Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism, illegal human experimentation, and more.
The industrial-scale harassment, sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, commercial exploitation, reputational sabotage, hacking, phone tracking, intimidation, and human rights abuses just continue despite pending legal actions. It’s something I have to live with daily — constant reminders that my privacy has been invaded in every way possible and my safety compromised.
Furthermore, they also keep implying to me that they’re also doing the same thing to my daughter. It’s one of the most evilest thing I have ever experienced.
Earlier this year, I tried to apply for an injunction several times already. I submitted my documents and evidence to the King’s Bench Division through the secure Dropbox system provided for court filings. Each time, I followed the process carefully — yet somehow, my documents, including my injunction application and N1 Claim Form, simply vanished. They never reached the court. This happened not once, but two or three times, causing significant delays to my case and prolonging the harm I continue to suffer.
Now, I’m preparing to apply again as well as initiating court proceedings. This injunction is not just another filing; it is a vital legal step to protect myself & my daughter and to hold those responsible accountable. The ongoing obstruction of justice, harassment, intimidation, invasion of privacy, voyeurism, hacking, cyberstalking, phone tracking, and misuse of my private information have taken a serious toll on my wellbeing.
The injunction represents more than just paperwork — it’s about survival, dignity, and the right to live without fear. Everyone deserves to feel safe, to be free from harassment and invasion of privacy. And when that safety and right to privacy are taken away, the law must step in.
I’m sharing this because no one should have to face harassment in silence. If you’ve experienced similar obstruction or intimidation, know that you’re not alone — and that persistence matters.
This application is my way of standing firm, refusing to be silenced, and demanding the protection and justice I should have received long ago.
Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:
#JusticeForBuppha
#JusticeForMyDaughter
#HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK
King’s Bench Division in London where I am going to apply for urgent injunctions and initiate court proceedings.
On 15 October 2025, I shared a link on my daughter’s Facebook profile to my blog post describing the sexual exploitation I’ve been subjected to through hidden cameras and years of unlawful surveillance. Along with the link, I included a message warning her that she might also be at risk of similar abuse — and urged her to seek help from a specialist IT professional to scan her home for hidden devices and to consult a human rights lawyer.
Less than twenty-four hours later, the post was gone. Not only that — every other post I had ever shared on her profile disappeared, too.
Crucially, she had never deleted my posts before. But as soon as I warned her that she might be a victim as well, everything vanished suggesting that this deletion was not her independent action.
When I tried to post again today, the new post was deleted almost instantly. Shortly afterward, my ability to post anything on her timeline was turned off entirely.
What they are doing to my daughter is not just criminal — it’s deeply unethical, cruel and evil. She is an innocent third party being deliberately targeted and even preventing her from accessing help or justice. This mirrors the same tactics I’ve experienced: suppression of information, obstruction of legal assistance, and retaliation whenever I try to protect myself or others.
This isn’t just censorship. If my daughter is indeed a victim, such actions directly violate her fundamental right to access justice under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects every person’s right to be informed, to seek help, and to pursue legal remedies. Preventing her from even knowing she might be at risk denies her that right!
Their alleged actions in involving and targeting my daughter are consistent with known stalking methodologies, specifically the involvement of third parties to upset the victim, as outlined in official guidance for law enforcement. For example, the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf) states: ‘Stalkers will involve third parties for several reasons, principally to upset the victim (ie by involving or targeting the victim’s children), to obtain information on the victim, etc.
Another example of “Controlling and Coercive Behaviour” from the College of Policing’s ‘Stalking or harassment guidance’ (200519.pdf).
In addition to the direct harassment I’ve experienced, there are strong indications that certain individuals may also be encouraging or inciting others to participate in the ongoing campaign of stalking, harassment and intimidation against me. Over time, I’ve noticed multiple people — often strangers — appearing to copy distinctive words, phrases, or expressions that I use, where my own language appears to have been mirrored publicly, echoing them in ways clearly meant to provoke, distress, or humiliate me – and to let me know that I am being constantly watched both online (cyberstalking / hacking) and offline (e.g., illegal surveillance, stalking by proxy).
