Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
Understanding Image-based Abuse Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003
The right to privacy is not a privilege — it’s a fundamental human right. Yet for many victims of voyeurism, illegal surveillance, and image-based abuse, this right is routinely violated in the most degrading ways imaginable.
Under Section 66(b) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, it is a criminal offence to share or threaten to share an intimate photograph or film of a person without their consent. The law recognises several situations in which a person is considered to be in an intimate state — including acts of a sexual nature, exposure of genitals or breasts, urination or defecation, and any act of personal care related to those functions.
In short, the law is clear: recording or distributing such material without consent is a form of sexual abuse.
What Counts as an “Intimate State”?
The College of Policing guidance defines it precisely. A person is in an intimate state if:
They are participating in or engaging in a sexual act;
They are doing something a reasonable person would consider sexual;
Their genitals, buttocks, or breasts are exposed;
They are urinating or defecating; or
They are carrying out personal care associated with those acts.
These definitions capture not only overtly sexual acts but also moments of bodily vulnerability — the private routines we all expect to perform in absolute privacy.
The Role of Intention and Harm
According to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidance, a crucial element in prosecuting these offences is intent to cause alarm, distress, or humiliation. This is why victim impact statements are vital — they communicate the devastating emotional and psychological effects of these violations.
When Harassment Becomes Psychological Torture
In my own experience, this abuse manifests through constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded — often in ways that appear choreographed to humiliate.
There are times when, immediately after I engage in a private act such as using the bathroom, some individuals outside begin chatting loudly, or a housemate exits / returns to the property as if on cue. These synchronised acts, repeated over time, send a clear message: you are being watched.
Such experiences go far beyond harassment. They are psychological tactics designed to reinforce powerlessness and fear, to make the victim feel that even their most private bodily functions are subject to surveillance and mockery.
The Human Cost
The emotional impact of these invasions cannot be overstated. To know or even suspect that one’s most intimate moments have been observed, recorded, or broadcast — and then weaponised to cause humiliation — is to live in a constant state of distress. It erodes dignity, safety, and trust in the world around you.
I have felt violated, degraded, and stripped of my humanity.
A Call for Recognition and Justice
This form of abuse — the deliberate exploitation of privacy through hidden surveillance, image-based abuse, and sexual humiliation — must be recognised for what it is: a serious sexual offence under UK law.
Victims deserve to be believed, protected, and empowered to seek justice. Law enforcement and the public must understand that these acts are not “pranks” or coincidences — they are orchestrated violations designed to cause trauma and control.
Privacy is sacred. The law exists to defend it. And silence only protects the perpetrators.
It has often left me speechless how, even after I’ve written openly about the years of harassment and exploitation that my daughter and I have endured, there are still people who choose to join in the abuse, harassment, bullying, stalking, etc. I have described in painful detail what it feels like to be watched, mocked, sexually humiliated, and manipulated — and yet, instead of empathy, some respond with more cruelty by continuing to harass me more. But remember, hate has no place in this world.
When people read about someone’s suffering, there are usually two paths they can take: compassion or complicity. Compassion means recognising the humanity of another person and standing against injustice. Complicity means either silently approving or actively taking part in harm. What I see happening around me suggests that many have chosen the latter.
It’s difficult to understand what drives this. Perhaps some have been deliberately misled — fed misinformation by those who wish to cover up their wrongdoing. Perhaps they’ve been told lies about who I am, what I’ve done, or why this is happening, so they feel justified in their cruelty. Or perhaps, for others, the power to join in the humiliation of another person is itself an intoxicating form of control or pure entertainment seeing another human being suffering.
But regardless of motive, the result is the same: the perpetuation of abuse. Every act of mockery, every knowing smirk, every participation in the coordinated harassment keeps the cycle of violence alive. It is not merely “following instructions” or “going along with it.” It is a moral choice — and each person who participates in becomes part of the harm.
What makes this especially alarming is that many of these individuals cannot claim ignorance. They have read my words. They know the toll this has taken on me and my daughter — emotionally, psychologically, and even physically. They know about the sleepless nights, the fear, the humiliation, the destruction of privacy, and the blocking of my access to lawyers. And yet, even with that knowledge, they continue.
When someone can look at suffering, fully informed, and still decide to contribute to it, that reveals something dark about human nature. It exposes how easily prejudice, misinformation, or simple indifference can override empathy. It shows how a society can be conditioned to dehumanise a person — to treat someone’s pain as entertainment or as a tool for manipulation. If this is the case, what’s wrong with the world today?
There’s also another layer to this: bias. Some people are quick to dismiss my experiences because of who I am — a woman of colour, an outsider, a person without institutional power. They assume that if powerful organisations or individuals are involved, then the victim must be exaggerating. This reflexive bias allows abusers to continue unchallenged, hiding behind their reputations and resources.
To those who have read my blog and still choose to side with cruelty, ask yourself this: If something like this happens to you or your loved ones, what would you do? Do you have a daughter, and what would you feel if they’re doing this to your daughter as well?
