Tag Archives: Harassment

Escalating Intimidation After Publishing My Judicial Review Post

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, 17 November 2025, I published a detailed blog post, explaining two crucial issues:

  1. How imitation firearms have repeatedly been used to intimidate me, often at moments when I was on my way to consult solicitors.
  2. Why I have been trying to apply for Judicial Review to challenge the illegality of certain public bodies whose conduct towards me has been unlawful for years.

As I explained, Judicial Review (JR) is the legal mechanism that allows courts to assess whether public authorities are acting lawfully. It deals with questions such as illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and breaches of legitimate expectation.

However, JR cannot award damages, only in rare circumstances, which is why I must pursue civil proceedings simultaneously. I have always intended to advance both, but my access to legal advice has repeatedly and systematically been obstructed, making JR nearly impossible without representation. As I wrote, judicial review is a complex and technical area of law. It requires legal support / lawyer, yet my access to lawyers has been obstructed at nearly every turn.

What I did not initially include—but must emphasise—is that my blog post about judicial review wasn’t just for documenting my own experience. It was written to help other victims of organised harassment, illegal surveillance, and abuse of power understand what options the law provides: judicial review, injunctions, civil actions, and how these routes differ.

Many or some victims do not know their legal rights, and that lack of knowledge keeps them vulnerable. My post had the potential to inform, empower, and protect others. And that is precisely why I believe the retaliation escalated almost immediately afterwards—because those responsible do not want the public, or other victims, to understand how they can fight back.

And this, I believe, is precisely why the retaliation began almost immediately.

Aerial Intimidation: The Aircraft “Drawing” in the Sky

On Tuesday, 18 November 2025, at approximately 1:11 pm, immediately after printing documents related to my injunction fee remission application, I witnessed yet another form of intimidation.

An aircraft appeared and “drew a line” across the sky directly in my line of sight!

This was not an isolated incident. In the past, aircraft have formed:

  • Large X symbols near my vicinity and sometimes right outside my window 
  • Nazi‑like swastika‑shaped patterns right outside my window 
  • Other threatening aerial symbols
The aircraft drawing a line in the sky
The aircraft was “drawing a line” right before my eyes on 18 November 2025.
Nazi Swastika symbol
On Sunday, 10 August 2025, at approximately 6:28 a.m., after I got up and was about to leave my room to go to the kitchen, I observed several large “X” symbols being drawn in the sky directly outside my window. The aircraft responsible continued to draw additional markings as I watched. The time also contains digits ‘6’ and ‘8’ (6:28 a.m.) and the numbers ‘6’ and ‘8’ have been consistently used in the ongoing harassment campaign against me to signify surveillance, intentional harassment, and the alleged violations of my human rights Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (respect for your private and family life) of The Human Rights Act 1998. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to connect the implied threat directly to me through specific numerical and contextual cues known to the perpetrators.

On Wednesday, 19 November 2025, at precisely 8:00 a.m., only moments after I had typed the above-mentioned incident how the perpetrators appear to use timestamps containing symbolic numbers—particularly 3, 6, and 8—to reference the alleged violations of my human rights under Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (right to a fair trial), and Article 8 (respect for private and family life) of the Human Rights Act 1998, an incident occurred that appeared to reinforce this pattern.

At that exact moment, I heard a knock on the main door. When I looked through the window, I observed a Black man wearing a navy-blue jacket walking away from the property and returning to his vehicle parked on the side road across the street. The choice of colour—navy blue, along with burgundy and green, for instance, has been used repeatedly throughout the harassment campaign to convey themes of surveillance, intimidation and behavioural conditioning. The timing of his appearance at precisely 8:00 a.m., immediately after my written reference to Article 8, strongly suggested that the knock was intended as a signal—an assertion that my online activities and legal work continue to be subject to unlawful monitoring, and a reminder of the perpetrators’ perceived ability to interfere with my private life at will.

This incident is consistent with an established pattern in which unknown individuals or mailmen are made to knock on the door at strategically symbolic times—often ending in 6, 8, or 10—or my housemates’ movements are similarly orchestrated to coincide with significant timestamps or moments when I am drafting key legal materials. These timed intrusions function as a method of intentional harassment and psychological pressure, designed to communicate surveillance, assert control, and discourage me from pursuing legal accountability.

