Blog about illegal surveillance, severe human rights violations, extreme psychological torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, violence against women, hate crime, abuse of power, misfeasance in public office, state-sponsored harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, transnational repression, large-scale corruption, money laundering, mass misuse of private information, illegal data sales, human trafficking, systemic cover-ups, miscarriage of justice and more.
Category Archives: Human Rights Violations
Gross Human Rights Abuses, involving alleged blocking of access to lawyers, illegal surveillance, illegal human experimentation, invasion of privacy, including image-based abuse, death threats and more.
I have filed a claim in the High Court of England and Wales (The Royal Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division – Claim No. KB-2025-004650) against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook/Instagram), Elon Musk, X.com (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and other parties.
The claim further alleges that my original literary and creative works were unlawfully accessed through hacking and disseminated to third parties without my consent, resulting in loss of income, loss of future professional opportunities, and significant psychological harm such as PTSD, severe emotional distress.
Some Defendants deny liability. Through their legal representatives, certain Defendants, including the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, have stated that the allegations are denied and that they intend to defend the claim.
On 19 December 2025, the court stayed the proceedings to permit the filing of amended Particulars of Claim, which I am currently preparing in accordance with the court’s directions.
The prolonged covert surveillance and organised harassment I’ve endured have manifested in increasingly insidious ways, extending beyond direct observation to a sophisticated campaign of psychological manipulation. It appears they employ various methods to convey hidden messages, demonstrating an alleged unlawful gathering of information about my life, possessions, and even my past.
One recurring pattern involves the use of numbers. For instance, I’ve observed repeated instances where numbers like 3, 6, 8, and 10 appear in contexts that, to me, seem to symbolically reference alleged violations of my human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. Similarly, the number 4 has appeared in ways that I interpret as alluding to Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which prohibits slavery in all its forms. These are not isolated occurrences but form part of a continuous campaign of intimidation.
Beyond numbers, I have noticed a consistent use of everyday objects and situations to convey these messages. This includes specific number plates, symbols, imagery, clothing, colours, and even brand names such as Adidas, Nike, and Puma. The language used in certain interactions also appears to be deliberately chosen.
The surveillance itself is pervasive and designed to be overtly acknowledged. A recent example highlights this: After experiencing a bout of sneezing and using tissues before leaving my home. Later that day, while on public transport, I observed several individuals who, shortly after sitting near or opposite me, began to sneeze and blow their noses with tissues in a manner that mirrored my earlier actions. This pattern of mirroring my private actions in public spaces is a frequent occurrence and contributes significantly to my sense of being under continuous surveillance.
They also appear to leverage knowledge of my past. For instance, I’ve observed a notable increase in the appearance of specific car brands that I used to own, such as Ford, or brands that allude to individuals I once knew. This suggests an extensive and unlawful information gathering operation, seemingly designed to humiliate and intimidate me by demonstrating their intimate knowledge of my personal history. More recently, I’ve noticed a particular car brand, KIA, appearing with unusual frequency. While I’ve never owned a KIA nor do I know anyone who does, its repeated appearance suggests another layer of their coded communication, the meaning of which remains unclear to me.
My experience resonates deeply with accounts from other victims of organised harassment. For example, a UK blogger, whose ordeal includes stalking, sabotage, cyberattacks, and even alleged attempts at poisoning, has spoken publicly about her experiences, including at the Houses of Parliament. She describes constant surveillance, with individuals and vehicles following her, and notes that license plates are often used for ‘secret communication,’ including veiled threats. Her description of her situation as a ‘psychological thriller and COINTELPRO 2.0’ mirrors the unsettling reality I face daily. This shared experience underscores that these are not isolated incidents but a pattern of sophisticated, organised harassment affecting multiple individuals.
I wish to inform members of the public, journalists, human rights lawyers, human rights organisations, human rights watch and interested parties that I have issued a new press release concerning my ongoing High Court proceedings relating to serious and sustained privacy violations.
The press release outlines the nature of the claim that has now been formally filed, the legal framework relied upon, and the broader public-interest issues raised by the case. These include unlawful surveillance (both digital and physical), misuse of private information, hacking, cyberstalking, and the systemic risks posed by such conduct when left unaddressed.
I have published a new press release outlining the filing of my High Court claim concerning serious and ongoing digital privacy violations.
This case raises urgent questions about digital surveillance, misuse of private information, data protection failures, and the accountability of powerful actors in an increasingly intrusive online ecosystem. It concerns the alleged unlawful access to personal devices, illegal and intrusive surveillance, monitoring of private communications, and the exploitation and dissemination of private data without consent.
