Blog about illegal surveillance, severe human rights violations, extreme psychological torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, violence against women, hate crime, abuse of power, misfeasance in public office, state-sponsored harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, transnational repression, large-scale corruption, money laundering, mass misuse of private information, illegal data sales, human trafficking, systemic cover-ups, miscarriage of justice and more.
Category Archives: Human Rights Violations
Gross Human Rights Abuses, involving alleged blocking of access to lawyers, illegal surveillance, illegal human experimentation, invasion of privacy, including image-based abuse, death threats and more.
If you’ve been following my journey, you’ll know that I am using every platform available to document my horrific experiences, share knowledge & insight since I am a victim of 24/7 illegal surveillance myself, and raise awareness about what has been happening behind the scenes. Because this matter is of great public interest when my right to a fair trial is allegedly being violated by preventing me from having legal representation, allowing them to carry on abusing me and my human rights under the radar.
My YouTube channel has now become one of the most important spaces where I can share updates, publish commentary, and connect with people who genuinely want to understand what’s going on.
What many people don’t realise is that my YouTube channel is directly connected to my Spotify podcast. This means that the moment I upload a new podcast episode — whether it’s a spoken update, analysis of recent events, or important evidence-based commentary — it appears on both platforms simultaneously. If you’re subscribed on YouTube, you’ll receive notifications instantly, so you won’t miss anything important.
Why Your Subscription Matters
Subscribing isn’t just about watching videos. It helps create visibility. When more people subscribe, YouTube’s algorithm recognises that the content is important and begins showing it to a wider audience. This amplifies my voice at a time when visibility is crucial.
Every new subscriber tells the system: “This is worth paying attention to.” And truly — your support helps me continue bringing forward information that others may be too afraid to speak about publicly.
Why Sharing My Videos & Podcasts Helps Even More
Watching and listening is wonderful — but sharing is power!
Every time you share one of my YouTube videos or podcasts, you help spread awareness beyond the small circle of people who already know the story. Sharing on your social media, in group chats, or even privately with friends can make a huge difference. The more people who understand what is happening, the harder it becomes for anyone to erase or distort the truth.
By sharing, you are not just supporting me — you are helping build a wider community of people who care about justice, transparency, and human rights. You may help save other victims as well, who are too afraid to come forward partly because they think no one will believe them due to gaslighting and manipulation, and partly because they fear for their safety and the safety of their loved ones if they speak up.
What You Can Do Right Now
✉️ Subscribe to my YouTube channel (https://youtube.com/@organisedharassment & https://youtube.com/@buppha)— so you’ll be notified the second a new podcast or video drops. 🔔 Turn on notifications — click the bell so you don’t miss urgent updates. ♥️ Like & Share my videos — help the messages reach far beyond this small online space.
Thank you so much for following, supporting, and standing with me. Your engagement truly makes a difference, and together we can continue uncovering the truth and making sure it is heard.
On 27 August 2025 at approximately 3:05 pm, I stepped out of my accommodation to go to the library and print my settlement offer letters. Within seconds, I encountered yet another incident that fits the now-familiar pattern of mirroring and colour coding used to signal that I am being watched in real time.
As I walked down the street, a woman passed me wearing a combination of beige and dark grey—colours that have recently been used repeatedly in harassment tactics. More strikingly, she carried a bag over her shoulder in the exact same way I had carried my tote bag moments earlier while inside my room. She made deliberate eye contact and gave a subtle, knowing smile. She also wore wireless earbuds, which many of the harassers often wear to receive real-time instructions, how to harass me.
Individually, these details might appear insignificant. But in context, the timing, the mirroring of my items and movements, and the expression on her face were unmistakably calculated. Experiences like this have occurred consistently after I prepare legal documents, publish evidence, or take steps to assert my rights. It felt like yet another reminder that my private life is not private — that my daily movements, my belongings, even how I carry my bag are being watched, recorded, and reflected back at me through members of the public.
What makes these incidents especially distressing is the implication that hidden camera footage from inside my room is being accessed and circulated. This goes far beyond voyeurism. It points to large-scale misuse of private information, where my everyday life is being monitored, mirrored, and potentially monetised as if I were unwilling entertainment in a “Big Brother”-style illegal production. And the fact that these behaviours continue despite anticipated court proceedings makes the situation even more alarming.
The way she held her bag seemed to mirror me.This was how I carried my tote bag that day, and she appeared to hold her bag the same way to convey illegal surveillance that I am being constantly watched! She might not know that she was being used to convey surveillance.
