Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism and crimes against humanity.
Access to justice should be a right, not a privilege reserved for those with influence or resources. Yet, for many victims of harassment, privacy violations, systemic abuse, discrimination and more that right is quietly eroded. I am now living through that erosion firsthand. It’s a clear due process violation.
Because of the seriousness of my case — involving multiple powerful defendants across various sectors — obtaining legal representation has become nearly impossible. Law firms that initially showed interest later withdrew without clear explanation, some after unusual delays or abrupt changes of tone. Others never replied at all. The pattern suggests not coincidence but pressure: subtle or overt signals that representing me would be “too risky” or “too political.” The result is that I have been forced to prepare every aspect of this complex litigation myself.
Each day and night, I work alone — drafting court documents, researching law, gathering evidence, organising exhibits, and defending myself against ongoing harassment. There is no team, no paralegal, no protection. I work in isolation, while those responsible for my suffering have access to institutional power, legal departments, and endless resources. This imbalance is not only emotionally exhausting; it is an affront to the very idea of a fair trial.
The consequences reach beyond the legal process. Since the harassment and surveillance began, almost every job I have applied for has been rejected. Employers either never respond or withdraw at the final stage without reason or with vague reason. This repeated pattern strongly suggests blacklisting or outside influence designed to isolate me economically — to ensure I remain vulnerable and without the financial means to pursue justice.
This is not simply about one individual being denied a lawyer. It is about a structural problem — where those with power can quietly suffocate a person’s access to justice by manipulating the professional networks, institutions, and gatekeepers meant to protect them.
Justice should not depend on who you are fighting against, or how powerful they are. But the reality I face shows otherwise. I continue to fight, document, and prepare my case — not because I have the resources to do so, but because I have no other choice.
Imagine living your life under constant observation, where every movement, every gesture, every private moment is monitored, recorded, zoomed in, and exploited. This is my reality. For years, I have been subjected to organised harassment, covert surveillance, sexual abuse via voyeurism (cybersex trafficking) and commercial exploitation, a pattern of abuse recognised by the United Nations and documented in OHCHR human rights reports.
The harassment and excessive monitoring campaign against me intensified last year, 2024, when I found out I have been living under 24/7 intrusive and illegal surveillance and tried to legally stop it.
Thus, this post details my experience of ongoing covert, intrusive surveillance around the clock, psychological harassment, and the industrial-scale misuse of private information, referencing UN-recognised harassment techniques. Insights for journalists, investigative journalists, policymakers, human rights organisations, human rights watch, human rights lawyers, politicians and advocates.
Industrial-Scale Exploitation of Private Life
For over a decade, my private life has secretly been under constant, unlawful and intrusive surveillance, racial and sexual harassment, and exploitation, targeting both my private life and my loved ones.
Hidden cameras captured intimate moments, including my personal relationships and private activities, without my consent. This footage has allegedly been shared widely—across online platforms, pornographic sites, and even with the people I know, including my daughter’s childhood friends to humiliate her as well (I have strong circumstantial evidence of this and will present it to the court. They may even be called to testify under oath). But she isn’t aware of it.
These entities profit financially while deliberately inflicting emotional distress. Even my daughter has allegedly been targeted, demonstrating malicious intent extending beyond myself. They even keep implying that they’re also exploiting her to cause me additional distress.
They use a range of psychological tactics, illegal surveillance methods, and media exploitation to intimidate, control, and humiliate me. Despite ongoing / pending legal actions, the harassment has escalated, showing malicious intent and deliberate obstruction of justice.
I am sharing my story publicly because silence allows them to shape the narrative, especially when they are high-profile individuals, tech executives, or institutions with reputations to protect.
Despite anticipated legal actions, these violations continue unabated, leaving me with no choice but to go public to protect myself and highlight the broader injustice.
The intent is unmistakable: to humiliate, harass, and exploit me, and probably my daughter as well, for financial gain. Even as I take legal steps to protect myself, these actions continue. My access to legal representation has been deliberately blocked, making it even more difficult to challenge this ongoing abuse.
Daily Surveillance and Harassment
The harassment I face is continuous, 24/7, and involves multiple methods:
Push notifications, emails, or phone calls timed to coincide with my private activities, such as using the bathroom, cooking, or moving in bed.
