On 15 October 2025, I shared a link on my daughter’s Facebook profile to my blog post describing the sexual exploitation I’ve been subjected to through hidden cameras and years of unlawful surveillance. Along with the link, I included a message warning her that she might also be at risk of similar abuse — and urged her to seek help from a specialist IT professional to scan her home for hidden devices and to consult a human rights lawyer.

Less than twenty-four hours later, the post was gone. Not only that — every other post I had ever shared on her profile disappeared, too.

Crucially, she had never deleted my posts before. But as soon as I warned her that she might be a victim as well, everything vanished suggesting that this deletion was not her independent action.

When I tried to post again today, the new post was deleted almost instantly. Shortly afterward, my ability to post anything on her timeline was turned off entirely.

What they are doing to my daughter is not just criminal — it’s deeply unethical, cruel and evil. She is an innocent third party being deliberately targeted and even preventing her from accessing help or justice. This mirrors the same tactics I’ve experienced: suppression of information, obstruction of legal assistance, and retaliation whenever I try to protect myself or others.

This isn’t just censorship. If my daughter is indeed a victim, such actions directly violate her fundamental right to access justice under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects every person’s right to be informed, to seek help, and to pursue legal remedies. Preventing her from even knowing she might be at risk denies her that right!

Their alleged actions in involving and targeting my daughter are consistent with known stalking methodologies, specifically the involvement of third parties to upset the victim, as outlined in official guidance for law enforcement. For example, the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf) states: ‘Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.

Source: https://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/Stalking_or_harassment_guidance_200519.pdf

Another example of “Controlling and Coercive Behaviour” from the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf).

In addition to the direct harassment I’ve experienced, there are strong indications that certain individuals may also be encouraging or inciting others to participate in the ongoing campaign of stalking, harassment and intimidation against me. Over time, I’ve noticed multiple people — often strangers — appearing to copy distinctive words, phrases, or expressions that I use, where my own language appears to have been mirrored publicly, echoing them in ways clearly meant to provoke, distress, or humiliate me – and to let me know that I am being constantly watched both online (cyberstalking / hacking) and offline (e.g., illegal surveillance, stalking by proxy).

Such conduct aligns with the very patterns described in the College of Policing’s Stalking and Harassment Guidance (20 May 2019), as seen in the screenshot above, “Has the suspect(s) persuaded other people to help him/her (wittingly or unwittingly).”

This repeated imitation and coordinated behaviour suggest a wider network of individuals being influenced — directly or indirectly — to harass, mock, or intimidate me, amplifying the emotional and psychological harm I face on a daily basis.

I therefore have reasonable grounds to believe that they have deployed agents into her life. These agents are tasked with controlling her, extracting information to be used later, monitoring her activities, and actively suppressing any information or attempts to expose the truth about their actions. This may form an integral part of the ongoing conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and to further harass and intimidate me and my family.

I also reasonably believe that my daughter’s new boyfriend, who began a relationship with her approximately two years ago, may be acting as an agent as well. This belief is supported by the abrupt cessation of contact between me and her following the commencement of this relationship, and the timing of the deletion of the Facebook posts immediately after my warning.

This conduct, including the alleged influence over my daughter and the removal of critical information, constitutes a continuation of their alleged campaign of harassment, control, and obstruction.

Thus, they allegedly have, as part of their sustained campaign of harassment and abuse against me, deliberately involved and targeted my daughter. This action is clearly designed to cause me extreme emotional distress and psychological harm, leveraging my parental concern as a weapon against me.

What’s happening mirrors the broader pattern I’ve faced—of influence being used to block legal representation and suppress information. Together, these tactics reveal a consistent effort to obstruct justice for victims of serious privacy and human-rights violations.

Silencing a warning doesn’t erase the danger. It only delays accountability. The public deserves to know when access to justice itself is being quietly dismantled.

This pattern isn’t new. Each time I try to raise awareness about possible wrongdoing — especially when it involves protecting my daughter — the retaliation is swift. In the past, similar efforts to seek help have been met with accusations questioning my sanity, as if concern for a loved one were evidence of instability. This is a classic example of gaslighting and coercive control to prevent victims from seeking help and stopping the abuse, which will then allow them to carry on the abuse and exploitation under the radar.

Such reactions are not normal. They fit a broader pattern of suppression and isolation — tactics often used to prevent victims or their families from communicating, supporting one another, or seeking outside help. When warnings are silenced, questions must be asked: who benefits from keeping victims quiet?

This issue is no longer just personal. It’s a matter of public interest when possible victims of surveillance or sexual exploitation are not only targeted, but also actively prevented from obtaining information or assistance. Attempts to silence those raising legitimate safety concerns can amount to deliberate obstruction and deepen the harm.

I’m sharing this publicly because no one should be punished for trying to protect their child. If my warnings are removed in one place, I will continue to document them elsewhere — until they can no longer be ignored.

For those assisting in or considering involvement in this harassment and abuse: legal mechanisms exist, including Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Early Disclosure Orders, and calling individuals to testify under oath. There are serious consequences, including the risk of perjury. Anyone involved or is going to should think twice.

This is a matter of public interest. Raising awareness is essential to protect victims, expose abuse, and ensure that those targeted can access support and justice.

Silencing victims does not erase the truth. It only delays accountability.

Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:

• #JusticeForBuppha

• #HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK

Thank You!