Such conduct aligns with the very patterns described in the College of Policing’s Stalking and Harassment Guidance (20 May 2019), as seen in the screenshot above, “Has the suspect(s) persuaded other people to help him/her (wittingly or unwittingly).”
This repeated imitation and coordinated behaviour suggest a wider network of individuals being influenced — directly or indirectly — to harass, mock, or intimidate me, amplifying the emotional and psychological harm I face on a daily basis.
I therefore have reasonable grounds to believe that they have deployed agents into her life. These agents are tasked with controlling her, extracting information to be used later, monitoring her activities, and actively suppressing any information or attempts to expose the truth about their actions. This may form an integral part of the ongoing conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and to further harass and intimidate me and my family.
I also reasonably believe that my daughter’s new boyfriend, who began a relationship with her approximately two years ago, may be acting as an agent as well. This belief is supported by the abrupt cessation of contact between me and her following the commencement of this relationship, and the timing of the deletion of the Facebook posts immediately after my warning.
This conduct, including the alleged influence over my daughter and the removal of critical information, constitutes a continuation of their alleged campaign of harassment, control, and obstruction.
Thus, they allegedly have, as part of their sustained campaign of harassment and abuse against me, deliberately involved and targeted my daughter. This action is clearly designed to cause me extreme emotional distress and psychological harm, leveraging my parental concern as a weapon against me.
What’s happening mirrors the broader pattern I’ve faced—of influence being used to block legal representation and suppress information. Together, these tactics reveal a consistent effort to obstruct justice for victims of serious privacy and human-rights violations.
Silencing a warning doesn’t erase the danger. It only delays accountability. The public deserves to know when access to justice itself is being quietly dismantled.
This pattern isn’t new. Each time I try to raise awareness about possible wrongdoing — especially when it involves protecting my daughter — the retaliation is swift. In the past, similar efforts to seek help have been met with accusations questioning my sanity, as if concern for a loved one were evidence of instability. This is a classic example of gaslighting and coercive control to prevent victims from seeking help and stopping the abuse, which will then allow them to carry on the abuse and exploitation under the radar.
Such reactions are not normal. They fit a broader pattern of suppression and isolation — tactics often used to prevent victims or their families from communicating, supporting one another, or seeking outside help. When warnings are silenced, questions must be asked: who benefits from keeping victims quiet?
This issue is no longer just personal. It’s a matter of public interest when possible victims of surveillance or sexual exploitation are not only targeted, but also actively prevented from obtaining information or assistance. Attempts to silence those raising legitimate safety concerns can amount to deliberate obstruction and deepen the harm.
I’m sharing this publicly because no one should be punished for trying to protect their child. If my warnings are removed in one place, I will continue to document them elsewhere — until they can no longer be ignored.
For those assisting in or considering involvement in this harassment and abuse: legal mechanisms exist, including Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Early Disclosure Orders, and calling individuals to testify under oath. There are serious consequences, including the risk of perjury. Anyone involved or is going to should think twice.
This is a matter of public interest. Raising awareness is essential to protect victims, expose abuse, and ensure that those targeted can access support and justice.
Silencing victims does not erase the truth. It only delays accountability.
Please share this post to as many people as you can with the hashtags:
“Anonymity, secrecy, or acting under someone else’s instruction does not protect you from liability. Justice moves with precision.”
Some individuals involved in the harassment, intimidation, data breach, misuse of private information, and defamation campaign against me may believe they are shielded by anonymity. They may think that if I don’t know their names or exact roles, they can evade justice. However, the law provides powerful tools to uncover hidden perpetrators and hold them accountable.
1. Norwich Pharmacal Orders: Compelling Disclosure from Third Parties
A Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) is a court order compelling a third party—such as an internet service provider, social media platform, email provider, or individual—to disclose information identifying wrongdoers.