Helicopter intimidation: Helicopters frequently fly over the courthouse (King’s Bench Division) or my residence whenever I attempt to assert my rights, submit court documents, on the verge of initiating court proceedings, or contact law firms.
Conditioning and signalling: Individuals wear specific colours (e.g., navy blue, army green) to imply intentionality and perform specific actions, like opening doors, leaving / returning, conversing, whistling, or walking past my window in sync with my movements such as when I step into the kitchen, open the bathroom door, to remind me I am being constantly monitored.
Vehicle harassment: Cars and motorcycles drive past or accelerate at precise moments during my daily routines or just to make a turn in bed to signal constant, intrusive surveillance with the purpose to make me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing I am being constantly watched.
Children’s distraction techniques: Even children are used to create auditory hints, talking loudly to catch my attention at key moments.
These tactics are not random; they appear deliberately orchestrated to instill fear, paranoia, and a constant sense of surveillance, aligning with violations of Human Rights Act 1998, for example:
Article 3: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.
Article 8: Respect for your private and family life.
Article 6: Right to a fair trial.
They just seem to try to violate all my human rights.
Industrial-ScaleMisuse of Private Information
They have systematically exploited my private materials for financial gain and public humiliation:
Unauthorised filming and distribution: Hidden cameras and surveillance devices were used to obtain private footage with audio as well!
Media and film exploitation: My private materials and information have been allegedly shared with film companies, voyeuristic websites, porn sites, advertisement companies, tech platforms, social media sites and other media to produce content referencing my life, which is also a form of harassment on top of commercial exploitation.
Unjust enrichment: These entities profit from my experiences without my permission while intentionally inflicting emotional distress.
Impact on family: Even my daughter has probably been targeted as well through voyeurism and shared private material, showing malicious intent beyond myself.
These actions constitute harassment, invasion of privacy on a global scale, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, with a clear commercial dimension; it’s an illegal enterprise that they don’t want the public to know.
Documented Harassment Techniques Recognised by the UN
What I have endured is not an isolated or “localised” situation. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has itself published detailed lists of harassment techniques used globally against victims of covert surveillance and organised stalking. These methods are documented as forms of psychological torture and community-based harassment.
According to the OHCHR’s report (“Harassment Techniques,” OHCHR.org), such tactics include:
Surveillance — Victims are persistently followed, electronically and physically monitored 24/7, and subjected to phone or computer hacking, including phone tracking.
Profiling — Intimate personal data is collected, often via trusted individuals or partners, and later weaponised to exploit emotional weaknesses.
Conditioning — Victims are sensitised to specific triggers such as coughing, colour patterns, hand gestures, or car headlights, which are then repeated to induce fear and hypervigilance.
Sound Campaigns — Abnormally high noise levels are directed at victims using cars, garbage trucks, shouting, or directional speakers to disturb peace and create psychological distress.
Sleep Deprivation — Victims are deliberately woken multiple times per night or kept awake for extended periods, impairing their ability to function and discrediting them as unstable.
Baiting and Entrapment — Harassers provoke victims into defensive reactions or minor offences, later used to criminalise or discredit them.
Gaslighting — A form of psychological abuse that distorts the victim’s perception of reality, undermining their confidence and mental stability.
Black-Bag Jobs — Covert entries into victims’ homes, with items moved or tampered with to induce self-doubt and fear.
Propaganda and Disinformation — Online misinformation campaigns spread to discredit victims and frame them as delusional, while false “support groups” are created to further isolate, manipulate and gaslight them.
Simulated Mental Health Symptoms — Harassers mimic or induce behaviours designed to make victims appear mentally ill, ensuring disbelief and institutional neglect.
These methods are well-documented human rights abuses and are therefore not isolated incidents.
Similar tactics have been reported by other UK survivors and other victims around the world. For example, another UK survivor of covert surveillance and organised harassment has confirmed that perpetrators use everyday stimuli (cars, clothing, coughs, phones) to create hypervigilance, fear, and trauma. This matches the tactics used against me daily, including colour-coded clothing, spitting, and staged public messages.
I am sharing my experience to urge journalists, policymakers, and human rights organisations to:
Investigate organised harassment networks.
Protect victims from illegal surveillance and exploitation.