The purpose of releasing this information publicly is threefold:
– Transparency – to ensure the public record accurately reflects the nature of the claim and the relief sought.
– Protection – to deter further interference, retaliation, intimidation, or further misuse of private information while proceedings are ongoing.
– Public interest – to contribute to wider discussions around digital privacy, surveillance abuse, platform responsibility, and access to justice.
I encourage journalists, legal professionals, digital rights advocates, and members of the public to read the press release in full and draw their own conclusions based on the source material.
The press release sets out the legal basis of the claim, the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, and the remedies being sought through the courts. It does not speculate on outcomes and does not replace the formal judicial process. I will continue to provide updates responsibly and in accordance with legal advice as the case progresses.
Thank you to everyone who has shown support, professionalism, and respect for due process.
Most people never have to think about Article 6 of the Human Rights Act. But when something goes wrong — when your privacy is violated, when you need legal protection, when you’re suddenly navigating the court system — Article 6 becomes one of the most important rights you have.
So what is Article 6?
Article 6 = The Right to a Fair Trial
In simple terms, Article 6 protects your right to:
– be heard – have a fair process – access legal advice – have equal footing with the other side – participate effectively in your own case
It exists to stop situations where one side has all the power, resources, or representation — and the other side is left unprotected.
Why Article 6 Matters in My Case
In my situation, there appear to be barriers preventing me from securing legal representation, while the opposing side has full legal support. This creates an imbalance that undermines the fairness of the proceedings.
A fair trial requires equality of arms — meaning both sides should have a fair chance to present their case.
When one side has lawyers and the other is prevented from obtaining them, that balance is lost.
Why I’m Seeking an Urgent Injunction
To restore fairness, I am seeking an urgent injunction to also prevent any interference with my ability to obtain legal representation, including any actions that discourage, influence, or obstruct lawyers or organisations from providing me with impartial advice. Without legal advice, it becomes impossible to navigate complex digital privacy issues or defend my rights effectively.
Because access to legal representation is essential for a fair trial, and any obstruction undermines my Article 6 rights.
This is not just about me — many people facing digital harms struggle to obtain legal support. Article 6 exists to protect all of us.
Why This Is a Public‑Interest Issue
Digital privacy violations are increasing. So are barriers to justice. When people cannot access lawyers, the system fails.
By speaking out, I hope to:
– raise awareness – encourage transparency – highlight systemic barriers – protect my rights – support others facing similar obstacles
Access to justice is a human right. Article 6 protects that right — and it must be upheld.
“Why I’m Speaking Out: Protecting Digital Privacy in a Dangerous Digital Age”
Digital privacy is no longer something we can take for granted. Every day, people are being watched, recorded, tracked, or digitally manipulated without their knowledge or consent. Hidden cameras, illegal surveillance, misuse of private information, and AI‑generated exploitation are no longer rare — they are becoming part of a disturbing new normal.
For many, these harms remain invisible until they happen to them. But once they do, the impact is profound. Your home stops feeling like home. Your sense of safety collapses. Your dignity is shaken. Your private life becomes something that can be accessed, shared, or distorted by others.
This is why I’m speaking out.
I have taken formal legal steps to protect my privacy and safety. This includes filing and amending High Court documents that address serious digital violations. While I cannot name individuals publicly, I believe it is important to talk openly about the issue itself — because this is not just about one case. It is about a wider pattern of digital abuse that affects countless people. I am also going to start a campaign soon.
Why This Campaign Matters
This campaign is my way of shining a light on a growing problem that too often remains hidden. It exists to:
– Raise awareness about illegal surveillance and digital exploitation
– Educate the public about the risks and realities of modern privacy violations
– Promote transparency and accountability in digital spaces
– Encourage ethical behaviour from institutions, platforms, and organisations
– Support stronger protections for individuals
– Build a movement for digital safety and human rights
Privacy is not a luxury.
It is a fundamental human right.
The Human Impact
Digital violations are not abstract. They cause real emotional, psychological and social harm. They affect your relationships, your work, your confidence and your ability to feel safe in your own life. Many victims feel isolated, ashamed, or afraid to speak out.
No one should have to face these harms alone.
Legal Action and Public Awareness: A Dual Approach
Legal action is one tool — a powerful one — but it is not the only tool. Public awareness is equally important. When people understand the issue, when they see the patterns, when they recognise the risks, change becomes possible.
This campaign will run alongside my legal case, synchronised with key milestones. As documents are filed, hearings approach, or orders are sought, I will use those moments to educate, inform, and advocate for stronger protections.
A Call for Change
We need better systems.
We need stronger safeguards.
We need accountability from platforms and institutions.
