Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
Unfortunately, soon after the court sealed my injunction application, see below, the defendants escalated their witness intimidation so much that they forced me to flee the UK back to Denmark. So, I am now back in Denmark and start my life all over again here.
The court sealed my injunction application on 21 June 2026, just the day before Keir Starmer resigned as the UK PM on 22 June 2026, who had also been added as a Respondent / Defendant.
But that’s not the end of it. The witness intimidation, large-scale harassment, and the illegal installation of hidden cameras in every place I live in Denmark, including in shared rooms and bathrooms in hostels, to sexually abuse, sexually humiliate, harass me, exploit and psychologically torture me continue unabated in Denmark as well. This is shocking despite the lawsuit having already been initiated, the injunction application having already been sealed and their lawyers having already been served the claim form and the injunction, they just boldly continue the abuse into Denmark regardless. This makes me think that the Danish police and/or authorities may be involved in this as well.
Every day I face severe harassment everywhere I go in Denmark and even inside my current accommodation. People are told to wear Adidas and Nike brands; the brand names they often use to harass me with. The same with the colours red, navy blue, burgundy, orange and pink, which are the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me, in which civilians are told / paid to wear these colours to harass me. They often intensify the colour and brand harassment whenever I try to assert my legal rights or make progress in this case, replicating the exact same harassment techniques used in the UK before I fled the country! This strongly suggests that the same perpetrators are behind this. Probably the British police,Keir Starmer and their Co-defendants, again, to try to silence me.
These two, probably father and son, also wore Adidas shoes. The father also wore a navy blue jumper, one of the main colour signifiers often used in the harassment campaign against me.
The amount of money they have spent so far to launch a cross-border intimidation and harassment campaign against me may have already exceeded the compensation I have asked them for. This is insane.
Well, I’m telling you now, I am not done with you yet. I will continue to pursue justice from Denmark instead. There’s no way I will back down! You have crossed the line by not just abusing me but my daughter as well.
Also here, Adidas shoes and pants.Adidas top.Adidas backpack. The man also wore a pair of navy blue shorts, to make it more obvious to me that this is intentional harassment.
PRESS NOTICE: High-Profile High Court Action Issued Against Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer, the Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, Elon Musk, X Corp, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms, Inc., TikTok. Coca-Cola, Google, US Film Studios such as Warner Bros and Universal Pictures + Others – Claim No: KB-2025-004650
For the attention of: The Legal Editor / Home News Desk
NOTICE OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS PURSUANT TO CPR 5.4C
Please find notice of a high-value civil action newly listed as “Approved” in the High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division) under Claim Number: KB-2025-004650
Case Details:
Jurisdiction: High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division), London.
Claimant: Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt (Litigant in Person)
Defendants: (1) Resigned UK PM Keir Starmer (2) The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis (3) Elon Musk (4) X Corp (5) Mark Zuckerberg (6) Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) TikTok (8) Coca-Cola (9) Google (10) Warner Bros (11) Universal Pictures + Others
Summary of Action:
The claim involves a high-value dispute pleaded on a joint and several liability basis, concerning systematic illegal surveillance, unlawful installation of hidden cameras and audio recording devices to non-consensually record and surveil the Claimant 24/7, dissemination / live-streaming of the illegal recordings for profit and harassment, cyberstalking, hacking, severe data breach, mass misuse of private information, commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, flagrant copyright infringement under Section 97(2) of the CDPA, gross human rights abuses, obstruction of justice, misfeasance in public office, large-scale corruption, cybersex trafficking ring, money laundering, and many more related illegal acts, committed against the Claimant, Buppha Wittaya-Amponpunt, for more than a decade and still continuing despite pending injunction and court proceedings.
The shocking part is that the Primary UK State-Actor Defendants, such as Keir Starmer and the Police, may have also subjected the Claimant’s 35-year-old daughter to the exact same sexual abuse and exploitation via hidden cameras and via a honey trap. Particularly when every attempt to warn her daughter by the Claimant is met with evidence tampering, intimidation, manipulation, gaslighting, and an increase in severe harassment. This is therefore NOT the behavior of innocent parties!
The Particulars of Claim detail that proprietary data and sensitive private materials were unlawfully obtained, mostly via hidden cameras, as mentioned above, and subsequently exploited globally via international corporations, film distribution networks, streaming platforms, tech platforms, and more.
The First Defendant, Keir Starmer, abruptly resigned his public position on 22 June 2026, exactly 18 hours after being formally added to these High Court proceedings. An urgent application for an Interim Injunction carrying a Penal Notice is currently before the court. See below:
At around 14:50 pm on 21 June 2026, I formally submitted my injunction application and added Keir Starmer as a Respondent / Defendant as well. 18 Hours after, at 9 am on 22 June 2026, he abruptly resigned.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION UPDATE: The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, one of the defendants, have formally appointed global firm DWF Law LLP via Form N434 to manage the defense under High Court Claim KB-2025-004650. This confirms the proceedings are live, active, and escalating. Media verification can be completed immediately against DWF’s record on the CE-File registry.
I also face severe harassment and intimidation daily. It escalates day by day as I work on this case, even during pending injunction and court proceedings. That’s why I need the public to contact human rights organisations and journalists for me, since all my devices and communications are being unlawfully monitored by the UK State-actor Defendants 24/7.
Pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 5.4C(1), members of the accredited press possess an automatic right to obtain copies of the Sealed Claim Form and Particulars of Claim directly from the High Court Central Office / King’s Bench Division Masters’ Secretary.
The Claimant welcomes transparent public scrutiny of these proceedings. Please quote Claim Number: KB-2025-004650 to the court clerk to secure the pleadings.
Please send an email with the information above to newsdesk@courtnewsuk.co.uk and newsdesk@lawgazette.co.uk on my behalf since I can’t do it myself when all my devices and communications are being illegally monitored 24/7.
More places to send my press kit to:
National Legal Affairs Editors: Find the direct emails of journalists like Haroon Siddique (The Guardian Legal Affairs), or the investigative teams at The Times and The Independent.
Deliver my evidence directly to investigative press desks (such as the BBC Panorama, The Guardian, or Private Eye).
Contact the legal and public-interest desks of major outlets (e.g., The Guardian, The Times, BBC Panorama, or The Bureau of Investigative Journalism).
Investigatory Media: Investigative desks at major national newspapers (such as The Guardian, The Times, or The Financial Times) and independent investigative outlets like The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) London Bureau: RSF specializes in breaking through state censorship and calling out governments globally. If you are in London, you can contact their UK desk directly at rsf-uk@rsf.org, or coordinate physical delivery to their office at 6th Floor, 2 London Wall Place, London, EC2Y 5AU.
The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) Campaigns Team: Reach out directly to the NUJ press and campaigns department at campaigns@nuj.org.uk or submit my case anonymously to the NUJ Journalists’ Safety Tracker. The NUJ has a direct mandate to raise national political and media alarms when a reporter’s safety and professional tools are weaponized against them.
Contact Private Eye (editorial@private-eye.co.uk), The Canary, or Novara Media. Give them my petition link and say this for me: “I am being monitored by UK officials for suing them, here is the proof https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk
If one independent journalist tweets my petition, it can reach millions overnight.
Contact Digital Rights Groups: Reach out to UK organizations dedicated to internet privacy and anti-surveillance, such as Big Brother Watch or the Open Rights Group. Because your story involves digital monitoring and privacy violations, these groups have massive, ready-made email lists of thousands of activists who will sign and share your link instantly.
Sometimes, trying to do the right thing—following the legal process, serving documents properly, or attempting to settle a dispute out of court—can feel impossible. I recently experienced this firsthand with a major social media platform.
I needed the address of their legal representative so I could serve them with court documents, include the correct information in my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, and even send settlement offers to try to resolve the matter without a full-blown trial. What should have been a straightforward request turned into a confusing back-and-forth.
First, I was directed to their European headquarters, which seemed like a logical starting point given my location and the company’s presence there. However, later, I was informed that I needed to contact the company’s legal department in the United States instead. This circular referral delayed my ability to proceed with legal filings and added unnecessary stress to an already difficult situation.
The experience illustrates a wider problem: even when we follow the rules and take steps to resolve disputes amicably, large organisations can inadvertently—or sometimes seemingly intentionally—make the process more complicated than it should be. For someone trying to navigate legal procedures, this kind of bureaucratic maze is exhausting and frustrating.
While I am not naming specific individuals or agencies involved in the initial harm at this stage, I believe it is crucial to highlight how even well-known platforms can complicate the pursuit of accountability. Every obstacle, no matter how procedural, adds to the stress and difficulty of trying to resolve the matter, preferably out of court—and that experience deserves to be acknowledged.
I’m sharing this not to attack the platform itself, but to highlight the real obstaclesindividuals face when trying to engage with powerful entities in a legal context. A simple request for an address should not be this complicated—but in practice, it can be.
The industrial-scale harassment, sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, commercial exploitation, reputational sabotage, hacking, phone tracking, intimidation, and human rights abuses just continue despite pending legal actions. It’s something I have to live with daily — constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded in every way possible and my safety compromised.
Furthermore, they also keep implying to me that they’re also doing the same thing to my daughter. It’s one of the most evilest thing I have ever experienced.
Earlier this year, I tried to apply for an injunction several times already. I submitted my documents and evidence to the King’s Bench Division through the secure Dropbox system provided for court filings. Each time, I followed the process carefully — yet somehow, my documents, including my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, simply vanished. They never reached the court. This happened not once, but two or three times, causing significant delays to my case and prolonging the harm I continue to suffer.
Now, I’m preparing to apply again as well as initiating court proceedings. This injunction is not just another filing; it is a vital legal step to protect myself & my daughter and to hold those responsible accountable. The ongoing obstruction of justice, harassment, intimidation, invasion of privacy, voyeurism, hacking, cyberstalking, phone tracking, and misuse of my private information have taken a serious toll on my wellbeing.
The injunction represents more than just paperwork — it’s about survival, dignity, and the right to live without fear. Everyone deserves to feel safe, to be free from harassment and invasion of privacy. And when that safety and right to privacy are taken away, the law must step in.
I’m sharing this because no one should have to face harassment in silence. If you’ve experienced similar obstruction or intimidation, know that you’re not alone — and that persistence matters.
This application is my way of standing firm, refusing to be silenced, and demanding the protection and justice I should have received long ago.
Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:
#JusticeForBuppha
#JusticeForMyDaughter
#HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK
King’s Bench Division in London where I am going to apply for urgent injunctions and initiate court proceedings.