This legal mechanism originated from Norwich Pharmacal Co. v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, where the House of Lords held that courts can order an innocent third party “mixed up” in wrongdoing to reveal the wrongdoer’s identity.
Real-life example:
In Filatona Trading Ltd v Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP (2024), the High Court granted a Norwich Pharmacal order against a law firm to reveal the source of a confidential report used in litigation. Even reputable institutions can be compelled to disclose identifying information when they are inadvertently entangled in wrongdoing. (Osborne Clarke, 2024)
Key takeaways:
NPOs can identify anonymous users behind fake profiles or emails.
Third parties must comply once ordered by the court.
Courts grant NPOs when a claimant shows a credible case of wrongdoing and that disclosure is essential to identify the wrongdoer.
2. Early Disclosure Orders and Specific Disclosure
An Early Disclosure Order under CPR 31.16 enables a person to obtain documents before starting formal proceedings—vital in cases where identifying the wrongdoer is a necessary first step.
Specific Disclosure under CPR 31.12 can compel a defendant or third party to hand over key documents during proceedings.
Real-life example:
In EUI Ltd v Charles and Others (2018), the court granted pre-action disclosure in a suspected fraud case, confirming that early disclosure may be appropriate where evidence is at risk or where identity must be established before the claim can proceed. (Westlaw Practical Law)
Key takeaways:
Early disclosure uncovers hidden abusers before proceedings.
Specific disclosure can obtain crucial documents revealing who is responsible.
Courts ensure disclosure is necessary to deal with the case fairly.
3. Witness Summons and Testimony Under Oath
A witness summons is a court order requiring a person to attend court and give evidence—or produce documents—under oath. False testimony constitutes perjury, a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment.
Real-life example:
In Johnson v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2019] EWHC 1709 (Admin), the High Court reviewed the process of summoning Boris Johnson to answer allegations of misconduct. This case illustrates that even high-profile individuals can be required to testify or face examination under oath. (Judiciary.uk)
Key takeaways:
Witnesses can be compelled to reveal who instructed or coordinated the wrongdoing.
False statements under oath carry criminal penalties.
Testimony can expose the full chain of conspirators.
When someone is summoned as a witness, they are legally required to tell the truth. Testifying under oath carries the risk of perjury, a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. Once under oath, they cannot lie about who instructed them, what they were told to do, or how far the conspiracy extends — without exposing themselves to serious legal consequences.
Testimonies under oath can provide direct evidence of coordination, conspiracy, or misconduct, confirming the links between the visible and hidden participants in a campaign of wrongdoing.
4. The Message
For anyone involved — whether as a main perpetrator or an enabler — it’s important to understand that silence and secrecy do not guarantee safety. The legal system is built to pierce through layers of concealment.
For readers facing similar challenges: you do not have to feel powerless just because you don’t yet know every name. The law gives you a pathway to find the truth.
Every order, every summon, and every piece of testimony brings accountability closer.
Please share this post to as many people as you can, including the hashtags:
For the past several years, I truly believe I have been living a normal life. Just like everyone else. But in reality, I have been subjected to what I can only describe as obsessive and intrusive surveillance.
After finding out that I have been secretly and sexually exploiting via hidden cameras for more than a decade late last year, 2024, and trying to legally stop it, the severe harassment campaign against me started!
The campaign of excessive surveillance and covert harassment against me has now reached an industrial scale where I can’t go anywhere without being harassed, sexually harassed, stalked, and sometimes even intimidated. It’s like public lynching, which is a form of unlawful retaliation and victimisation.
As a 54-year-old South East Asian woman living alone, I have become an easy target for tactics that exploit vulnerability and isolation. This may constitute race, age and gender abuse / discrimination, amounting to violence against women and a possible hate crime as well. This campaign of intimidation, covert harassment and intrusive surveillance has left me fearful, anxious, and exhausted, yet determined to share my story to raise awareness and advocate for justice.