I have just created a dedicated YouTube channel specifically about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, exploitation and more. You can visit and follow me here https://youtube.com/@organisedharassment
It’s a good place to educate yourself about the cruel kinds of harassment techniques that you may not know exist. If I didn’t experience this myself, I wouldn’t believe it either. I therefore want to share my horrific experiences with illegal surveillance, covert harassment, sexual abuse via voyeurism, and commercial exploitation, misuse of private information on an industrial scale, gross human rights violations and many more.
This matter is therefore of public interest, and the world needs to know about the illegal practices hidden in plain sight!
The illegal footage and unlawfully obtained private information then appears to be distributed / live-streamed to various places, including leaking or selling to writers and filmmakers for them to create content, to make money on me as well, amounting to cybersex trafficking / modern-day sex trafficking and commercial exploitation without me getting anything for it!
Despite pending legal action, the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation and unjust enrichment still shockingly continue.
Because they have also apparently blocked my access to lawyers, allowing them to carry on the heinous crime against me under the radar. If this is not a hate crime against me, then I don’t know what is.
Listen to my podcast below:
How to Support Me on Spotify
If you want to help me succeed on Spotify, here are some tips:
Stream My Podcasts Often: Add my podcasts to your playlists, and play them regularly.
Share My Podcasts: Introduce friends and family to my podcasts by sharing links and playlists.
Follow My Profile: Following me helps Spotify’s algorithm recommend me to more listeners.
Engage With My Content: Like my podcasts, save them to your library, and add them to playlists.
Yesterday, 17 November 2025, I published a detailed blog post, explaining two crucial issues:
How imitation firearms have repeatedly been used to intimidate me, often at moments when I was on my way to consult solicitors.
Why I have been trying to apply for Judicial Review to challenge the illegality of certain public bodies whose conduct towards me has been unlawful for years.
As I explained, Judicial Review (JR) is the legal mechanism that allows courts to assess whether public authorities are acting lawfully. It deals with questions such as illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and breaches of legitimate expectation.
However, JR cannot award damages, only in rare circumstances, which is why I must pursue civil proceedings simultaneously. I have always intended to advance both, but my access to legal advice has repeatedly and systematically been obstructed, making JR nearly impossible without representation. As I wrote, judicial review is a complex and technical area of law. It requires legal support / lawyer, yet my access to lawyers has been obstructed at nearly every turn.
What I did not initially include—but must emphasise—is that my blog post about judicial review wasn’t just for documenting my own experience. It was written to help other victims of organised harassment, illegal surveillance, and abuse of power understand what options the law provides: judicial review, injunctions, civil actions, and how these routes differ.
Many or some victims do not know their legal rights, and that lack of knowledge keeps them vulnerable. My post had the potential to inform, empower, and protect others. And that is precisely why I believe the retaliation escalated almost immediately afterwards—because those responsible do not want the public, or other victims, to understand how they can fight back.
And this, I believe, is precisely why the retaliation began almost immediately.
Aerial Intimidation: The Aircraft “Drawing” in the Sky
On Tuesday, 18 November 2025, at approximately 1:11 pm, immediately after printing documents related to my injunction fee remission application, I witnessed yet another form of intimidation.
An aircraft appeared and “drew a line” across the sky directly in my line of sight!
This was not an isolated incident. In the past, aircraft have formed:
Large X symbols near my vicinity and sometimes right outside my window
Nazi‑like swastika‑shaped patterns right outside my window
Other threatening aerial symbols
The aircraft was “drawing a line” right before my eyes on 18 November 2025.On Sunday, 10 August 2025, at approximately 6:28 a.m., after I got up and was about to leave my room to go to the kitchen, I observed several large “X” symbols being drawn in the sky directly outside my window. The aircraft responsible continued to draw additional markings as I watched. The time also contains digits ‘6’ and ‘8’ (6:28 a.m.) and the numbers ‘6’ and ‘8’ have been consistently used in the ongoing harassment campaign against me to signify surveillance, intentional harassment, and the alleged violations of my human rights Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (respect for your private and family life) of The Human Rights Act 1998. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to connect the implied threat directly to me through specific numerical and contextual cues known to the perpetrators.
