Listen to my recent podcast, reading the synopsis of my upcoming documentary Abuse in Plain Sight. A MUST see documentary exposing the web of illegal enterprises hidden in plain sight in a democratic society!
Abuse in Plain Sight synopsis
Reply
When Hidden Cameras Were First Installed
I believe the hidden cameras might have first been unlawfully installed in my Putney flat in 2013, the year I first moved there, and continued to be illegally installed till the day I moved out in September or August 2024. The hidden cameras, which also recorded audio, had supposedly been installed everywhere inside that flat, even in the bathroom and kitchen, non-consensually observing and recording everything I did in my Putney flat from between 2013 – 2024. That’s more than 10 years already. Possibly the longest sexual abuse via hidden cameras!
Consequently, it’s very disturbing to think how they may have been non-consensually filming me and distributing / live-streaming the illegal footage over the years making lots of profit at my expense without my knowledge or consent. It’s an Abuse in Plain Sight at its finest.
Furthermore, the hidden cameras then appear to be illegally installed in every place I live afterwards as well. Even in my current accommodation despite pending court proceedings.
This is therefore a predatory behaviour and an obsession!
What’s more insidious about this is that they even appear to intentionally want me to know that they have actually been sexually abusing and cybersex trafficking me via hidden cameras for years. Perhaps, to cause me severe distress, humiliation, embarrassment, psychiatric injury, and so on, as unlawful retaliation and victimisation.
The illegal footage also seems to be leaked or sold to various places and entities, including pornographic sites, to allow them to create content and generate substantial profit based on my private life illegally recorded and live-streamed on a daily basis. This is also unjust enrichment.
It therefore may constitute a hate crime or even a crime against humanity when the abuse has been carried out for over 10 years, and possibly by public officials working within law enforcement agencies and/or authorities, and still continues to this day despite pending legal action and injunction application.
They also appear to make it difficult for me as much as possible to stop the sexual abuse and exploitation by preventing me from having legal representation when I have contacted a large number of lawyers, probably 200-300 solicitors so far, and human rights organisations, but no one wants to help me suggesting external influence. This case is therefore a matter of great public interest!
Thus, I may be the only woman in the world who has endured severe abuse on every level for more than a decade, and the abuse even continues with no sign of slowing down regardless.
Moreover, they also appear to want me to know that they are also sexually abusing my daughter via hidden cameras as well. Particularly, when every attempt to warn her has been met with the alleged evidence tampering, suppression of the truth, manipulation, etc. This raises serious concerns that someone or entity doesn’t want the truth to come out. So, they can continue to sexually abuse and commercially exploit her as well under the noses of everyone. This looks therefore like a double hate crime.
I would never have thought this would happen to me and/or my daughter. Especially not from the people who are in positions of power, not just from a civilian, which makes this case extremely serious and challenging. Particularly when my access to lawyers also appears to have been blocked.
That’s why this case is of great public interest, and that’s why I also want to write a book and make a documentary about it to let the world know what they have done to me, and probably my daughter as well, in plain sight and no one acts.
Consequently, I only shower about once a month now due to credible fear of being non-consensually filmed and distributed or even live-streamed.
This is not just an act of prolonged sexual abuse but also a racist, discriminatory act. Because I believe they continue to sexually exploit and take advantage of me because I’m a Southeast Asian woman living alone. To stay single is also not my choice. Every attempt to establish a relationship with someone wil be sabotaged, as if to isolate me as much as possible to eliminate the help and support I could get as much as they possibly can. It’s like I don’t exist anymore.
The saddest part is that they may be doing the same thing to my daughter as well. Because they keep implying this themselves, as I said earlier.
Plus, they also appear to prevent me from having legal representation, so that they can continue to abuse me, and maybe my daughter as well, under the radar for the rest of our lives!
Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms and Others Sued in UK For Privacy Violations, Retaliation, Harassment
I have filed a claim in the High Court of England and Wales (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division – Claim No. KB-2025-004650) against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook/Instagram), Elon Musk, X.com (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and other parties.
According to the claim, I allege decade-long, continuous unlawful surveillance, even after the initiation of court proceedings, severe breach of privacy, misuse of private information on a massive scale, hacking/cyberstalking, organised harassment, conspiracy to injure and to pervert the course of justice, retaliation, blacklisting, obstruction of justice, gross human rights abuses, and related causes of action.
