CASE NUMBER: KB-2025-004650
Part 1: Investigation Package – Public Authority Litigation Interference
This bundle contains the objective, physical evidence of 24/7 state-level illegal surveillance, sexual abuse via hidden cameras (voyeurism / cybersex trade / human trafficking), mass misuse of private information, commercial exploitation on an industrial scale, unjust enrichment, severe harassment, witness intimidation, systemic interference with the Claimant’s access to independent legal counsel, gross human rights abuses, premeditated double hate crime, crimes against humanity, misfeasance in public office, misconduct in public office, large-scale corruption, money laundering, organised crime, illegal sexpionage and CHIS operation, and many more illegal acts, committed against me, the Claimant, and her daughter for years. It contains:
- ITEM 01 – Brief Info on The Case: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zrrkL2ZaXXprPG5Q3GVpgtsqA_PyLjs-/view?format=pdf
Description: A summary of the case and the link to my petition if you haven’t found this petition package through https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk - ITEM 02 – Official King’s Bench Claim Issue Notification: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KCoqYJY2VdzuPA3UX_8tWR3FyvFL75Hy/view?format=pdf
Description: Chronological photos and CE-filing receipts showing significant, unnatural delays and physical tampering with official court documents. Plus, the original High Court Claim notification proving the case exists against the public authorities and their Co-defendants, including the original stamped High Court Order, notifying me that the claim has been stayed to allow me time to amend my Particulars of Claim. - ITEM 03 – Official King’s Bench N244 Application Notice: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19kKaCbugHpUKe0Lr_bKcu_oLCSm6CE2v/view?format=pdf
Description: The original High Court claim and injunction application bundle and an application to strike out the defendants’ defenses due to an abuse of process, proving the case exists against the UK and Danish public authorities, including their co-defendants – some of whom are major corporations and top tech executives such as Coca-Cola, Google, Warner Bros, Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. - ITEM 04 – 2nd Witness Statement:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eN9OmKvTuKhdp2rCw3ul8Pfi5r2h0LiV/view?format=pdf
Description: Chronological description of ongoing and escalating illegal surveillance, dissemination, witness intimidation and more despite pending injunction application. - ITEM 05 – Exhibit BW/1 Medical Evidence of Distress:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1deV6kyTKYLQI5QjXn5NMyzdqHK1pJr_o/view?format=pdf
Description: A screenshot of medical evidence proving that the Claimant had attended the A&E on 11 June 2026 due to persistent severe left-side chest pain, chest palpitations, stress and anxiety caused by the Defendants’ relentless harassment and witness intimidation by the Defendants’ proxy agents. - ITEM 06 – Exhibit BW/2 Ongoing Leaks: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QLuQE-h-gYBM_I_4hZUGhLmKixvR45GY/view?format=pdf
Description: Chronological photos detailing the rapid and ongoing leaks of the Claimant’s private information and intimate materials, non-consensually filmed with the hidden cameras for more than a decade. - ITEM 07 – Exhibit BW/3 Email Correspondence:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vpG0eFGj-fpgubvaP7Y4y11x09WFjybv/view?format=pdf
Description: Screenshots showing email correspondence between the Claimant and the 2nd Defendant’s legal representatives, the 2nd Defendant is The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis, including the Claimant’s proposed Undertakings and Settlement Offer, demonstrating attempts to resolve the matter and avoid unnecessary litigation. - ITEM 08 – Exhibit BW/4 Ongoing Witness Intimidation: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vLKxTkj357W2ae3dhU-2to5e1AsLFisW/view?format=pdf
Description: Chronological photos detailing physical encounters, constant illegal surveillance, 24/7 cyberstalking to assert coercive control and physical threats/warnings received. - ITEM 09 – Exhibit BW/5 Synchronized Harassment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qyvUYJ7xrl_FNqEapOZ5lgLMafTdwgpe/view?format=pdf
Description: Examples of incidents concerning a synchronised-harassment technique used as part of the harassment campaign against the Claimant. - ITEM 10 – Exhibit BW/6 Witness Intimidation Escalation:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s9uE79kueAtbYQdZhQwHpM0IeUd1LWd0/view?format=pdf
Description: Examples of incidents demonstrating ongoing severe witness intimidation despite pending injunction application. - ITEM 11 – Affidavit:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oeXggUL_R8OXd7LxpgPPtV2P6KPQMqIZ/view?format=pdf
Description: The affirmation that the Claimant has been the victim of a prolonged and systematic pattern of illegal surveillance and organised harassment, which she believes to be unlawful and in violation of her human rights. - ITEM 12 – Urgent UN Appeal:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1THGbHWA4FdZAoJx9Hn8BRUUwyeESX2T0/view?format=pdf
Description: Urgent Appeal Intended for Submission to The United Nations Special Rapporteur On The Situation Of Human Rights Defenders. - ITEM 13 – ECHR Prohibition of Degrading Treatment:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mpodZmJyTbA5O-ofbH0j_7HFTU-KbvWl/view?format=pdf