Ensure perpetrators face legal and ethical consequences.
Living under 24/7 intrusive surveillance and having private life exploited for profit is a violation of human rights, a form of psychological torture, and an urgent social issue. Public awareness is the first step toward justice.
Conclusion
The combination of illegal surveillance, psychological harassment, and media exploitation represents a severe violation of human rights. By sharing my experience, I hope to:
Raise awareness of organised harassment campaigns.
Provide a roadmap for victims to document and publicise abuses.
Encourage policymakers, journalists, and human rights organisations to investigate, intervene, and prevent these abuses.
These are not isolated incidents — they are part of a systematic abuse of power with both financial and psychological motives.
🚨 Open Call to Journalists & Human Rights Organisations: Please Investigate the Systematic Abuse and Denial of My Right to Legal Representation
The defendants (e.g., The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, University of West London, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms) I am suing also have solicitors to represent them. But I am not allowed to have legal representation due to the alleged blocking of my access to lawyers, forcing me to represent myself against powerful state and non-state actors. What is this?
I cannot even use my phone and laptop to contact anyone for help safely and confidentially. Because all my online activities and communications seem to have been monitored and listened to at all times as if to prevent me from seeking help and from preparing my case fairly, safely and confidentially.
Some Background:
For over 10 years, I believe I have been subjected to an industrial campaign of psychological harassment, psychological torture, mental abuse, unlawful surveillance, intimidation and coordinated public humiliation — across borders and involving state and non-state actors.
Despite repeated complaints and numerous attempts to seek legal protection through proper judicial channels, I am being systematically denied access to legal representation.
This is not due to a lack of effort on my part. I have contacted dozens of solicitors, about 200-300 so far, submitted formal complaints to legal regulators, and applied to the courts for urgent injunctions and relief. Yet every attempt is either blocked, withdrawn without explanation, or mysteriously interrupted — often immediately after I submit sensitive evidence or publish new details online.
It is now clear that this is not coincidental. It appears to be a deliberate pattern of obstruction, aimed at silencing me and preventing legal accountability for what I believe are serious and unlawful actions — including:
Racial and sexual harassment (e.g. illegal surveillance, phone tracking)
Hacking/Cyberstalking and interception of communications
Sexual exploitation via 24/7 voyeurism and cybersex trade, despite initiating court proceedings and applying for an urgent injunction the abuses appear to shockingly continue with impunity
Social ostracism
Character assassination and public shaming
Interference with the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act
Torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, in violation of Article 3 – the torture I have to go through each day is both mental and physical when I can’t even take a shower due to credible fear of being secretly filmed and distributed and have consequently not taken a shower for days now!
Violation of my right to private and family life, protected by Article 8
Severe discrimination, in violation of Article 14
And many more!
I am calling on all journalists, legal advocates, and human rights organisations to urgently investigate this matter and help bring attention to what is happening. I am documenting everything in real time and can share evidence with trusted parties under safe, confidential conditions.
> Everyone deserves a fair chance to be heard — especially when powerful actors are involved. Everyone deserves legal protection — not punishment — for speaking out.
If you are a journalist, solicitor, barrister, human rights worker, or NGO interested in helping or investigating, please contact me via my secure contact form or by encrypted email (available upon request).
Article 6 doesn’t give you an automatic right to free legal representation in civil cases. But if your case is too complex for you to represent yourself properly, there may be a breach of article 6 if you don’t get help with legal costs.”
My case is also too complex for me to represent myself properly. Consequently, there may be a breach of my article 6 if I don’t get help with legal costs and/or legal representation.
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) guarantees the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal. This right applies to both civil and criminal proceedings and includes key safeguards such as:
The right to equality of arms between parties.
The right to legal representation where necessary for effective participation.
The duty of the court or tribunal to provide reasoned judgments.
Thus, it’s very frustrating when I can’t get impartial legal advice and can’t have legal representation, so that the abuse could continue under the radar.
If you’re a human rights solicitor, a human rights organisation, or just someone who’s willing to help me, please do not hesitate to contact me.
If you’re a journalist and would like to investigate this, please do.
But all my online activities and communications appear to have been monitored at all times, so I don’t know how to go about this. If you have any ideas, please let me know as well.