The claim further alleges that my original literary and creative works were unlawfully accessed through hacking and disseminated to third parties without my consent, resulting in loss of income, loss of future professional opportunities, and significant psychological harm such as PTSD, severe emotional distress.
Some Defendants deny liability. Through their legal representatives, certain Defendants, including the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, have stated that the allegations are denied and that they intend to defend the claim.
On 19 December 2025, the court stayed the proceedings to permit the filing of amended Particulars of Claim, which I am currently preparing in accordance with the court’s directions.
KIA Car
The prolonged covert surveillance and organised harassment I’ve endured have manifested in increasingly insidious ways, extending beyond direct observation to a sophisticated campaign of psychological manipulation. It appears they employ various methods to convey hidden messages, demonstrating an alleged unlawful gathering of information about my life, possessions, and even my past.
One recurring pattern involves the use of numbers. For instance, I’ve observed repeated instances where numbers like 3, 6, 8, and 10 appear in contexts that, to me, seem to symbolically reference alleged violations of my human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. Similarly, the number 4 has appeared in ways that I interpret as alluding to Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which prohibits slavery in all its forms. These are not isolated occurrences but form part of a continuous campaign of intimidation.
Beyond numbers, I have noticed a consistent use of everyday objects and situations to convey these messages. This includes specific number plates, symbols, imagery, clothing, colours, and even brand names such as Adidas, Nike, and Puma. The language used in certain interactions also appears to be deliberately chosen.
The surveillance itself is pervasive and designed to be overtly acknowledged. A recent example highlights this: After experiencing a bout of sneezing and using tissues before leaving my home. Later that day, while on public transport, I observed several individuals who, shortly after sitting near or opposite me, began to sneeze and blow their noses with tissues in a manner that mirrored my earlier actions. This pattern of mirroring my private actions in public spaces is a frequent occurrence and contributes significantly to my sense of being under continuous surveillance.
They also appear to leverage knowledge of my past. For instance, I’ve observed a notable increase in the appearance of specific car brands that I used to own, such as Ford, or brands that allude to individuals I once knew. This suggests an extensive and unlawful information gathering operation, seemingly designed to humiliate and intimidate me by demonstrating their intimate knowledge of my personal history. More recently, I’ve noticed a particular car brand, KIA, appearing with unusual frequency. While I’ve never owned a KIA nor do I know anyone who does, its repeated appearance suggests another layer of their coded communication, the meaning of which remains unclear to me.
My experience resonates deeply with accounts from other victims of organised harassment. For example, a UK blogger, whose ordeal includes stalking, sabotage, cyberattacks, and even alleged attempts at poisoning, has spoken publicly about her experiences, including at the Houses of Parliament. She describes constant surveillance, with individuals and vehicles following her, and notes that license plates are often used for ‘secret communication,’ including veiled threats. Her description of her situation as a ‘psychological thriller and COINTELPRO 2.0’ mirrors the unsettling reality I face daily. This shared experience underscores that these are not isolated incidents but a pattern of sophisticated, organised harassment affecting multiple individuals.
You can read more on her blog here.
Please Sign The Petition
Demand Change: Keir Starmer, Step Down Now!
This petition had 330,923 supporters
Let us raise our voices, sign this petition, and demand accountability.
Thank you for standing up for what’s right. 🌟🇬🇧
https://c.org/SbJxVM8vYt
Life Goes On Even Under 24/7 Intrusive Surveillance
Living under constant, illegal and intrusive surveillance is something few can truly imagine. Every movement, every private moment, and even routine activities are potentially being observed, recorded, and analysed by individuals acting without consent. Despite this, life must go on. This morning, for example, I made myself a simple breakfast of fried eggs. It may sound mundane, but even in the shadow of ongoing unlawful surveillance, small acts like these are acts of autonomy and normalcy.
After breakfast, I returned to my legal work, amending my Particulars of Claim and my injunction application. These documents are vital to holding the perpetrators accountable, to seeking justice for the prolonged harassment, illegal surveillance, and misuse of private information I have endured for years. Each line I draft, each paragraph I review, is a step toward asserting my rights and reclaiming control over my life, even while under constant observation.