We need transparency when digital harms occur.
We need to protect people from exploitation — online and offline.
This campaign is a step toward that change.
Join Me
If you care about privacy, safety, and human rights, I invite you to follow this journey. Share the campaign. Talk about the issue. Support ethical organisations. Help raise awareness.
Together, we can push for a safer digital world — one where no one’s private life can be exploited without consequences.
Your privacy matters. Your safety matters. Your dignity matters.
Visit my Legal Case page for more info and download my Press Kit by clicking on the button below:
I am very busy with lots of things at once. Mostly working on this case alone without a solicitor due my access to lawyers appears to have been obstructed. I have to prepare lots of legal paperwork, gather information and evidence, study specific areas of law related to my claim, drafting an injunction application, Particulars of Claim, and many more.
It’s overwhelming when you don’t have legal representation. Especially when this case involves multiple defendants – most of them are large corporations and powerful individuals, residing both inside and outside the UK – making this case an exceptionally high-profile and high-stakes case.
Therefore, this is so wrong when they apparently prevent me from having legal representation, to make it difficult for me as much as possible to challenge their illegal enterprises.
Furthermore, they seem to continue to install hidden cameras and keep giving me hints that they are still unlawfully observing everything I do and disseminating/live-streaming the illegal footage far and wide.
They also appear to cyberstalk me 24/7 and then use the stolen information to harass, intimidate, gain insight into my legal strategies, and share the illegally obtained information to various places to violate my privacy even further as a form of unlawful retaliation and victimisation for trying to assert my rights.
This has caused me severe emotional distress, humiliation and the feeling that my privacy has severely been violated on every level.
Plus, I have to prepare a complex case alone without formal legal training while enduring daily abuse, racial and sexual harassment, intimidation and humiliation since I still live under 24/7 illegal surveillance, knowing that everything has been non-consensually filmed, both with video and audio, and has subsequently been distributed or sold to various places for profit as well.
While I am typing this blog post, at approximately 10:10 am, I hear someone cough outside. This is what they appear to do by cyberstalking me around the clock and then constantly giving me hints via various means, such as someone coughing or conversing loudly nearby, as soon as I type some crucial or sensitive information into my legal documents, especially regarding sexual abuse via hidden cameras. This seems to serve two purposes: To let me know that they are also constantly watching me online via cyberstalking/hacking to make me feel intimidated that they are still illegally monitoring me both online and offline, to demonstrate that nothing in my life is private anymore, and to induce anger by giving me hints at the precise moment I detail the horrific crimes allegedly committed against me. It’s one of their sadistic ways to consistently confirm and remind me of their evil, illegal practices.
This is an extreme form of human rights violations under the ECHR, particularly Article 8: Respect for your private and family life.
Again, at approximately 10:36 am, immediately upon finishing drafting this blog post, I hear some housemates begin to converse loudly right outside my room to mock and confirm their constant monitoring of all my online activities by getting the housemates to do the exact same thing I have just typed in my legal note on my mobile phone. The time contains numbers 3 and 6 again, the numbers often used in the harassment campaign against me, including number 8, to constantly and symbolically refer to their alleged violations of my human rights Article 3 (Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (Right to a fair trial) and Article 8 (Respect for your private and family life) under the ECHR.
Over time, I began to notice something unsettling: everyday brands I personally own and wear—particularly Adidas and Nike—started appearing frequently in situations that felt targeted and distressing.
These are brands I already had in my wardrobe. Ordinary, unremarkable choices. And yet, after certain private moments, disclosures, or legal work, I would suddenly notice individuals around me wearing the same brands in conspicuous or repetitive ways, often at moments when I already felt vulnerable or under pressure.
It began to feel as though what I owned, what I wore, and what was familiar to me was being reflected back at me—not neutrally, but in a way that felt mocking, intrusive, and unsettling.
The Appearance of Instruction
What troubled me most was the consistency. It often appeared as though individuals had been instructed to wear Adidas or Nike in specific contexts or just to harass me. On some occasions, I could not shake the impression that these appearances were not coincidental, but part of a wider pattern intended to remind me that my private life was being observed.
I began to wonder whether clothing itself had been turned into a signalling mechanism—using what I already own to unsettle me further. I begin to think that people might even be financially incentivised or provided with clothing in order to wear it for this purpose. They appear to use repetition techniques a lot to condition me to certain stimuli.
Why Puma?
More recently, I also noticed the Puma brand appearing in similar contexts.
This stood out to me because Puma is not a brand I personally own or wear. That raised new questions. Why this brand? Why now?