Description: Draft Letter Intended for Urgent Appeal Submission to The United Nations Special Rapporteur (Rule 39). Because the surveillance involves the non-consensual filming and commercial exploitation of intimate data for profit, this constitutes a severe, continuous violation of Article 3 (Prohibition of Degrading Treatment) and Article 8 (Right to Respect for Private Life) under the European Convention of Human Rights. - ITEM 14 – Intense Public Interest Statement:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14YDqa18xFoVhIb9zAfhaFfhokBA2qHGR/view?format=pdf
Description: This is not merely a private dispute. It concerns the integrity of our legal system and the principle that no one—regardless of their power or status—is above the law. When a citizen’s access to the courts is effectively blocked by state actors’ influence, it sets a dangerous precedent for all members of the public. - ITEM 15 – Special Protection:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15vQEqV35b6ESxkZ8HunG9OOG4owO2l__/view?format=pdf
Description: Application to the Court for an in-camera hearing and special protections due to severe and ongoing witness intimidation. - ITEM 16 – Urgent Notice to The Court With Medical Evidence:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GY8uzJ93GmrPJ_MRs6oMC4_EBm7txMBw/view?format=pdf
Description: Direct the court to the medical evidence due to severe and ongoing witness intimidation, which have ultimately caused the Claimant to suffer persistent left-side sharp chest pain, chest palpitations, stress and anxiety. - ITEM 17 – My Attempt to Warn My Ex-husband:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GtmRsvokQnOJPuC4byubzroC3cm_TQMX/view?format=pdf
Description: A copy of correspondence between me and my ex-husband, trying to warn him that our 35-year-old daughter may also be sexually abused and exploited via hidden cameras. But he completely ignored me, suggesting he has been manipulated as well. - ITEM 18 – Campaign Package:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wU2EInZAB-jn0WLNnu7ppc_1AQpuh_KE/view?format=pdf
Description: Finally, a list of various entities, both national and international, for example, investigative journalists, newspapers, NGOs, and so on, that you can contact and pass on my evidence bundle to them to launch this campaign internationally. - ITEM 19 – Write to Your MP:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IL-gPbS3KWmUZEVKkncUnSwJwrl7iU3p/edit?format=pdf
Description: Use this template to accompany my Evidence Package. You should fill in the bracketed information, sign it, and send it by post if possible to avoid interception by the state.
Part 2: Target the Specific Journalists Who Cover the High Court
You must target the specific “Court Correspondents” and “Legal Editors” who have permanent press passes inside the Royal Courts of Justice and spend their days analyzing the High Court registries.
- The Law Gazette: This is the UK’s premier legal publication. Their reporters (newsdesk@lawgazette.co.uk) cover access to justice and Article 6 breaches aggressively.
- Court News UK: A dedicated press agency (newsdesk@courtnewsuk.co.uk) that operates directly out of the London courts. They look for extraordinary High Court filings to syndicate to major national newspapers.
- National Legal Affairs Editors: Find the direct emails of journalists like Haroon Siddique (The Guardian Legal Affairs), or the investigative teams at The Times and The Independent or other journalists you can find.
Part 3: Send an Unblockable “Media Flash” Package
When you contact these journalists on my behalf use a clear, professional template that gives them everything they need to verify the case instantly.
Subject: MEDIA ALERT: High Court Claim: KB-2025-004650 – State Surveillance and Blocking of Lawyers
Body:
“To the Legal Affairs Desk,
I have filed an active lawsuit and an emergency injunction application in the High Court under Claim Number: KB-2025-004650. The defendants include the police and former Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Since filing on 21 June 2026, the defendants have used state surveillance mechanisms to monitor my digital devices and actively block my confidential access to legal counsel, making a fair trial under Article 6 impossible. Furthermore, there are unexplained administrative delays in listing my urgent injunction hearing.
The High Court registry holds the active file. Please query the registry under this claim number to verify the existence of the proceedings. I am seeking immediate press coverage to bring this constitutional overreach out of the dark and ensure the administration of justice is not corrupted.”
Part 4: Scan & Share The QR Code
Please also scan the QR code below and massively share it linking directly to the petition https://c.org/K78dxV9bCk
Part 5: Third-Party Privacy Disclaimer
LEGAL PRIVACY DISCLAIMER FOR INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA & PUBLIC ADVOCATES
- Redaction Protocol: All documents and images contained within this public evidence folder have been checked for third-party privacy. The names, direct phone numbers, and private home addresses of innocent bystanders, lower-level court administrative staff, or unrelated witnesses have been explicitly redacted (blacked out).
- Public Interest Intent: The dissemination of these records is driven entirely by an overwhelming public interest under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act (Freedom of Expression) to expose an active, illegal blockade on Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial), severe torture Article 3 violation (Prohibition of Torture, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment) and breach of privacy Article 8 violation (Right to Privacy).
- Use of Materials: International investigative journalists and human rights organizations are granted full permission to download, mirror, reproduce, and cite these documents for the purposes of reporting on state accountability, judicial interference, and public sector misconduct.
