: I am subjected to constant stalking, cyberstalking, harassment and intimidation by civilians who appear to be employed or directed by the perpetrators, or their agents, behind my ongoing legal battle as retaliation and victimisation.
These individuals are not random strangers — they follow a deliberate pattern designed to punish and silence me. Many wear specific colours like blue and army green – others may not wear these colours directly but carry items or accessories in blue, army green, burgundy, or orange to signal their role – including brands like Adidas and Puma (Seemingly copying my own clothing style because I also have some clothes from Adidas. But I don’t have Puma clothing. So, they might copy the Puma clothing style from someone I know), which act as a coded language within this harassment network. They often wear wireless earbuds, signaling live coordination and surveillance.
Blue and army green colours are some of the known sensitising colours use to harass me (colour harassment) on a daily basis every time I go out! They also use burgundy colour a lot to sensitise and harass me. Others may not wear these colours directly but carry items or accessories in blue, army green, burgundy, or orange to signal their role.
One of the cruelest tactics they use involves elderly men. Soon after I expose wrongdoing in my legal documents, which strongly suggests constant hacking/cyberstalking, these men are sent to sexually harass me in public places — at bus stops, on streets, on public transport, and other everyday locations. This targeted harassment is a form of punishment for speaking out and seeking justice. The abuse is humiliating, degrading, and designed to instill fear and silence me.
The elderly men then often wear blue colour to suggest intentional harassment. They would also instruct people to sit or stand in a group of 3, 6 or 8 to also imply the violations of my human rights articles 3 (freedom from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment), 6 (right to a fair trial) and 8 (right to privacy) under The Human Rights Act 1998.
Living under this constant, targeted harassment is like torture. Whenever I sit somewhere—like at a bus stop—an elderly man wearing a known sensitising colour, or carrying something in that colour, to signal intentionality and illegal surveillance, is almost immediately dispatched to sit or stand near me, making me feel deeply uncomfortable and unsafe. Sometimes these men come with their wives or partners, making it seem less obvious but no less intentional. If I try to escape by moving to another seat on the bus or train, a new harasser wearing those same colours, or some other colours of the known sensitising colours often used to harass me, will be sent to sit opposite or nearby, asserting that I cannot get away from their surveillance or abuse. This relentless, orchestrated presence is a cruel form of coercive control designed to isolate and intimidate me.
This elderly man walking towards me also carried something in blue to suggest intentionality. This elderly man also wore a black-and-white outfit, some of the newly introduced sensitising colours. He even followed me into a shop pretending to buy something as well, to make me feel uncomfortable. Surely, he was instructed to do so. It’s like this every single day!
What’s even more shocking is how orchestrated, calculated and sadistic this harassment is. The timing is rarely coincidental. Every time I write about or expose their actions, the harassment intensifies almost immediately. They want me to know I am being watched, cyberstalked, tracked (both via phone tracking and stalking by proxy), and punished for standing up.
For example, just after I drafted this blog post, I immediately heard a mocking laugh outside my window. When I looked out, two people wearing the known sensitising colours walked by while chatting, followed by a Black woman dressed in all black with a pink backpack, some of the known sensitising colours they have newly introduced. This immediate sequence is a clear message that I am being illegally monitored 24/7 both online and offline.
This pattern of symbolic harassment, close surveillance, and coordinated intimidation is designed to isolate, degrade, and break me. They use personal references and coded messages to make it clear this abuse is targeted and ongoing.
This is not merely personal harassment but a systematic campaign of psychological terror, abuse, and illegal surveillance. By sharing my story, I hope to raise awareness about these hidden forms of abuse and encourage others facing similar situations to seek help.
No one should have to endure this level of control and cruelty in silence.
It’s part of a wider pattern of illegal surveillance, invasion of privacy, and efforts to isolate and control me. By sharing this, I hope to raise awareness about these tactics, highlight the abuse, and urge others not to ignore the hidden forms of harassment techniques that people like me endure in silence daily.
If you or someone you know is experiencing harassment, stalking, or abuse, please reach out to trusted support services, legal advisers, or advocacy groups. Speaking out is the first step toward breaking free from abuse and reclaiming your life. Together, we can shine a light on these dark tactics and demand justice and dignity for all victims.
No one should have to live under such oppressive conditions.
In any fair society, legal representation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental right. It is one of the few tools individuals have to defend themselves against injustice, abuse of power, and exploitation by those with more influence, resources, or institutional backing. When that right is deliberately withheld—especially in cases involving powerful individuals or state actors—it’s an insult to democracy!
It thus becomes a matter of public interest and human rights.