One possibility I cannot ignore is that Puma may be used not to reference me directly, but to suggest knowledge of people close to me—perhaps family members or individuals in my personal life who do own or wear Puma. If so, this would imply that information about people I know is also being accessed or exploited through unlawful or intrusive means.
Thus, the pattern feels deliberate when it’s being done repeatedly, and it adds another layer of distress.
When the Ordinary Becomes Weaponised
What makes this particularly disturbing is how ordinary objects—clothes, logos, familiar brands—can be repurposed into something that feels threatening when placed in the right context.
There is no overt threat. No explicit message. Just repetition, timing, and symbolism.
That ambiguity is what makes it so effective—and so cruel.
Why I Am Writing This
I am sharing this to document my lived experience and the psychological impact of these repeated patterns and to warn other potential victims of this form of insidious harassment technique. So, they can recognise this type of harassment method.
Harassment does not always come in loud or obvious forms. Sometimes it hides in the familiar, using subtle cues to destabilise and distress.
This adds to the growing sense that nothing in my life remains untouched.
I write this so there is a record. So that others understand how harassment can operate through symbolism.
The Adidas socks that I own. This brand then seems to be used to harass me daily.This is how they appear to get people to wear something similar to what I own to convey surveillance and invasion of my privacy 24/7.
The hidden surveillance cameras used to monitor me without consent do not merely record my movements visually, but also capture audio, including private conversations, thoughts spoken aloud, moments of distress and in intimate states. These recordings are not kept privately, nor are they isolated breaches. Instead, I believe they have been unlawfully distributed and even broadcast live to various third parties, including pornographic websites, others known to me and to my daughter, and others known to the Defendants.
This exploitation has persisted for years and appears to be commercial in nature, weaponising my privacy, body, and identity for financial gain. The level of cruelty, humiliation, and psychological abuse resulting from this long-term monetised voyeurism is beyond comprehension. The invasion is total — affecting my physical safety, mental health, and ability to function as a normal human being. I believe this form of organised, profit-driven exploitation not only exceeds anything described in comparable witness accounts, but also constitutes a psychological torture, a modern form of enslavement and cybersex trafficking.
Based on clear and repeated patterns of behaviour — including highly specific, sexually explicit references used to taunt me — I believe the perpetrators have been unlawfully observing and filming me over many years inside my private accommodation, Putney flat, where I lived for over a decade, including many other places afterwards.
These individuals appear to have detailed knowledge of my private and intimate life and even verbal expressions during such private moments. These are facts no one could know unless they had been watching me live or accessing recorded footage through hidden cameras.
I strongly believe the recordings were not only stored but also distributed, possibly broadcast live to pornographic platforms, the dark web, or even to individuals known to me, in an effort to destroy my dignity, reputation, and relationships.
This is the longest, most invasive, and cruel form of image-based sexual abuse I have ever encountered. It constitutes gendered violence, racial exploitation of a vulnerable South East Asian woman, and human rights violations under Article 3 and Article 8 ECHR.
The psychological trauma has been immense. This is mental abuse by design — intended to cause maximum anguish through a combination of sexual exploitation, degradation, surveillance, and total loss of autonomy over my body and private life.
I believe the Defendants have also profited from this abuse, and have treated me as an object of ongoing illegal human experimentation, retaliating and escalating the abuse whenever I try to resist, speak out, or seek protection.
When I fled the UK to seek refuge in Denmark, the abuse intensified, with the same patterns of surveillance, voyeurism, misuse of private information, taunts, colour-coded harassment, and symbolic intimidation continuing there — but with even more cruelty and sadism, strongly suggesting that the Defendants instructed Danish actors or other actors to continue the harassment and abuse abroad.
Moreover, I have not only experienced severe and prolonged surveillance, harassment, and retaliation—both online and offline—but I have also been completely obstructed from accessing legal representation, thereby preventing me from stopping the abuse.
They have been subjecting me to illegal surveillance via hidden cameras, repeated sexual abuse through unlawful live broadcasting, and coordinated campaigns of intimidation and humiliation, including smear tactics, symbolic stalking, death threats, and harassment and exploitation of my daughter. Each time I attempt to seek help or assert my rights—whether by consulting organisations, approaching solicitors, or submitting claim forms—the harassment escalates immediately, confirming that I remain under hostile and illegal surveillance.
Thus, they have allegedly persistently denied me legal assistance and isolated me from support systems, so that the abuse can continue to escalate unchecked. This demonstrates the calculated, retaliatory, and cruel nature of the treatment they are giving me.
This morning, I had taken a video of individuals who were supposedly sent by my perpetrators to convey surveillance to make me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing that I am being constantly watched 24/7.