Maintaining a sense of routine, even under such extreme circumstances, is crucial. Cooking, reading, or simply organizing one’s day are small ways to push back against the constant pressure and intrusion. These acts reaffirm that despite attempts to intimidate or control, I remain fully engaged in my life and responsibilities. Surveillance is intended to create fear, disorientation, and compliance, but it cannot extinguish resilience or determination.
It is also a reminder of why my legal work is so important. Documenting the patterns of harassment, surveillance, and intimidation is essential, not only for the claim I have filed but also for exposing the broader misuse of power and technology in ways that threaten privacy, dignity, and personal security. Each step I take in preparing my case is both a defensive measure and a constructive action to restore accountability.
Life under 24/7 illegal surveillance is challenging, but it has not stopped me from pursuing justice or from maintaining the routines that sustain me. From the simplest pleasures—like frying eggs for breakfast—to the most complex tasks—like preparing court applications—I continue to assert my autonomy, protect my well-being, and move forward. Surveillance may watch, record, and intrude, but it cannot define the course of my life. I continue, deliberately and purposefully, reclaiming space for myself, the truth and justice.
New Press Release: High Court Claim Filed Over Serious Digital Privacy Violations
I wish to inform members of the public, journalists, human rights lawyers, human rights organisations, human rights watch and interested parties that I have issued a new press release concerning my ongoing High Court proceedings relating to serious and sustained privacy violations.
The press release outlines the nature of the claim that has now been formally filed, the legal framework relied upon, and the broader public-interest issues raised by the case. These include unlawful surveillance (both digital and physical), misuse of private information, hacking, cyberstalking, and the systemic risks posed by such conduct when left unaddressed.
I have published a new press release outlining the filing of my High Court claim concerning serious and ongoing digital privacy violations.
This case raises urgent questions about digital surveillance, misuse of private information, data protection failures, and the accountability of powerful actors in an increasingly intrusive online ecosystem. It concerns the alleged unlawful access to personal devices, illegal and intrusive surveillance, monitoring of private communications, and the exploitation and dissemination of private data without consent.
The purpose of releasing this information publicly is threefold:
– Transparency – to ensure the public record accurately reflects the nature of the claim and the relief sought.
– Protection – to deter further interference, retaliation, intimidation, or further misuse of private information while proceedings are ongoing.
– Public interest – to contribute to wider discussions around digital privacy, surveillance abuse, platform responsibility, and access to justice.
I encourage journalists, legal professionals, digital rights advocates, and members of the public to read the press release in full and draw their own conclusions based on the source material.
📄 View or Download the Press Release
HTML versions
Full URL: https://www.prlog.org/13119343-high-court-claim-filed-over-serious-digital-privacy-violations.html
Short URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343.html
PDF versions
Full URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343-high-court-claim-filed-over-serious-digital-privacy-violations.pdf
Short URL:
https://www.prlog.org/13119343.pdf
The press release sets out the legal basis of the claim, the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, and the remedies being sought through the courts. It does not speculate on outcomes and does not replace the formal judicial process.
I will continue to provide updates responsibly and in accordance with legal advice as the case progresses.
Thank you to everyone who has shown support, professionalism, and respect for due process.
What Article 6 Really Means And Why It Matters in My Case
Most people never have to think about Article 6 of the Human Rights Act. But when something goes wrong — when your privacy is violated, when you need legal protection, when you’re suddenly navigating the court system — Article 6 becomes one of the most important rights you have.
So what is Article 6?
Article 6 = The Right to a Fair Trial
In simple terms, Article 6 protects your right to:
– be heard
– have a fair process
– access legal advice
– have equal footing with the other side
– participate effectively in your own case
It exists to stop situations where one side has all the power, resources, or representation — and the other side is left unprotected.
Why Article 6 Matters in My Case
In my situation, there appear to be barriers preventing me from securing legal representation, while the opposing side has full legal support. This creates an imbalance that undermines the fairness of the proceedings.
A fair trial requires equality of arms — meaning both sides should have a fair chance to present their case.
When one side has lawyers and the other is prevented from obtaining them, that balance is lost.
Why I’m Seeking an Urgent Injunction
To restore fairness, I am seeking an urgent injunction to also prevent any interference with my ability to obtain legal representation, including any actions that discourage, influence, or obstruct lawyers or organisations from providing me with impartial advice. Without legal advice, it becomes impossible to navigate complex digital privacy issues or defend my rights effectively.