If you have involved yourself in this harassment in any way — through mockery, gossip, or passive observation — you still have a choice. You can refuse to participate further. You can choose empathy over exploitation and abuse.
I am shocked that no one says, “I don’t want to be a part of this. This is just so wrong.”
And to those who still have the courage to see beyond the lies and manipulation — who recognise the human cost of what is being done — your understanding matters more than you know.
I continue to write because silence would mean acceptance. And I will not accept being silenced, erased, or dehumanised by those who profit from cruelty or those who enable it.
Because hate has no place in this world.
Therefore, I am taking important steps to hold those responsible accountable. The harassment, exploitation, deception and unlawful use of private information will not go unchallenged. I will be pursuing formal legal action against the perpetrators and all entities involved, to ensure that justice is served and that the full scope of wrongdoing is exposed.
It began in early 2023, when I submitted several formal complaints regarding individuals within different public and private sectors. At the time, I was unaware that these matters might be interconnected, but over time it has become apparent that they may stem from the same underlying network or entities.
I could not have anticipated that this would mark the start of a sequence of events that would completely upend my life — both personally and creatively.
Around August 2023, my daughter and her long-term partner of 12 years suddenly broke up. The timing felt abrupt, and almost immediately after, around September, I think, she began dating a much younger man from Spain (10 years younger) — a streamer she met online through mutual gaming friends. Despite their relationship now lasting around two years, he has never once visited her home. It’s always her who travels to Spain or meets him elsewhere on holiday. This detail has never sat easily with me; it raises questions about her safety and whether her home environment is secure.
Not long after this new relationship began, I started seeing something deeply unsettling. Films, commercials, and online content began appearing that seemed to reference her — including details about her personal life, even medical information, in ways that mirrored my own experiences of being mimicked and exposed. The parallels were too precise to dismiss as coincidence.
By October 2023, I began to suspect that my private and sensitive information — and perhaps even my daughter’s — had been leaked or shared illegally.
Around summer of 2024, I began writing on my previous blog, buppha.com, about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, stalking and tech abuse. I wrote from a place of curiosity and outrage, unaware that I was, in fact, describing my own lived reality. Soon after I started publishing those posts, the harassment escalated beyond anything I had experienced before.
Then came the realisation that changed everything: by late 2024, I began piecing together evidence that my private life — my most intimate, personal moments — had likely been secretly filmed and distributed for years, perhaps for more than a decade.
By early 2025, I decided to act. I began the formal legal process, sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters to those I believed responsible or complicit. Instead of stopping the abuse, this triggered an escalation — retaliation in new and alarming forms.
And then, the final straw came in the spring and summer of 2025, when I tried to apply for an urgent injunction multiple times through the King’s Bench Division. Each time, my evidence — carefully compiled, documented, and submitted — inexplicably disappeared?!
Now, looking back, this timeline is more than just a sequence of events. It tells the story of a pattern — of power, silence, and retaliation. It’s the record of how justice can be obstructed and delayed when those with influence abuse the very systems meant to protect.
But it’s also a record of endurance — of my determination to keep documenting, exposing, and standing up for myself.
1. Early 2023 I submitted some formal complaints concerning the conduct of certain individuals working across different public bodies.
2. August 2023 My daughter and her long-term partner of twelve years unexpectedly separated.
3. September 2023 She began a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online. Who is 10 years younger than her and who works as a streamer. Despite their relationship lasting around two years, he has never visited her home. It’s always her who goes visit him in Spain or they meet elsewhere to go on holidays together, which raises concerns that her home environment might not be safe or private.
4. Autumn 2023 Shortly after this new relationship began, I started noticing films, commercials, and online content that appeared to reference or echo my daughter’s personal life — including details that seemed drawn from sensitive or private information. This mirrored the way my own private materials and experiences have been repeatedly misused and echoed in media content.
5. October 2023 I began to suspect that my own personal and sensitive information may have been illegally shared with third parties without my knowledge or consent.
6. Summer 2024 On my previous blog, http://www.buppha.com, I began writing about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, and tech abuse — unaware that I was myself a victim of the very illegal acts I was describing. Soon after, the harassment and excessive surveillance campaign against me started!
7. Late 2024 I began to realise that my private activities at home may have been secretly filmed and distributed for years — likely for over a decade — without my consent.
8. Early 2025 After I attempted to stop the abuse lawfully by sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters, the illegal surveillance and harassment campaign against me intensified dramatically.
9. Spring & Summer 2025 My access to legal representation also appears to have been blocked. Consequently, I had no choice but to try to apply for an urgent injunction myself. I then made several attempts to apply for an urgent injunction through the King’s Bench Division, but each time my evidence and documents mysteriously disappeared after submission?!
On 15 October 2025, I shared a link on my daughter’s Facebook profile to my blog post describing the sexual exploitation I’ve been subjected to through hidden cameras and years of unlawful surveillance. Along with the link, I included a message warning her that she might also be at risk of similar abuse — and urged her to seek help from a specialist IT professional to scan her home for hidden devices and to consult a human rights lawyer.