For probably over a decade, I have endured unrelenting harassment, continuing surveillance campaign and targeted intimidation, both online and offline, which intensifies each time I try to speak out and to do something to stop the ongoing abuse. The individuals and entities behind this campaign of abuse are not just random strangers — they include powerful people and state-affiliated actors. Yet, while they enjoy full access to legal representation to protect themselves and mount their defence, I have been systematically and deliberately deprived of the same basic right.
I write this from a deeply personal experience. I am someone who has been persistently targeted and harassed both online and offline for maybe more than a decade. My case involves highly sophisticated techniques of psychological manipulation, illegal surveillance, symbolic harassment, colour harassment, racial and sexual harassment, and repeated acts of intimidation. And yet, despite the seriousness and scale of this campaign against me, I have been systematically denied access to legal representation.
Why I Desperately Need Legal Representation
Having a lawyer or barrister would act as a protective buffer between me and those who are targeting me. Having access to legal representation is not just a procedural right — it is an essential lifeline, especially for individuals being targeted by powerful adversaries or those who wield institutional influence. A lawyer or barrister would:
Apply for emergency injunctions swiftly—even over the phone, on weekends, or outside court hours, which could stop the ongoing abuses in an instant.
Serve as a protective buffer against direct and retaliatory intimidation.
Help me swiftly seek protective orders in moments of urgent danger.
Navigate the complex legal system, which is quite overwhelming for those without support.
Protect my rights, safeguard my evidence, protect me from injustice and discrimination, prevent gaslighting and manipulation, and effectively defend my case and interests.
Challenge those who are using their institutional power to suppress and retaliate against me.
Advocate on my behalf to prevent further escalation or psychological harm.
Challenge any racial or discriminatory practices that are being used against me.
The very people or institutions harassing me already have legal representation—to defend themselves, to intimidate, and to delay or derail justice. The fact that I, the victim, am denied the same right is not only unjust—it is deliberate.
This is not just a personal struggle; it is a matter of public interest and a human rights issue.
Legal Representation: More Than Just a Right
Legal representation is not a luxury — it is a fundamental safeguard in any democratic society. It serves as a buffer between an individual and systemic abuse, offering protection, advocacy, and the ability to assert one’s legal rights within a complex judicial system. Especially for someone facing powerful adversaries — including institutions, corporations, and individuals with significant resources — access to a solicitor or barrister is critical.
Legal professionals can swiftly apply for urgent injunctions, including out-of-hours or weekend applications, when safety or serious harm is at stake. I have been denied this protection. As a result, I have been left vulnerable to escalating retaliation, without a mechanism to enforce even the most basic boundaries.
A Pattern of Intimidation and Retaliation
Whenever I attempt to speak out about their harassment techniques, they almost immediately punish me!
The calculated nature of the punishment and retaliation — timed to moments of vulnerability or assertion — is intended to inflict emotional distress and reassert their control.
Escalation in Response to Resistance
Each time I attempt to document or speak publicly about these techniques, the harassment escalates dramatically. They replicate the exact same tactics — but ten times more intensely — to punish and provoke me. It’s a form of psychological warfare and coercive control, designed to deter me from resisting, and to enforce submission through retaliation.
This reaction further supports the theory that my activities — including writing, messaging, or any form of documentation — are being continuously and illegally monitored. The perpetrators sift through my private digital life to identify sensitive points, then design new harassment strategies in real-time.
Discrimination and Systemic Injustice
It is impossible to ignore the racial and discriminatory dimension of this abuse. I am a woman of colour. I am not white. And I believe that if I were white, I would never have been subjected to this kind of prolonged, targeted harassment — certainly not for over a decade, with state actors involved, and certainly not with such systematic barriers to legal help.
I have been left isolated, with no legal advocate, no protection, and no recourse — while my abusers continue their violations with impunity.
This is not just harassment. It is severe racial, psychological and mental abuse, fuelled by discriminatory bias and sustained by the denial of my rights.
The Public Interest.
This situation is not unique to me. When someone’s access to justice is systematically blocked — particularly while they are being abused — that is a matter of public interest. When powerful individuals or institutions seemingly collude to deny a person legal representation, weaponise surveillance, and escalate harassment as punishment for speaking out, it goes beyond personal grievance.
It becomes a threat to the rule of law itself.
I Refuse to Be Silent Any Longer
For years, I stayed silent, hoping that enduring would somehow lead to an end. But silence has only emboldened them. My refusal to be abused is not defiance — it is survival. And now, I am speaking out not only for myself, but for everyone whose rights are quietly stripped from them while their pain is mocked or ignored.
It is time for this to end.
I don’t want to suffer in silence anymore.
I demand what every person is entitled to under law: the right to safety, dignity, and legal protection.
Instead, I have been left completely unrepresented — deliberately denied the legal help I urgently need, while my abusers exploit their access to power, law enforcement, and professional networks to continue harming me with impunity.