Because access to legal representation is essential for a fair trial, and any obstruction undermines my Article 6 rights.
This is not just about me — many people facing digital harms struggle to obtain legal support. Article 6 exists to protect all of us.
Why This Is a Public‑Interest Issue
Digital privacy violations are increasing. So are barriers to justice. When people cannot access lawyers, the system fails.
By speaking out, I hope to:
– raise awareness
– encourage transparency
– highlight systemic barriers
– protect my rights
– support others facing similar obstacles
Access to justice is a human right. Article 6 protects that right — and it must be upheld.
Court Case Now in Motion
“Why I’m Speaking Out: Protecting Digital Privacy in a Dangerous Digital Age”
Digital privacy is no longer something we can take for granted. Every day, people are being watched, recorded, tracked, or digitally manipulated without their knowledge or consent. Hidden cameras, illegal surveillance, misuse of private information, and AI‑generated exploitation are no longer rare — they are becoming part of a disturbing new normal.
For many, these harms remain invisible until they happen to them. But once they do, the impact is profound. Your home stops feeling like home. Your sense of safety collapses. Your dignity is shaken. Your private life becomes something that can be accessed, shared, or distorted by others.
This is why I’m speaking out.
I have taken formal legal steps to protect my privacy and safety. This includes filing and amending High Court documents that address serious digital violations. While I cannot name individuals publicly, I believe it is important to talk openly about the issue itself — because this is not just about one case. It is about a wider pattern of digital abuse that affects countless people. I am also going to start a campaign soon.
Why This Campaign Matters
This campaign is my way of shining a light on a growing problem that too often remains hidden. It exists to:
– Raise awareness about illegal surveillance and digital exploitation
– Educate the public about the risks and realities of modern privacy violations
– Promote transparency and accountability in digital spaces
– Encourage ethical behaviour from institutions, platforms, and organisations
– Support stronger protections for individuals
– Build a movement for digital safety and human rights
Privacy is not a luxury.
It is a fundamental human right.
The Human Impact
Digital violations are not abstract. They cause real emotional, psychological and social harm. They affect your relationships, your work, your confidence and your ability to feel safe in your own life. Many victims feel isolated, ashamed, or afraid to speak out.
No one should have to face these harms alone.
Legal Action and Public Awareness: A Dual Approach
Legal action is one tool — a powerful one — but it is not the only tool. Public awareness is equally important. When people understand the issue, when they see the patterns, when they recognise the risks, change becomes possible.
This campaign will run alongside my legal case, synchronised with key milestones. As documents are filed, hearings approach, or orders are sought, I will use those moments to educate, inform, and advocate for stronger protections.
A Call for Change
We need better systems.
We need stronger safeguards.
We need accountability from platforms and institutions.
We need transparency when digital harms occur.
We need to protect people from exploitation — online and offline.
This campaign is a step toward that change.
Join Me
If you care about privacy, safety, and human rights, I invite you to follow this journey. Share the campaign. Talk about the issue. Support ethical organisations. Help raise awareness.
Together, we can push for a safer digital world — one where no one’s private life can be exploited without consequences.
Your privacy matters. Your safety matters. Your dignity matters.
Visit my Legal Case page for more info and download my Press Kit by clicking on the button below:
Human Rights Abuses On Every Level
I am very busy with lots of things at once. Mostly working on this case alone without a solicitor due my access to lawyers appears to have been obstructed. I have to prepare lots of legal paperwork, gather information and evidence, study specific areas of law related to my claim, drafting an injunction application, Particulars of Claim, and many more.
It’s overwhelming when you don’t have legal representation. Especially when this case involves multiple defendants – most of them are large corporations and powerful individuals, residing both inside and outside the UK – making this case an exceptionally high-profile and high-stakes case.
Therefore, this is so wrong when they apparently prevent me from having legal representation, to make it difficult for me as much as possible to challenge their illegal enterprises.
Furthermore, they seem to continue to install hidden cameras and keep giving me hints that they are still unlawfully observing everything I do and disseminating/live-streaming the illegal footage far and wide.
They also appear to cyberstalk me 24/7 and then use the stolen information to harass, intimidate, gain insight into my legal strategies, and share the illegally obtained information to various places to violate my privacy even further as a form of unlawful retaliation and victimisation for trying to assert my rights.