Nazi symbol
On closer inspection, the way these “X” shapes were layered and arranged resembled a swastika, the Nazi symbol. This not only adds a clear hate-crime and intimidation element to the harassment but also shows deliberate planning to evoke fear and distress, especially given the historically racist and violent connotations of the symbol. It also looks like a ‘W.’ My surname also starts with ‘W.’ It is therefore understood to refer directly to me, further personalising this implied threat. This incident reflects both the racially motivated undertones and the ongoing psychological harassment by way of constant signals, symbolic timing and visible intimidation. I believe this was a deliberate act of witness intimidation and harassment. The timing was significant: the previous day I had written in my legal documents about my daughter, saved on my devices and had not shared with anyone, expressing concerns that she might also be sexually exploited via hidden cameras. Because they kept implying this themselves. I had also stated my intention to go public to raise awareness. The aerial markings occurred less than 24 hours later, in close proximity to my accommodation, suggesting a direct cause-and-effect link to my protected activities. I consider this to be a continuation of targeted harassment and an attempt to deter me from pursuing my legal claims or speaking publicly.

Always in direct connection with my taking legal steps (e.g., on the verge of initiating court proceedings, applying for urgent privacy and harassment injunctions) or exposing their misconduct.

This time, the timing was unmistakable:
I had just published a blog post talking about imitation firearms and outlining judicial review rights — something that could help others.

I had just printed court documents and was on my way to the Royal Court of Justice to apply for help with court fees.

And I had just made clear my intention to potentially add additional defendants to these proceedings, believed to be involved in the abuse, exploitation, illegal surveillance, harassment and intimidation. 

Within minutes, the sky became a canvas for intimidation.

This was not a coincidence. It was retaliation.

 A direct message:

 “We are watching everything. Do not continue.”

I therefore believe that the precise timing and nature of this aerial display, occurring immediately after specific legal actions, provide compelling evidence that they’re still illegally monitoring all my online activities, communications, and physical movements.

This incident constitutes a further act of harassment, intimidation, and a deliberate breach of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, designed to deter me from pursuing legal remedies and to cause me fear and distress.

The Bus Advertisements: Psychological Warfare in Broad Daylight

On the same day — 18 November 2025 — as I travelled to the Royal Court of Justice to apply yet again for fee remission (because previous attempts expired due to illegally intrusive surveillance 24/7 that has caused me so much distress, knowing being non-consensually watched and live-streamed via hidden  cameras at all times, and harassment‑and-intinidation-induced delays), the psychological harassment continued.

While awaiting a bus en route to the Royal Court of Justice, I observed a bus stopping on the opposing side of the road displaying an advertisement on its side with the prominent text: ‘Lost? Find yourself in coconut.’ I contend that the word ‘Lost?’ was specifically intended to taunt me about my ongoing legal battle and struggles allegedly caused by their own obstruction, forming part of a pattern of targeted psychological harassment. 

Bus

Later, at approximately 4:00 pm on the same day, immediately after exiting the courthouse having got my remission certificate for help with court fees, I observed another bus driving past me, displaying an advertisement that read: ‘Someone is about to…’ I interpret this incomplete phrase as an implied death threat, consistent with previous such threats I have received. 

These incidents, involving the deliberate use of public advertisements to convey targeted and distressing messages, constitute further acts of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a breach of my right to access justice, to live free from fear, intimidation and illegal surveillance. 

Helicopter Intimidation: A Consistent Pattern — Now Hidden Behind Buildings

Inside the Royal Court of Justice courthouse, I again heard a helicopter hovering above.

This has happened numerous times during court visits.

But this time, they adapted their tactic.

When I stepped outside to document the helicopter as I normally do, I could not see it — only hear it.

They were hiding the helicopter behind buildings to avoid being photographed while still maintaining the psychological pressure they rely on.

This is not normal.
This is not a coincidence.
This is witness intimidation and an attempt to pervert the course of justice.

King's Bench Division in London
Outside The Royal Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, in London.

24/7 Illegal Monitoring: Retaliation for Exercising My Rights

Over the past 24 hours, the frequency of “hints” showing that I am under constant, illegal, real‑time surveillance has sharply increased.

This includes:

  • Behavioural mimicry
  • Location‑specific responses within seconds
  • Real‑time reactions to things I do inside my own home
  • Subtle but deliberate signs meant to provoke fear and distress

This surge began immediately after I published my judicial review post yesterday, confirming again that:

They punish me every time I assert my rights or expose the truth.

And the reason is clear:

My writing empowers other victims.