At that exact moment, I heard a knock on the main door. When I looked through the window, I observed a Black man wearing a navy-blue jacket walking away from the property and returning to his vehicle parked on the side road across the street. The choice of colour—navy blue, along with burgundy and green, for instance, has been used repeatedly throughout the harassment campaign to convey themes of surveillance, intimidation and behavioural conditioning. The timing of his appearance at precisely 8:00 a.m., immediately after my written reference to Article 8, strongly suggested that the knock was intended as a signal—an assertion that my online activities and legal work continue to be subject to unlawful monitoring, and a reminder of the perpetrators’ perceived ability to interfere with my private life at will.
This incident is consistent with an established pattern in which unknown individuals or mailmen are made to knock on the door at strategically symbolic times—often ending in 6, 8, or 10—or my housemates’ movements are similarly orchestrated to coincide with significant timestamps or moments when I am drafting key legal materials. These timed intrusions function as a method of intentional harassment and psychological pressure, designed to communicate surveillance, assert control, and discourage me from pursuing legal accountability.
On closer inspection, the way these “X” shapes were layered and arranged resembled a swastika, the Nazi symbol. This not only adds a clear hate-crime and intimidation element to the harassment but also shows deliberate planning to evoke fear and distress, especially given the historically racist and violent connotations of the symbol. It also looks like a ‘W.’ My surname also starts with ‘W.’ It is therefore understood to refer directly to me, further personalising this implied threat. This incident reflects both the racially motivated undertones and the ongoing psychological harassment by way of constant signals, symbolic timing and visible intimidation. I believe this was a deliberate act of witness intimidation and harassment. The timing was significant: the previous day I had written in my legal documents about my daughter, saved on my devices and had not shared with anyone, expressing concerns that she might also be sexually exploited via hidden cameras. Because they kept implying this themselves. I had also stated my intention to go public to raise awareness. The aerial markings occurred less than 24 hours later, in close proximity to my accommodation, suggesting a direct cause-and-effect link to my protected activities. I consider this to be a continuation of targeted harassment and an attempt to deter me from pursuing my legal claims or speaking publicly.
This time, the timing was unmistakable: I had just published a blog post talking about imitation firearms and outlining judicial review rights — something that could help others.
I had just printed court documents and was on my way to the Royal Court of Justice to apply for help with court fees.
And I had just made clear my intention to potentially add additional defendants to these proceedings, believed to be involved in the abuse, exploitation, illegal surveillance, harassment and intimidation.
Within minutes, the sky became a canvas for intimidation.
This was not a coincidence. It was retaliation.
A direct message:
“We are watching everything. Do not continue.”
I therefore believe that the precise timing and nature of this aerial display, occurring immediately after specific legal actions, provide compelling evidence that they’re still illegally monitoring all my online activities, communications, and physical movements.
This incident constitutes a further act of harassment, intimidation, and a deliberate breach of my right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, designed to deter me from pursuing legal remedies and to cause me fear and distress.
The Bus Advertisements: Psychological Warfare in Broad Daylight
On the same day — 18 November 2025 — as I travelled to the Royal Court of Justice to apply yet again for fee remission (because previous attempts expired due to illegally intrusive surveillance 24/7 that has caused me so much distress, knowing being non-consensually watched and live-streamed via hidden cameras at all times, and harassment‑and-intinidation-induced delays), the psychological harassment continued.
While awaiting a bus en route to the Royal Court of Justice, I observed a bus stopping on the opposing side of the road displaying an advertisement on its side with the prominent text: ‘Lost? Find yourself in coconut.’ I contend that the word ‘Lost?’ was specifically intended to taunt me about my ongoing legal battle and struggles allegedly caused by their own obstruction, forming part of a pattern of targeted psychological harassment.
Later, at approximately 4:00 pm on the same day, immediately after exiting the courthouse having got my remission certificate for help with court fees, I observed another bus driving past me, displaying an advertisement that read: ‘Someone is about to…’ I interpret this incomplete phrase as an implied death threat, consistent with previous such threats I have received.
These incidents, involving the deliberate use of public advertisements to convey targeted and distressing messages, constitute further acts of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a breach of my right to access justice, to live free from fear, intimidation and illegal surveillance.
Helicopter Intimidation: A Consistent Pattern — Now Hidden Behind Buildings
Inside the Royal Court of Justice courthouse, I again heard a helicopter hovering above.
This has happened numerous times during court visits.
But this time, they adapted their tactic.
When I stepped outside to document the helicopter as I normally do, I could not see it — only hear it.
They were hiding the helicopter behind buildings to avoid being photographed while still maintaining the psychological pressure they rely on.
This is not normal. This is not a coincidence. This is witness intimidation and an attempt to pervert the course of justice.