This has caused me severe emotional distress, humiliation and the feeling that my privacy has severely been violated on every level.
Plus, I have to prepare a complex case alone without formal legal training while enduring daily abuse, racial and sexual harassment, intimidation and humiliation since I still live under 24/7 illegal surveillance, knowing that everything has been non-consensually filmed, both with video and audio, and has subsequently been distributed or sold to various places for profit as well.
While I am typing this blog post, at approximately 10:10 am, I hear someone cough outside. This is what they appear to do by cyberstalking me around the clock and then constantly giving me hints via various means, such as someone coughing or conversing loudly nearby, as soon as I type some crucial or sensitive information into my legal documents, especially regarding sexual abuse via hidden cameras. This seems to serve two purposes: To let me know that they are also constantly watching me online via cyberstalking/hacking to make me feel intimidated that they are still illegally monitoring me both online and offline, to demonstrate that nothing in my life is private anymore, and to induce anger by giving me hints at the precise moment I detail the horrific crimes allegedly committed against me. It’s one of their sadistic ways to consistently confirm and remind me of their evil, illegal practices.
This is an extreme form of human rights violations under the ECHR, particularly Article 8: Respect for your private and family life.
Again, at approximately 10:36 am, immediately upon finishing drafting this blog post, I hear some housemates begin to converse loudly right outside my room to mock and confirm their constant monitoring of all my online activities by getting the housemates to do the exact same thing I have just typed in my legal note on my mobile phone. The time contains numbers 3 and 6 again, the numbers often used in the harassment campaign against me, including number 8, to constantly and symbolically refer to their alleged violations of my human rights Article 3 (Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (Right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (Respect for your private and family life) under the ECHR.
Source: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/human-rights-act
When Familiar Brands Become Part of the Harassment
Over time, I began to notice something unsettling: everyday brands I personally own and wear—particularly Adidas and Nike—started appearing frequently in situations that felt targeted and distressing.
These are brands I already had in my wardrobe. Ordinary, unremarkable choices. And yet, after certain private moments, disclosures, or legal work, I would suddenly notice individuals around me wearing the same brands in conspicuous or repetitive ways, often at moments when I already felt vulnerable or under pressure.
It began to feel as though what I owned, what I wore, and what was familiar to me was being reflected back at me—not neutrally, but in a way that felt mocking, intrusive, and unsettling.
The Appearance of Instruction
What troubled me most was the consistency. It often appeared as though individuals had been instructed to wear Adidas or Nike in specific contexts or just to harass me. On some occasions, I could not shake the impression that these appearances were not coincidental, but part of a wider pattern intended to remind me that my private life was being observed.
I began to wonder whether clothing itself had been turned into a signalling mechanism—using what I already own to unsettle me further. I begin to think that people might even be financially incentivised or provided with clothing in order to wear it for this purpose. They appear to use repetition techniques a lot to condition me to certain stimuli.
Why Puma?
More recently, I also noticed the Puma brand appearing in similar contexts.
This stood out to me because Puma is not a brand I personally own or wear. That raised new questions. Why this brand? Why now?
One possibility I cannot ignore is that Puma may be used not to reference me directly, but to suggest knowledge of people close to me—perhaps family members or individuals in my personal life who do own or wear Puma. If so, this would imply that information about people I know is also being accessed or exploited through unlawful or intrusive means.
Thus, the pattern feels deliberate when it’s being done repeatedly, and it adds another layer of distress.
When the Ordinary Becomes Weaponised
What makes this particularly disturbing is how ordinary objects—clothes, logos, familiar brands—can be repurposed into something that feels threatening when placed in the right context.
There is no overt threat. No explicit message. Just repetition, timing, and symbolism.
That ambiguity is what makes it so effective—and so cruel.
Why I Am Writing This
I am sharing this to document my lived experience and the psychological impact of these repeated patterns and to warn other potential victims of this form of insidious harassment technique. So, they can recognise this type of harassment method.
Harassment does not always come in loud or obvious forms. Sometimes it hides in the familiar, using subtle cues to destabilise and distress.
This adds to the growing sense that nothing in my life remains untouched.
I write this so there is a record. So that others understand how harassment can operate through symbolism.