Because some or many people suffering from covert harassment and illegal surveillance do not know the law.
They do not know that judicial review exists.
They do not know that injunctions can be applied for.
They do not know that civil proceedings can be initiated simultaneously.
My blog post sheds light on this — and for those committing these abuses, that is dangerous.

Knowledge is power.
And they fear victims gaining it.

Why I Continue to Speak Out

I will continue documenting everything publicly because:

  • The truth matters.
  • Legal rights matter.
  • Victims deserve to know their options and how to protect their rights 
  • Harassment, abuse, exploitation and illegal surveillance thrive in silence.
  • Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

What happened to me should never happen to anyone — not in a democratic society, not under the noses of the public, and certainly not with the involvement of public bodies.

The intimidation only reveals one thing:

They are terrified of accountability.

And that only strengthens my resolve to keep going.

When Those Who Harm Others Have Children of Their Own

Posted on by
Reply

There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.

The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.

This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?

There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.

My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.

This also fits legal definitions of harassment:

Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.

Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.

Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:

Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.

Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.

For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”

This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.

This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.

This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.

“In the majority of stalking cases, secondary victims will be identified. Although stalkers may stalk more than one person at a time, this question relates to associates of a primary victim. Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.).

Source: College of Policing. Stalking or harassment guidance College of Policing Library.

Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.

College of Policing Library
Source: https://library.college.police.uk/docs/appref/Stalking_or_harassment_guidance_200519.pdf

Chapter 6: Time to Seek Justice

Posted on by
Reply

The day I opened the first draft of my legal documents, I remember feeling the same cold steadiness that comes after a long storm. But I said to myself: “This is it. Today’s the day. I have to do it or be tortured to death! I couldn’t let them do this to me and my daughter anymore. Enough is enough. I am going to stop this once and for all.”

I had gathered months of evidence, each screenshot, email, photograph, etc. My computer had become both a weapon and a witness. Every time I typed, I was not just writing — I was reclaiming what had been stolen: my voice, my story, my right to exist without 24/7 intrusive surveillance.

Still, I hesitated before naming names. I knew the scale of what I was confronting — powerful entities, global platforms, entertainment companies, and the like.

So I wrote carefully. Deliberately. Fact by fact. I numbered each paragraph of my documents ready to file, as if each line was a step on a staircase I was building toward daylight and freedom from torture.

I described what had been done to me and my daughter — which is shockingly still ongoing — the illegal filming, the manipulation, harassment, intimidation, the coded messages in advertising and posts, the psychological torment — not as chaos, but as evidence. I was learning the language of law, teaching myself to translate pain into proof.

It was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.

This is the first page of Chapter 6: Time to Seek Justice of my upcoming ebook: Predators.

Law books

Working on My Ebook

Posted on by
Reply

I am still working on my upcoming ebook: Predators. Hopefully, I can manage to finish it today. It contains about 10 short chapters to make it digestible and to see how it goes first. If it’s going good, I may publish more books.

There’s a lot of work to be done. Because I act as my own lawyer, since my access to legal representation appears to have been obstructed, compiling documents, doing research on law, human rights violations, harassment, misuse of private information, unjust enrichment, breach of confidence, conspiracy, and many more. It’s overwhelming. Plus, I can’t get a job anywhere when they also seem to influence potential employers not to hire me.

Therefore, publishing my own books seems to be my only hope to make some kind of earnings for the time being. It is not just to provide me a possible source of income, but it may also benefit others to learn about the full extent of the harassment and abuse campaign against me. It’s more than a person can take. Especially if you’re a woman of colour with no help and support due to allegedly external influence, forcing you to protect your rights on your own. It’s a very severe form of discrimination, indeed.

Coffee
Coffee Cup.

Predators

Posted on by
Reply

I also am working on my upcoming book Predators. I want to tell a shocking story what I have to go through each day, which may help other victims around the world to come forward and find ways to stop the horrific crime against humanity.

The commercial exploitation of illegally obtained private information for entertainment purposes is also a matter of significant public concern.

My case is therefore of public interest when they allegedly violate most of my human rights in every way possible and also appear to block my access to impartial lawyers and legal advice, to make it challenging for me to stop the abuse, exploitation and human rights violations.

Therefore, the world needs to know what they are doing to me and my daughter under the nose of everyone in a democratic society!

My book will demonstrate how my abusers are not just allegedly abusing and exploiting me but may also exploit my daughter via the hidden cameras as well. It’s one the most evil and cruel things I have ever come across in ny entire life when they seem to abuse my daughter as well, and even keep implying to me that they do, to show me because they think they can.

