Illegal Surveillance Continues

On November 30, 2025, I covered all light bulbs in my room and bathroom with multiple layers of thick paper, specifically because I suspected hidden cameras and audio recordings were installed within them.

Despite these measures, I continued to observe individuals walking past my window at the precise moment I stepped into the kitchen. This pattern of synchronised movement strongly indicates that my movements are still being closely observed.

Furthermore, the frequency of these synchronised appearances increased, with individuals emerging precisely in sync with my movements, as if to demonstrate their continued surveillance and defiance of my attempts to secure my privacy.

This continued, precise surveillance, even after physical obstructions were placed over suspected camera locations, suggests the use of highly sophisticated surveillance technology. It appears to indicate the deployment of advanced hidden cameras capable of detecting movement through multiple layers of thick paper, potentially mirroring technologies used in military applications for ‘through-wall’ detection. This level of technological capability underscores the resources and power of the perpetrators.

The synchronised and escalating nature of these appearances, particularly following my efforts to obscure potential camera locations, serves as a direct form of intimidation and a clear message that I remain under constant surveillance, despite my attempts to protect my privacy. This constitutes a deliberate and ongoing act of harassment and psychological distress.

This continued, sophisticated surveillance reinforces my initial claim that the defendants are “powerful people working within law enforcement agencies, tech companies, social media platforms, and the like,” as such technology and coordination would require significant resources and organisation.

This persistent and technologically advanced surveillance, coupled with the overt acts of intimidation, has caused and continues to cause severe psychological distress, fear for my safety, and a profound sense of violation of my most fundamental rights to privacy and security in my own home.

Light bulb
I covered all the lights and smoke detector in my room, where I believe hidden cameras and audio recordings may have illegally been installed.
Bathroom
I also covered the light bulb in the bathroom. Still, they appear to be able to see through layers of trick papers!

This Is What Happens When Women Speak Out

It is a well-documented social pattern that women who report or talk about abuse are often subjected to renewed attacks, both personally and publicly. This phenomenon reflects a systemic failure to protect women from retaliatory harm. The harassment I am enduring — both online and offline — exemplifies this pattern and demonstrates how victim-blaming and misogynistic narratives continue to undermine justice.

The public campaign of humiliation against Amber Heard following the Depp–Heard trial is a clear precedent. That case, widely reported, revealed how digital platforms became tools for orchestrated harassment, disinformation, and the amplification of misogyny. According to multiple reports, including the Amber Heard Open Letter and subsequent investigations, there was extensive evidence of online abuse not only directed at Ms. Heard but also at those who publicly supported her. One supporter described enduring “weeks and weeks” of coordinated online attacks simply for expressing empathy.

This environment of intimidation, misinformation, and mob ridicule is not confined to celebrities. I am now subjected to a similar campaign of targeted harassment and mockery — one that operates with disturbing coordination and precision. The abuse extends across multiple platforms and even into public spaces. I am persistently subjected to hidden insults, coded references, and veiled allusions to my private life through social media content, advertisements, and videos. The timing and frequency of these acts indicate that they are not coincidental but deliberate efforts to degrade, silence, and intimidate me.

The retaliation has also extended to my daughter, who has been drawn into this campaign as part of a wider pattern of coercion, exploitation, psychological abuse and mental abuse. This conduct represents a grave violation of our rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights — protection from degrading treatment and respect for private and family life. It also constitutes ongoing harassment and victimisation within the meaning of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 as well as The Malicious Communications Act 1988 (MCA), which is illegal in England and Wales to “send or deliver letters or other articles for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety.” It also applies to electronic communications. This is exactly what happens in my case.

The behaviour I face today mirrors the public hostility women experience when they challenge abuse. It is an extension of the same misogynistic system that weaponises social media, institutional bias, and societal prejudice to silence female victims and protect abusers.

This continued harassment, intimidation, and psychological manipulation are not isolated acts but a coordinated campaign that undermines my access to justice.

References

  1. Amber Heard Open Letter (2022): “Support for Amber Heard” — signed by women’s rights organisations and legal experts, denouncing disinformation and online misogyny. Available at: https://amberopenletter.com
  2. Glamour Magazine (2022): “Hundreds of women’s rights groups sign open letter in support of Amber Heard.” https://www.glamour.com/story/support-for-amber-heard-open-letter
  3. UNILAD (2022): “Huge national feminist organisation breaks silence in support of Amber Heard.” https://www.unilad.com/news/huge-national-feminist-organization-breaks-silence-support-amber-heard-20221117
Beach