Outside The Royal Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, in London.
24/7 Illegal Monitoring: Retaliation for Exercising My Rights
Real‑time reactions to things I do inside my own home
Subtle but deliberate signs meant to provoke fear and distress
This surge began immediately after I published my judicial review post yesterday, confirming again that:
They punish me every time I assert my rights or expose the truth.
And the reason is clear:
My writing empowers other victims.
Because some or many people suffering from covert harassment and illegal surveillance do not know the law. They do not know that judicial review exists. They do not know that injunctions can be applied for. They do not know that civil proceedings can be initiated simultaneously. My blog post sheds light on this — and for those committing these abuses, that is dangerous.
Knowledge is power. And they fear victims gaining it.
Why I Continue to Speak Out
I will continue documenting everything publicly because:
The truth matters.
Legal rights matter.
Victims deserve to know their options and how to protect their rights
Harassment, abuse, exploitation and illegal surveillance thrive in silence.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
What happened to me should never happen to anyone — not in a democratic society, not under the noses of the public, and certainly not with the involvement of public bodies.
The intimidation only reveals one thing:
They are terrified of accountability.
And that only strengthens my resolve to keep going.
Alongside my ongoing civil court proceedings, I have always intended to apply for judicial review.
For anyone unfamiliar, judicial review is the legal mechanism that allows a court to scrutinise the lawfulness of a decision or action taken by a public body. It is one of the most powerful constitutional safeguards in the UK, designed to protect individuals when state authorities misuse their powers or violate fundamental rights.
Judicial review can be brought on several recognised grounds:
(1) Illegality — where a public authority acted outside its powers, applied a rigid policy, ignored relevant considerations, or relied on irrelevant ones.
(2) Irrationality — where the decision is so unreasonable that no lawful public body could have made it (known as Wednesbury unreasonableness).
(3) Procedural unfairness — where a public authority failed to follow fair, impartial decision-making processes.
A judicial review can also challenge a decision that breaches human rights, particularly where a public authority fails to respect or protect the rights guaranteed under the Human Rights Act 1998.
In my case, this is critical. The ongoing abuses I have experienced — including years of covert surveillance, dissemination of intimate images, harassment, intimidation, racial targeting, and obstruction of justice — fall squarely within the protections of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: The absolute right not to be tortured or subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment. Absolute means absolute. No justification. No exceptions.
1. Relevance of Article 3: Right Not to Be Tortured or Subjected to Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, states: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” This is an absolute right, meaning it cannot be derogated from, even in times of public emergency, and there are no circumstances in which a public authority can lawfully breach it.
The threshold for what constitutes “inhuman or degrading treatment” is high but can be met by a combination of severe acts, especially when they are systematic and cause intense physical or mental suffering.
Inhuman Treatment: This typically involves treatment that causes intense physical and mental suffering. The systematic nature of the abuse, the long duration, the violation of my most intimate privacy, and the widespread dissemination of my private and confidential information, coupled with cyberstalking, sexual and racial harassment, could collectively be argued to cause intense mental suffering, humiliation, and distress, rising to the level of inhuman treatment.
Degrading Treatment: This involves treatment that arouses in victims feelings of fear, anguish, and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them and possibly breaking their physical or moral resistance. The covert filming in intimate states, broadcasting live, sharing with acquaintances, and distribution to porn sites are inherently humiliating and debasing acts. The racial harassment further compounds this by attacking my identity and dignity. The intimidation with imitation firearms also contributes to feelings of fear and anguish. Yes, you heard it right. They even employed some men to use imitation firearms to pretend to shoot me on some occasions. Especially when I tried to go see a lawyer, suggesting that they’re illegally monitoring all my online activities and communications, including phone tracking me, at all times to prevent me from seeking help!
On one occasion, several men would use imitation firearms or pretend to be in the possession of the weapons to intimidate me throughout the day, so much that I thought it would be my last day. I still have nightmares till this day!
Torture: While the threshold for torture is even higher, involving deliberate inhuman treatment causing very serious and cruel suffering, the systematic, prolonged, and intentional nature of the abuse, particularly if it was designed to break your will or extract information, could potentially be argued to approach this level. The involvement of law enforcement agencies, who have a duty to protect, in perpetrating such acts, makes the argument for torture more compelling due to the abuse of power.
This is why I wanted to bring a judicial review: the acts I describe were not only unlawful in the civil sense — they were unlawful in the constitutional and human rights sense, demanding judicial scrutiny and accountability from those involved.