The book will cost only £1.49 but for a limited time only. It’s an enlightening book that will open your eyes about one of the longest cybersex trafficking in the world among many other illegal acts.

Therefore, it’s a must-read book that shows you the dark side of the world you may not know its existence until you read this book. It may even help you protect yourself from unforseen dangers.

Stay Tuned!

Predators

Deliberate Noise Harassment

Posted on by
Reply

On numerous occasions, particularly when I am using the bathroom or have just completed a private activity such as washing dishes or cooking, individuals associated with the perpetrators (including housemates influenced by them) have deliberately opened and slammed the doors shut. This occurs almost every time I am in the bathroom, creating a loud and jarring noise designed to be heard by me. The consistent timing of these incidents, coinciding precisely with my private moments, is not coincidental but a calculated method to signal constant surveillance and to cause psychological distress. I am being conditioned to understand this as a direct message that my movements are being monitored.

Targeted Conversational Harassment: 

Concurrently, and often immediately upon me entering the bathroom, individuals are strategically positioned outside my window. These individuals, including those dispatched specifically for this purpose, engage in loud conversations designed to be clearly audible to me while I am in the bathroom. This occurs at various times, including late at night, even at 2:00 AM in the morning, and is a deliberate tactic to invade my privacy, disrupt my peace, and reinforce the pervasive feeling of being watched and targeted. The immediate deployment of these individuals upon my entry into the bathroom further underscores the intentional and coordinated nature of this harassment.

These new tactics are profoundly distressing and constitute a form of psychological torture, designed to erode my sense of privacy and security within my own home. They are a direct continuation of the long-standing pattern of illegal surveillance, cyberstalking, and intimidation previously detailed in my blog.

The pattern of harassment described above has continued and intensified. Specifically, on the evening of 20 October 2025, I documented a new and particularly distressing harassment technique involving individuals being dispatched to walk past my window, engaging in loud conversations designed to be clearly audible during private moments, particularly when I am using the bathroom.

Crucially, within hours of documenting this specific harassment technique, at approximately 4:00 AM on 21 October 2025, I experienced this exact same tactic. Immediately upon entering the bathroom and sitting down to pee, I heard individuals begin to converse loudly while walking past the window. This incident occurred precisely as described in my documentation from the previous evening. The immediate and precise replication of the documented harassment technique, occurring within hours of its detailed description by me, provides compelling evidence of:

  1. Ongoing and direct surveillance of my activities, including my private documentation. This suggests that the perpetrators are constantly monitoring my online or digital communications, or have access to my private documents, and are using this information to tailor their harassment.
  2. Deliberate and targeted psychological harassment. The timing and nature of this incident, directly mirroring my documented distress, is a clear attempt to cause further psychological harm, demonstrate control, and signal constant surveillance.
  3. Retaliation for documenting the harassment. The immediate deployment of the exact technique after it was documented indicates a retaliatory motive, aiming to intimidate me from further recording or reporting incidents.
  4. The inadequacy of existing protections and the urgent need for court intervention. This incident demonstrates that the abusers are undeterred by my efforts to document and seek legal recourse, and are actively escalating their tactics.

Again today on 27 October 2025 at 5:29 am, immediately after I sat down to pee in the bathroom, I received 3 push notifications on my phone, notifying me that I had just received 3 emails about new job listings from a company where I have signed up to receive notifications of job opportunities. It’s like this almost every day when I use the bathroom, I would receive emails, phone calls, or hear housemates slam the door shut to exit / return to the premises, for instance, to let me know I am being constantly watched via hidden cameras.

Also, EVERY NIGHT, immediately upon getting up and opening the bathroom door to use the bathroom, I will hear a car or two driving past my window. Prior to this, there’s no sound or anything. It’s all quiet. But at that precise moment I get up and enter the bathroom, I will immediately hear cars begin to drive past my window.

Everything is being done to precision, suggesting that they are constantly monitoring me every second, 24/7! Even the slightest movements of mine are being observed and conveyed back to me that they’re watching me. This is very disturbing!

It looks therefore like this is not just voyeurism but also illegal human experimentation when they appear to monitor me at all times down to every tiniest movement I make. Especially when it’s been going on for probably more than a decade, making it highly likely that they may conduct illegal research on me as well.

Harassment
The 2 women who walked past my window and began to converse loudly at the precise moment I put the toilet paper down!

