Blog about illegal surveillance, human rights violations, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, violence against women, misogyny, hate crime, organised harassment, discrimination, racism and crimes against humanity.
On November 30, 2025, I covered all light bulbs in my room and bathroom with multiple layers of thick paper, specifically because I suspected hidden cameras and audio recordings were installed within them.
Despite these measures, I continued to observe individuals walking past my window at the precise moment I stepped into the kitchen. This pattern of synchronised movement strongly indicates that my movements are still being closely observed.
Furthermore, the frequency of these synchronised appearances increased, with individuals emerging precisely in sync with my movements, as if to demonstrate their continued surveillance and defiance of my attempts to secure my privacy.
This continued, precise surveillance, even after physical obstructions were placed over suspected camera locations, suggests the use of highly sophisticated surveillance technology. It appears to indicate the deployment of advanced hidden cameras capable of detecting movement through multiple layers of thick paper, potentially mirroring technologies used in military applications for ‘through-wall’ detection. This level of technological capability underscores the resources and power of the perpetrators.
The synchronised and escalating nature of these appearances, particularly following my efforts to obscure potential camera locations, serves as a direct form of intimidation and a clear message that I remain under constant surveillance, despite my attempts to protect my privacy. This constitutes a deliberate and ongoing act of harassment and psychological distress.
This continued, sophisticated surveillance reinforces my initial claim that the defendants are “powerful people working within law enforcement agencies, tech companies, social media platforms, and the like,” as such technology and coordination would require significant resources and organisation.
This persistent and technologically advanced surveillance, coupled with the overt acts of intimidation, has caused and continues to cause severe psychological distress, fear for my safety, and a profound sense of violation of my most fundamental rights to privacy and security in my own home.
I covered all the lights and smoke detector in my room, where I believe hidden cameras and audio recordings may have illegally been installed. I also covered the light bulb in the bathroom. Still, they appear to be able to see through layers of trick papers!
There’s something deeply disturbing about the way cruelty hides behind ordinary faces. Some of the people who have taken part in the ongoing campaign of harassment and abuse against me are parents themselves. They have daughters. They have children who look up to them. And yet, despite knowing the innocence of a child, they have chosen to target mine — not out of misunderstanding, but, perhaps, out of deliberate malice.
The hypocrisy is staggering. How can anyone who tucks their child into bed at night, who teaches them about kindness and empathy, take part in actions designed to traumatise another person’s child? To retaliate through an innocent life is not just immoral — it is inhuman.
This isn’t just about me. It’s about a sickness that runs deeper in our society — a willingness to dehumanise victims to the point where empathy disappears. When people can watch cruelty unfold and still go home to their families as if nothing happened, we have to ask ourselves: what kind of world are we building for the next generation?
There is no justification, no ideology, no excuse that can make this right. The act of targeting a child to punish a parent reveals the true nature of this network — not as a system of power, but as a collapse of conscience.
My daughter deserves safety, dignity, and peace — just like every child. And I will continue to fight for a world where people are held accountable not only in courts, but in their own humanity.
This also fits legal definitions of harassment:
Collective harassment: Targeting members of my family as part of the campaign. My daughter is potentially also being subjected to voyeurism and symbolic harassment fits this definition exactly.
Stalking by proxy: Using my daughter (and potentially others) as indirect targets to harm me. They appear to be orchestrating this intentionally.
Breach of Article 3 and Article 6 ECHR:
Article 3: Protection from inhuman or degrading treatment. Sexual exploitation and voyeurism against my child — especially when used as a weapon against me — is a grave breach.
Article 6: Preventing me from warning her, or from being believed, is part of the wider obstruction of justice.
For example, on 15 October 2025, I tried to warn my daughter that she may be a victim of voyeurism as well by posting a link on her Facebook’s timeline to my blog for her to read and understand the situation and how sophisticated their techniques are, including advising her to hire Specialist IT to immediately scan her accommodation for hidden cameras and seek legal advice from human rights lawyer straight away. The very next day, the link I had posted on her timeline had been removed?! All the previous links and posts I had posted on her timeline had also been removed. My daughter had never removed my posts before. Furthermore, she also blocked me from posting on her timeline altogether. Something just doesn’t seem right. I therefore believe someone has influenced her decision. This is when the police guidance, as seen in the image below, comes in regarding “controlling and coercive behaviour.”
This further solidifies my belief that they have their agents to infiltrate my daughter’s social sphere to suppress the truth, extract information, manipulate, gaslight and control her, thereby preventing her from receiving crucial information about potential harm and seeking protection.
This directly interferes with my ability to protect my daughter and demonstrates their reach and determination to control narratives and individuals connected to me.
This conduct constitutes a further invasion of privacy, interference with family life (Article 8 ECHR), and an attempt to obstruct justice by preventing me from warning a potential victim.
Thus, it demonstrates that their actions are not accidental or coincidental but are deliberate and calculated, using known psychological manipulation tactics.
It is a well-documented social pattern that women who report or talk about abuse are often subjected to renewed attacks, both personally and publicly. This phenomenon reflects a systemic failure to protect women from retaliatory harm. The harassment I am enduring — both online and offline — exemplifies this pattern and demonstrates how victim-blaming and misogynistic narratives continue to undermine justice.
The public campaign of humiliation against Amber Heard following the Depp–Heard trial is a clear precedent. That case, widely reported, revealed how digital platforms became tools for orchestrated harassment, disinformation, and the amplification of misogyny. According to multiple reports, including the Amber Heard Open Letter and subsequent investigations, there was extensive evidence of online abuse not only directed at Ms. Heard but also at those who publicly supported her. One supporter described enduring “weeks and weeks” of coordinated online attacks simply for expressing empathy.
This environment of intimidation, misinformation, and mob ridicule is not confined to celebrities. I am now subjected to a similar campaign of targeted harassment and mockery — one that operates with disturbing coordination and precision. The abuse extends across multiple platforms and even into public spaces. I am persistently subjected to hidden insults, coded references, and veiled allusions to my private life through social media content, advertisements, and videos. The timing and frequency of these acts indicate that they are not coincidental but deliberate efforts to degrade, silence, and intimidate me.
The retaliation has also extended to my daughter, who has been drawn into this campaign as part of a wider pattern of coercion, exploitation, psychological abuse and mental abuse. This conduct represents a grave violation of our rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights — protection from degrading treatment and respect for private and family life. It also constitutes ongoing harassment and victimisation within the meaning of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 as well as The Malicious Communications Act 1988 (MCA), which is illegal in England and Wales to “send or deliver letters or other articles for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety.” It also applies to electronic communications. This is exactly what happens in my case.
The behaviour I face today mirrors the public hostility women experience when they challenge abuse. It is an extension of the same misogynistic system that weaponises social media, institutional bias, and societal prejudice to silence female victims and protect abusers.
This continued harassment, intimidation, and psychological manipulation are not isolated acts but a coordinated campaign that undermines my access to justice.
References
Amber Heard Open Letter (2022): “Support for Amber Heard” — signed by women’s rights organisations and legal experts, denouncing disinformation and online misogyny. Available at: https://amberopenletter.com