Insights from the Medium article
What I Read — And How They Retaliated
Recently, I came across a powerful Medium article titled Understanding Gangstalking: Methods and Protection. It captured with startling accuracy the very tactics used against me — and the moment I began reading it, I was again harassed in real-time, with throat-clearing noises from my neighbour (because they appear to turn everyone against me, even the community I live in) to imply coercive control and other signs of constant surveillance both digitally and physically. Those around me are then instructed to act as messengers to deliver hidden messages that they are illegally monitoring me around the clock!
Here are a few key takeaways from the article that resonate deeply with my own experience:
Abuse of Power and Influence
The perpetrators include individuals in positions of authority — even those with “public-facing” roles — who manipulate systems (such as law enforcement or social services) to isolate and discredit their victims.
Invasion of Privacy
Like many victims, I’ve experienced 24/7 illegal surveillance – both online and offline. My confidential information appears to be broadcast or shared with various places and companies, who then recycle it into mocking, targeted content meant to cause distress.
Slander, Rumors, and Gossip
They use untruths to create division between their victims and people in their community — from landlords to coworkers to acquaintances — spreading lies to isolate the victims and destroy their support network.
Unofficial “Games” and Entertainment
This was especially chilling. The article describes how some perpetrators treat the abuse as entertainment — as a kind of sick, sadistic sport. They view a victim’s suffering, even breakdowns or cries for help, as amusement. I, too, have been treated like a source of “entertainment” rather than a human being. This explains why they seem to escalate when I’m in distress, turning even my pain into a cruel spectacle. It’s a chilling form of psychological torture.
The information below is what I read on Medium, which triggered the throat-clearing harassment and intimidation that I had just experienced earlier this morning:
Abuse of Power and Influence: Perpetrators in positions of authority, including those within religious or spiritual groups, and even “unseen” with public fronts, often use their roles to facilitate harassment. This may involve manipulating law enforcement, leveraging influence over community resources, or using professional networks to isolate and strategically target individuals.
Invasion of Privacy: Victims frequently report extensive breaches of privacy, such as unauthorized surveillance and hacking of electronic devices. This indicates deep intrusions into personal lives, with perpetrators — sometimes part of unseen groups or secretive organizations — accessing confidential information to manipulate and control.
Slander, Rumors, and Gossip: An additional and potent tool in the gangstalking arsenal is the strategic use of slander, rumors, and gossip to discredit and isolate the victim within their community. By spreading untruths and manipulative stories, harassers create environments of mistrust and fear, often pitting friends, family, and colleagues against the victim. This tactic not only undermines the victim’s support network but also serves as a psychological weapon, further entrenching feelings of helplessness and isolation.
Divide and Conquer Techniques: These methods are linked with spreading rumors and fostering distrust. By creating and exacerbating rifts between the victim and those in their immediate social or professional circles, perpetrators can more effectively control and manipulate situations to their advantage, weakening the victim’s defenses and ability to seek help.
Motives Behind Gangstalking:
The motives for gangstalking are diverse and often disturbing, reflecting a range of unethical intentions:
Silencing Dissent: This motive is frequently cited in instances where the target is involved in activism or has acted as a whistleblower. Perpetrators, often representing powerful interests or entities, use gangstalking tactics to suppress and discourage any opposition that could threaten their status quo or expose wrongdoing.
Social Manipulation: Gangstalking is also described as a tool for broad societal control, orchestrated by influential groups aiming to destabilize or manipulate specific communities or individuals. This tactic can be employed to enforce conformity, discourage certain behaviors, or even as a means of social experimentation.
Unofficial Competitions and “Games” of Entertainment: Another unsettling motive involves gangstalking being used as a form of entertainment for the perpetrators, who may treat the harassment like a game or competition. This often sadistic perspective is especially troubling as it turns the severe distress and harm of victims into a source of amusement and competition among groups. This kind of motive underscores a deep lack of empathy and disregard for human rights, as participants in these “games” seek thrills at the expense of another’s well-being.
Building Awareness and Community Support: Engaging with supportive communities can significantly reduce feelings of isolation and help validate the experiences of those targeted. Joining or forming support groups, participating in forums, and educating the local community about gangstalking can foster a supportive network. Public speaking, blogging, and social media can also be powerful tools for raising awareness and connecting with others who share similar experiences.
Legal Recourse: Consulting with legal professionals is crucial. They can offer guidance on the feasibility of legal action based on evidence, help obtain restraining orders, and navigate the complexities of privacy laws. Understanding one’s legal rights is essential for effectively addressing and documenting instances of harassment.
Another interesting post below about stalking and harassment also perfectly matches my situation:
What may prevent a victim from seeking help?
Not understanding that what is happening to them is stalking and/or illegal.
Fear that others will think they are over-reacting or that they will be blamed for somehow having encouraged the stalker in the first place.
Trying to pretend that it is not happening. Believing that they should be able to deal with the situation, thinking that the stalker will see reason.
Fears about how the stalker will respond either to them or those that they love or care for.
Direct threats from the stalker. This is what they also appear to do to me by sending me implied threats (for example, death threats and kidnapping) both against me and my daughter.
Feeling isolated in their plight, believing that there is nothing that can be done to help them, or not knowing who to go to.
Previous requests for help being ignored.
Financial limitations in regard to seeking legal advice or taking time off to seek help.
Limited options in respect to changing their situation e.g. relocation to safer housing.
What makes this all even more harrowing is that every time I document or speak about these abuses, there is an immediate, traceable retaliation.
If I write about being harassed by a police van, another one appears within minutes.
If I speak out online, push notifications or advertisements arrive within seconds with encoded insults or mocking messages.
When I began reading the Medium article, I was immediately targeted with loud throat-clearing — a known form of signal harassment and coercive control.
This pattern strongly suggests that my devices and online activity are being illegally monitored, including phone tracking — not just passively, but to generate targeted, real-time abuse meant to silence me and enforce control.
This Is Also Racial Discrimination
It’s impossible to separate this abuse from my identity. I strongly believe that if I were white, I would not be subjected to this kind of targeted, prolonged abuse, nor denied legal representation for over a decade.
I am a woman of colour — and my rights, my privacy, and my humanity have all been treated as disposable. The systemic denial of legal help, coupled with sustained, racially charged abuse, points clearly to institutional discrimination.
Silence Helps Them — So I Am Speaking Out
The Medium article also encouraged victims to reclaim their voice:
> “Public speaking, blogging, and social media can be powerful tools for raising awareness and connecting with others who share similar experiences.”
This is what I am doing now. Because staying silent has only empowered the abusers. It made them believe they could continue — unchecked, unchallenged, and invisible.
But I will no longer be invisible.
I will speak up. I will document. I will resist.
What Needs to Happen
1. Immediate access to legal representation. I need a lawyer or barrister urgently to apply for injunctions, challenge the abuse, and assert my legal and human rights.
2. Investigation into illegal surveillance and discrimination. My case needs to be heard. Not silenced, not buried. This includes an inquiry into institutional complicity and digital misconduct (Malicious Communications Act 1988, Computer Misuse Act 1990, Online Harassment, Cyberstalking, etc.).
3. Community and legislative awareness. We must educate others — including legal professionals, mental health workers, and the general public — about how gangstalking or organised harassment operates and the real harm it causes.
Conclusion: My Story Is a Warning
The abuse I face is not just about me. It is about what happens when institutions fail to protect the vulnerable and side with those in power. It’s about how technology is used not just to monitor — but to torment. And it’s about what happens when access to justice is blocked in plain sight. Gangstalking or covert harassment is not a conspiracy theory. It is a real, complex, and deeply traumatising form of harassment — and the longer we pretend it’s not happening, the more people will suffer in silence, which may lead to self harm or even suicide.
I refuse to suffer in silence any longer.
How Do They Know Everything I Do?
This is the question I keep asking: How do they always know what I’m writing, reading, or thinking — in real time? The only explanation is that they are illegally monitoring my devices, my communications, and possibly my physical location through hidden surveillance cameras or spyware. This surveillance is not passive. It is designed to detect sensitive moments and weaponise them instantly — through gestures, alerts, messages, or staged events.
This is why I can no longer remain silent. I believe that my silence — my attempts to remain composed, dignified, and private — is part of what emboldened them. By never publicly naming what they were doing, I gave them room to continue. That stops now.
Denial of Legal Representation Is Part of the Abuse
All of this leads back to the legal system. Why am I being denied access to a solicitor or barrister when I need them most? Why am I being forced to navigate complex, urgent court procedures alone — while the other side uses lawyers, influence, and insider knowledge to protect themselves?
The denial of legal representation is not just an administrative failure. It is part of the broader pattern of discrimination, obstruction, and psychological warfare being waged against me.
I Am Fighting Back
This blog post is not just a personal outcry. It is a public declaration of intent. I will continue to document every incident — every insult, every signal, every escalation — and expose the tactics used to isolate, silence, and destroy victims of harassment.
I will not stop seeking justice. I will not be silenced by fear or shame.
And I will continue to demand legal representation — not just for myself, but for every person who is silenced, surveilled, and excluded from justice because they do not have power or protection.
If you’re reading this and you believe in justice, transparency, or the right to live free from surveillance and intimidation, I ask you to stand with me. Speak out. Share. And demand that victims like me are given the legal tools to fight back.