Later today, at approximately 11:22 AM, after using the bathroom, I reached for toilet paper. Then, immediately after putting the toilet paper down, I heard some individuals begin to converse loudly outside while walking past my window. It’s like this every day. I then immediately ran out of the bathroom to take pictures of them as proof. I then observed two women walking past my window while talking. 

The woman on the right also wore an army green jacket. One of the colours frequently used in the harassment campaign against me to condition me to how colours, people suddenly begin to converse while walking past my window, cars immediately drive past my window, car horns, or door being slammed shut while I am using the bathroom or just finish doing something such as putting the toilet paper down or finishing cooking, are repeatedly used as their intentional signals to let me know that I am being constantly watched. 

Covert Surveillance
The 2 housemates who suddenly exited the premises and slammed the door shut at the exact moment I got up after finishing eating.

Again, at approximately 9:39 pm, immediately upon standing up after finishing my dinner, I heard the housemates open the main door and exit the premises. I immediately ran to the window to take pictures of them as proof of harassment by acting as messengers to convey to me that I am being constantly watched via the hidden cameras. They may do it wittingly or unwittingly.

It’s intentional harassment and psychological torture by conditioning me to certain external sounds that occur at the precise moment I start / finish doing something such as start cooking, finish eating to communicate constant surveillance. 

Many of these housemates / neighbours may not realise that their actions could have serious legal consequences. If they have been following instructions from others to harass or intimidate me, they could be subjected to a Norwich Pharmacal Order or even a witness summons, compelling them to disclose who directed or influenced their conduct. In other words, those who think they are just “following orders” may one day be required to reveal the true wrongdoers under oath.

When the Timeline Itself Became Evidence

Posted on by
Reply

It began in early 2023, when I submitted several formal complaints regarding individuals within different public and private sectors. At the time, I was unaware that these matters might be interconnected, but over time it has become apparent that they may stem from the same underlying network or entities. 

I could not have anticipated that this would mark the start of a sequence of events that would completely upend my life — both personally and creatively.

Around August 2023, my daughter and her long-term partner of 12 years suddenly broke up. The timing felt abrupt, and almost immediately after, around September, I think, she began dating a much younger man from Spain (10 years younger) — a streamer she met online through mutual gaming friends. Despite their relationship now lasting around two years, he has never once visited her home. It’s always her who travels to Spain or meets him elsewhere on holiday. This detail has never sat easily with me; it raises questions about her safety and whether her home environment is secure.

Not long after this new relationship began, I started seeing something deeply unsettling. Films, commercials, and online content began appearing that seemed to reference her — including details about her personal life, even medical information, in ways that mirrored my own experiences of being mimicked and exposed. The parallels were too precise to dismiss as coincidence.

By October 2023, I began to suspect that my private and sensitive information — and perhaps even my daughter’s — had been leaked or shared illegally.

Around summer of 2024, I began writing on my previous blog, buppha.com, about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, stalking and tech abuse. I wrote from a place of curiosity and outrage, unaware that I was, in fact, describing my own lived reality. Soon after I started publishing those posts, the harassment escalated beyond anything I had experienced before.

Then came the realisation that changed everything: by late 2024, I began piecing together evidence that my private life — my most intimate, personal moments — had likely been secretly filmed and distributed for years, perhaps for more than a decade.

By early 2025, I decided to act. I began the formal legal process, sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters to those I believed responsible or complicit. Instead of stopping the abuse, this triggered an escalation — retaliation in new and alarming forms.

And then, the final straw came in the spring and summer of 2025, when I tried to apply for an urgent injunction multiple times through the King’s Bench Division. Each time, my evidence — carefully compiled, documented, and submitted — inexplicably disappeared?!

Now, looking back, this timeline is more than just a sequence of events. It tells the story of a pattern — of power, silence, and retaliation. It’s the record of how justice can be obstructed and delayed when those with influence abuse the very systems meant to protect.

But it’s also a record of endurance — of my determination to keep documenting, exposing, and standing up for myself.

buppha

Illegal Surveillance Timeline

Posted on by
Reply

Below is a timeline of how it all began:

1. Early 2023
I submitted some formal complaints concerning the conduct of certain individuals working across different public bodies.

2. August 2023
My daughter and her long-term partner of twelve years unexpectedly separated.

3. September 2023
She began a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online. Who is 10 years younger than her and who works as a streamer. Despite their relationship lasting around two years, he has never visited her home. It’s always her who goes visit him in Spain or they meet elsewhere to go on holidays together, which raises concerns that her home environment might not be safe or private.