It’s one of their insidious techniques to cause me severe emotional distress, knowing that they are severely violating my privacy every single day. Furthermore, the illegal footage then seems to have been distributed and/or live-streamed to various places to make money on my as well.
Their abuse and illegal practices continue despite pending court proceedings. Because they have made it difficult for me to stop the abuse or challenge their illegal enterprises by allegedly preventing me from having legal representation.
Watch the video below, how they employ civilians to act as messengers to convey surveillance:
Furthermore, it has become alarmingly apparent that these defendants are not only targeting me but are also making repeated hints that suggest they may be sexually exploiting my daughter via hidden cameras, mirroring the abuse I have endured. This is therefore a matter of public interest!
What they are doing to my daughter is not just criminal — it’s deeply unethical and evil. She is an innocent third party being deliberately targeted to prevent her from accessing help or justice. This mirrors the same tactics I’ve experienced: suppression of information, obstruction of legal assistance, and retaliation whenever I try to protect myself or others.
If my daughter is indeed a victim, such actions directly violate her fundamental right to access justice under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects every person’s right to be informed, to seek help, and to pursue legal remedies. Preventing her from even knowing she might be at risk denies her that right.
What’s happening mirrors the broader pattern I’ve faced—of influence being used to block legal representation and suppress information. Together, these tactics reveal a consistent effort to obstruct justice for victims of serious privacy and human-rights violations.
If you’re my daughter and reading this, you must consult a human rights lawyer IMMEDIATELY.
They may even try to prevent you from having legal representation by gaslighting or manipulating you into not believing me. Just like how they allegedly block my access to lawyers. You must therefore not to believe what others say and seek help as fast as you can before it’s too late!
Yesterday, 13 December 2025, I was actively preparing and updating evidence, exhibits, an injunction application, and the Particulars of Claim concerning some of the Defendants.
Shortly after I had been working extensively on this case all morning, at approximately 12:44 pm, I observed aircraft markings in the sky resembling “lines” and “X” or “target-like” symbols. The timing of these incidents led me to perceive them as intimidating and retaliatory, suggesting to me once again that my online activities and communications are being illegally monitored at all times.
The “X” or “target-like” symbols, drawing by the aircraft right outside my residence.
This incident is not isolated but forms part of the Defendants’ continuous and escalating campaign of cyberstalking, racial harassment, and psychological intimidation against me and my daughter. It demonstrates the Defendants’ persistent efforts to monitor, harass, and cause distress, directly contributing to the severe emotional and psychological harm suffered by me, as detailed elsewhere on my blog.
Later, at approximately 2:04 pm, a helicopter was observed flying at low altitude near my residence, as seen in the image above, shortly after the aircraft had drawn trick “lines” and “X” symbols in the sky earlier today.
Photograph of another low‑flying helicopter observed near my residence at approximately 2:35 pm on 13 December 2025.
At approximately 2:35 pm, another helicopter was observed flying at low altitude near my residence once again, coinciding with my preparation of further evidence concerning some of the Defendants, and following an unexplained knock at the door shortly beforehand.
I also observed aircraft continue to draw lines and marks resembling ‘X’ or ‘target-like’ symbols in the sky, as seen in the photos above.
At approximately 9:01 pm, immediately after I posted a link to my blog post on the social media platform X.com, I observed a police car drive past my window.
These incidents followed closely on the heels of my private legal preparation, including the drafting of:
– The disappearance of my court evidence and documents from the Royal Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division) each time I attempted to apply for an urgent junction;
– The obstruction of my access to legal representation;
– A blog post exposing the use of “X” symbols and lines for intimidation, the deployment of elderly men to sexually harass me in retaliation for exposing wrongdoing and the ongoing harassment;
– Settlement offers to defendants, including film production companies who allegedly used my confidential information for profit.
The timing, symbolism, and coordinated harassment clearly demonstrate malicious intent to psychologically intimidate me, retaliate for my legal actions and interfere with court proceedings. This conduct continues despite my pending injunction application and court proceedings, demonstrating flagrant disregard for the law.
Another picture showing massive aircraft-drawn lines outside my window. I even observed the aircraft actively drawing more symbols. In addition, they created large lines emerging from a house right opposite my window, seemingly designed to resemble a volcano—symbolising anger, warning, or threat.On Tuesday, 12 August 2025, a similar incident also occurred in which the aircraft had also drawn ‘lines’ and a ‘volcano-like’ symbol right outside my window. This happened the very next day after I privately raised concerns in my legal documents about the possibility that they may have sexually abused my daughter via hidden cameras as well. So, this is not an isolated incident. Clearly, there’s a pattern of behaviour going on.