Less than twenty-four hours later, the post was gone. Not only that — every other post I had ever shared on her profile disappeared, too.
Crucially, she had never deleted my posts before. But as soon as I warned her that she might be a victim as well, everything vanished suggesting that this deletion was not her independent action.
When I tried to post again today, the new post was deleted almost instantly. Shortly afterward, my ability to post anything on her timeline was turned off entirely.
What they are doing to my daughter is not just criminal — it’s deeply unethical, cruel and evil. She is an innocent third party being deliberately targeted and even preventing her from accessing help or justice. This mirrors the same tactics I’ve experienced: suppression of information, obstruction of legal assistance, and retaliation whenever I try to protect myself or others.
This isn’t just censorship. If my daughter is indeed a victim, such actions directly violate her fundamental right to access justice under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects every person’s right to be informed, to seek help, and to pursue legal remedies. Preventing her from even knowing she might be at risk denies her that right!
Their alleged actions in involving and targeting my daughter are consistent with known stalking methodologies, specifically the involvement of third parties to upset the victim, as outlined in official guidance for law enforcement. For example, the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf) states: ‘Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.
Another example of “Controlling and Coercive Behaviour” from the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf).
In addition to the direct harassment I’ve experienced, there are strong indications that certain individuals may also be encouraging or inciting others to participate in the ongoing campaign of stalking, harassment and intimidation against me. Over time, I’ve noticed multiple people — often strangers — appearing to copy distinctive words, phrases, or expressions that I use, where my own language appears to have been mirrored publicly, echoing them in ways clearly meant to provoke, distress, or humiliate me – and to let me know that I am being constantly watched both online (cyberstalking / hacking) and offline (e.g., illegal surveillance, stalking by proxy).
Such conduct aligns with the very patterns described in the College of Policing’s Stalking and Harassment Guidance (20 May 2019), as seen in the screenshot above, “Has the suspect(s) persuaded other people to help him/her (wittingly or unwittingly).”
This repeated imitation and coordinated behaviour suggest a wider network of individuals being influenced — directly or indirectly — to harass, mock, or intimidate me, amplifying the emotional and psychological harm I face on a daily basis.
I therefore have reasonable grounds to believe that they have deployed agents into her life. These agents are tasked with controlling her, extracting information to be used later, monitoring her activities, and actively suppressing any information or attempts to expose the truth about their actions. This may form an integral part of the ongoing conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and to further harass and intimidate me and my family.
I also reasonably believe that my daughter’s new boyfriend, who began a relationship with her approximately two years ago, may be acting as an agent as well. This belief is supported by the abrupt cessation of contact between me and her following the commencement of this relationship, and the timing of the deletion of the Facebook posts immediately after my warning.
This conduct, including the alleged influence over my daughter and the removal of critical information, constitutes a continuation of their alleged campaign of harassment, control, and obstruction.
Thus, they allegedly have, as part of their sustained campaign of harassment and abuse against me, deliberately involved and targeted my daughter. This action is clearly designed to cause me extreme emotional distress and psychological harm, leveraging my parental concern as a weapon against me.
What’s happening mirrors the broader pattern I’ve faced—of influence being used to block legal representation and suppress information. Together, these tactics reveal a consistent effort to obstruct justice for victims of serious privacy and human-rights violations.
Silencing a warning doesn’t erase the danger. It only delays accountability. The public deserves to know when access to justice itself is being quietly dismantled.
This pattern isn’t new. Each time I try to raise awareness about possible wrongdoing — especially when it involves protecting my daughter — the retaliation is swift. In the past, similar efforts to seek help have been met with accusations questioning my sanity, as if concern for a loved one were evidence of instability. This is a classic example of gaslighting and coercive control to prevent victims from seeking help and stopping the abuse, which will then allow them to carry on the abuse and exploitation under the radar.
Such reactions are not normal. They fit a broader pattern of suppression and isolation — tactics often used to prevent victims or their families from communicating, supporting one another, or seeking outside help. When warnings are silenced, questions must be asked: who benefits from keeping victims quiet?
This issue is no longer just personal. It’s a matter of public interest when possible victims of surveillance or sexual exploitation are not only targeted, but also actively prevented from obtaining information or assistance. Attempts to silence those raising legitimate safety concerns can amount to deliberate obstruction and deepen the harm.
I’m sharing this publicly because no one should be punished for trying to protect their child. If my warnings are removed in one place, I will continue to document them elsewhere — until they can no longer be ignored.
For those assisting in or considering involvement in this harassment and abuse: legal mechanisms exist, including Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Early Disclosure Orders, and calling individuals to testify under oath. There are serious consequences, including the risk of perjury. Anyone involved or is going to should think twice.
This is a matter of public interest. Raising awareness is essential to protect victims, expose abuse, and ensure that those targeted can access support and justice.
Silencing victims does not erase the truth. It only delays accountability.
Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:
