Tag Archives: relationship

Covert Human Intelligence Source Operation

Posted on by
Reply

In addition to the direct unlawful acts allegedly committed against me, I have grave and urgent concerns about the apparent deployment of an individual / CHIS to target my daughter, aged 34 or 35, who also lives alone.

Following my complaints against some public officers’ misconduct in early 2023, my daughter experienced a sudden and unexplained breakup with her long-term partner of twelve years in or around August 2023. Shortly thereafter, she entered into a new relationship with a Spanish man she met online, whose behaviour raises serious concerns consistent with the characteristics of an unlawful CHIS operation.

Over the course of more than a year:

– This individual has reportedly never visited my daughter’s residence, despite the apparent seriousness of their relationship.

– My daughter’s communications with me abruptly deteriorated after forming the relationship.

– There have been signs suggesting leakage and misuse of her sensitive and private information, in a manner strikingly similar to the harassment, unlawful surveillance and misuse of private information that they have been subjecting me to.

I therefore fear that her private residence may have unlawfully been surveilled as well through hidden cameras, and that intimate footage may have been misused, constituting sexual exploitation and a profound breach of her rights under Articles 3, 8, and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The facts strongly indicate that the purpose of deploying an agent against my daughter was to gather intelligence about me and her as well, to control her, to suppress the truth, to sever our relationship, and to cause psychiatric harm — either now or when the deception is ultimately revealed.

Mission Impossible film

Such conduct, if proven, would amount to:

  • Malfeasance in Public Office, given the abuse of public powers for improper motives with foreseeably harmful consequences;
  • Deceit, by inducing emotional reliance based on false identities for the purpose of surveillance and exploitation;
  • Violation of Fundamental Human Rights, including freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment (Article 3), right to respect for private and family life (Article 8), and protection from discrimination (Article 14).

This pattern of behavior echoes well-documented abuses in the “spycops” cases (e.g., Police Spies Out of Lives litigation) where women were deceived into long-term intimate relationships with undercover officers, causing profound psychological harm.

This is precisely what I fear! Because I believe that one of the reasons they seemingly employ their agent / CHIS to fake a romantic relationship with my daughter, so that when his true identity and motives are discovered, she will likely suffer psychiatric injury and mental distress as a result of the deceit. If this is their true agenda, they act maliciously.

Thus, one of his evil tasks appears to be to make my daughter fall hard for him. So, once his mission is over, her heart will be severely broken. This looks therefore like a premeditated hate crime against her as well!

It therefore shows, they have no remorse, no concern, or whatsoever for my daughter’s welfare and constitute severe emotional and psychological abuse, including coercive control.

Police
This woman is also one of them, wearing an army green jacket – one of the colours often associated with the harassment campaign against me. Her real photos with her face will also be presented in court! I may add her to a list of Respondents for my Norwich Pharmacal Order application as well.

Lessons from the Spycops Scandal and My Own Experience

Posted on by
Reply

A new wave of attention has turned to the Spycops scandal — one of the most talked about chapters in modern British policing. The revelations are disturbing: undercover Metropolitan Police officers infiltrated themselves in activist groups, formed intimate relationships under false identities, fathered children, and then vanished without warning.

A recent ITV documentary, The Spycops Scandal, reviews the immense human cost of this systematic deception. One woman, Helen, believed she had found a true partner in a fellow Greenpeace activist, John Barker. They shared a home, a vision, and even talked about starting a family. Years later, she discovered that “John” never existed. He was an undercover officer sent to insinuate himself into her world — and her life.

As Helen told reporters, “This isn’t an accident or an isolated case of a rogue officer. This is institutional sexism being handed from officer to officer – how to deceive women into relationships and use them for cover, for sex, or whatever purpose they were using us for.”

The Spycops inquiry has exposed how severely such deceptions can injure those targeted — not only breaching privacy and autonomy, but also inflicting lasting psychological harm / psychiatric injury. Many victims were left devastated and lost their ability to trust again.

Reading these accounts, I couldn’t help but see a version of my own experience. I, too, believe that I have been subjected to intrusive and unlawful surveillance — cameras covertly installed in my accommodation, and still continuing to the present day, and constant digital and physical monitoring that mirrors the tactics once used by undercover police. But unlike the Spycops of the past, this network appears far broader, blending state and private actors, and civilians under their influence.

Worse still, I believe similar tactics are now being used against my daughter. In particular, I have strong reason to believe that someone has been deliberately placed in her life — a man from Spain — to feign a romantic relationship. This, I fear, is not genuine affection but a calculated attempt to control her, gather information, prevent her from contacting me freely, and hinder her from ever knowing the truth that she may also be exploited. 

The purpose appears twofold: to manipulate her emotionally and psychologically, and to isolate both of us from one another — a deliberate act of retaliation and victimisation. The parallels to the Spycops scandal are chilling. In both cases, deception is used as a weapon: intimacy becomes infiltration, and love becomes a tool for exploitation.

I very worry about the long-term consequences. The women deceived by Spycops officers described profound trauma and psychiatric injury when their partners disappeared after years of deceit. If the same manipulation is happening to my daughter — if she is made to fall deeply for someone whose loyalty lies elsewhere — then the aftermath could be devastating for her, too.

These tactics go beyond surveillance; they are psychological warfare. They aim not only to monitor but to break — to dismantle one’s sense of safety, love, and honesty.

The goal seems clear — to destabilise, silence, and destroy from within. Like the Spycops victims, we are forced to question who we can trust and whether love itself can be genuine in the face of deceit.

The Spycops inquiry proves that such abuse of power is real and can have devastating human consequences. Our stories remind the world that surveillance isn’t only about technology — it’s about control, identity, and the right to live without fear of being illegally monitored and filmed 24/7 for malicious purposes.

Sources:

https://www.thecanary.co/long-read/2024/09/12/spycops-documentary/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/spycops-scandal-undercover-met-police-inquiry-b2702247.html

https://theweek.com/law/the-uk-spy-cops-scandal-explained

When the Timeline Itself Became Evidence

Posted on by
Reply

It began in early 2023, when I submitted several formal complaints regarding individuals within different public and private sectors. At the time, I was unaware that these matters might be interconnected, but over time it has become apparent that they may stem from the same underlying network or entities. 

I could not have anticipated that this would mark the start of a sequence of events that would completely upend my life — both personally and creatively.

Around August 2023, my daughter and her long-term partner of 12 years suddenly broke up. The timing felt abrupt, and almost immediately after, around September, I think, she began dating a much younger man from Spain (10 years younger) — a streamer she met online through mutual gaming friends. Despite their relationship now lasting around two years, he has never once visited her home. It’s always her who travels to Spain or meets him elsewhere on holiday. This detail has never sat easily with me; it raises questions about her safety and whether her home environment is secure.

Not long after this new relationship began, I started seeing something deeply unsettling. Films, commercials, and online content began appearing that seemed to reference her — including details about her personal life, even medical information, in ways that mirrored my own experiences of being mimicked and exposed. The parallels were too precise to dismiss as coincidence.

By October 2023, I began to suspect that my private and sensitive information — and perhaps even my daughter’s — had been leaked or shared illegally.

Around summer of 2024, I began writing on my previous blog, buppha.com, about organised harassment, illegal surveillance, voyeurism, stalking and tech abuse. I wrote from a place of curiosity and outrage, unaware that I was, in fact, describing my own lived reality. Soon after I started publishing those posts, the harassment escalated beyond anything I had experienced before.

Then came the realisation that changed everything: by late 2024, I began piecing together evidence that my private life — my most intimate, personal moments — had likely been secretly filmed and distributed for years, perhaps for more than a decade.

By early 2025, I decided to act. I began the formal legal process, sending Pre-Action Protocol Letters to those I believed responsible or complicit. Instead of stopping the abuse, this triggered an escalation — retaliation in new and alarming forms.

And then, the final straw came in the spring and summer of 2025, when I tried to apply for an urgent injunction multiple times through the King’s Bench Division. Each time, my evidence — carefully compiled, documented, and submitted — inexplicably disappeared?!

Now, looking back, this timeline is more than just a sequence of events. It tells the story of a pattern — of power, silence, and retaliation. It’s the record of how justice can be obstructed and delayed when those with influence abuse the very systems meant to protect.

But it’s also a record of endurance — of my determination to keep documenting, exposing, and standing up for myself.

buppha