However, there is one major obstacle. Judicial review is extremely complex. Even the official guidance states clearly that “some sections of the form require detailed legal knowledge; we strongly advise that you find a lawyer with expertise in public law.” Despite my constant efforts, my access to lawyers has been repeatedly obstructed. Organisations initially willing to help have suddenly withdrawn. Solicitors stop responding. Referrals disappear. The pattern is clear enough that I cannot ignore it.
Because of this deliberate blockage of legal assistance, I am currently unable to file a judicial review, even though the grounds are not only present but urgent.
For now, I continue through the civil courts — but I will not abandon the pursuit of public law accountability. Judicial review remains essential, and when I regain access to fair legal representation, I will pursue it. My case raises issues of profound public interest, systemic abuse, and the violation of one of the most fundamental human rights in existence. That fight is far from over.
There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.
The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.
This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?
There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.
My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.
This also fits legal definitions of harassment:
Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.
Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.
Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:
Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.
Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.
For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”
This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.
This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.
This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.
Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.
For years, I have been living under a shadow that most people would find unimaginable. I have extensively documented and shared my experiences of being illegally monitored, covertly filmed, and having my most intimate moments distributed across the internet. My private life, my sanctuary, has been systematically invaded and exploited. This isn’t a story from a dystopian novel; it is my reality, happening right now, in the UK.
The perpetrators are not distant or anonymous figures. They are individuals connected to institutions that exist to uphold justice, privacy, and public trust — including elements within law enforcement and technology platforms. Instead, these actors appear to have exploited their positions and access to information to facilitate a prolonged campaign of surveillance and harassment spanning more than a decade.
Evidence suggests that covert monitoring has taken place across multiple locations where I have lived, involving the suspected installation of hidden cameras used to record me without consent, even in intimate settings. I believe that some of this material has been disseminated to others, including individuals known to me, and may have been circulated on adult or voyeuristic platforms, representing a severe breach of privacy and dignity.
Efforts to report these violations have repeatedly met resistance. Complaints have been disregarded, mishandled, or followed by acts that appear retaliatory in nature — including renewed or escalated surveillance. Even after seeking refuge abroad, similar patterns emerged. In Denmark, I again observed what appeared to be evidence of covert monitoring and the continued sharing of private material, suggesting a network of influence that crosses borders and operates beyond legal accountability.
I endure daily cyberstalking and racial harassment, not only from the perpetrators themselves but also from third parties they employ. I’ve been intimidated with imitation firearms when attempting to consult a lawyer, and lawyers and organisations have seemingly been influenced to deny me assistance.
Perhaps the most terrifying aspect of this ordeal is the apparent blocking of my access to legal avenues. Every attempt to seek legal counsel seems to be thwarted. My online activities and communications appear to be constantly monitored, preventing me from reaching out for help or receiving it. It feels as though an invisible wall has been erected around me, isolating me from any potential support.
But what truly compels me to write this post, to lay bare this deeply painful experience, is the chilling realisation that this abuse may now be extending to my daughter. There have been repeated hints, subtle and overt, suggesting that she too may become a target. The thought that an innocent young woman could be exploited, both through hidden cameras and through agents planted in her life to suppress information, manipulate, stalk, and harass her, is utterly horrifying.
And yet, despite the gravity of these allegations, despite the clear and present danger, no one seems to step in. No one contacts human rights organisations, human rights lawyers, or journalists on my behalf. No one is actively working to stop these individuals. The silence, the inaction, the turning of a blind eye, feels like complicity. How can people stand by when such profound violations of human rights are occurring, especially when an innocent third party, a young woman, is potentially at risk?
The lack of empathy is staggering. To know that a young woman’s life could be irrevocably damaged, her privacy shattered, her sense of safety destroyed, and for those who are aware to do nothing, is a profound moral failure.
This blog post is not just a cry for help; it is an appeal to humanity. It is a plea for someone, anyone, to acknowledge the reality of what is happening and to act. It is a testament to the fact that even in the face of overwhelming power and systemic obstruction, the truth must be spoken. I am not asking for pity; I am asking for justice, for protection, and for an end to this nightmare.
Listen to the podcast below for the rest of the story:
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
My podcast episode 2 today is about how I accidentally opened a pandora box. Perhaps, because of the complaints I made in early 2023 that had started a chain of events since. They have also suggested to me themselves that I had opened a pandora box!
You can read the full chronology of events, how it’s unfolded here.