Copenhagen, Denmark.
The systematic and illegal surveillance includes the non-consensual installation of hidden cameras in my private residences, and even in shared rooms and bathrooms at every hostel I have stayed at both in the UK and Denmark, the live broadcasting of my intimate life, and the widespread distribution of these images to pornographic sites, individuals I know, social media sites, tech platforms, and God knows where else they have distributed / live streamed to! They have also engaged in constant cyberstalking, racial and sexual harassment, and intimidation tactics, including displaying imitation firearms when I sought legal counsel.
Many human rights experts have described as covert surveillance and organised harassment. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has even documented these techniques: stalking, sound campaigns, conditioning, gaslighting, sleep deprivation, and targeted disinformation to discredit victims. Every tactic they list matches my experience — in detail and intent.
I am constantly monitored through covert means. Each movement in my home seems mirrored by external signals — footsteps, doors closing, whistling, loud conversations, or vehicles driving past my window at precisely timed moments. People appear wearing coordinated colours — navy blue, army green, burgundy, red, and orange, for instance — that have been repeatedly used in this harassment campaign as psychological triggers.
Their actions go far beyond illegal voyeuristic surveillance. The hidden cameras installed in all my accommodations, both past and present, are used not only to record me for distribution purposes but also to excessively monitor me in real time, 24/7. This allows them to coordinate harassment strategies with precision.
For example, when I step into the kitchen, I frequently observe individuals emerging outside almost simultaneously, visible through the small gap of the window. The timing is so exact that it cannot be coincidental; it reflects an immediate response to my private movements. This demonstrates that individuals are being stationed in nearby “holding areas” ready to be deployed at any moment, proving that the surveillance is actively used to harass and intimidate me.
Furthermore, these individuals often wear or carry items in specific colour ranges, as I said earlier, consistently associated with the harassment campaign against me. The repetition of these symbolic colours makes clear that their presence is not accidental but a deliberate sign intended to remind me that I am being constantly watched.
They use conditioning techniques—repeated visible cues such as people coughing, repeated use of specific clothing colours, and people walking past my window at precisely the moments I move—to sensitise and intimidate me and to make me self-police. These tactics, described by OHCHR as recognised harassment techniques, correspond with covert, real-time surveillance of my movements. It’s psychological torture by making me feel uncomfortable around the clock, knowing I am being constantly watched.
To reclaim a sense of agency and to gather irrefutable evidence of the external activities associated with this surveillance, I am exploring the installation of external recording devices. This is a necessary measure to document the ongoing nature of these crimes and to support my pursuit of justice against those responsible for this egregious human rights violation.
The fear of being recorded has affected my daily routines, including basic self-care. I have avoided showering for days, fearing that intimate footage may be captured and distributed without my consent. The strain on my health, hygiene, and emotional well-being is profound. It’s pure torture when I can’t even take a shower.
Please donate. Just scan the code on the image above or click on it to be taken to my GoFundMe page.
Psychological and Emotional Impact
The tactics used in this harassment campaign mirror those documented by human-rights organizations: conditioning, sleep deprivation, gaslighting, sound campaigns, and repeated hints of being constantly watched to make the victims feel uncomfortable around the clock. These practices are designed to instill fear, self-doubt, and paranoia, ultimately isolating the victim from support networks and normal life. The emotional toll is immense. Feeling constantly watched, and knowing my private life could be misused, has caused severe distress.
A Call to Action
No one should live in fear in their own home. Harassment and invasion of privacy can happen to anyone, but marginalised or isolated individuals are particularly at risk.
So, I want to seek justice, aim to prevent others from suffering similar abuse, and expose systemic corruption. We can create a safer environment for everyone by talking openly about these issues. It is important to support victims. We should thus advocate for stronger protections to guarantee justice.
Please share this post to as many people as you can, including the hashtags: #JusticeForBuppha #HumanRightsAbusesInTheUK
