A fair trial is the cornerstone of democracy. No one can take it away from you under any circumstances. Yet, my right to a fair trial seems to be severely violated when no lawyers want to take on my case; a case that involves gross human rights abuses among many other crimes against me and my daughter.
Even top human rights lawyers refused to help me, suggesting someone with great influence is behind this. As I said in my previous post that Keir Starmer is possibly behind this, given that he used to be a human rights lawyer himself and now he’s a Prime Minister. This gives him even more power to do whatever he pleases. This also strongly suggests that he’s either directly behind the sexual abuse and exploitation of me and my daughter or complicit in this. Because why on earth would he want to prevent me from having legal representation and a fair trial if he has nothing to hide? What is he afraid of?
If I even dare to go see a solicitor in person instead, I will be intimidated to death! On some occasions helicopters are sent out to harass and intimidate me across London and imitation firearms are used to intimidate me as well, causing me to live in constant fear and nightmares.
Almost everyone certainly remembers the much talk about McLibel Case (McDonald’s Corporation v Steel & Morris), which was the longest-running trial in English legal history, lasting from 1994 to 1997. In McLibel Case, he helped the activists Helen Steel and David Morris take on McDonalds according to the article from the Mirror below.



Read the full article here.
The pair took the UK government to European Court and won with the help of Starmer, in which he argued:
1. Challenging the Inequality of Arms
Starmer’s most significant argument was that the case was “patently unfair” because of the massive resource imbalance.
Lack of Legal Aid: He argued that denying legal aid in libel cases created a “real risk that criticism will be stifled,” effectively allowing wealthy corporations to silence individuals.
Burden of Proof: He critiqued English libel law for requiring defendants to prove the “exact truth” of every statement, which he argued was an impossible burden for two individuals without resources against a multi-national corporation.
2. Freedom of Speech & Pluralism
Starmer argued that requiring strict proof for every claim in social campaign literature “strikes at the very heart of pluralism, which is the hallmark of democracy“.
So, he is a hypocrite if he himself disrespects democracy and subsequently violates my right to a fair trial by blocking my access to lawyers. Apparently, democracy is not for everyone according to Keir Starmer.



Recent update: In late 2024, it was confirmed that an undercover police officer had spied on Starmer during his private legal meetings with the McLibel defendants in the 1990s, relaying their confidential legal strategy back to police bosses.
He said this was a breach of the legal rule allowing lawyers and their clients to debate tactics confidentially.
Mr Morris cited evidence that the police secretly passed information about the campaigners to McDonald’s, which he said gave the company an advantage in the legal fight.
Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/10/16/sir-keir-starmer-spied-on-by-police-mclibel-case/
So, Starmer and the police also appear to use this very tactic themselves to spy on my legal strategy via unauthorized access to my devices and employ agents to spy on me as well and even intimidate me with imitation firearms, sometimes helicopters, whenever I psychically go see a lawyer, as I said earlier.
Perhaps, the police knew they wouldn’t stand a chance if we’re to fight in court. They then supposedly ran to Starmer as soon as he became Prime Minister in 2024 to get his help. Now they both appear to retaliate and victimise me further for trying to assert my rights by continuing to install hidden cameras everywhere I live and go till this day to sexually abuse and exploit me and at the same time block my access to lawyers, to make it as challenging as possible for me to stop the abuse and hold them accountable.
The saddest past is that they now also seem to subject my adult daughter to the exact same abuse and exploitation as retaliation.
For those reading this — I ask only this: do not turn away. Because silence and indifference allow these abuses to continue unchecked. When people witness wrongdoing and stay silent, it emboldens those who commit it.
I cannot safely reach out for help myself. My access to lawyers and other forms of support appears to have been blocked, and my digital activities — even in public libraries — are closely monitored. Those who should protect me seem to look the other way.
That is why I ask you: if you see something, say something. If you can, act. Contact human rights organisations, lawyers, journalists, or advocates who may have the power to investigate and bring accountability. Help ensure that what is happening is not buried in silence.
Because when people are silenced through fear and isolation, it takes the courage of others to break that silence. And one day, your voice might be the one that saves a life.
I thank you for you help in advance.
Buppha




Leave a Reply