4. Autumn 2023
Shortly after this new relationship began, I started noticing films, commercials, and online content that appeared to reference or echo my daughter’s personal life — including details that seemed drawn from sensitive or private information. This mirrored the way my own private materials and experiences have been repeatedly misused and echoed in media content.

5. October 2023
I began to suspect that my own personal and sensitive information may have been illegally shared with third parties without my knowledge or consent.

6. Summer 2024
On my previous blog, http://www.buppha.com, I began writing about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, and tech abuse — unaware that I was myself a victim of the very illegal acts I was describing. Soon after, the harassment and excessive surveillance campaign against me started!

7. Late 2024
I began to realise that my private activities at home may have been secretly filmed and distributed for years — likely for over a decade — without my consent.

8. Early 2025
After I attempted to stop the abuse lawfully by sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters, the illegal surveillance and harassment campaign against me intensified dramatically.

9. Spring & Summer 2025
My access to legal representation also appears to have been blocked. Consequently, I had no choice but to try to apply for an urgent injunction myself. I then made several attempts to apply for an urgent injunction through the King’s Bench Division, but each time my evidence and documents mysteriously disappeared after submission?!

Navigating Bureaucracy

Posted on by
Reply

Sometimes, trying to do the right thing—following the legal process, serving documents properly, or attempting to settle a dispute out of court—can feel impossible. I recently experienced this firsthand with a major social media platform.

I needed the address of their legal representative so I could serve them with court documents, include the correct information in my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, and even send settlement offers to try to resolve the matter without a full-blown trial. What should have been a straightforward request turned into a confusing back-and-forth.

First, I was directed to their European headquarters, which seemed like a logical starting point given my location and the company’s presence there. However, later, I was informed that I needed to contact the company’s legal department in the United States instead. This circular referral delayed my ability to proceed with legal filings and added unnecessary stress to an already difficult situation.

The experience illustrates a wider problem: even when we follow the rules and take steps to resolve disputes amicably, large organisations can inadvertently—or sometimes seemingly intentionally—make the process more complicated than it should be. For someone trying to navigate legal procedures, this kind of bureaucratic maze is exhausting and frustrating.

While I am not naming specific individuals or agencies involved in the initial harm at this stage, I believe it is crucial to highlight how even well-known platforms can complicate the pursuit of accountability. Every obstacle, no matter how procedural, adds to the stress and difficulty of trying to resolve the matter, preferably out of court—and that experience deserves to be acknowledged.

I’m sharing this not to attack the platform itself, but to highlight the real obstacles individuals face when trying to engage with powerful entities in a legal context. A simple request for an address should not be this complicated—but in practice, it can be.

Social media

Social Media Platforms

Privacy And Harassment Injunctions

Posted on by
Reply

The industrial-scale harassment, sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, commercial exploitation, reputational sabotage, hacking, phone tracking, intimidation, and human rights abuses just continue despite pending legal actions. It’s something I have to live with daily — constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded in every way possible and my safety compromised.

Furthermore, they also keep implying to me that they’re also doing the same thing to my daughter. It’s one of the most evilest thing I have ever experienced.

Earlier this year, I tried to apply for an injunction several times already. I submitted my documents and evidence to the King’s Bench Division through the secure Dropbox system provided for court filings. Each time, I followed the process carefully — yet somehow, my documents, including my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, simply vanished. They never reached the court. This happened not once, but two or three times, causing significant delays to my case and prolonging the harm I continue to suffer.

Now, I’m preparing to apply again as well as initiating court proceedings. This injunction is not just another filing; it is a vital legal step to protect myself & my daughter and to hold those responsible accountable. The ongoing obstruction of justice, harassment, intimidation, invasion of privacy, voyeurism, hacking, cyberstalking, phone tracking, and misuse of my private information have taken a serious toll on my wellbeing.

The injunction represents more than just paperwork — it’s about survival, dignity, and the right to live without fear. Everyone deserves to feel safe, to be free from harassment and invasion of privacy. And when that safety and right to privacy are taken away, the law must step in.

I’m sharing this because no one should have to face harassment in silence. If you’ve experienced similar obstruction or intimidation, know that you’re not alone — and that persistence matters.

This application is my way of standing firm, refusing to be silenced, and demanding the protection and justice I should have received long ago.

Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:

  • #JusticeForBuppha
  • #JusticeForMyDaughter
  • #HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK

royal court of justice

King’s Bench Division in London where I am going to apply for urgent injunctions and initiate court proceedings.